[00:29] k3dar7: ...I went ahead and packaged that. >_> [00:34] Unit193: what? where? :-) [00:35] Haven't pushed it yet because I still need to enter the longer description. [00:36] prepared to PPA? [00:36] Nearly ready to push to the PPA, yep. [00:37] nice [00:38] now in Xfce is for "BFU" need only one, xfce4-panel-plugin for "Safe Unmount Flash" ;-) [00:40] * i think modify xfce4-mount-plugin [00:56] krytarik: HALP. [00:57] Description: quickly share a folder using Samba from Thunar [00:57] I need a long one! [01:01] Unit193: mainline about line ? ;-) "The Thunar Shares Plugin (thunar-shares-plugin) allows you to quickly share a folder using Samba from Thunar (the XFCE file manager) without requiring root access." http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/thunar-plugins/thunar-shares-plugin [01:02] Not quite, k3dar7. But uploaded. [01:39] Unit193: remove me compiled before, installed from PPA, work ok :) [04:45] Unit193: lots of words there to buy in on - got a one liner for me [04:46] flocculant: xubuntu-dev/experimental has a lot of crap to test. It snowballs a bit which elements we pick for Cosmic. I kind of want a go/nogo on the things. xfconf/xfdesktop/thunar/xfce4-panel are the big ones there. [04:49] Unit193: I thought /exp was the just dev release one - and staging the 'backporty' type one [04:49] Correct. [04:49] flocculant: They want some dev releases for Cosmic. [04:49] by they you mean that user? [04:50] flocculant: If you're asking why there's a bunch of other stuff, that's because they have to be rebuilt for either xfconf or xfce4-panel. 'They' == ochosi and bluesabre. :P [04:50] my word - there's a lot of plugins in there :D [04:51] If you expand, you'll see if it's new or a rebuild. [04:51] aah ack to rebuilt ... and as far as they goes - I'm good with that, unless they want all those plugins tested :p [04:52] bluesabre ochosi ^^ /exp ppa is now big - with lots of things we'd not normally test - what you want? [04:52] * flocculant isn't really awake enough to think about this ... [05:00] I haven't talked to them too much on this, they've been doing things upstream so I've taken care of everything downstream (and been busy with Debian too.) [05:02] yea I sort of realised that's what was happening [05:03] ...my name on everything kind of gave it away didn't it? :3 [05:03] :P [05:06] I'll pick up the development xfdashboard too while I'm at 'er. [05:06] Also, thunar-shares-plugin does seem like something that's been asked about before, and quite useful in a mixed system env. [05:39] I will at least check those plugins I can check - to make sure the world doesn't explode [11:11] flocculant, did you have a google account? i'm looking at the team calendar editor list and you're not there :) [11:12] though i'm not sure what will happen to it -- i'm planning making my sp.org a non-google account and it's the owner of that calendar [11:12] in the worst case we can just set up a new one... [11:12] (or use another calendar service) [11:15] oh nvm, i just fixed that :P [11:21] (but still, let me know of your google account if you have one) [11:51] flocculant: a spot check to make sure they still work is really all that's needed for the rebuilds [14:43] knome: I do have one [14:43] I've added to the team calendar in the past [14:45] and ygm [14:54] bluesabre: okey doke - I can do that for ones I don't use - one's I do get a proper going over :p [15:42] flocculant, you're now in the editors list [17:04] knome: ack - not sure what that actually is - but ok :p [17:05] bluesabre: I'd honestly think more things might break from being rebuilt against xfconf than the panel, though I trust xfconf more than the panel. >_> [18:18] flocculant, you now have the permission to edit the calendar :P [21:41] Unit193, bluesabre: just so we don't confuse anyone, what do we put in which PPA again? (staging vs exp) [21:41] i thought staging was like "we'll try to ship this in the coming release" [21:42] ochosi: 'staging' is backports, afaik. [21:42] if it's backports, why isn't it called backports? [21:42] and exp was like "we may try to look into this, but still not convinced" [21:42] imo staging does indeed hint that it's staging for the release [21:42] i know it sucks if we have to discuss this again, but i also dont want ppl at the beginning of the cycle to be confused [21:43] maybe we write this down somewhere (if we haven't done that yet) [21:43] https://docs.xubuntu.org/contributors/development.html#development-ppa [21:43] OK, well in that case I'm confused. [21:44] i don't think/know if we have a PPA for backports. [21:45] Well, that's what I was supposed to do with staging as far as I knew. :D [21:46] Note that there's xubuntu-staging and staging. [21:46] if you want to be exceptionally clear on the intent, name them staging-cosmic and staging-backport-bionic [21:48] We don't do official backports because nobody reviews them. [21:51] staging-backport-unofficial-bionic [21:56] link to Xubuntu Staging PPA from that doc seems broken - https://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/ubuntu/xubuntu-staging [21:56] Too many Ubuntus. [21:57] well, nobody noticed it until now and it's the people who wrote it who are readin [21:57] +g [21:57] so.. [21:57] :P [21:58] Also, the appendix is out of date in regards to applications. :D [22:04] of course [22:05] anyway, gotta get some sleep [22:05] ochosi, please [22:05] ochosi, your target email for sp.org fw?