| lubot | <tsimonq2> @mitya57 Is qtwebkit-opensource-src syncable? I'll try a test build tonight, but if it is, I'd like to sync it :) | 02:33 |
|---|---|---|
| lubot | <tsimonq2> (Along with the Qt transition I'm preparing, but still.) | 02:34 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Right now I'm almost done with the bootstrapping process in the PPA, but since I'm concurrently doing Debian Experimental uploads, I can just sync packages to the PPA when the bootstrapping is done. | 02:43 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> irt bootstrapping, qtwebkit is building locally (just bumping build deps, I might bump debhelper and std-ver) and after that I just need qttools. | 02:43 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Once both are done and uploaded, I can go quicker (because I'm not waiting for build dependencies to get done). So the slow part is almost done. :) | 02:44 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> I see 5.11.1 was planned for tomorrow, but seeing as there are still open blockers in the bug tracker, they'll probably push it back. If they don't push it back however, I still want to finish 5.11.0 and get it out of the way, and then the update to 5.11.1 should be trivial at best. | 02:46 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @mitya57, lisandro: When 5.11.1 does come out though, and when it's in Experimental (which should be in the next week or two), I'd like to plan a time to sit down with one of you to go through requesting the transition in Debian. I already commented in #ubuntu-release that I wanted to do a Qt transition, but devel-proposed is in rough shape, so there's a chance I'll have to wait (but I'll keep dialogue going). | 02:49 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Hmmmmm, I see 5.11.1 tars but no announcement yet... | 03:37 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @tsimonq2, Ah, so ppc64el is FTBFS. I wonder if we can upstream that patch to Debian or if it should stay in Ubuntu. | 05:40 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Anyway, I'll leave that how it is for now... bed for me. | 05:40 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> p/ | 05:40 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> *o/ | 05:40 |
| lubot | <mitya57> @tsimonq2, First you will need to test-build all packages depending on qt{base,declarative}-private-dev to see if they get broken. Looking at the failures in Ubuntu is usually enough, as it is a superset of Debian. | 07:00 |
| lubot | <mitya57> Then file a transition bug (`reportbug release.debian.org`), wait for the green light. When you get it, re-upload all Qt packages with s/experimental/unstable/ (and updating symbols if needed). | 07:04 |
| lubot | <mitya57> @tsimonq2, It won’t hurt in Debian, but the FTBFS is Ubuntu specific for some reason. Note that it's not just a patch, but also three lines in d/rules. | 07:04 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> @tsimonq2, http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/06/19/qt-5-11-1-released/ | 12:13 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Thanks @mitya57 and @acheronuk | 15:33 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> I think instead of continuing, now that I have the core toolchain bootstrapped, I think I'll start over with 5.11.1 and qtbase in Debian and Ubuntu. | 17:43 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> It shouldn't be that hard to update things now that .0 is out of the way for them. | 17:43 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> I think the plan of action from here is to go full speed ahead updating to .1, and land that in Ubuntu/pass that off to @acheronuk for Plasma. From there, once I know Ubuntu's completely good, I'll request a transition slot for Debian and proceed there. | 17:48 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> I might land in Ubuntu first with the packages from Experimental pre-transition, then as soon as that's done, do the transition in Debian and let the packages flow down via the autosyncer. | 17:49 |
| lubot | <Santa> good afternoon | 17:57 |
| lubot | <Santa> @tsimonq2 do you have the 5.11 ubuntu work in git? | 17:58 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @Santa, Yes, in Salsa. | 17:59 |
| lubot | <Santa> ok, I was expecting an ubuntu/bionic branch here https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtbase/branches | 18:00 |
| lubot | <Santa> sorry, ubuntu/cosmic | 18:00 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> O_o | 18:00 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> There should be one there. | 18:01 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> just looked at the exact same url, and though the same | 18:01 |
| lubot | <mitya57> @tsimonq2, +1 | 18:01 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Awesome | 18:02 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> no cosmic for qtdeclarative either | 18:03 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> qtdeclarative gets synced | 18:03 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> The only things that should have Cosmic branches are qtbase and qtwebkit | 18:03 |
| lubot | <mitya57> Note that qtdeclarative *does* have a delta in Bionic. | 18:04 |
| lubot | <mitya57> And also qtmultimedia. | 18:04 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> All Qt packages have a delta in Bionic because we diverged from Debian. | 18:05 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> The only meaningful delta left in qtdeclarative were transitional packages that could be dropped. | 18:05 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> I'll just pull the ci-train sources for testing backport builds then | 18:05 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Am I wrong? | 18:05 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @acheronuk, This isn't all of it anyway | 18:06 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Just the core stuff | 18:06 |
| lubot | <mitya57> Hm, I meant real delta :) | 18:06 |
| lubot | qtdeclararive used to have a patch to fix breakage on arm64. Maybe it got dropped, but I don’t remember that. | 18:06 |
| lubot | qtmultimedia used to need some changes to account for OpenGL ES on arm64. | 18:06 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtdeclarative-opensource-src/5.9.1-4ubuntu1 | 18:07 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> That's Artful | 18:07 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> @tsimonq2, meaning you won't build all in ci-train to land? | 18:07 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @mitya57 Mind taking another look and seeing if I accidentally dropped meaningful qtdeclarative delta at one point? qtmultimedia is one I haven't even looked at yet. | 18:08 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @acheronuk, Well, not right now, but eventually | 18:08 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @acheronuk Were you going to backport 5.11 to Bionic for Backports? | 18:08 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Did you want me to do that? | 18:08 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> I don't mind who does it | 18:09 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> OK | 18:09 |
| lubot | <mitya57> @tsimonq2, If the whole Qt stack built fine without that patch, then dropping it was right. Looks like that is the case. | 18:09 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Qool :) | 18:10 |
| lubot | <mitya57> But the patch is still there :( | 18:11 |
| lubot | https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtdeclarative/blob/ubuntu/bionic/debian/patches/testcase_array_iteration.patch | 18:11 |
| lubot | <mitya57> So it just was not documented as a delta. | 18:11 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Ah. | 18:12 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> It seems to build fine without it though... 🤔 | 18:12 |
| lubot | <mitya57> qtdeclarative itself will build fine without it, but you might have problems in some other Qt modules. | 18:13 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> OK | 18:13 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Do you think it would hurt to pull that patch into Debian? | 18:14 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> If not, I'll just include it there when I get to it for 5.11.1. | 18:14 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Otherwise I can do a delta; it doesn't really matter to me. :) | 18:14 |
| lubot | <mitya57> It won’t hurt, but I cannot explain why this patch helps in Ubuntu, it is a dirty workaround for some crazy bug 😱 | 18:15 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Ah OK :) | 18:15 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> I'll put it in Debian then | 18:15 |
| lubot | <mitya57> Maybe first check if it is still needed — maybe that bug disappeared somehow | 18:17 |
| lubot | <mitya57> According to upstream bug https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-61579 you need to check if qtmultimedia tests pass on s390x without that patch | 18:17 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> OK | 18:21 |
| lubot | <Santa> @tsimonq2 @mitya57 it would be really helpful if we could have ubuntu/cosmic branches for all the git repositories (even if they just point to a debian branch if there's no delta) | 18:46 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @Santa, I'll get to it. | 18:47 |
| lubot | <Santa> @tsimonq2, Thank you | 18:48 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> yw | 18:48 |
| lubot | <Santa> @tsimonq2 sometimes in the past you have documented the bootstrap process, have you documented somewhere the one you are just doing right now? | 22:15 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @Santa, https://is.gd/GIZG9E | 22:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!