| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| rbalint | vmbuilder did not see an update for some time, is there a successor or it just needs some love to support bionic + cosmic? | 04:18 |
|---|---|---|
| tsimonq2 | (multipass?) | 04:21 |
| tsimonq2 | In this case I'll assume that this is OK, but for the future, a native package with e.g. 1.4.4 when SRUed becomes 1.4.4.1 right? | 04:32 |
| === giraffe is now known as Guest28040 | ||
| cpaelzer | xnox: hi is the systemd autopkgtest still retry-to-win? | 06:19 |
| cpaelzer | recent logs look that way, but to be sure I wanted to ask in case there are special bells and whistles to that atm | 06:20 |
| cjwatson | tsimonq2: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging has some recommendations for native packages. 1.4.4.1 would only be OK if it's an Ubuntu native package that's not in Debian. | 07:19 |
| tsimonq2 | cjwatson: Thanks. | 07:26 |
| xnox | cpaelzer, i think it got worse recently, did not yet debug on how to make it better =/ | 07:27 |
| cpaelzer | ok | 07:27 |
| cpaelzer | I have seen the fsck hit in the past | 07:30 |
| cpaelzer | there seem to be a new one around "unhappy-2.input" | 07:30 |
| cpaelzer | good name btw | 07:30 |
| cpaelzer | breaks on "Failed to parse UID: '9999999999': Numerical result out of range" | 07:30 |
| cpaelzer | maybe now both issues are flaky and together cause a higher fail rate | 07:31 |
| cpaelzer | I could get it working with "just" one retry this time | 07:31 |
| cpaelzer | I haven't seen the UID thing before, so I thought I mention if that is known to you already xnox | 07:31 |
| cpaelzer | xnox: I read through the last 8 fails and found like 6 different issues | 07:33 |
| cpaelzer | so it is (as it was in the past) not just a single issue to fix :-/ | 07:33 |
| === Guest83599 is now known as _hc | ||
| rbasak | RAOF: please could you take a look to see if you're happy releasing budgie-desktop-environment? I'm not sure how to verify the things mentioned in the changleog without bugs, or if you're expecting those to be released without explicit veriication? | 09:53 |
| rbasak | bug 1755831 and bug 1772238 | 09:54 |
| ubottu | bug 1755831 in budgie-desktop-environment (Ubuntu Bionic) "ibus not working properly" [Wishlist,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1755831 | 09:54 |
| ubottu | bug 1772238 in budgie-desktop-environment (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] .desktop file strings shown untranslated in Budgie" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1772238 | 09:54 |
| RAOF | rbasak: I was going to release without explicit verification of the things not bugged in the changelog. | 09:58 |
| RAOF | Oh, yeah! It's Wednesday! Oops. | 09:59 |
| rbasak | RAOF: OK. Do you want to take care of that then? | 09:59 |
| rbasak | I'm just about done with the pending-sru queue for today. I didn't get o some. debootstrap should be releasable soon - I've kicked some dep8 tests and force-badtested one. | 10:00 |
| rbasak | I'm looking at qemu and libvirt from the Bionic unapproved queue next. | 10:00 |
| cpaelzer | RAOF: he is looking at the mentioned because he is kind and I'm sort of RAOF for those two updates :-) | 10:02 |
| RAOF | I can take care of that, but it'll be tomorrow, because I'm on my phone now 😀 | 10:03 |
| cpaelzer | RAOF: then let rbasak continue and take what you can tomorrow | 10:03 |
| cpaelzer | IMHO the queue is full enough to get both of you busy | 10:03 |
| cpaelzer | if rbasak tries to get the full queue done today his head might explode | 10:04 |
| === Son_Goku is now known as Conan_Kudo | ||
| === Conan_Kudo is now known as Son_Goku | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | nacc, pacemaker merge? | 12:24 |
| rbasak | didrocks: fancy re-sponsoring lastpass-cli in bionic unapproved but using Ubuntu or adjusting vendor so that Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed appears? :) | 12:28 |
| * rbasak will be back after lunch | 12:28 | |
| xnox | Laney, mailings lists are dead; long live mailing venues =) | 12:53 |
| Laney | :> | 12:53 |
| Laney | we could use the Ubuntu amphitheatre | 12:53 |
| didrocks | rbasak: sorry, wdym by "using Ubuntu"? Indeed, the changelog has a Closes: instead of LP:. I didn't notice it, Nafallo FYI ^ | 13:13 |
| didrocks | if that's the only thing needing changes, I'll handle it, just want to clarify the "but using Ubuntu" :) | 13:14 |
| rbasak | didrocks: "Closes LP: | 13:14 |
| rbasak | #1766186" | 13:14 |
| rbasak | should be parsed correctly I believe. | 13:14 |
| ahasenack | "Closes" is fine, dep3changelog uses that syntax | 13:14 |
| ahasenack | but LP: # is mantadory | 13:14 |
| rbasak | I think it's odd, but some old timers use it. | 13:14 |
| didrocks | I'll replace by a traditional LP: ;) | 13:14 |
| didrocks | rbasak: let me reject the current one | 13:15 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: dep3changelog adds "Closes" | 13:15 |
| rbasak | didrocks: usually when the header is missing it's because the signer used dpkg-buildpackage on Debian without overriding the vendor. | 13:15 |
| didrocks | rbasak: it's a new setup machine, maybe I'm missing a config I didn't restore? but I'm on bionic | 13:16 |
| rbasak | The only other thing I can think of is that the line wrap confused the parser. But I was under the impression that didn't affect anything. | 13:17 |
| didrocks | could be | 13:17 |
| rbasak | AFAIK, it should work by default on any Ubuntu | 13:17 |
| rbasak | (well maybe not Warty, I don't know) | 13:17 |
| Laney | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/374036485/lastpass-cli_1.0.0-1.2ubuntu2_source.changes <- no LP there? | 13:17 |
| rbasak | That's weird | 13:17 |
| rbasak | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/374053940/apache2_2.4.29-1ubuntu4.2_source.changes is what I was looking at | 13:18 |
| rbasak | Which would explain it | 13:18 |
| rbasak | I'm looking at the wrong package :) | 13:18 |
| Laney | :D | 13:18 |
| didrocks | :) | 13:18 |
| didrocks | yeah, it was wrong anyway, Closes: instead of LP: as said | 13:18 |
| didrocks | argh, I purged LaTeX after sponsoring this! Have to reinstall it because debian/rules clean needs it :p | 13:18 |
| rbasak | I use -nc -d usually | 13:18 |
| Laney | didrocks: debuild -S -d -nc? | 13:19 |
| Laney | high five | 13:19 |
| didrocks | yeah, let's try with -nc to see if the diff is ok | 13:19 |
| didrocks | Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 1555562 | 13:20 |
| didrocks | ok, looking better | 13:20 |
| didrocks | and diff is ok | 13:20 |
| rbasak | \o/ | 13:20 |
| didrocks | rbasak: thanks for noticing! Pushed | 13:21 |
| * rbasak pends on the Launchpad diff generator | 13:21 | |
| Laney | ahasenack: never heard of dep3changelog, thanks for the hint BTW | 13:22 |
| * Laney notices who wrote it too | 13:22 | |
| ahasenack | who? | 13:22 |
| rbasak | The one person that I know of who considers "Closes: LP: #XXX" OK :) | 13:22 |
| rbasak | Oh no sorry. That's "Closes LP: #XXX" :) | 13:23 |
| nacc | LocutusOfBorg: i'll take a look | 16:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nacc, <3 | 16:06 |
| === caravena_ is now known as caravena | ||
| smoser | slangasek: you did a review of bionic pollinate SRU at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pollinate/+bug/1761240 . the code for the trusty, xenial, artful are all the same as the bionic... i wonder if you could easily review those also ? | 17:39 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1761240 in pollinate (Ubuntu Artful) "SRU pollinate 4.33" [Medium,Confirmed] | 17:39 |
| smoser | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pollinate/+bug/1761240 | 17:39 |
| slangasek | smoser: it's not true that they're all the same as for bionic, today; bionic is at 4.31, artful is at 4.27, etc. so the diffs will need separate review (but I'm planning to do that) | 17:47 |
| smoser | slangasek: yes, understood that you review the changes, but in this particular package, probably reviewing the code is just as easy. | 17:51 |
| smoser | $ wc -l `which pollinate` | 17:51 |
| smoser | 350 /usr/bin/pollinate | 17:51 |
| xevious | python3-configshell-fb (which is in universe) has a bug that's breaking my scripts on Ubuntu. It was resolved in 1.1.fb23 (1.1.23 in Debian-speak). What's the process for getting a universe package updated to its latest version? | 19:11 |
| xevious | https://github.com/open-iscsi/configshell-fb/commit/82f79eb2f967ecd820d531488d0b64d6015b1aaf | 19:11 |
| nacc | xevious: file a bug | 19:36 |
| xevious | Would it be better to file it with Debian or on Launchpad? | 19:36 |
| tsimonq2 | xevious: Launchpad. | 19:38 |
| nacc | xevious: ubuntu bugs go in launchpad | 19:39 |
| nacc | xevious: but it's not fixed in debian either? then you'd also file one there as a good person (tm) | 19:40 |
| roaksoax | win 3 | 19:45 |
| tsimonq2 | win 4 | 19:48 |
| Unit193 | /win 73 | 19:48 |
| xevious | nacc: No, sid and bionic have the same version in universe. | 20:00 |
| xevious | nacc: I'll file the bugs once I finish some tests. | 20:01 |
| winksaville | I'm using bionic and I ran across a problem using llvm-3.9 that I build from source using gcc, but if I use llvm-3.9 package it works. Further, if I use clang to compile llvm-3.9 from source it works. | 20:14 |
| winksaville | So my question is when the llvm-3.9 package is built for distribution what compiler is used? | 20:15 |
| sarnold | winksaville: take a look at the build logs on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-3.9 | 20:16 |
| sarnold | here's the difference that ubuntu carries compared again sthe debian package https://patches.ubuntu.com/l/llvm-toolchain-3.9/ | 20:17 |
| sarnold | hope this helps, lunchtime :) | 20:17 |
| winksaville | Txs, I'll take a look | 20:18 |
| === caravena_ is now known as caravena | ||
| === cascardo` is now known as cascardo | ||
| xevious | nacc: I got around to making the Ubuntu ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-configshell-fb/+bug/1776761 | 20:58 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1776761 in targetcli-fb (Ubuntu) "targetcli aborts with the error message "NameError: name 'readline' is not defined" when running in interactive shell mode" [Undecided,New] | 20:58 |
| winksaville | sarnold: I found the build logs on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-3.9/1:3.9.1-19ubuntu1/+build/14185079 and downloaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-3.9/1:3.9.1-19ubuntu1/+build/14185079/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-amd64.llvm-toolchain-3.9_1%3A3.9.1-19ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 21:04 |
| winksaville | But when I try to gunzip it says its "not in gzip format", what have I done wrong? | 21:04 |
| xevious | nacc: I just emailed it to Debian. | 21:06 |
| xevious | nacc: ...and here it is on their bug tracker: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901484 | 21:11 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 901484 in python3-configshell-fb "targetcli aborts with the error message "NameError: name 'readline' is not defined" when running in interactive shell mode" [Normal,Open] | 21:11 |
| winksaville | sarnold: never mind, it appears it gets decompressed in transit or some such and if I save it as a .txt file I can see it just fine. | 21:12 |
| doko | coreycb, jamespage: for LP: #1482765 please can you follow-up with the security team? | 21:46 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1482765 in neutron-vpnaas (Ubuntu) "[MIR] neutron-vpnaas" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1482765 | 21:46 |
| sarnold | winksaville: all good? | 21:55 |
| coreycb | doko: it looks like the security team's been subscribed. should i check with them on status? | 22:07 |
| doko | coreycb: please do. just promited it for cosmic | 22:08 |
| coreycb | doko: will do, thanks | 22:08 |
| coreycb | doko: is there any way to get that into main for bionic at this point or is it too late? | 22:13 |
| doko | coreycb: I was told that you need approval/awareness of the security team for this extended security support | 22:15 |
| doko | but we had prmotions in the update pocket before | 22:15 |
| coreycb | doko: got it | 22:16 |
| coreycb | doko: thanks agian | 22:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!