[15:05] <zhenguoli> hello, everyone! I am new to debian package. I want to know if there exists some specification about the directory structure like the po(i18n) and which files are needed for desktop application?
[15:06] <zhenguoli> thank you in advance.
[16:02] <nacc> zhenguoli: i think you have the wrong channel, do you want #debian-packaging?
[16:03] <zhenguoli> nacc thanks. I may switch the channel.
[17:15] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: This is a first for me... chroot problem? https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3291/+sourcepub/9192457/+listing-archive-extra
[17:15] <tsimonq2> W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net/ci-train-ppa-service/3291/ubuntu cosmic InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 85504128ECF1204C
[17:16] <tsimonq2> E: The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/ci-train-ppa-service/3291/ubuntu cosmic InRelease' is not signed.
[17:16] <tsimonq2> hmm
[17:20] <cjwatson> tsimonq2: Just retry, please.  There's some known keyserver instability at the moment.
[17:21] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: Alright, thanks.
[18:49] <bigfoot-> "Bad Request" whenever I want to submit a new bug to bugs.launchpad.net; is there some known outage?
[19:40] <cjwatson> bigfoot-: Nothing known.
[19:40] <cjwatson> bigfoot-: Do you get an OOPS ID?
[19:41] <cjwatson> bigfoot-: Or is there anything more you can tell us?  "Bad Request" is awfully general.
[19:41] <bigfoot-> I figured it out; have seen that earlier, too.  The problem was that the attachment I tried to upload was not readable to the user running Firefox.  bugs.launchpad.net doesn't seem to take this too generously.
[19:42] <cjwatson> bigfoot-: Ah, so https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1777095
[19:43] <bigfoot-> Yes.
[19:43] <cjwatson> It'll be somewhere in lib/lp/bugs/browser/bugmessage.py.  Hopefully not too hard to fix ...
[19:45] <bigfoot-> I'd be happy if lp could be more verbose in this case, this caught me twice in the last few years ... ;)
[19:51] <cjwatson> Right, it's absolutely a bug - I'll try to squeeze in a fix somewhere
[20:29] <cjwatson> bigfoot-: actually, bad news, I just investigated and there's no reasonable way I can see for Launchpad to work around this (see the bug for details of why).  It needs to be fixed in Firefox.
[20:31] <cjwatson> Not necessarily to be able to read the file, of course, but at least to send a request that isn't so catastrophically ill-formed that it makes Apache reject it.