[00:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.25.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu3] (no packageset) [00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-os-service-types [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.2.0-0ubuntu1] [00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.25.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu3] [00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1.25.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu3] [00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [1.25.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu3] [00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.25.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu3] [00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.25.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu3] [00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [1.25.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu3] === freyes__ is now known as freyes [01:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-zunclient [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [01:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ssh-import-id (bionic-proposed/main) [5.7-0ubuntu1 => 5.7-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [02:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20180129+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [03:19] cjwatson, slangasek: So, I want to make a change (well, propose one) to debian-cd for some adjustments in Lubuntu's image. However, I don't see tools/boot/cosmic to be able to edit... can I get a hand please? (Probably needs copying over or something.) === maclin1 is now known as maclin [03:22] Namely, I want to add Lubuntu to the conditionals on lines 422 and 453. [03:22] (of "bionic/boot-amd64") [03:25] ((soon to be "cosmic/boot-amd64")) [03:42] tsimonq2: pushed the prod branch to the public branch now [03:42] slangasek: Thanks! [03:48] slangasek: https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/debian-cd/lubuntu-cosmic-changes/+merge/345717 [03:49] slangasek: It's unclear to me if doing an MP that way is the right workflow, but feel free to grab my diff nonetheless. [03:49] slangasek: (Assuming it looks sane to you, ofc.) [03:50] Uhh, that looks messy. [03:50] This: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/debian-cd/lubuntu-cosmic-changes/revision/1993 [03:51] For future ref, what's the Right Thing here? [03:59] tsimonq2: Wrong MP target, should be "debian-cd/ubuntu" instead. [04:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ssh-import-id (bionic-proposed/main) [5.7-0ubuntu1 => 5.7-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [06:22] cjwatson: is it time to unblacklist ghc/haskell? [06:35] slangasek: thanks, I'll look at seqan2 [06:58] * sil2100 is reviewing the KDE stack for bionic now [07:02] sil2100: any chance of waiving the minimum aging on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/1764399 ? [07:02] Ubuntu bug 1764399 in lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Cosmic) "running apport in terminal doesn't work, as python3-launchpadlib is not installed by default in Lubuntu Bionic" [Critical,Fix committed] [07:15] wxl: looking [07:15] sil2100: thx [07:17] wxl: what about cosmic? Has the dependency been added there already? [07:17] sil2100: yes, cosmic was already resolved. we did some drastic changes to our cosmic seed as a result of switching from lxde to lxqt and managed to resolve that in the process. [07:18] Ok [07:21] wxl: I don't see any direct dependency for launchpadlib there, I assume it's pulled in through dependencies though? Anyway, just make sure the same issue doesn't appear in cosmic - I'll release the bionic SRU now [07:23] sil2100: yeah, if you check the manifest it's on there. one of the "drastic changes" is also not excluding recommends, so that kind of helps. thank you! === maclin1 is now known as maclin [08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bluedevil [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:10] acheronuk[m]: hey! You around? [08:13] acheronuk[m]: I'm reviewing the KDE bionic SRUs now - there's a lot of packages that have only a version bump and/or only translation fixes in them [08:13] acheronuk[m]: since those are basically governed by your team - do you want those to all go in with the update? [08:15] acheronuk[m]: I'm asking since there's no real blocker for getting those in and I guess that's what we did for zesty (and all is super fine with that), but accepting even those no-change uploads does always generate an update for the user in the end [08:16] acheronuk[m]: not a big deal, but users will have to download packages and update even if the actual contents did not change [08:16] acheronuk[m]: so question: is that something you're concerned about as a flavour or not? [08:17] sil2100: I would prefer users to see Plasma as a whole update, rather than just some packages and not others. especially where they have had version updates from us in the past via our PPAs, that is what they expect to see, and what tends to happen elsewhere [08:17] acheronuk: that's fine with me then [08:18] Thanks! [08:18] thank you! [08:18] acheronuk, do you get each package to go through testing/SRU verification? [08:18] because even no change rebuild can contain issues, sometime toolchain or something else changed since the previous build [08:18] it seems tedious to test a stack of packages just to bump a changelog :/ [08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted drkonqi [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:19] Yeah, every package needs to be tested, I guess that's one of the reason why verification of KDE updates always takes so long [08:19] I remember the zesty one hanging around for quite a while [08:20] hopefully will be quicker this time [08:22] acheronuk: ok, so the decision to accept them all still stands, right? Just making sure ;) [08:23] (seems a waste of mirrors/user data/testing resources from here, just to bump a changelog version :/) [08:24] sil2100: yeah. dependencies (build and otherwise) have been set so we could abandon the not strictly bug fix updates should that become the better option [08:28] acheronuk: so maybe let's do it like this for now, some middle grounds - I'll be accepting those that have only translation updates but not those that just bump the changelog, we can decide later how many of those are there and if it really makes sense to have those [08:28] Translation updates are anyway something we'd like before .1 [08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted breeze [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:30] sil2100: sounds reasonable. [08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kactivitymanagerd [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kde-cli-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kde-gtk-config [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:39] slangasek: I blacklisted ghc/haskell on request; LocutusOfBorg, can you comment on whether it can be unblacklisted now? (presumably it'd want to be "controlled sync of at least the first few layers and then unblacklist", to avoid unnecessary rebuilds) [08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdeplasma-addons [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kgamma5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted khotkeys [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kinfocenter [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmenuedit [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kscreen [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kscreenlocker [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksysguard [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kwin [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:04] cjwatson, I asked if I could manually sync ghc few days ago [09:04] juliank / sil2100: either of you got any spare time to look into bos01/s390x? [09:04] so, I agree with you, please let me manually do this stuff [09:04] things seem to be dying in weird ways [09:05] they are? [09:05] ubuntu@juju-prod-ues-proposed-migration-machine-11:~$ tail -1 /tmp/autopkgtest-work.kevt6uoh/out/log [09:05] [10:11:40] Release Team, the Debian haskell transition should be mostly over, and I would like to drop llvm 3.7 from our world... [09:05] [10:12:09] can you please tell me when it is convenient to do my manual syncs? (please don't whitelist it right now, I prefer to sync in the right order to avoid useless rebuilds and infra time) [09:05] tar: ./debian/.debhelper/libkf5kiofilewidgets5/dbgsym-root/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/f1/e44922cfe0fa00af06436c65a97c5403912ac0.debug: Wrote only 2560 of 10240 bytes [09:05] or just hanging or whatever [09:05] this was my request, so let me sync it *now* [09:05] (you will need to process some haskell new queue, new packages might be around 10~15 [09:05] LocutusOfBorg: this sounds like consensus that you can go ahead, to me :) [09:06] syncpackage: Error: Source package ghc is blacklisted. [09:06] can you pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeease :) ? [09:06] that's what copy-package is for [09:06] ack [09:06] sounds good to me [09:06] Laney: I could take a look after my sru shift [09:07] Laney: ah, it's the thing Steve mentioned, right? [09:07] just remember that you need to explicitly copy to cosmic-proposed [09:07] dunno [09:07] or you could locally hack the blacklist check out of syncpackage if you prefer [09:07] ghc 8.2.2-3 in sid [09:07] Candidate copy target: https://api.launchpad.net/devel/ubuntu/+archive/primary [09:07] Copy [y|N]? y [09:07] 1 copy requested. [09:07] nah, done! thanks! [09:08] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghc/8.2.2-3 [09:08] it is there... [09:08] * LocutusOfBorg hides in a cave [09:08] juliank / sil2100: filed https://trello.com/c/WnlpdF4t/16-investigate-bos01-s390x-instances-not-working-properly [09:08] * Laney goes back to meson.build :-) [09:09] looks like the gnome-software bionic SRU was missing the SRU info on one of the bugs and that has been fixed now, should be good to re-review/let in [09:09] odd [09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libksysguard [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted milou [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:12] seb128: thanks! I'll look at it once I go through those KDE packages [09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oxygen [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:14] Laney, sil2100 I'm rerunning the kio test in debug, and I can notice that the open takes about 20 seconds, but it does not hang indefinitely. [09:15] Let's wait for it to finish [09:15] look in the journal [09:15] you can see tons of bos01-s390x-* dying [09:15] yes [09:15] Well no, i don't see them dying [09:16] but i might be missing the lines where they do [09:16] acheronuk: looking at plasma-desktop, a bit curious why the build-dependency to breeze-dev has been bumped, since actually the breeze package had only translation updates [09:16] acheronuk: do you know? [09:16] oh I see, there are no error messages inside the testbed, they just stop [09:17] you don't always get the end of the log for some reason [09:19] Should we systemctl stop autopkgtest@bos01-s390x-*.service them for now? [09:20] acheronuk: hope nothing went missing from the breeze upload in that case? Since build-depends are usually bumped if we're actually depending on something from the newer version [09:21] juliank: can do, & disable or the script will bring them back [09:21] sil2100: because the cmake in plasma-desktop looks for an internally versioned breeze build dep of the same version [09:21] if it ends up being disabled for a while, I'd document that cowboy in the local config-changed copy on the node [09:22] thx Lucasz :) [09:22] sil2100: if it doesn't find it, it doesn't set the breeze window deco as the default for the build [09:22] acheronuk: ah, good to know! [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-desktop [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:24] sil2100: the build deps I did bump were as a result of seeing what went missing in my staging builds, and correcting those [09:25] Laney: done that. we also might want to try just starting less workers and see if that helps things, maybe it's overloaded somehow [09:29] could be, that short write looks suspicious [09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-discover [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-integration [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-nm [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-pa [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-sdk [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-vault [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-workspace [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted polkit-kde-agent-1 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted powerdevil [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sddm-kcm [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemsettings [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted user-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:10] acheronuk: ok, I guess I approved all that mattered - could you take a look at the list of packages that have been left unapproved and see if you want those approved or rejected? [10:10] acheronuk: there's like around 11 of those [10:14] sil2100: looks sensible to me. thanks [10:15] acheronuk: I'm leaving the decision up to you - we're trying not to rebuild stuff if not needed as seb mentioned, since it's counter-productive - but I think we didn't care about that last time [10:19] sil2100: I think I'm happy with this middle ground at the moment. I just 'aimed high' preparing them all, but practicalities here say that was a bit much [10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.1] [10:20] It's better this way than missing something, I'll reject them now - we can always bring them back from the rejected queue easily [10:21] ok [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected breeze-grub [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected breeze-plymouth [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ksshaskpass [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kwrited [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected plasma-workspace-wallpapers [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xdg-desktop-portal-kde [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected breeze-gtk [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kwayland-integration [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected plymouth-kcm [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kdecoration [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libkscreen [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.5-0ubuntu0.1] [10:32] apw: you shephearding those snapd updates, yes? Like, the ones in -proposed as well? [10:34] sil2100, yes ... i have a .9 coming to replace the .5s because the testing is broken, but the testing is sick for that too [10:35] apw: ouch [10:42] sil2100, it is becoming "fun" that is for sure [10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pyvmomi [source] (xenial-proposed) [6.5.0.2017.5-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] [11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdm3 (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.0-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [11:32] o/ sil2100, could you please approve the Trusty upload for 'initramfs-tools' ? [11:32] For LP: #1771557 ^ [11:32] Launchpad bug 1771557 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) "NVMe boot drives not supported - failing in generating initramfs" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771557 [12:01] rbasak: In bug 1771345, the script did not add the verification-needed-* tags when you accepted the packages, odd. Adding -done-* tags now [12:01] bug 1771345 in util-linux (Ubuntu Bionic) "lscpu possible crash in min/max frequency" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771345 === Guest24334 is now known as _hc [12:16] hi, could an archive admin please reject my apache2 upload that is in cosmic-proposed? [12:18] sil2100: typical. sigh. https://community.kde.org/Plasma/5.12_Errata [12:18] "Plasma Discover in 5.12.5 was updated on 17 May 2018 with a 5.12.5.1 version. 5.12.5.1 includes a fix for https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394048" [12:18] KDE bug 394048 in discover "Software Centre Discover crashed three times out of three when searching for "latte" after hiting return" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] [12:32] sil2100: do you want to replace 5.12.5 with that as if it didn't happen in updates? [12:34] I have an additional changelog item on the current upload which would need to be appended to the new one if done like that [15:04] bdmurray: hey! If anything I'm still doing some SRU work for the nearest 1.5 hour, working on gce-compute-image-packages now [15:07] sil2100: okay [15:08] how do we persuade britney not to see removing autotests as a regression? e.g. if we want to follow debian and remove some that are too broken [15:20] acheronuk: force-badtest hints [15:22] slangasek: thanks.will they need to keep being updated, or would britney 'forget' after a few times [15:23] no, this is supposed to be handled [15:23] which package? [15:24] Laney: kdepim-runtime is one: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/kdepim-runtime/commit/6bfa589c1d0982048b3588e184416e3b2f2101e1 [15:24] there are some others I saw in debian changes emails [15:25] some just removed. some set to run at build time instead [15:25] acheronuk: Can you point me to a specific upload that ran its tests after dropping debian/tests/*? [15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (bionic-proposed) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu2~18.04.0] [15:28] Laney: not seen any recently. if britney has been changed so that no longer flags as a regression, then that will help me when I merge these debian changes properly :) [15:28] I think we did that quite a while ago [15:29] I must have missed the memo [15:29] commit 41d51369f54d695153fcd71043b511883392a5bf (dropped-tests) [15:29] Author: Iain Lane [15:29] Date: Wed Jan 11 10:43:30 2017 +0000 [15:29] autopkgtest: Accept packages which have dropped their tests in unstable [15:29] oooh [15:29] I mean, it could be broken, that's why I ask for a link [15:30] So let me know after you've uploaded one if it doesn't work [15:30] well, I don't have one. I was just assuming the old behaviour would stand. if it does not, then great. thank you [15:31] rbalint: regarding the gce packages - I see you pushed ubuntu3 to cosmic that was removing the Breaks/Replaces of irqbalance to cosmic, does that also apply for the other series like bionic? [15:37] sil2100, yes, none of them should break/replace [15:38] rbalint: hm, ok, so I guess we'll need new uploads for b/a/x/t? [15:38] rbalint: I accepted the bionic one already sadly so it'll have to be overriden [15:39] rbalint: since I saw bionic and artful at least break/replace still [15:39] sil2100, hm [15:39] sil2100, let me check [15:40] rbalint: they're all based on ubuntu2 and there was no added changes for that, at least per the debdiffs I see [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (artful-proposed/universe) [20180129+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.10.0 => 20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~17.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20180129+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20180129+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu2~18.04.0 => 20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [15:48] rbalint: thanks! Rejecting the old ones and handling those [15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (artful-proposed) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu2~17.10.0] [15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~14.04.0] [15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] [15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (bionic-proposed) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~18.04.0] [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (artful-proposed) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~17.10.0] [16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.0] [16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~14.04.0] [16:13] sil2100, thanks, i had the earlier ones prepared for upload then during testing I decided to update them but accidentally uploaded the earlier ones at late night [16:23] yw! [16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-11] (no packageset) [16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-11] (no packageset) [16:54] seb128: hi, network-manager-gnome now depends on ayatana-appindicator instead of libappindicator. ~dx-packages is defunct; should desktop own ayatana-appindicator in main? This shouldn't need an MIR since it's a straight swap of the same code under a new source package name [16:55] curious how autopkgtest sees instances that are stalled for 12h+, but the moment the cronjob goes to delete them, they've disappeared [16:59] slangasek: seb128: (same for libindicator > libayatana-indicator) [17:00] slangasek: bug 1770146 [17:00] bug 1770146 in libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libayatana-appindicator" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1770146 [17:01] "appindicator is dead, we should move it to universe" yeah that's not how universe works ;) [17:02] as I said, we don't need an MIR, we need a team subscriber [17:03] ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [17:03] Just thought I'd link it. [17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-11] (no packageset) [17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-11] (no packageset) [17:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-11] (no packageset) [17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-11] (no packageset) [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsfml [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsfml [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: autopep8 [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.3.5-2] (kubuntu) [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.15-11] [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.15-11] [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.15-11] [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.15-11] [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.15-11] [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.15-11] [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsfml [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsfml [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-transliterate [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.10.1-1] (no packageset) [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-sexpdata [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset) [17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsfml [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsfml [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfixposix [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.3-1] (no packageset) [17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfixposix [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.3-1] (no packageset) [17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfixposix [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.3-1] (no packageset) [17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfixposix [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.3-1] (no packageset) [17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfixposix [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.3-1] (no packageset) [17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfixposix [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.3-1] (no packageset) [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted autopep8 [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.3.5-2] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfixposix [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:0.4.3-1] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfixposix [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1:0.4.3-1] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfixposix [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [1:0.4.3-1] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsfml [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsfml [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsfml [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-transliterate [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.10.1-1] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfixposix [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:0.4.3-1] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfixposix [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1:0.4.3-1] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsfml [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-sexpdata [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.3-1] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfixposix [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [1:0.4.3-1] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsfml [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsfml [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.5.0+dfsg-2] [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-zunclient [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ssh-import-id [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.7-0ubuntu1.1] [18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: x11-xkb-utils (bionic-proposed/main) [7.7+3 => 7.7+3ubuntu0.18.04.1] (desktop-core) [18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected x11-xkb-utils [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.7+3ubuntu1] [18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted x11-xkb-utils [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.7+3ubuntu0.18.04.1] [18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-system-monitor [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.2-0ubuntu1] [18:37] slangasek, whoever did that change should revert it, we want to check that the ayatana- components are indeed better codebases and see if we need a coordinated transition or if we can mix apps using both the old and new libraries [18:37] LocutusOfBorg, ^ that would be you [18:38] seb128: ok, thanks [18:39] seb128: to be fair, I think it's probably better to migrate to it just to not be islanded on a dead-upstream branch, and deal with any issues along the way; but I'll sit on my hands for now [18:40] slangasek, I've little visibility on the roadmap/direction that ayatana-* want to take at this point and I'm not confident it's compatible with what we do/want to do [18:40] it's probably fine but I don't want to handwave accept it without checking [18:41] * slangasek nods [18:42] (and I still find how that project has been handled pretty stupid, they should have taken over the existing projects but that's another topic) [18:42] ok; I haven't followed the politics there [19:15] seb128: Please do correct me if I'm wrong, but I wouldn't be quick to blame LocutusOfBorg . There are some Debian packages, notably transmission, who switched themselves. [19:16] This doesn't seem to be a delta we're carrying. [19:16] (For all the packages I've been dealing with, personally.) [19:16] I won't take a side on the politics, but people are adopting it. [19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-desktop3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.2-0ubuntu1] [19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu1.1] [19:29] tsimonq2, I don't blame him, but he uploaded a package in main making it use a package in universe without an approved MIR [19:30] tsimonq2, well they can if they want, we just didn't say we wanted to replace our solution by the new one [19:30] so until we do it's wrong to assume we are going to [19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ssh-import-id [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.7-0ubuntu1.1] [19:32] seb128: Ah. So if it's required for one package (and needs a MIR anyway),, why not convert other packages? [19:32] s/,,/,/ [19:32] tsimonq2, it's not "required" afaik [19:32] our solution is libappindicator atm [19:32] seb128: Well, transmission needs it. [19:32] or needs to be patched to use the library Ubuntu support [19:32] So unless you want a delta (not up to me), oi's required. [19:32] *it's [19:33] we want a delta [19:33] our main packages need to use components in main [19:33] OK; like I said, not up to me. [19:33] In that case, on the other side of it, why not adopt it? [19:34] read t he backlog of this channel? I stated the reason earlier [19:35] Let me rephrase: why not do the review? [19:35] Of course, it has to go through e.g. a security review. [19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.9+18.04] [19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.32.8+17.10] [20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32.8] [20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.32.8~14.04] [20:03] bdmurray, oh are we clashing ? [20:05] apw: I don't know. What are you doing? [20:05] bdmurray, i was just clearing up some pending snapd uploads i was intending to review [20:05] bdmurray, but you had just accepted bionic i think, so was checking if i should do the rest [20:06] bdmurray, in the sense i know the background with mvo [20:06] apw: Have at it. [20:06] bdmurray, ack [20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.32.9+17.10] [20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32.9] [20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.32.9~14.04] [20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted simbody [source] (artful-proposed) [3.5.4+dfsg-1ubuntu1.1] [20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rasdaemon [source] (artful-proposed) [0.5.8-1ubuntu2.1] [20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rasdaemon [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.5.6-2ubuntu1.1] [20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.11] [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.103ubuntu4.11] [22:22] cjwatson, slangasek: There, this looks right now, could I please get a review? https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/debian-cd/lubuntu-cosmic-changes/+merge/345792 [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grabix [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: listserialportsc [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-obuild [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.10-1] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libocxl [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-obuild [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.10-1] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: listserialportsc [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) [23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grabix [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dd-plist [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.20-1] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libb-debug-perl [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.26-1] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grabix [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: minetest-mod-infinite-chest [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grabix [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: listserialportsc [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytest-sugar [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.9.1-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: listserialportsc [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-obuild [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.10-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-obuild [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.10-1] (no packageset) [23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grabix [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] (no packageset) [23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: listserialportsc [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) [23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grabix [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] (no packageset) [23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-obuild [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.10-1] (no packageset) [23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: listserialportsc [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) [23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-obuild [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.10-1] (no packageset) [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dd-plist [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.20-1] [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grabix [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grabix [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grabix [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted listserialportsc [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted listserialportsc [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minetest-mod-infinite-chest [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.1-1] [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-obuild [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.10-1] [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-obuild [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.10-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grabix [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grabix [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted listserialportsc [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-obuild [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.10-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytest-sugar [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.9.1-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grabix [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.6+git20171023-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted listserialportsc [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libb-debug-perl [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.26-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-obuild [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.10-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libocxl [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted listserialportsc [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-obuild [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.10-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted listserialportsc [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-obuild [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.10-1] [23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: obsidian-icon-theme [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.5-1] (no packageset)