[00:30] dpb1, cpaelzer: please could you have a look at LP: #1262290. it's an approved MIR, but I don't know the history ... would need seeding, or a dependency somewhere [00:30] Launchpad bug 1262290 in The Dell-poweredge project "[MIR] wsmancli" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1262290 [00:38] infinity: do you want to reject debhelper from the SRU queues then? [00:48] rbasak, jamespage: please could you comment on LP: #1273865, if that is still needed? [00:48] Launchpad bug 1273865 in websocket-client (Ubuntu Utopic) "[MIR] juju-quickstart, python-jujuclient, urwid, websocket-client" [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1273865 [00:51] rbasak: I mean, backporting that commit isn't particularly "wrong", but if the goal is to fix the rsyslog-versus-systemd bug, that's not how it should be done. [00:51] rbasak: So, rejecting it on the basis that it's not necessary to fix said bug seems reasonable. [00:52] rbasak: On the other hand, it's not incorrect that ignoring /etc overrides is wrong. :P [00:52] rbasak: (But we don't really want to rebuild everything in the archive with a tmpfiles.d snippet to fix that) [00:53] rbasak: Or maybe we do. But that's a much larger bugfix than first proposed. [00:53] rbasak: xnox's take is that it's a systemd-tmpfiles bug that it's processing that snippet on --create at all, though. [00:54] rbasak: Note that it gets it half right by not "fixing" the ownership while it does "fix" the permissions. [00:56] hi infinity [00:56] were you the one that was going to help me get my libnss modue into apt? [00:56] module [00:57] it was quite some time ago, and i took a little break, but maybe in the next 2 months im going to work on it again [00:57] i already have two modules in apt, and they work great [00:57] i was planning on mimic'ing that structure for the libnss package [01:13] infinity, rbasak specific rsyslog vs systemd case can be fixed in systemd postinst; ubuntu is different from debian [01:14] infinity, rbasak the feature of supporting /etc & /run (NB!) overrides in postinst is good, but I don't believe justifyable under SRU policy. [06:24] LocutusOfBorg: virtualbox-hwe doesn't seem to build on cosmic [06:43] tjaalton, it does :) [06:44] my rebuild didn't [06:45] ah, there's a new one, cool === Elimin8r is now known as Elimin8er [11:11] From remote login, how do i find out whether installed version is ubuntu desktop version or server version? [15:44] tjaalton: is LP: #1412441 still relevant? could you follow-up on that? [15:44] Launchpad bug 1412441 in libclc (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libclc" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1412441 [15:49] coreycb, jamespage: please could you follow-up on LP: #1420028, LP: #1420021 and LP: #1420017 ? they are not seeded anywhere [15:49] Launchpad bug 1420028 in openstack-nose (Ubuntu) "[MIR] openstack-nose" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1420028 [15:49] Launchpad bug 1420021 in python-nose-exclude (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-nose-exclude" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1420021 [15:49] Launchpad bug 1420017 in python-nosehtmloutput (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-nosehtmloutput" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1420017 [16:06] xnox: LP: #1522003 claims that there is no copyright file. Please could you follow-up on this one? [16:06] Launchpad bug 1522003 in s390-dasd (Ubuntu) "[MIR] s390-dasd" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1522003 [16:07] xnox: same for LP: #1522004 [16:07] Launchpad bug 1522004 in s390-netdevice (Ubuntu) "[MIR] s390-netdevice" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1522004 [16:10] bdmurray: please could you follow-up on LP: #1588558? [16:10] Launchpad bug 1588558 in pocl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pocl" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1588558 [16:18] jamespage: please could you follow-up on LP: #1592465 ? [16:18] Launchpad bug 1592465 in swift-plugin-s3 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] swift-plugin-s3" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1592465 [16:31] doko: jamespage: i've updated those bugs, all invalid at this point [16:31] jamespage, coreycb: please could you follow-up on LP: #1643608 [16:31] Launchpad bug 1643608 in python-pyldap (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-pyldap" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1643608 [16:32] coreycb: ta [16:48] doko: 1643608 done [17:03] karstensrage: That may have been me, yes. [17:03] slangasek: Saw your action on bug #1701047. How is fonts-guru-extra special in this respect? [17:03] bug 1701047 in fonts-orya-extra (Ubuntu) "Renaming of conf file fails" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1701047 [17:04] GunnarHj: I don't know, I haven't looked at the version history to understand. But fonts-guru-extra is definitely the only one where the bug affected me in practice. [17:04] GunnarHj: it's possible that for the other packages, the buggy version was never in a release [17:05] slangasek: Ok. My understanding is that the issue is present in the same manner for those who have installed the other packages. [17:06] GunnarHj: sure, but if it doesn't affect users of stable releases, it is a much lower priority to fix [17:07] slangasek: True. It was a while, will take a closer look. (I'm surprised that they haven't fixed it in Debian.) [17:11] infinity, so are you up for it? [17:14] does anybody here recall why ubuntu has had -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions in LDFLAGS for about 10y now, and debian does not? [17:14] I just came across a delta in autofs because of that option [17:15] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1470687 [17:15] Launchpad bug 1470687 in autofs (Ubuntu Vivid) "Not working properly with compile options "-symbolic-functions"" [Undecided,Fix released] [17:32] GunnarHj: I think the difference is just that only fonts-guru-extra is in ubuntu-desktop, I suspect the same bug exists in all that maintainer's packages. [17:32] GunnarHj: (Since he "fixed" them all at the same time) [17:33] karstensrage: Potentially. I'm at a sprint this week, so limited time to pay attention to the outside world. [17:33] ok well it will take me more than a week [17:33] slangasek: Right; I just saw that fonts-guru (which depends on fonts-guru-extra) is in desktop-common in Xenial. So yes, that particular package affects everyone unlike the other. [17:33] i have to page in the context for how to do it again [17:33] but at least i can ping you and let you know when i think its ready for a look? [17:35] slangasek: So I suppose it means that if "someone" finds the time to fix the others, that would be helpful. ;) [17:38] infinity: ^ pinged slangasek instead of you... [17:43] GunnarHj: fonts-guru is a metapackage that doesn't have files (and, thus, doesn't have the bug) [17:44] GunnarHj: But yes, I'm positive the bug exists in several other packages, as per the debian bug number where the bug was introduced. [17:44] Debian bug #853848 references a bunch of packages from the same maintainer with the same issue. [17:44] Debian bug 853848 in fonts-deva-extra "fonts-deva-extra: unneeded directory in /etc/fonts/conf.avail/" [Normal,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/853848 [17:50] infinity: Right, understood. Personally I find it worth fixing all of them, even if fonts-guru-extra is most important since it affects everyone. Will triage the bug report accordingly. [17:55] GunnarHj: Yeahp, I absolutely agree they should all be fixed the same way, Steve was just scratching his own itch after I pointed out the issue and it gave him an aneurysm. [17:56] jamespage, coreycb: please could you follow-up on LP: #1737989? [17:56] Launchpad bug 1737989 in ujson (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ujson?" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1737989 [18:02] cpaelzer: looking at LP: #1744072, why are there tasks for cloud-init and maas, they are already in main. If there needs something to be done, could you file a separate issue, so that we can close the MIR? [18:02] Launchpad bug 1744072 in maas (Ubuntu) "[MIR] Chrony in 18.04" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1744072 [18:05] infinity: ;) [18:10] xnox: please could you follow-up on LP: #1766451 and 1746680? [18:10] Launchpad bug 1746680 in xe-guest-utilities (Ubuntu) "[MIR] xe-guest-utilities" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1746680 [18:10] Launchpad bug 1766451 in xe-guest-utilities (Ubuntu) "remove the shell script for 18.10" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766451 [18:50] doko: I don't think that bug matters anymore, now that build-deps can be from universe [18:50] doko: libclc that is === beisner-sick is now known as beisner [19:01] doko: I closed th ebug tasks [19:01] doko: thanks for spotting it [19:02] TL;DR: that was for both tools to adapt their ntp service config to chrony for >=Bionic [20:00] slangasek: Still there? I posted a reply on the bug report. === walbon_ is now known as gwalbon [20:40] GunnarHj: ok, you're probably right that it impacts any users that did have the old version of the package installed outside of the stock desktop dependencies [20:54] slangasek: Then we are agreed, good. I'll proceed with the other packages. (Tomorrow or this weekend.) [22:30] pjdc: about anope: we need to add that to some seed ... any proposal which one? [22:30] doko, https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/s390-netdevice/+bug/1522004 [22:30] Launchpad bug 1522004 in s390-netdevice (Ubuntu) "[MIR] s390-netdevice" [Undecided,Fix released] [22:30] doko, i hope my update on that one, is enough / appropriate. [22:32] doko: sorry, i don't even know what a seed is. typically we're interested in things being in main so that they gain security support, if that helps [22:34] doko: although i don't know that was the entirely of lamont's motivation [22:35] doko: assuming i'm looking at the page, i guess "supported"? [22:35] "it's a C binary compiled into `postinst`" .. wha? :) [22:35] doko: supported-misc-servers perhaps [22:38] Anope IRC services? [22:41] pjdc: right, but I'd like to have the server team to do the seeding. could you chase them down? [22:42] i can try!