[05:06] <happyfr0gg> How do I make running programs appear in LxPanel? I would like to 'Quit' them when they don't appear in the Taskbar.
[19:44] <[[thufir]]> doing the distro dance on this 2007 macbook.  bodhi, puppy, ubuntu, etc.  Now at lubuntu.  last but not least.  Can I select "entire disk" install like Ubuntu?  Or, do I need to manually format hard drive, set bootable partition, swap, etc?
[19:52] <anonusr> +anonusr> why is lubuntus default openssl package version 1.1.0g when according to openssl.org we should be using at least version 1.1.0h?
[19:52] <anonusr> +anonusr> and more importantly, how do i create a package that contains the latest/"not vulnerable" openssl for other users (the ones using the default openssl) to use?
[19:53] <anonusr> +anonusr> compiled 1.1.0-pre8-dev yesterday, but that may not be optimal tho
[19:53] <anonusr> got asked to post this question here instead on #ubuntu at dalnet
[20:00] <anonusr> out from "strings /usr/lib/x86_64*/libssl.a | grep OpenSSL" now gives "OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8-dev  xx XXX xxxx" instead of the default lubuntu 18.04 version string "OpenSSL 1.1.0g  2 Nov 2017"
[20:00]  * anonusr is happy, but other users may not be, se he wonders how to package this
[20:02] <anonusr> and also the 1.1.0h version
[20:02] <anonusr> inte an official package (that I think gets validated????? dunno exactly how it works) but then it should be no problem, right?
[20:10] <anonusr> here are the vulnerabilites that lubuntu's OpenSSL 1.1.0g (yet theoreticall) is vulnerable against: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-217/product_id-383/version_id-223239/Openssl-Openssl-1.1.0f.html
[20:13] <anonusr> oh wrong link
[20:13] <anonusr> https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-217/product_id-383/version_id-232284/Openssl-Openssl-1.1.0g.html
[20:19] <anonusr> otherwise I like lubuntu, but security updates should be priority 1
[20:29] <krytarik> anonusr: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+changelog , https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2018/CVE-2018-0733.html
[21:30] <bobbuckjack> Looking for help with Lubuntu.
[21:36] <anonusr> what do you want help with?
[21:40] <anonusr> krytarik: Ok, so only the HP-UX shit is affected?
[21:40] <anonusr> if I understand the sum of all three URLs correctly
[21:58] <|\n> hello, maybe this is a common issue to ubuntu distribution, having qt5 apps they look like this https://i.imgur.com/WeIQ5PR.png - anything one could do to cope with it? it's just black menus on black background are unreadable
[21:58] <anonusr> or.... how do I check what package version is installed without using x?
[21:58] <anonusr> so I can check if default package on my machine contains fixes
[22:04] <anonusr> wtf, never seen any problem like that pic on imgur before
[22:05] <|\n> same for virtualbox gui almost with more disturbing experience
[22:06] <anonusr> maybe some qt5-setting can have borders aroune the menus?
[22:06] <anonusr> o_O
[22:06] <|\n> i'm unable to figure anything out myself not becoming a qt coder and maintainer i guess, living like that for several months i still have a habit to attempt gui heheh
[22:07] <|\n> i don't have it, the qt5-setting thing
[22:07] <anonusr> yeah haha, GUI I go with SDL or ncursess :>
[22:07] <anonusr> ok :/
[22:07] <|\n> where does it get shipped from?
[22:07] <|\n> rmadison is not aware of it as well
[22:08] <|\n> theres chooser and qt4-setting one
[22:08] <anonusr> both can be found with apt-get
[22:08] <|\n> well, it is either we got different apt-get or i'm too slow to chase it
[22:09] <anonusr> www.libsdl.org
[22:09] <anonusr> but it's not GUI per se
[22:09] <anonusr> but easy to do it witg
[22:09] <anonusr> with*
[22:11] <|\n> sounds like gentoo, but why would i need it to make vlc at least black n white
[22:11] <anonusr> ????????????
[22:12] <anonusr> oh, I thiought you were programming something that needs GUI
[22:12] <|\n> no, not at all, sorry for the way i expressed myself (probably)
[22:13] <anonusr> no can also be I who misunderstood
[22:13] <|\n> ok, what can i do to troubleshoot this bizarre qt5 issue that paints it all black heh
[22:14] <|\n> and what is the current state of an old good lxde in ubuntu? because there is a box nearby that looks perfectly fine with it
[22:15] <anonusr> I don't know really
[22:15] <anonusr> I'm not very inte C
[22:15] <anonusr> X
[22:15] <anonusr> I mean
[22:15] <|\n> ah thanks anyway, man
[22:15] <anonusr> besides right now I am used to use DWM
[22:15] <anonusr> :D
[22:15] <anonusr> the simplest window manager I know of
[22:15] <anonusr> that is also flexible
[22:16] <|\n> well i used to be a gnometard since 2.24 but then i took a gtk3 to my knee
[22:16] <anonusr> hahahaha
[22:16] <anonusr> yeah, I'm on gnome atm
[22:17] <anonusr> I don't like but that haven't had the "time" to remove it yet lol
[22:18] <anonusr> aaaah fuck it, doing as soon I got another IRC-screen running somewhere :p
[22:18] <|\n> 3 things ruined my perfect world with canonical on desktop: gtk3, plymouth (in context of related dependencies) and systemd
[22:19] <anonusr> SYSTEMD !!!
[22:19] <anonusr> I FUCKING HATE IT
[22:20] <anonusr> netstat -tulpan should ONLY show port 53 and 113 for me, but nonono.... also the traffic systemd produces that is all errors (can prove it with output from strace firefox for example)
[22:20] <anonusr> is ENOURMUS
[22:20] <|\n> you override but then you kinda edit service to undepend from socket and allow stuff and remove socket and reload reload and maybe it will work somehow until bricks to service restart
[22:20] <anonusr> HHAHAH
[22:21] <anonusr> fucking shot
[22:21] <anonusr> shit*
[22:21] <anonusr> no, gonna backport this sometime on my own branch of lubuntu
[22:21] <anonusr> *into my own branch of lubuntu
[22:22] <wxl> !language | anonusr
[22:23] <|\n> s***emd
[22:23] <anonusr> ubottu: sorry, will read the guidelines
[22:23] <anonusr> ahahahahaha :D
[22:24] <anonusr> |\n: you ever had a look at LinuxFromScratch?
[22:24] <anonusr> one does learn a tremendous amount
[22:24] <wxl> also you folks may want to take the conversation that does not have to deal with support on lubuntu to #lubuntu-offtopic
[22:24] <|\n> i was too young for that and there was slackware so i thought i could skip it
[22:25] <|\n> ah, sorry wxl, indeed
[22:25] <anonusr> wxl: ok
[22:30] <anonusr> krytarik: please reply if I was correct about the point or not? otherwise I must have missed some detail
[22:31] <anonusr> when you got time ofc
[22:33] <krytarik> anonusr: Well, as for as I've understood the page on the remaining CVE, it doesn't affect Ubuntu at all.
[22:35] <anonusr> krytarik: ok, then I got it right
[22:35] <anonusr> thanks :)
[22:35] <anonusr> krytarik: but does ubuntu share repositories with any other distro  ?
[22:35] <anonusr> if so, is this explored?
[22:37] <anonusr> I am gonna part this channel, as the offtopic one suites me more :D
[22:37] <anonusr> and maybe the devel some day