[02:03] <jamesh> duflu: do you know anything about gnome-shell getting colour planes mixed up when taking screenshots?
[02:03] <duflu> jamesh, yes...? There was a longstanding bug. Only fixed upstream recently
[02:04] <duflu> Somewhere
[02:04] <duflu> jamesh, jbicha was involved
[02:04] <jamesh> duflu: okay.  Was just attaching a screenshot to a bug, and noticed all my orange was blue
[02:04] <duflu> Or rather your red is blue :)
[02:04] <duflu> Lemme find it
[02:06] <duflu> jamesh, fixed in mutter 3.29.2: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779234
[02:09] <duflu> jamesh, sorry that was last year...
[02:09] <duflu> hmm
[02:09] <jamesh> duflu: the last comment on the bug sounds relevant
[02:09] <duflu> Jeremy mentioned one this year
[02:09] <jamesh> and I do only notice it on my desktop (open source radeon drivers), and not my laptop (Intel)
[02:10] <jamesh> it says mutter was compensating for a bug in old Intel drivers
[02:10] <jamesh> so it ended up looking okay on the laptop and the compensation broke things elsewhere
[02:10] <jamesh> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/72
[02:10] <ubot5-ng> GNOME bug 72 in mutter "Screenshot doesn't have the correct colours" (comments: 11) [Closed]
[02:11] <duflu> Yes, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/72
[02:13] <duflu> jamesh ... fixed in mutter 3.29.1 and 3.28.1 apparently. So bionic should have the fix
[02:14] <duflu> jamesh, if you're using bionic then it sounds like you'll need to log a new bug
[02:15] <jamesh> maybe I've just got to log out and in again.
[02:15] <jamesh> looks like my running gnome-shell is an old executable
[02:16] <duflu> jamesh, only if you've been logged in for months... :)
[02:16] <duflu> Otherwise you already had the latest fix
[02:18] <duflu> It's not uncommon for developers to mix up RGB and BGR logic. Especially since the byte order of those reverses depending on which API you're using.
[02:20] <jamesh> running strings over /proc/$pid/exe seems to show 3.28.0, so I guess I have been running for a while
[02:21] <duflu> Wow. Good word
[02:21] <duflu> work
[02:21] <duflu> jamesh, yeah the fix is in 3.28.1
[02:21] <duflu> Hopefully. Just restart
[02:22] <duflu> You should have received that update exactly 2 months ago
[02:22] <duflu> 1 month ago
[02:22] <duflu> I need more coffee
[02:24] <jamesh> with any luck, it might help with that xdg-desktop-portal-gtk wayland issue I was having too
[02:25] <duflu> jamesh, if you haven't logged in for over a month you're missing a lot of good stuff :)
[02:43] <jamesh> duflu: that's definitely fixed the problem.
[02:43] <jamesh> I kind of miss X11 where I could just restart the shell without quitting all my apps.
[02:50] <duflu> jamesh, I recently heard about: Alt+F2, r
[02:50] <duflu> to do that
[02:50] <duflu> Not sure how much restarts
[02:51] <jamesh> duflu: it prints "Restart is not available on Wayland"
[02:51] <duflu> Hah. That explains it
[02:52] <duflu> jamesh, so yes you can still do that with Xorg. If you choose a Xorg session
[02:53] <jamesh> sure, but for some of the snap stuff I've been working on, I want to know if it works on Wayland
[02:53] <jamesh> I can easily enough get the apps to run in X11 mode on a Wayland session, but not vice versa
[05:54] <didrocks> good morning!
[08:01] <willcooke> OMG!!!
[08:01] <willcooke> My docking station audio output just works on 18.04
[08:01] <willcooke> it's taken me this long to test it
[08:01]  * willcooke closes his kernel bug
[08:02] <seb128> hey willcooke, good start of day ... and it's friday!
[08:02] <Laney> hulo
[08:04] <didrocks> good morning willcooke, Laney
[08:04] <Laney> hey didrocks
[08:04] <didrocks> double win ;)
[08:04] <Laney> happy GDPR day
[08:04] <Laney> I'm afraid you can't contact me any more, it's been nice knowing you, BYE
[08:04] <didrocks> bye bye laney, hr won't know either your bank account details in that case, I think :)
[08:05] <Laney> oh shit
[08:05] <Laney> that's one opt-in link that I will click
[08:05] <didrocks> heh ;)
[08:08] <seb128> hey Laney, happy GDPR friday!
[08:10] <Laney> hey seb128!
[08:30] <willcooke> hi robert_ancell!
[08:30] <robert_ancell> willcooke, hello!
[08:34] <seb128> hey robert_ancell
[08:34] <robert_ancell> o/
[08:38] <seb128> robert_ancell, what are you doing around on a friday evening?
[08:38] <robert_ancell> seb128, hacking on a side project, just forgot to close IRC :)
[08:39] <seb128> I see :)
[09:27] <willcooke> seb128, did you see this?  https://christian.kellner.me/2018/05/24/thunderbolt-networking-on-linux/
[09:27] <willcooke> From what I read we'd need to do some network manager work too though
[09:28] <seb128> willcooke, I didn't read that specific blogpost yet, thanks. That's what I was telling you when we discussed bolt vs thunderbolt-tools
[09:29] <willcooke> ah right
[09:29] <Nafallo> ooh. that's great news :-)
[09:29] <Nafallo> my lab NUCs will appreciate that one :-)
[09:29] <seb128> willcooke, the n-m change seems to be https://github.com/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/pull/97/files
[09:29] <ubot5-ng> NetworkManager bug (Pull request) 97 in NetworkManager "all: add support for thunderbolt networking" (comments: 4) [Closed]
[09:29] <seb128> which is an easy changeset
[09:29] <seb128> I'm going to ask gicmo (upstream) if there are other changes needed
[09:30] <willcooke> nice one, thanks seb128
[09:30] <seb128> np
[09:30] <Nafallo> that looks neatly SRU-able even?
[09:32] <Nafallo> checked kernel config on bionic, and it's built as a module already.
[10:12]  * xnox wonders if above thunderbolt networking is what rbalint was after on his laptop
[10:17] <rbalint> xnox, i have a tb docking station and the ethernet in it shows up as an usb one, thus i did not miss that kind of tb networking
[10:17] <xnox> awww, ok
[10:18] <rbalint> but seems a feature very nice to have :-)
[10:37] <seb128> jbicha, hey, you were looking at making a g-c-c SRU for bionic, did you start on that/commited work somewhere?
[14:23] <jbicha> seb128: I only did the regular cosmic bzr branch so far, we wanted to add the new fix for LP: #1759468 too
[14:26] <jbicha> seb128: we might need https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/commit/fb509dfc2 if we take bolt 0.3
[14:26] <seb128> jbicha, no we don't, see my comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bolt/+bug/1773332/comments/2
[14:26] <jbicha> ok cool, because I didn't cherry-pick that fix for cosmic either :)
[14:28] <jbicha> on that bug, I believe not all USB-C devices are Thunderbolt
[14:30] <seb128> well, feel free to edit the description
[14:30] <seb128> I think it's understandable
[14:30] <seb128> but you are probably right
[14:34] <jbicha> were you going to upload the big g-c-c SRU to bionic today? if not, I'll try to do it later this weekend
[14:34] <seb128> jbicha, I did like 10 minutes ago
[14:34] <seb128> but not including your changes
[14:34] <seb128> I need to wrap and go in like 25 min for 2 weeks holidays
[14:34] <seb128> I sorted out what was on my list, we do another round later
[14:36] <jbicha> ok, I might re-upload this weekend if it hasn't been accepted then
[14:36] <jbicha> thanks, enjoy your holiday :)
[14:36] <seb128> thx
[14:37] <seb128> the other packaging changes didn't look like they were important for bionic
[14:37] <seb128> like the font thing is a detail
[14:42] <jbicha> I asked earlier and you said they were fine (except I won't rename the distro-logo patch in bionic)
[14:45] <seb128> yeah, they look fine in principle
[14:45] <seb128> they just don't look important and I didn't have time to do more work/testing
[14:45] <seb128> I believe it's fine if that' sfor a next round, I'm sure we are going to get some more g-c-c SRUs before .1 ;-)
[14:47] <jbicha> ok I understand
[14:59] <seb128> jbicha, k, I'm not going to be able to do that properly today, that is ready for upload I believe http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/p2J2PtdrRv/ but I don't have time to checkout the n-m git and to see how to use it ... if you maybe you are interested to sponsor/look at that or get in debian and back to Ubuntu feel free, otherwise I have another look once I'm back
[15:00] <seb128> willcooke, ^ that's the n-m thunderbolt thing
[15:00] <seb128> or I could just dput and let others deal with the vcs :p
[15:01] <seb128> jbicha, or is that a simple git commit/git push in the cosmic branch?
[15:01] <seb128> I can do that but I guess that might be better with tagging or such
[15:05] <willcooke> seb128, no rush on that one, but yay!
[15:10] <jbicha> seb128: yes, git commit, git push, you can make the tag with gbp buildpackage --git-tag-only
[15:15] <jbicha> and then git push --tags if you want to push all tags (or something like git push origin 1.10.8-1ubuntu2 if you only want to push the one tag)
[15:17] <seb128> jbicha, willcooke, commited/uploaded
[15:17] <seb128> and on that I call it a week, holidays!
[15:17] <seb128> have a nice w.e desktopers and good luck for the next weeks :)
[15:18] <willcooke> bye seb128!
[15:19] <andyrock> have a nice holiday seb128 !!
[15:21] <Laney> hf seb128
[15:22] <didrocks> enjoy your holidays seb128 :)
[16:14] <kenvandine> Trevinho, have you successfully fixed the snapcraft deprecations?
[16:14] <kenvandine> i'm still getting a warning about using install keyword even though i am not anymore
[16:14] <kenvandine> DEPRECATED: The 'install' keyword has been replaced by 'override-build'
[16:15] <kenvandine> grep install snapcraft.yaml  |wc -l
[16:15] <kenvandine> 0
[16:18] <GunnarHj> sil2100: Is there some oddity in the console-setup package wrt $2 in postinst then?
[16:21] <sil2100> GunnarHj: I don't know, I'll test it - but anyway it looks like there's something wrong going on on your side when preparing the console-setup package
[16:21] <sil2100> Since I didn't need those addtional changes to push it to a PPA earlier
[16:22] <sil2100> GunnarHj: anyway, I'll test it on console-setup later, push to a PPA for you to check if it does the right thing and then sponsor
[16:22] <GunnarHj> sil2100: That's true... Ok, thanks!
[16:22] <sil2100> GunnarHj: your build machine is haunted mayhaps!
[16:22] <sil2100> ;)
[16:25] <kenvandine> Trevinho, oh... that comes from desktop-gnome-platform :)
[16:25] <GunnarHj> sil2100: I'm usually doing such work on a partition which is the result of multiple distupgrades and with a lot of installed packages. Maybe time to clean it up.
[16:26] <Trevinho> kenvandine: yeah...
[16:27] <Trevinho> kenvandine: I sent the pr
[16:35] <kenvandine> Trevinho, i merged that and still getting this
[16:35] <kenvandine> it works though
[16:35] <kenvandine> Trevinho, i'm getting the deprecation warning before it pulls the remote part
[16:58] <Trevinho> kenvandine: mh, have you refereshed local parts?
[16:58] <kenvandine> i cleaned
[16:58] <Trevinho> I don't see where else it could be otherwise
[16:58] <Trevinho> snapcraft refresh
[16:59] <Trevinho> ops no, it changed the command.. mhmh
[16:59] <kenvandine> Trevinho, ah...
[16:59] <kenvandine> update did it :)
[16:59] <kenvandine> i forgot those were cached
[17:00] <Trevinho> :)
[17:00] <kenvandine> i'm cleaning up all my deprecations today
[17:00] <Trevinho> nice
[17:01] <Trevinho> also for some changes it's now better to move them to stage or prime
[17:01] <Laney> night peeps
[17:01] <Laney> see you tuesday!
[17:01] <Trevinho> so that you don't have to cleanup all the steps
[17:01] <Trevinho> bye Laney enjoy your long WE
[17:01] <kenvandine> yeah
[17:01] <Laney> 😘
[17:06] <willcooke> night all, see you Tuesday
[17:38] <Trevinho> kenvandine: is it gtk-common-themes auto-connecting now, or not yet?
[17:39] <kenvandine> Trevinho, not yet
[17:39] <kenvandine> still waiting for a vote, i think
[17:40] <Trevinho> kenvandine: ack
[17:40] <Trevinho> kenvandine: it's going to be soon
[17:40] <kenvandine> should be