| jamesh | robert_ancell: for the issue of gnome-software claiming to handle snap URIs on installs without the plugin, one option would be for it to install separate desktop files for each URI scheme handler (using NoDisplay=true so they don't clutter menus) | 02:01 |
|---|---|---|
| jamesh | robert_ancell: that way the scheme handlers could be packaged with the plugins on distros that split it into multiple binary packages | 02:02 |
| VoltronDikz | Hi guys. How yall doing? | 02:38 |
| VoltronDikz | Quick question. I have a 18.04 iso. | 02:38 |
| jamesh | oh? | 02:39 |
| VoltronDikz | What am I running? kde, Gnome, ??? Am confused and trying to config some Icons but I can't find a way to do so. | 02:39 |
| jamesh | VoltronDikz: the default desktop is GNOME 3 with an extension to show an icon dock on the left. | 02:40 |
| jamesh | (basically to give something that should be familiar to both people coming from Unity 7 in previous releases, and people who have used other GNOME 3 based desktops) | 02:41 |
| VoltronDikz | I am trying to resize (make way smaller) the icons on the center page when clicking show programs. | 03:16 |
| VoltronDikz | I am not talking about the ICON DOCK. | 03:16 |
| VoltronDikz | Could not find 1 good and simple way to resize and compact to have more apps showing. | 03:16 |
| VoltronDikz | Anybody? | 03:16 |
| jamesh | VoltronDikz: I don't know if there is a preference for that. Maybe there is an extension that can help with that at https://extensions.gnome.org/ ? | 03:23 |
| duflu | VoltronDikz, having fixed a bug in that area recently I think it is hard coded :( But yes extensions can change some things that are otherwise hard coded | 03:24 |
| duflu | (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/90) | 03:24 |
| gitlab-bot | GNOME bug (Merge request) 90 in gnome-shell "Display full application names under their icons" (comments: 9) [Closed] | 03:24 |
| duflu | Hmm, did I break my theming in cosmic or did an update? | 03:28 |
| duflu | My fault. 'dconf reset -f /org/gnome/' to the rescue. | 03:31 |
| VoltronDikz | duflu so basically no way to resize / schrink those icons in middle of screen right? | 03:33 |
| duflu | VoltronDikz, it might be possible using an extension. Because the high-level design of the shell (and extensions) is all in JavaScript and it's easy to tinker. But no I can't find any proper configuration option | 03:34 |
| didrocks | good morning | 05:16 |
| === ecloud_wfh is now known as ecloud | ||
| duflu | Morning didrocks | 05:39 |
| didrocks | hey duflu | 05:42 |
| jibel | Good morning every one | 05:45 |
| duflu | Morning jibel | 05:46 |
| didrocks | salut jibel | 05:47 |
| jamesh | hi didrocks, jibel | 05:47 |
| didrocks | hey jamesh | 05:47 |
| duflu | Oh, hi jamesh :) | 06:10 |
| duflu | And hi bschaefer, seb128 | 06:10 |
| seb128 | hey duflu, how are you? | 06:11 |
| seb128 | good morning desktopers | 06:11 |
| duflu | Doing OK seb128. You? | 06:11 |
| seb128 | I'm fine, need some coffee though! | 06:11 |
| didrocks | salut seb128! | 06:13 |
| seb128 | lut didrocks | 07:42 |
| alexarnaud | Good morning all | 07:54 |
| willcooke | morning | 07:55 |
| thumper | morning willcooke | 07:56 |
| willcooke | hey thumper, how goes? | 07:58 |
| seb128 | hey alexarnaud willcooke | 07:58 |
| thumper | willcooke: pretty good | 07:58 |
| thumper | as in I'm pretty good at procrastinating doing performance reviews | 07:59 |
| willcooke | thumper, ha! It does drag on. Every year I say to myself "If I just made some notes once a month then reviews would be easy" | 08:00 |
| willcooke | never happens | 08:00 |
| thumper | hah | 08:00 |
| thumper | yeah | 08:00 |
| didrocks | hey willcooke, thumper | 08:00 |
| thumper | o/ didrocks, seb128 | 08:01 |
| Laney | hey | 08:01 |
| didrocks | morning Laney | 08:01 |
| didrocks | thumper: nice tweet! +1 | 08:01 |
| didrocks | (pun intended) | 08:02 |
| thumper | hah | 08:02 |
| * thumper is going through CVs again | 08:02 | |
| duflu | Morning willcooke | 08:02 |
| duflu | Evening thumper | 08:03 |
| duflu | Morning Laney | 08:03 |
| thumper | o/ duflu | 08:08 |
| Laney | happy solstice | 08:08 |
| seb128 | hey Laney, ah indeed, happy summer day! | 08:17 |
| Laney | hey seb128 | 08:20 |
| Laney | look at it negatively - all downhill from here towards winter | 08:20 |
| * duflu looks uphill | 08:23 | |
| seb128 | and winter is not downhill, it's time to drink hot beverages next to the fire | 08:24 |
| seb128 | which is nice as well :) | 08:24 |
| Laney | damn it | 08:24 |
| Laney | you win this one, positivitiy | 08:24 |
| duflu | That's true. It's interesting Europeans celebrate winter outdoors more than those of us with warmer winters | 08:24 |
| duflu | indoors and outdoors | 08:25 |
| duflu | markets and all | 08:25 |
| Laney | need less incentive to get people to go out? | 08:28 |
| willcooke | 186 days to Christmas | 08:31 |
| Laney | that sound quite short | 08:33 |
| Laney | better get shopping | 08:33 |
| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| xnox | willcooke, I❤🎄 | 09:39 |
| willcooke | :DD | 09:39 |
| Laney | tjaalton: do you like https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/VPjjHq2Qcy/ ? | 10:30 |
| Laney | just been reviewing that for Marco, seems good to me, if you like it I'll upload to the silo | 10:30 |
| Laney | & for the SRUs with adjusted versions | 10:30 |
| tjaalton | Laney: yep, looks good to me | 10:31 |
| Laney | 👍 | 10:31 |
| tjaalton | I'll commit it to diff | 10:32 |
| tjaalton | err | 10:32 |
| tjaalton | git | 10:32 |
| Laney | thx | 10:33 |
| Laney | I can make branches if that's good for you | 10:33 |
| tjaalton | sure | 10:33 |
| tjaalton | could migrate that out of salsa | 10:33 |
| Laney | no bother to me | 10:33 |
| Laney | gimme a bit, will put up MRs | 10:34 |
| seb128 | Nafallo, could you reply on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1773213 ? | 11:08 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1773213 in gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu Bionic) "U1 login dialog missing link to the privacy policy" [High,Fix committed] | 11:08 |
| Nafallo | seb128: sure. | 11:10 |
| seb128 | thx | 11:10 |
| Nafallo | I thought that was obvious... but yeah :-P | 11:11 |
| Nafallo | seb128: morning btw ;-) | 11:12 |
| seb128 | good morning indeed :) | 11:12 |
| seb128 | I think the SRU team started requesting the version because some users did test wrong versions and gave confusing feedback about fixes not working | 11:13 |
| seb128 | it makes easier to tell them "no, you are not using the SRU version" :) | 11:13 |
| Nafallo | oooh. lastpass-cli finally landed in -updates. | 11:16 |
| Nafallo | my first upload in YEARS accepted :-) | 11:16 |
| seb128 | jibel, looks like robert_ancell update bug #1768744 so maybe you can verify that one now? | 11:17 |
| seb128 | Nafallo, congrats :) | 11:17 |
| ubot5 | bug 1768744 in gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu Bionic) "Crash when unable to get installed snaps" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1768744 | 11:17 |
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|lunch | ||
| seb128 | jibel, bug #1766277 updated as well if you can test | 11:42 |
| ubot5 | bug 1766277 in gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu Bionic) "Ubuntu changes graphic is not translatable" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766277 | 11:42 |
| Laney | aha | 11:58 |
| Mirv | I updated ubuntu-software on my xenial work laptop and at least now it crashes every time on startup for me personally (sorry, not sure what was the situation earlier, I usually use synaptic but decided to try gnome-software now after I saw it updated). if you have the permission, you should quickly check if it seems worrying at https://errors.ubuntu.com/oops/b1fd9ff8-7549-11e8-bea3-fa163eec78fa (I | 11:58 |
| Mirv | don't have permission) | 11:58 |
| Mirv | would ping robert_ancell but he's not around atm | 11:58 |
| Mirv | I did reboot too | 11:58 |
| jibel | seb128, sure thing. I'll finish the verification. | 12:01 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk | ||
| === pstolowski|lunch is now known as pstolowski | ||
| Laney | tjaalton: https://salsa.debian.org/laney/xorg.git ubuntu ubuntu-xenial ubuntu-artful ubuntu-bionic | 12:50 |
| Laney | I couldn't find a commit that matched what's in artful atm so I made one up | 12:50 |
| tjaalton | Laney: ah, I assumed you'd have created them on lp :P but this works too | 12:51 |
| Laney | nice fork button on salsa :P | 12:52 |
| * Laney checks debdiffs and then uploads to the silo | 12:52 | |
| willcooke | Mirv, thanks for the info. Seems to work fine on a Xenial VM, so I don't think it's a huge issue, but I'll email Robert and get him to check oit | 13:05 |
| willcooke | it | 13:05 |
| Laney | (force pushed again to move an echo) | 13:09 |
| tjaalton | Laney: oh, looks like I have ubuntu-artful locally.. anyway, did you create a merge request? | 13:16 |
| Trevinho | Laney: as per "local", I knew about... But, it's also true that debian' sh supports it and that many debian scripts use it. Including the ones mentioned in the debian wiki I was using before for removing the conffiles, so I decided to keep it | 13:17 |
| Trevinho | grep "local " /var/lib/dpkg/info/* | wc -l => 380 | 13:18 |
| Trevinho | here | 13:18 |
| === alan_g|afk is now known as alan_g | ||
| seb128 | willcooke, Mirv, that looks like the same than https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=974806 which was fixed upstream in 2016 but not in the 3.20 serie | 13:36 |
| ubot5 | bugzilla.opensuse.org bug 974806 in GNOME "Gnome-software crashes every time (after enabling of a certain obs repository)" [Critical,Resolved: fixed] | 13:36 |
| seb128 | there are 3k reports of that issue on 16.04 which is not very high | 13:36 |
| seb128 | the e.u.c report also suggests it's indeed fixed in > 3.20 | 13:37 |
| seb128 | jibel, thanks for the gnome-software SRU verifications! | 14:11 |
| Laney | tjaalton: nah, do you want one? I was hoping you'd just pull my branches :P | 14:29 |
| seb128 | tjaalton, I guess fixing the libinput build is on your todolist? it seems that the .symbols needs and update which should be easy? | 14:45 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, hey, what's the status of gnome-shell 3.28.2? | 14:51 |
| Trevinho | seb128: it's waiting review | 14:52 |
| seb128 | where and who did you ask about reviewing it? | 14:52 |
| Trevinho | https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+git/gnome-shell/ | 14:52 |
| Trevinho | didrocks is going to take that | 14:52 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, what about the bionic SRU? | 14:53 |
| Trevinho | seb128: didrocks was saying that we'll just sync them | 14:54 |
| Trevinho | as there's no actual fork in between the two | 14:54 |
| seb128 | sync? | 14:54 |
| Trevinho | so far | 14:54 |
| seb128 | ah | 14:54 |
| Trevinho | I mean push that one on bionic too | 14:54 |
| Trevinho | without branching | 14:54 |
| Trevinho | I did a bionic branch first, but so we decided | 14:54 |
| seb128 | Marco, marco, maaarrccooo | 14:55 |
| Trevinho | what? | 14:55 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, none of the bugs listed in the changelog are SRU compliant atm, some have testcases but they all need proper "impact/test case/regression potential" sections | 14:56 |
| seb128 | also some of the cherry pick have no bugs associated | 14:57 |
| didrocks | well, to be exact, I'm waiting for the latest correct edits on the wiki page | 14:57 |
| seb128 | unsure the SRU team is going to like that | 14:57 |
| didrocks | then, replay on nautilus | 14:57 |
| didrocks | then replay on the gnome-shell branch | 14:57 |
| didrocks | and I can review | 14:57 |
| seb128 | nautilus? | 14:57 |
| didrocks | yeah | 14:57 |
| seb128 | why is nautilus blocked our gnome-shell SRU? | 14:57 |
| didrocks | because there is the case that wasn't taken if we merge bzr branch | 14:57 |
| * seb128 got lost | 14:57 | |
| didrocks | I want the instructions to be correct | 14:57 |
| didrocks | right now, they aren't | 14:57 |
| didrocks | because there are cases you have unreleased commits in bzr | 14:58 |
| seb128 | k, I get that part | 14:58 |
| didrocks | which wasn't taken into account and may impact the import procedure | 14:58 |
| seb128 | is nautilus another SRU/discussion? | 14:58 |
| seb128 | with similar issues | 14:58 |
| seb128 | sorry I just got lost :p | 14:58 |
| Trevinho | seb128: bugs, I'm updating them once we are ok wit the review, I won't do that earlier | 14:58 |
| didrocks | *shrugh* basically, right now, it's now pending on me | 14:59 |
| didrocks | contrary to what was left thinking to you | 14:59 |
| didrocks | I'm only talking about the git branch | 15:00 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, maybe linking that update/SRU to the git conversion wasn't a smart idea | 15:01 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, we are delaying fixes by weeks just because internal workflow issues | 15:02 |
| seb128 | we should have done them with the etablished tools | 15:02 |
| seb128 | out of the way | 15:02 |
| seb128 | then iterated with the vcs and tweaks when there was no real world issues being taken hostage | 15:02 |
| Trevinho | seb128: eh, well it would have come one day or another... | 15:02 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, read what I wrote? | 15:02 |
| seb128 | it can come | 15:03 |
| seb128 | not delay LTS fixes | 15:03 |
| seb128 | come on, you can agree it makes sense to not delay fixes when we can land the SRU and then deal with the vcs problems no? | 15:03 |
| Trevinho | it wasn't my expectation | 15:03 |
| seb128 | rather than the other way around | 15:03 |
| Trevinho | yeah, sure... | 15:03 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: can we move on with gnome-shell itself first? As that is following anyway the process already. So we can start with the content first. Then update the others | 15:06 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: have you changed the tag and commit message? | 15:06 |
| didrocks | I doubt, the branch hasn't been updated for 15h | 15:07 |
| Trevinho | tag was there | 15:07 |
| didrocks | commit message? and you redid with our latest changes? | 15:07 |
| didrocks | because the "it shouldn't imapct", remember that you thought that in the order you wrote for replaying the history :p | 15:07 |
| didrocks | so theory is nice | 15:08 |
| didrocks | checking with following the steps is better | 15:08 |
| didrocks | as seb128 told anyway, no bug is SRU compliant, so, as a first step, they should be converted | 15:10 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, right, no reason that the bugs need to come after the Vcs is ready | 15:11 |
| didrocks | if you want to unrelate the 2, get a .dsc ready for cosmic and bionic | 15:11 |
| didrocks | get that sponsored | 15:11 |
| didrocks | then, you can replay that with commits in the Vcs | 15:12 |
| didrocks | you can even add them to the bzr VCS to test your conversion :p | 15:12 |
| Trevinho | this is just a bit loosing time | 15:12 |
| didrocks | all those bzr history change is a lost of time IMHO | 15:13 |
| seb128 | you mean that week wasted on trying to deal with Vcs tweaks? | 15:13 |
| didrocks | but I've already stated that and didn't convince you apparently | 15:13 |
| Trevinho | it's not the only thing I'm doing, but I want to follow things in a logical order that allows to keep what we did. But anyway, the process itself it's not lost time imho. it's more going back and forth on bzr stuff again when a branch is ready and we can work on that, if content needs fixes | 15:15 |
| Trevinho | also, on mutter side... I prepared also a branch, but in that case we can be in sync with debian.. So can we do that? Our *ubuntu* package is just a change of mine which is already in debian anyway | 15:16 |
| Trevinho | anyway, i can update the bzr too if you want, since anyway having the git branch around helps in having that quickly too | 15:17 |
| Trevinho | seb128: and bugs, I checked again all the ones I cherry-picked from upstream are in gnome-2-28 branch so will be next .3. Then there ar two patches which have no unbutu bug attached, should I create them? As they are already upstream, so I though it was something not eneded | 15:18 |
| Laney | you don't need explicit SRU verification for patches coming from the point release | 15:20 |
| Laney | for cherry picks or downstream patches, you do | 15:20 |
| Laney | (that's a gnome specific policy) | 15:20 |
| Trevinho | "SRU verification for patches coming from the point release" so this doesn't applies to point-release-branches? | 15:22 |
| Laney | no | 15:22 |
| Laney | that combination hasn't been blessed by upstream yet | 15:22 |
| Laney | so we need to test it | 15:22 |
| Trevinho | mh, I see | 15:23 |
| Trevinho | let me decide weather drop them or not then | 15:23 |
| Laney | it's OK to include them, they just need a proper SRU bug | 15:24 |
| Trevinho | yes, sure | 15:25 |
| Trevinho | that's the thing, I want to see that | 15:25 |
| Laney | in terms of workflow arguments | 15:25 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, what Iain said | 15:25 |
| Laney | didrock_s or whoever is sponsoring can build the dsc out of git currently and sponsor it as if it has no VCS for now | 15:26 |
| Laney | then if there's any delta required that can be resolved as another commit | 15:26 |
| Laney | like sidestep the argument to get the upload done | 15:26 |
| Laney | without having to go redo on bzr or whatever | 15:26 |
| Trevinho | yeah, that would be the way... And since I can't do that, it's not something I can go forward.. It's up to one of you guys to pick the content, review and push to ubuntu, as it's a step I can't do. And vcs could or could not match it. | 15:28 |
| seb128 | Laney, if that doesn't get sorted out tomorrow then the SRU might be a good thing for you and Marco to resolve at the sun sprint :) | 15:28 |
| Trevinho | I mean I got the content ready quickly, true that i invested some time in the infrastructure too, but it's something I care, and that didn't cause the content to differ. | 15:29 |
| Trevinho | "content" as debian/* | 15:29 |
| Trevinho | and that was pushed last friday | 15:29 |
| Laney | seb128: Not sure I could help any more than didrock____s who already has the context on this, but OK if necessary ... | 15:30 |
| seb128 | Laney, Didier has been reviewing the git side, he didn't look at it from a SRU perspective from what he said | 15:32 |
| seb128 | or sponsoring | 15:32 |
| Laney | it was going to be him and Olivier working on it originally | 15:32 |
| Laney | before all this business | 15:32 |
| Laney | anyway whatever, but it's probably not going to be tomorrow for me | 15:32 |
| seb128 | right | 15:33 |
| seb128 | no worry | 15:33 |
| didrocks | right, then, trevhino told he has done it :p | 15:33 |
| didrocks | which is where the delay started | 15:33 |
| didrocks | I can have a look tomorrow at it, not today for sure | 15:33 |
| seb128 | well, let's see if Didier feels like doing the sponsoring this week, if not we can see on monday who feels like doing it | 15:33 |
| didrocks | if the bug follow the SRU process at least | 15:34 |
| Laney | yeah sry, I thought you were signed up to review the SRU too, maybe my mistake | 15:34 |
| seb128 | didrocks, Laney, Trevinho, thanks guys :) | 15:34 |
| * seb128 steps out for a bit | 15:34 | |
| seb128 | bbl | 15:34 |
| Trevinho | ok, I've also go to buy stuff | 15:34 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: so, let's forget about the git side, ensure all bugs follow SRU and email me/share with me a debdiff for cosmic and bionic | 15:34 |
| Trevinho | it looks like you guys don't need anything special as there was nothing more in the shopping list, right (Laney,seb128)? | 15:35 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: ok, I mean if you've time check also the git side of things, but no need to hurry for that | 15:36 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: I will as said once you have replayed all steps on a new virgin branch | 15:39 |
| didrocks | to ensure nothing is missing | 15:39 |
| didrocks | and that it has enw commit messages | 15:39 |
| didrocks | (which isn't the case right now) | 15:39 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: so, if the branch is ready for tomorrow, for both cosmic and bionic, this is enough | 15:39 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: it was a virgin one the one where I replayed all the things.... It was last night though | 15:40 |
| Trevinho | should I do that again for real? Not that it would take time, but it's just the same :) | 15:41 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: it won't be the same, we changed at least the commit message, didn't we? | 15:41 |
| didrocks | as told for the 3rd time here | 15:41 |
| Trevinho | well, that is just an amend xD | 15:42 |
| Trevinho | or rebase | 15:42 |
| didrocks | ah, you didn't change it | 15:42 |
| didrocks | despite my suggestion :/ | 15:42 |
| didrocks | yeah, but I want to replay as we reshuffled | 15:42 |
| didrocks | please take my suggestion about changing the commit message into account | 15:42 |
| didrocks | "debian subtree" is confusing and undeed, just change it by "branch" | 15:43 |
| didrocks | uneeded | 15:44 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: didn't I on the wiki? :o | 15:45 |
| didrocks | or my F5 is broken | 15:46 |
| didrocks | git commit -m "Importing lp:~ubuntu-desktop/gnome-control-center/ubuntu debian subtree" | 15:46 |
| didrocks | this is what I still see | 15:47 |
| * didrocks hopes everyone will run git gc --aggressive on branches and not miss that step, or the git clone will take forever for everyone | 15:47 | |
| Trevinho | --agressive! | 15:48 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: there is no -a to add to that commit? | 15:48 |
| didrocks | git read-tree won't restore debian/ dir? | 15:49 |
| didrocks | so you need to restage them, correct? | 15:49 |
| Trevinho | no, theres' no need for that | 15:50 |
| Trevinho | git read-tree will do it | 15:50 |
| didrocks | didn't know it was staging them | 15:51 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: wasn't "Importing lp:~ubuntu-desktop/gnome-control-center/ubuntu debian subtree" the one you proposed? | 15:51 |
| didrocks | ah right, I was puzzled by the second discussion about 7. | 15:52 |
| Trevinho | eh, see :D | 15:52 |
| didrocks | what do you think about changing debian subtree by "branch"? | 15:52 |
| didrocks | in the whole document | 15:52 |
| Trevinho | ok that's fine too | 15:52 |
| Trevinho | I mean no to be too technical | 15:52 |
| Trevinho | eventuall it's not needed to konw that | 15:52 |
| Trevinho | know* | 15:52 |
| Trevinho | ok branch it is now | 15:53 |
| didrocks | can I f5? | 15:53 |
| Trevinho | if it works :-D | 15:53 |
| * didrocks tries this intriguing tech | 15:54 | |
| didrocks | hum | 15:55 |
| didrocks | 7. Modify or create gbp.conf containing: | 15:55 |
| didrocks | then 7a if you… | 15:55 |
| didrocks | this is not what we discussed? | 15:55 |
| didrocks | I think we should have: 8. If you imported bzr ubuntu history | 15:55 |
| didrocks | 8a. If you add pending changes in bzr after release: | 15:56 |
| didrocks | 8b. Remove the temporary ubuntu-bzr remote | 15:56 |
| Trevinho | ah, it was misleading the log | 15:56 |
| didrocks | yeah, only spotted it in seeing the whole page as well | 15:56 |
| didrocks | but clearly, step 4 and 8 now are "if you want to import bzr history" | 15:56 |
| didrocks | (then we have 4a, 4b…4f and 8a, 8b) | 15:57 |
| Trevinho | k | 15:57 |
| didrocks | "and I hope you did" | 15:57 |
| didrocks | as told, I tried to remove all "I" in tech docs and personal opinions :p | 15:58 |
| Trevinho | irc reviews are the worst thing in the world :-D | 15:58 |
| didrocks | that was on the logs ;) | 15:58 |
| didrocks | yeah, should be an etherpad | 15:58 |
| Trevinho | yes, but we talk a lot :-D | 15:58 |
| Trevinho | I mean it's a wiki already | 15:58 |
| didrocks | yeah, but no parallel writes/comments | 15:59 |
| Trevinho | you can fix things too as in writing is normally faster than at 4 hands | 15:59 |
| Trevinho | yep, etherpad next time | 15:59 |
| didrocks | but there are locks… | 15:59 |
| didrocks | and TBH, you wanted to have those steps | 15:59 |
| Trevinho | I know , i know | 15:59 |
| didrocks | unfair to ask other to fix them afterwards | 15:59 |
| Trevinho | the wording I mean | 15:59 |
| didrocks | so, once done | 16:00 |
| didrocks | really, reprepare a gnome-shell to valid all steps once again | 16:00 |
| didrocks | (you have no idea how many times I did previously for g-c-c, to revalidate I didn't miss anything) | 16:00 |
| didrocks | and create a maintenance branch for bionic (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/git#Create_a_maintenance_branch) | 16:00 |
| didrocks | then, I'll review that | 16:00 |
| didrocks | sounds ok? | 16:01 |
| Trevinho | ah, so you want the bionic now? | 16:01 |
| Trevinho | k | 16:01 |
| didrocks | well | 16:01 |
| didrocks | as we are going to upload | 16:01 |
| Trevinho | we're not goiung to diverge yet | 16:01 |
| Trevinho | yeah that was my point | 16:01 |
| Trevinho | of having different changelogs | 16:01 |
| didrocks | yes, but SRU team won't copy your pacakge | 16:02 |
| didrocks | so, we need to have different changelog | 16:02 |
| didrocks | prepare master for the cosmic upoad | 16:02 |
| didrocks | prepare master for the cosmic upload | 16:02 |
| Trevinho | I'll do a debdiff first though | 16:02 |
| didrocks | then I would say branch with commit -1 | 16:02 |
| didrocks | change gbp.conf | 16:02 |
| didrocks | as in the wiki | 16:02 |
| didrocks | for bionic | 16:02 |
| Trevinho | yeah, I read | 16:02 |
| didrocks | I'll review them tomorrow | 16:03 |
| Trevinho | good | 16:03 |
| didrocks | so if redoing the branches is faster for you than the debdiff, don't bother | 16:03 |
| Trevinho | well, should be the same | 16:03 |
| Trevinho | but if we can i'd prefer to do one time only | 16:04 |
| Trevinho | if you're checking those tomorrow anyway I'm doing this later though | 16:04 |
| Trevinho | or shops will close | 16:04 |
| Trevinho | otherwise I can do it now, if you're not leaving (but i guess it's time for you) | 16:05 |
| didrocks | I'm going to step out before the GNOME board meeting | 16:05 |
| didrocks | extra special meeting, thinking my time was almost over with one evening meeting, but no, a second special one, last minute surprise! :) | 16:05 |
| didrocks | so, TBH, I will just attend that meeting now and sign off ;) | 16:05 |
| Trevinho | :) | 16:05 |
| Trevinho | k | 16:05 |
| Trevinho | so i can send you this so you look at it tomorrow I guess | 16:06 |
| didrocks | yes! :) | 16:06 |
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk | ||
| seb128 | Trevinho, @shopping, I don't, thanks for asking :) | 16:22 |
| Trevinho | we'd have to go buy stuff anyway during the week maybe | 16:23 |
| Trevinho | but dinners will be out I guess | 16:23 |
| Laney | Trevinho: sous vide! | 16:24 |
| Laney | https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/SystemdUser | 16:57 |
| Laney | going to start filling that table out tomorrow | 16:57 |
| Laney | probably won't be online first thing in the morning, going to be heading to the train | 16:58 |
| Mirv | seb128: willcooke: right, thanks, so not a new bug, I'm just hitting it | 17:03 |
| === Guest16456 is now known as jose | ||
| seb128 | Laney, nice, happy train journey :) | 17:51 |
| willcooke | night all | 17:53 |
| Trevinho | Laney: I've everything for it... We'll just buy the meat the same day | 18:39 |
| tjaalton | seb128: huh, somehow built fine here, dpkg-gensymbols only warned about the new symbols | 18:56 |
| tjaalton | I'll bump it to 1.11.1 too | 19:02 |
| tjaalton | Laney: well, it's a one click operation to ack (fast-forward) merge requests | 19:02 |
| tjaalton | but sure, I'll add a new remote ;) | 19:03 |
| seb128 | tjaalton, unsure what's different about the buildd env, but it failed in Debian and Ubuntu ... thanks for fixing :) | 19:03 |
| tjaalton | yeah I've poked folks to tell me what's wrong :) | 19:04 |
| seb128 | tjaalton, do you plan to SRU some 1.10 update? or maybe directly 1.11? | 19:05 |
| tjaalton | the last 1.10.x maybe | 19:05 |
| tjaalton | 1.11 changes things too much for sru I think | 19:06 |
| seb128 | k, makes sense | 19:09 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!