[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-acme (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22.2-1 => 0.22.2-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted changeme [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.1-1]
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-vitrageclient [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[04:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected maas [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-6981-g011e51b7a-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-beng-extra [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-6ubuntu0.1]
[04:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-deva-extra [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0-4ubuntu0.1]
[04:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-gujr-extra [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-6ubuntu0.1]
[04:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-orya-extra [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0-5ubuntu0.1]
[07:40] <acheronuk> apw or any other AA. can krita 1:4.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu1 be removed from -proposed and be replaced by a direct sync? I misread the changelog slightly, and we can drop the delta
[07:42] <acheronuk> if too late for that, no probs
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-acme [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.22.2-1ubuntu0.1]
[19:02] <rbasak> acheronuk: I'm not an AA, but I'm pretty sure you can't do that since the version number would have to go backwards (1:4.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu1 is "published" even though it's in cosmic-proposed). You could drop the delta in a 1:4.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu2 upload perhaps, ready to sync in a future 1:4.0.4+dfsg-2 (or higher) in Debian.
[19:02] <rbasak> Or just leave it if it won't matter to users.
[19:23] <tsimonq2> I would even go 1:4.0.4+dfsg-1+build1 fakesyncing then let the autosyncer take care of it from there.
[19:24] <tsimonq2> Unless... hmm... is build1 higher or lower than ubuntu1?
[19:25] <tsimonq2> ubuntu1 is probably higher
[19:26] <acheronuk> rbasak: thanks. it is going no-where, so can wait for a bit
[19:26] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: ubuntu1 is higher
[19:29] <tsimonq2> Right, that would make sense.
[19:58] <slangasek> acheronuk, rbasak: LP does allow for rolling back version numbers in -proposed, as long as they are version numbers that haven't previously been used in the archive; but this isn't something I want us to be doing, especially for packages currently tied up in transitions in -proposed - it can just be made a sync next time around.
[19:59] <acheronuk> slangasek: great. not a problem :)
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.0.1-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 3.0.1-0ubuntu2~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[23:19] <stgraber> ^ that should unstick the lxcfs SRU (bionic) and should be pretty easy to review