[00:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtifiles [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-2] (no packageset)
[00:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtifiles [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-2] (no packageset)
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtifiles [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-2] (no packageset)
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtifiles [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-2] (no packageset)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtifiles [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-2] (no packageset)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtifiles [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-2] (no packageset)
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtifiles [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.7-2]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtifiles [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.7-2]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtifiles [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.7-2]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtifiles [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.7-2]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtifiles [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.7-2]
[07:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtifiles [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.7-2]
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libticalcs [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.9+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libticalcs [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.9+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libticalcs [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.9+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libticalcs [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.9+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libticalcs [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.9+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libticalcs [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.9+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[08:53] <xnox> slangasek, infinity - i want to change UEFI boot options as well. Default to maybe-ubiquity, call that menu option "Ubuntu" and hide other options in additional submenu (e.g. Try, Install, Debug, etc.)
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inkscape [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.92.3-2]
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libticalcs [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.9+dfsg-2]
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libticalcs [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.9+dfsg-2]
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libticalcs [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.9+dfsg-2]
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libticalcs [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.9+dfsg-2]
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libticalcs [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.9+dfsg-2]
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libticalcs [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.9+dfsg-2]
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ncurses (bionic-proposed/main) [6.1-1ubuntu1 => 6.1-1ubuntu1.18.04] (core)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.1-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1] (kubuntu)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (bionic-proposed/main) [1.14.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.14.1-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (bionic-proposed/main) [1.14.0-2ubuntu1 => 1.14.1-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[13:12] <tsimonq2> xnox: If you let me know where that is, I can make it part of my MPs.
[13:14] <tsimonq2> And you mean "maybe-installer"? ;)
[13:15] <xnox> tsimonq2, i believe it is in lp:~ubuntu-cdimage/debian-cd/ubuntu in tools/boot/bionic/boot-amd64 for example, the grub.cfg portions
[13:23] <tsimonq2> ack, thanks
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-characters (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-3 => 3.28.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntugnome)
[14:08] <ahasenack> hi, is apache2 "not considered" in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html because of "old binaries left ..."?
[14:09] <ahasenack>  2.4.33-3ubuntu1 never migrated and 3ubuntu2 is fixing that
[14:09] <ahasenack> exactly because of those new binaries
[14:10] <ahasenack> or did the page just not update yet? There was a failing test in the previous refresh that now passed
[14:10] <ahasenack> update_output.txt doesn't seen to have an entry for apache2
[14:11] <apw> ahasenack, no you are doing something more complex than it can understnad, it needs a finger inserted
[14:11] <apw> ahasenack, can you confirm, the listed binaries were added and then removed again in the uploads that were only in -proposed
[14:11] <ahasenack> apw: yes I confirm
[14:11] <ahasenack> apw: they exist in the archive already, but from another source package
[14:14] <apw> ahasenack, with luck that is resolved, let me know if it doesn't after a publisher run
[14:14] <ahasenack> apw: thanks
[14:15] <Laney> someone reject those gst-* please
[14:15] <Laney> using a silo instead
[14:15]  * Laney the irritator of the SRU team
[14:15] <apw> Laney, bionic ?
[14:15] <Laney> ya
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gst-plugins-bad1.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.14.1-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gst-plugins-good1.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.14.1-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gst-plugins-base1.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.14.1-1ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[14:17] <Laney> 👐
[14:18] <Laney> thanks apw 💯
[14:20]  * apw awwws, i missed your emoticon phase
[14:21] <sil2100> Now the emojis are all colorful on my irssi window
[14:21] <apw> yeah mine are nice a shiney too
[14:34] <Laney> :D
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: crda (xenial-proposed/main) [3.13-1 => 3.13-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core)
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted crda [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.13-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[14:59] <slangasek> xnox: can you communicate on ubuntu-devel about bzr's demotion, so that any teams that still have branches maintained in bzr (like, um, the release team and the cdimage team, and the core-dev team with all the seed branches that you just updated) know that it's no longer officially supported?  and did you look at bringing breezy in to replace it?
[15:01] <slangasek> xnox: UEFI boot options> the lack of consistency between UEFI and BIOS is terribly annoying.  I don't necessarily know that defaulting to maybe-ubiquity will resolve this.
[15:02] <xnox> slangasek, it's not about bzr or breezy. Bringing in breezy will not help, as that is still python2-only at the moment.
[15:02] <slangasek> ok, I thought there was supposed to be python3ery
[15:02] <slangasek> if it's still only "in progress", well
[15:02] <xnox> slangasek, *planning to become*
[15:03] <xnox> slangasek, ubuntu development team has many tools and utilities which are not in main, and are used to develop ubuntu. And that is fine by me.
[15:03] <xnox> slangasek, including launchpad itself, bzr branches, etc.
[15:03] <slangasek> xnox: please communicate this change to the developers all the same
[15:04] <xnox> slangasek, but we should not ship python2 in main going forward because of that.
[15:06] <cjwatson> breezy's at least getting there
[15:07] <cjwatson> but it probably ought to have a stable release before anyone goes around recommending it
[15:08] <cjwatson> (we're waiting for that before switching LP's code hosting over to it, for instance)
[15:13] <slangasek> infinity, cjwatson: speaking of which, I wasn't sure if there needed to be any discussion or if I should JFDI the bzr->git migration for the seeds https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Germinate/ConvertingToGit
[15:13] <cjwatson> I have no particular problem with JFDI
[15:14] <cjwatson> git all the things
[15:24] <tsimonq2> I sent Adam an email...
[15:24] <tsimonq2> JFDI.
[15:24] <tsimonq2> I already converted the branches, pushed to my LP profile
[15:36] <cpaelzer> can someone in here free dovecot from cosmics new queue?
[15:36] <cpaelzer> in artful we dropped one of its binary packages
[15:36] <cpaelzer> issues are now resolved, so it is reintorucde
[15:36] <cpaelzer> which makes it stuck in new queue
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrony (bionic-proposed/main) [3.2-4ubuntu4 => 3.2-4ubuntu4.1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrony [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2-4ubuntu4.1]
[15:43] <xnox> infinity, thanks a lot! powersj fixed everything and http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/current/ looks awesome now.
[16:39] <mdeslaur> is the publisher broken again? I've been waiting 2 hours
[16:42] <cjwatson> it wasn't broken last time you asked, it was just busy vacuuming
[16:43] <cjwatson> and that's what it's doing at the moment too
[16:44] <Laney> should have used a dyson
[16:45] <mdeslaur> cjwatson: how often does it vacuum? can the job me moved away from the usual unembargo times?
[16:48] <cjwatson> mdeslaur: I'm waiting for infinity's promised patch to make it weekly on Sunday evening or whatever rather than daily when it's >24hr since the last run
[16:48] <cjwatson> mdeslaur: or alternatively for infinity to tell me he no longer holds the baton on that patch in which case I'll do it
[16:48]  * mdeslaur sends beer to infinity
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ndctl [source] (cosmic-proposed) [60.1-0ubuntu1]
[18:25] <coreycb> hello, can an archive admin please promote the following list of packages to main? https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/RZcZ9tbFYT/  these are all python3 packages with corresponding python2 packages that are already in main.
[18:33] <slangasek> coreycb: I will work through these
[18:33] <coreycb> slangasek: thank you
[18:40] <slangasek> coreycb: overridden
[18:40] <coreycb> slangasek: great, thanks again
[19:45] <wxl> does anyone envision the return of edubuntu or mythbuntu? i see they're still mentioned at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFlavors
[19:48] <sarnold> seems unlikely to me
[19:49] <wxl> that's my feeling, too, and given u.c/download/flavours doesn't mention them...
[20:33] <wxl> is there any reason why we can't store flavors in old-images.u.c like we do with ubuntu?
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3-3ubuntu9 => 2.3-3ubuntu9.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[21:56] <slangasek> wxl: because space is not unlimited and we need to manage the rate of growth on that service.  Flavors may provide their own archives (and we may be able to recover images from older releases if there's sufficient interest), but Canonical hasn't offered to host that
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~14.04.0 => 20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~14.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7 => 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.1] (core)