[00:29] <Unit193> k3dar7: ...I went ahead and packaged that. >_>
[00:34] <k3dar7> Unit193: what? where? :-)
[00:35] <Unit193> Haven't pushed it yet because I still need to enter the longer description.
[00:36] <k3dar7> prepared to PPA?
[00:36] <Unit193> Nearly ready to push to the PPA, yep.
[00:37] <k3dar7> nice
[00:38] <k3dar7> now in Xfce is for "BFU" need only one, xfce4-panel-plugin for "Safe Unmount Flash" ;-)
[00:40] <k3dar7> * i think modify xfce4-mount-plugin
[00:56] <Unit193> krytarik: HALP.
[00:57] <Unit193> Description: quickly share a folder using Samba from Thunar
[00:57] <Unit193> I need a long one!
[01:01] <k3dar7> Unit193: mainline about line ? ;-) "The Thunar Shares Plugin (thunar-shares-plugin) allows you to quickly share a folder using Samba from Thunar (the XFCE file manager) without requiring root access." http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/thunar-plugins/thunar-shares-plugin
[01:02] <Unit193> Not quite, k3dar7.  But uploaded.
[01:39] <k3dar7> Unit193: remove me compiled before, installed from PPA, work ok :)
[04:45] <flocculant> Unit193: lots of words there to buy in on - got a one liner for me 
[04:46] <Unit193> flocculant: xubuntu-dev/experimental has a lot of crap to test.  It snowballs a bit which elements we pick for Cosmic.  I kind of want a go/nogo on the things.  xfconf/xfdesktop/thunar/xfce4-panel are the big ones there.
[04:49] <flocculant> Unit193: I thought /exp was the just dev release one - and staging the 'backporty' type one 
[04:49] <Unit193> Correct.
[04:49] <Unit193> flocculant: They want some dev releases for Cosmic.
[04:49] <flocculant> by they you mean that user?
[04:50] <Unit193> flocculant: If you're asking why there's a bunch of other stuff, that's because they have to be rebuilt for either xfconf or xfce4-panel.  'They' == ochosi and bluesabre. :P
[04:50] <flocculant> my word - there's a lot of plugins in there :D
[04:51] <Unit193> If you expand, you'll see if it's new or a rebuild.
[04:51] <flocculant> aah ack to rebuilt ... and as far as they goes - I'm good with that, unless they want all those plugins tested :p
[04:52] <flocculant> bluesabre ochosi ^^ /exp ppa is now big - with lots of things we'd not normally test - what you want?
[04:52]  * flocculant isn't really awake enough to think about this ...
[05:00] <Unit193> I haven't talked to them too much on this, they've been doing things upstream so I've taken care of everything downstream (and been busy with Debian too.)
[05:02] <flocculant> yea I sort of realised that's what was happening
[05:03] <Unit193> ...my name on everything kind of gave it away didn't it? :3
[05:03] <flocculant> :P
[05:06] <Unit193> I'll pick up the development xfdashboard too while I'm at 'er.
[05:06] <Unit193> Also, thunar-shares-plugin does seem like something that's been asked about before, and quite useful in a mixed system env.
[05:39] <flocculant> I will at least check those plugins I can check - to make sure the world doesn't explode
[11:11] <knome> flocculant, did you have a google account? i'm looking at the team calendar editor list and you're not there :)
[11:12] <knome> though i'm not sure what will happen to it -- i'm planning making my sp.org a non-google account and it's the owner of that calendar
[11:12] <knome> in the worst case we can just set up a new one...
[11:12] <knome> (or use another calendar service)
[11:15] <knome> oh nvm, i just fixed that :P
[11:21] <knome> (but still, let me know of your google account if you have one)
[11:51] <bluesabre> flocculant: a spot check to make sure they still work is really all that's needed for the rebuilds
[14:43] <flocculant> knome: I do have one 
[14:43] <flocculant> I've added to the team calendar in the past
[14:45] <flocculant> and ygm
[14:54] <flocculant> bluesabre: okey doke - I can do that for ones I don't use - one's I do get a proper going over :p
[15:42] <knome> flocculant, you're now in the editors list
[17:04] <flocculant> knome: ack - not sure what that actually is - but ok :p
[17:05] <Unit193> bluesabre: I'd honestly think more things might break from being rebuilt against xfconf than the panel, though I trust xfconf more than the panel. >_>
[18:18] <knome> flocculant, you now have the permission to edit the calendar :P
[21:41] <ochosi> Unit193, bluesabre: just so we don't confuse anyone, what do we put in which PPA again? (staging vs exp)
[21:41] <ochosi> i thought staging was like "we'll try to ship this in the coming release"
[21:42] <Unit193> ochosi: 'staging' is backports, afaik.
[21:42] <knome> if it's backports, why isn't it called backports?
[21:42] <ochosi> and exp was like "we may try to look into this, but still not convinced"
[21:42] <knome> imo staging does indeed hint that it's staging for the release
[21:42] <ochosi> i know it sucks if we have to discuss this again, but i also dont want ppl at the beginning of the cycle to be confused
[21:43] <ochosi> maybe we write this down somewhere (if we haven't done that yet)
[21:43] <knome> https://docs.xubuntu.org/contributors/development.html#development-ppa
[21:43] <Unit193> OK, well in that case I'm confused.
[21:44] <knome> i don't think/know if we have a PPA for backports.
[21:45] <Unit193> Well, that's what I was supposed to do with staging as far as I knew. :D
[21:46] <Unit193> Note that there's xubuntu-staging and staging.
[21:46] <knome> if you want to be exceptionally clear on the intent, name them staging-cosmic and staging-backport-bionic
[21:48] <Unit193> We don't do official backports because nobody reviews them.
[21:51] <knome> staging-backport-unofficial-bionic
[21:56] <Spass> link to Xubuntu Staging PPA from that doc seems broken - https://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/ubuntu/xubuntu-staging
[21:56] <Unit193> Too many Ubuntus.
[21:57] <knome> well, nobody noticed it until now and it's the people who wrote it who are readin
[21:57] <knome> +g
[21:57] <knome> so..
[21:57] <knome> :P
[21:58] <Unit193> Also, the appendix is out of date in regards to applications. :D
[22:04] <knome> of course
[22:05] <ochosi> anyway, gotta get some sleep
[22:05] <knome> ochosi, please
[22:05] <knome> ochosi, your target email for sp.org fw?