| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-acme (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22.2-1 => 0.22.2-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 02:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted changeme [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.1-1] | 02:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-vitrageclient [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 02:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected maas [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-6981-g011e51b7a-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 04:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-beng-extra [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-6ubuntu0.1] | 04:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-deva-extra [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0-4ubuntu0.1] | 04:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-gujr-extra [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-6ubuntu0.1] | 04:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-orya-extra [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0-5ubuntu0.1] | 04:42 | |
| acheronuk | apw or any other AA. can krita 1:4.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu1 be removed from -proposed and be replaced by a direct sync? I misread the changelog slightly, and we can drop the delta | 07:40 |
|---|---|---|
| acheronuk | if too late for that, no probs | 07:42 |
| === WMRamadan_ is now known as WMRamadan | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-acme [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.22.2-1ubuntu0.1] | 18:34 | |
| rbasak | acheronuk: I'm not an AA, but I'm pretty sure you can't do that since the version number would have to go backwards (1:4.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu1 is "published" even though it's in cosmic-proposed). You could drop the delta in a 1:4.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu2 upload perhaps, ready to sync in a future 1:4.0.4+dfsg-2 (or higher) in Debian. | 19:02 |
| rbasak | Or just leave it if it won't matter to users. | 19:02 |
| tsimonq2 | I would even go 1:4.0.4+dfsg-1+build1 fakesyncing then let the autosyncer take care of it from there. | 19:23 |
| tsimonq2 | Unless... hmm... is build1 higher or lower than ubuntu1? | 19:24 |
| tsimonq2 | ubuntu1 is probably higher | 19:25 |
| acheronuk | rbasak: thanks. it is going no-where, so can wait for a bit | 19:26 |
| acheronuk | tsimonq2: ubuntu1 is higher | 19:26 |
| tsimonq2 | Right, that would make sense. | 19:29 |
| slangasek | acheronuk, rbasak: LP does allow for rolling back version numbers in -proposed, as long as they are version numbers that haven't previously been used in the archive; but this isn't something I want us to be doing, especially for packages currently tied up in transitions in -proposed - it can just be made a sync next time around. | 19:58 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: great. not a problem :) | 19:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.0.1-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 3.0.1-0ubuntu2~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 23:10 | |
| stgraber | ^ that should unstick the lxcfs SRU (bionic) and should be pretty easy to review | 23:19 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!