-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.39-0ubuntu1 => 1.40-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 00:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.39-0ubuntu1 => 1.41-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 00:12 | |
ginggs | would someone please 'force-badtest pyfai/0.15.0+dfsg1-1/amd64' ? It passed once by accident on 2018-06-01 http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/pyfai/cosmic/amd64 | 06:35 |
---|---|---|
RAOF | Bah! Why is gst-plugins-bad1.0 not migrating to cosmic? | 07:25 |
RAOF | It, and all of it's dependencies, appear to be valid candidates in update_excuses. | 07:26 |
apw | RAOF, your answer will be in update_output.txt | 07:29 |
RAOF | And update_output is rather inscrutable. | 07:29 |
RAOF | Is the skipped…. s390x: <big long list of packages> the list of packages that an update would make uninstallable? | 07:31 |
apw | RAOF, yeah so migrating all the valid things would make that mess (only one arch is reported iirc and not always the same one) | 07:33 |
apw | RAOF, pming you some bits | 07:33 |
Laney | It ends up being entangled in other transitions | 08:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dovecot (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.2.33.2-1ubuntu4 => 1:2.2.33.2-1ubuntu4.1] (ubuntu-server) | 08:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rfkill (xenial-proposed/main) [0.5-1ubuntu3 => 0.5-1ubuntu3.1] (desktop-core) | 10:23 | |
LocutusOfBorg | bdmurray, ^^ thanks for the reject :) | 10:28 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openipmi [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.22-1.1ubuntu2.1] | 11:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openipmi [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.22-1.1ubuntu1.1] | 11:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openipmi [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.18-0ubuntu11.2] | 11:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (artful-proposed) [3.186.3] | 11:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.192.1.1] | 11:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.168.9] | 11:42 | |
doko | RAOF: it usually helps if you can fix blocking issues | 11:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rfkill [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.5-1ubuntu3.1] | 11:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (artful-proposed) [1:17.10.15] | 11:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boinc [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.9.3+dfsg-5ubuntu2] | 12:06 | |
sil2100 | rbasak: would you mind if I review initramfs-tools for xenial/artful now? | 13:45 |
sil2100 | rbasak: I was supposed to review it yesterday but it had some issues that only got fixed after my EOD | 13:46 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openstack-trove [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:10.0.0~b1-0ubuntu1] | 13:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zaqar [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [7.0.0~b1-0ubuntu1] | 13:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sahara [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:9.0.0~b2-0ubuntu1] | 13:49 | |
rbasak | sil2100: sure - I'm done processing SRUs for today. | 13:58 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: networking-sfc [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [7.0.0~b2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 14:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: networking-ovn [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0~b2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 14:32 | |
juliank | Laney, sil2100 https://trello.com/c/RAnrwNw1/17-make-the-retry-button-reuse-the-same-triggers-as-the-last-run | 15:11 |
juliank | does this make sense, smarter retry button for autopkgtest? | 15:12 |
sil2100 | juliank: I would say yes, since I actually would expect it to work like that | 15:12 |
Laney | what makes the last set of triggers the right set and not someone randomly playing around (e.g. adding all-proposed)? | 15:14 |
Laney | Like, if you added a trigger and there's a retry button still, sounds like that means the run failed and the trigger wasn't right/enough anyway | 15:17 |
doko | Laney: how would you determine the minimal set of triggers? e.g. for vtk7, triggered by openmpi? | 15:24 |
Laney | doko: not sure what that has to do with what the retry button does? | 15:24 |
Laney | (Note that you can retry with a previous run's set of triggers from autopkgtest.u.c already) | 15:25 |
doko | I'm not aware of that. how would I do that? | 15:25 |
Laney | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/python-pydap/cosmic/armhf | 15:26 |
Laney | See the links there for example | 15:26 |
doko | hmm, so how did ginggs find out about these triggers? | 15:27 |
Laney | I don't know, some domain specific knowledge? | 15:27 |
Laney | This seems orthogonal to the original question to me | 15:28 |
doko | right, domain specific knowledge for any random package | 15:28 |
Laney | It would have been better for the maintainer to have specified that a newer numpy was required there. | 15:29 |
* ginggs searched for update_excuses for python-pydap looking for other packages that it needed to be tested against | 15:29 | |
doko | Laney: the original thing is that with every new openmpi upload, the tests triggered by openmpi are failing again. and how best to fix that | 15:30 |
Laney | The original thing to me was a question about uthe retry button. | 15:30 |
doko | yes, because I usually retrigger the openmpi tests with all-proposed=1 | 15:31 |
Laney | If new openmpi uploads break previously built things, it sounds like that should be expxressed in the package somehow. | 15:31 |
doko | so add a delta just for the autopkg tests and hope that nobody discards that with the next sync? | 15:31 |
Laney | I said 0 of the things you just asserted. | 15:32 |
doko | "should be expxressed in the package somehow" | 15:32 |
doko | but maybe I'm not reading between the lines | 15:33 |
Laney | It almost certainly should *not* be a delta, for one. | 15:33 |
Laney | And it's not clear that this would be "just" for the tests. | 15:33 |
Laney | If it's possible to install a broken set of packages, that'd probably apply to non-test usecases too. | 15:34 |
doko | so you mean to express this by a hint? | 15:34 |
Laney | No, more like a versioned package relationship. | 15:34 |
ginggs | a new upload of openmpi upload doesn't break things, britney runs the tests against the versions of the packages in testing instead of in proposed - all of the tests need to triggered again | 15:34 |
Laney | ginggs: What is wrong about the versions in testing that they fail? | 15:35 |
ginggs | Laney: they are compiled against openmpi2 not openmpi3 | 15:35 |
ginggs | this discussion should probably go to #debci | 15:36 |
ginggs | britney needs to learn there's a transition going on and trigger the right group of packages together | 15:36 |
Laney | Sorry, we went on an extreme tangent from a simple question about the generated retry button and I don't really have time to get into this in depth. | 15:39 |
ginggs | regarding the retry button, I think it would be really useful if successful tests also had a retry button, so I could copy the link and make a minor change | 15:39 |
ginggs | ...on this page http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/python-pydap/cosmic/armhf not update_excuses | 15:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (artful-proposed) [0.125ubuntu12.2] | 15:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.122ubuntu8.12] | 15:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networking-ovn [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [5.0.0~b2-0ubuntu2] | 16:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networking-sfc [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [7.0.0~b2-0ubuntu2] | 16:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: senlin [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [6.0.0~b2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:29 | |
mitya57 | Can someone please mark three autopkgtests that block sphinx migration as ignored failures? pyfai/amd64, python-asdf/armhf and xonsh (all archs) | 17:04 |
mitya57 | I have verified that they have nothing to do with sphinx, and not trivial to fix | 17:04 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-arioch-redis [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [3.2.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: c-sig [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.8-22] (no packageset) | 17:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-turbolinks-source [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [5.1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 17:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-ovn [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [13.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-websocket [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.2.5-1] (no packageset) | 17:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpdl-ccs-perl [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.23.8-1] (no packageset) | 17:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-congress [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [13.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xcite [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.60-4] (no packageset) | 17:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpdl-ccs-perl [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.23.8-1] (no packageset) | 17:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-gnocchi [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [13.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ironic-inspector [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [7.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-arioch-redis [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [3.2.0-1] | 17:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-gnocchi [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [13.1.0-1] | 17:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-congress [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [13.1.0-1] | 17:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-ovn [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [13.1.0-1] | 17:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted c-sig [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [3.8-22] | 17:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-turbolinks-source [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [5.1.0+dfsg-1] | 17:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted senlin [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [6.0.0~b2-0ubuntu1] | 17:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ironic-inspector [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [7.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 17:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xcite [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.60-4] | 17:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-websocket [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.2.5-1] | 17:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpdl-ccs-perl [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.23.8-1] | 17:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpdl-ccs-perl [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1.23.8-1] | 17:47 | |
doko | ginggs: r-base: r-cran-rmarkdown/armhf and /s390x, r-cran-yaml/i386 r-cran-memoise/armhf still failing. did you look at any of those? | 18:07 |
doko | no debian reports yet | 18:07 |
doko | r-cran-rmarkdown is a leaf package | 18:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.12.2.0~dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 18:37 | |
LocutusOfBorg | hello chrisccoulson, are you aware of the dh-cargo/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: cargo (>= 0.27.0-2) issue? | 18:51 |
ginggs | doko: r-cran-rmarkdown/armhf and /s390x is due to missing haskell/pandoc | 19:15 |
ginggs | doko: r-cran-yaml/i386 is a regression due to new r-cran-yaml, r-cran-memoise is a alignment regression due to new r-cran-memoise - none are caused by the new r-base | 19:16 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.12.2.0~dfsg-1] | 19:55 | |
ginggs | would someone please 'force-badtest pyfai/0.15.0+dfsg1-1/amd64' ? It passed once by accident on 2018-06-01 http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/pyfai/cosmic/amd64 | 20:22 |
* enyc sneezes.... | 21:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qemu-ovmf-secureboot (cosmic-proposed/primary) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1] | 22:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!