/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/06/20/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.39-0ubuntu1 => 1.40-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)00:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.39-0ubuntu1 => 1.41-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)00:12
ginggswould someone please 'force-badtest pyfai/0.15.0+dfsg1-1/amd64' ?  It passed once by accident on 2018-06-01  http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/pyfai/cosmic/amd6406:35
RAOFBah! Why is gst-plugins-bad1.0 not migrating to cosmic?07:25
RAOFIt, and all of it's dependencies, appear to be valid candidates in update_excuses.07:26
apwRAOF, your answer will be in update_output.txt07:29
RAOFAnd update_output is rather inscrutable.07:29
RAOFIs the skipped…. s390x:  <big long list of packages> the list of packages that an update would make uninstallable?07:31
apwRAOF, yeah so migrating all the valid things would make that mess (only one arch is reported iirc and not always the same one)07:33
apwRAOF, pming you some bits07:33
LaneyIt ends up being entangled in other transitions08:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dovecot (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.2.33.2-1ubuntu4 => 1:2.2.33.2-1ubuntu4.1] (ubuntu-server)08:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rfkill (xenial-proposed/main) [0.5-1ubuntu3 => 0.5-1ubuntu3.1] (desktop-core)10:23
LocutusOfBorgbdmurray, ^^ thanks for the reject :)10:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openipmi [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.22-1.1ubuntu2.1]11:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openipmi [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.22-1.1ubuntu1.1]11:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openipmi [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.18-0ubuntu11.2]11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (artful-proposed) [3.186.3]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.192.1.1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.168.9]11:42
dokoRAOF: it usually helps if you can fix blocking issues11:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rfkill [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.5-1ubuntu3.1]11:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (artful-proposed) [1:17.10.15]11:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boinc [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.9.3+dfsg-5ubuntu2]12:06
sil2100rbasak: would you mind if I review initramfs-tools for xenial/artful now?13:45
sil2100rbasak: I was supposed to review it yesterday but it had some issues that only got fixed after my EOD13:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openstack-trove [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:10.0.0~b1-0ubuntu1]13:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zaqar [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [7.0.0~b1-0ubuntu1]13:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sahara [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:9.0.0~b2-0ubuntu1]13:49
rbasaksil2100: sure - I'm done processing SRUs for today.13:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: networking-sfc [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [7.0.0~b2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)14:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: networking-ovn [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0~b2-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)14:32
juliankLaney, sil2100 https://trello.com/c/RAnrwNw1/17-make-the-retry-button-reuse-the-same-triggers-as-the-last-run15:11
juliankdoes this make sense, smarter retry button for autopkgtest?15:12
sil2100juliank: I would say yes, since I actually would expect it to work like that15:12
Laneywhat makes the last set of triggers the right set and not someone randomly playing around (e.g. adding all-proposed)?15:14
LaneyLike, if you added a trigger and there's a retry button still, sounds like that means the run failed and the trigger wasn't right/enough anyway15:17
dokoLaney: how would you determine the minimal set of triggers? e.g. for vtk7, triggered by openmpi?15:24
Laneydoko: not sure what that has to do with what the retry button does?15:24
Laney(Note that you can retry with a previous run's set of triggers from autopkgtest.u.c already)15:25
dokoI'm not aware of that. how would I do that?15:25
Laneyhttp://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/python-pydap/cosmic/armhf15:26
LaneySee the links there for example15:26
dokohmm, so how did ginggs find out about these triggers?15:27
LaneyI don't know, some domain specific knowledge?15:27
LaneyThis seems orthogonal to the original question to me15:28
dokoright, domain specific knowledge for any random package15:28
LaneyIt would have been better for the maintainer to have specified that a newer numpy was required there.15:29
* ginggs searched for update_excuses for python-pydap looking for other packages that it needed to be tested against15:29
dokoLaney: the original thing is that with every new openmpi upload, the tests triggered by openmpi are failing again. and how best to fix that15:30
LaneyThe original thing to me was a question about uthe retry button.15:30
dokoyes, because I usually retrigger the openmpi tests with all-proposed=115:31
LaneyIf new openmpi uploads break previously built things, it sounds like that should be expxressed in the package somehow.15:31
dokoso add a delta just for the autopkg tests and hope that nobody discards that with the next sync?15:31
LaneyI said 0 of the things you just asserted.15:32
doko"should be expxressed in the package somehow"15:32
dokobut maybe I'm not reading between the lines15:33
LaneyIt almost certainly should *not* be a delta, for one.15:33
LaneyAnd it's not clear that this would be "just" for the tests.15:33
LaneyIf it's possible to install a broken set of packages, that'd probably apply to non-test usecases too.15:34
dokoso you mean to express this by a hint?15:34
LaneyNo, more like a versioned package relationship.15:34
ginggsa new upload of openmpi upload doesn't break things, britney runs the tests against the versions of the packages in testing instead of in proposed - all of the tests need to triggered again15:34
Laneyginggs: What is wrong about the versions in testing that they fail?15:35
ginggsLaney: they are compiled against openmpi2 not openmpi315:35
ginggsthis discussion should probably go to #debci15:36
ginggsbritney needs to learn there's a transition going on and trigger the right group of packages together15:36
LaneySorry, we went on an extreme tangent from a simple question about the generated retry button and I don't really have time to get into this in depth.15:39
ginggsregarding the retry button, I think it would be really useful if successful tests also had a retry button, so I could copy the link and make a minor change15:39
ginggs...on this page http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/python-pydap/cosmic/armhf not update_excuses15:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (artful-proposed) [0.125ubuntu12.2]15:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.122ubuntu8.12]15:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networking-ovn [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [5.0.0~b2-0ubuntu2]16:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networking-sfc [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [7.0.0~b2-0ubuntu2]16:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: senlin [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [6.0.0~b2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)16:29
mitya57Can someone please mark three autopkgtests that block sphinx migration as ignored failures? pyfai/amd64, python-asdf/armhf and xonsh (all archs)17:04
mitya57I have verified that they have nothing to do with sphinx, and not trivial to fix17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-arioch-redis [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [3.2.0-1] (no packageset)17:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: c-sig [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.8-22] (no packageset)17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-turbolinks-source [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [5.1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-ovn [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [13.1.0-1] (no packageset)17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-websocket [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.2.5-1] (no packageset)17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpdl-ccs-perl [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.23.8-1] (no packageset)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-congress [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [13.1.0-1] (no packageset)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xcite [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.60-4] (no packageset)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpdl-ccs-perl [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.23.8-1] (no packageset)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-gnocchi [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [13.1.0-1] (no packageset)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ironic-inspector [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [7.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)17:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-arioch-redis [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [3.2.0-1]17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-gnocchi [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [13.1.0-1]17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-congress [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [13.1.0-1]17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-ovn [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [13.1.0-1]17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted c-sig [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [3.8-22]17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-turbolinks-source [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [5.1.0+dfsg-1]17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted senlin [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [6.0.0~b2-0ubuntu1]17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ironic-inspector [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [7.3.0-0ubuntu1]17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xcite [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.60-4]17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-websocket [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.2.5-1]17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpdl-ccs-perl [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.23.8-1]17:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpdl-ccs-perl [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1.23.8-1]17:47
dokoginggs: r-base:  r-cran-rmarkdown/armhf and /s390x, r-cran-yaml/i386 r-cran-memoise/armhf  still failing. did you look at any of those?18:07
dokono debian reports yet18:07
dokor-cran-rmarkdown is a leaf package18:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: monero [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.12.2.0~dfsg-1] (no packageset)18:37
LocutusOfBorghello chrisccoulson, are you aware of the dh-cargo/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: cargo (>= 0.27.0-2)  issue?18:51
ginggsdoko:  r-cran-rmarkdown/armhf and /s390x is due to missing haskell/pandoc19:15
ginggsdoko:  r-cran-yaml/i386 is a regression due to new r-cran-yaml, r-cran-memoise is a alignment regression due to new r-cran-memoise - none are caused by the new r-base19:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted monero [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.12.2.0~dfsg-1]19:55
ginggswould someone please 'force-badtest pyfai/0.15.0+dfsg1-1/amd64' ?  It passed once by accident on 2018-06-01  http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/pyfai/cosmic/amd6420:22
* enyc sneezes....21:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qemu-ovmf-secureboot (cosmic-proposed/primary) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1]22:38

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!