| === havenstance1 is now known as havenstance | ||
| === havenstance1 is now known as havenstance | ||
| === havenstance1 is now known as havenstance | ||
| didrocks | good morning | 06:40 |
|---|---|---|
| duflu | Hi didrocks | 06:53 |
| === pstolowski|afk is now known as pstolowski | ||
| willcooke | morning all | 07:40 |
| willcooke | morning sun sprinters | 07:40 |
| didrocks | hey willcooke! | 07:45 |
| willcooke | morning didrocks, how goes? | 07:46 |
| didrocks | willcooke: sunny, trying to invite in the condo the morning cool temperature ;) | 07:47 |
| Laney | 😅 | 07:47 |
| didrocks | hey Laney! How is Italy? | 07:47 |
| Laney | hey didrocks! | 07:47 |
| Laney | very pleasant so far | 07:48 |
| Laney | we got the country place at like 2am | 07:48 |
| Laney | so slightly late start today | 07:48 |
| Laney | not as warm here as the city but it's a nice temperature for working | 07:48 |
| Laney | those guys are messing around trying to make the gas work | 07:48 |
| didrocks | :p | 07:49 |
| didrocks | I still need Trevhino to fix the SRU branch! | 07:49 |
| duflu | Morning willcooke, Laney | 07:49 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: once you are aroud, your master branch is good. However, the maintenance branch isn't and isn't buildable: referencing an upstream branch which isn't needed, still referencing ubuntu/master. Just follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/git#Create_a_maintenance_branch as I pointed the other day please | 07:51 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: also, the bugs doesn't follow the SRU procedure despite asking multiple times :/ | 07:51 |
| seb128 | good morning desktopers | 08:00 |
| didrocks | hey seb128! How is Italy? | 08:00 |
| seb128 | didrocks, he's making coffee/we are eating, as L_aney said, slightly delayed start today | 08:01 |
| didrocks | seb128: make him drinking double coffee so that he follow closely the link I gave to him :p | 08:01 |
| seb128 | didrocks, great! Marco has been doing a great job at showing us around this w.e :) and his house here is great | 08:01 |
| seb128 | haha | 08:01 |
| didrocks | (same than Friday, the link didn't change :p) | 08:01 |
| didrocks | nice! | 08:01 |
| didrocks | saw some pictures, seems you are all having fine | 08:02 |
| didrocks | and eating (or not) properly | 08:02 |
| seb128 | lol | 08:25 |
| didrocks | apport……… bpport……… cpport……… dpport……… | 08:29 |
| * didrocks is doing ascii art for tests, as apport has those (missing some as well, completing…) | 08:30 | |
| seb128 | hahaha | 08:31 |
| Trevinho | morninggg | 08:31 |
| andyrock | morning | 08:32 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: dbp.conf you mean? | 08:32 |
| didrocks | hey Trevinho, andyrock | 08:32 |
| Trevinho | Might be, as I had to revert things and back... I'm checking | 08:32 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: that, and the fact that you add commit after releasing cosmic | 08:32 |
| Trevinho | as per SRU bug, I wanted to be OK'd before, updating them is comging later, as I said | 08:32 |
| didrocks | I think you should fork on -1 | 08:33 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: let me see | 08:33 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: I don't see how updating the blog is blocking on the branch | 08:33 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: as per the fork point, right now is before the C changelog, where you wanted that? | 08:42 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: not what I see | 08:47 |
| didrocks | 5742a8d2a8ecaf5b6f0c64d4434666910128e430 has the released commit as parent, no? | 08:48 |
| didrocks | let me check, maybe it's gitg playing with me | 08:49 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: yeah, ok, gitg is confusing, if I use my old good git log, this looks correct and we agreed, as I wanted | 08:49 |
| didrocks | so basically, only debian/gbp.conf is wrong | 08:49 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: yeah, I've fixed already I was waiting your answer to push. now it's there | 08:58 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: if you're ok with all the bugs, I'm going to update them | 08:59 |
| Trevinho | oh, need to tag | 08:59 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: you want me to change the ownership to ~canonical-desktop-team so you can then change it to ~desktop-team without having to re-push? | 09:00 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: I'm going to just repush it, that's fine, that way, it will prune the repo | 09:00 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: so, I can repull your bionic branch? | 09:00 |
| Trevinho | yeah, I've changed the tag and used debian/bionic | 09:01 |
| didrocks | ubuntu/bionic, you meant? | 09:02 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: ffs :/ | 09:03 |
| didrocks | https://git.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/commit/?id=404375ee82c7899e8cfab905d7c0f1385c9b3da1 | 09:03 |
| didrocks | seriously… | 09:03 |
| didrocks | where do you see in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/git#Create_a_maintenance_branch that you need to change upstream/latest to upstream/3.28.x ? | 09:03 |
| didrocks | have you tried to clone as well your branch and build it? Do you understand those parameters that you are changing? :/ | 09:03 |
| didrocks | this is a total lost of time on my side… | 09:04 |
| didrocks | just take a read of the link I gave to you many times please, and do this, and only this :/ | 09:04 |
| didrocks | it's more than a week that I'm regularly interrupting because you wanted to add more steps, and we aren't still done yet because you don't follow simple steps like 1. 2. 3.… | 09:05 |
| duflu | Note to self: Reboot the other machine | 09:14 |
| Trevinho | was just about to build, but I don't see much the sense of delaying something that will happen anyway, but it's ok. It's pushed again. | 09:14 |
| duflu | Not my desktop | 09:14 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: because if we want to release 3.28.3 and stay on 3.28 | 09:15 |
| didrocks | that means you always have to resync 2 branches | 09:15 |
| didrocks | instead of one | 09:15 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: also, you could have asked before not following what was written | 09:16 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: changing 7b by 8b as you didn't rename the title when adding a step btw | 09:21 |
| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|lunch | ||
| === pstolowski|lunch is now known as pstolowski | ||
| kenvandine | Trevinho, could you please review https://github.com/ubuntu/snapcraft-desktop-helpers/pull/136 | 12:48 |
| gitlab-bot | ubuntu bug (Pull request) 136 in snapcraft-desktop-helpers "Don't LD_PRELOAD bindtextdomain for classic snaps" (comments: 0) [Open] | 12:48 |
| Trevinho | kenvandine[m][m]: k | 13:18 |
| kenvandine | Trevinho, thx for the suggestion, pushed a fix | 14:18 |
| Laney | 😘 | 14:19 |
| Laney | didrocks: I just updated the command for making the release tags on the wiki btw, gbp provides a command for that which reads gbp.conf amongst other things (like signing the tag if you have that configured, which is nice) | 14:41 |
| kenvandine | seb128, remember the issue with zenity dialogs being narrow on bionic for those snapd xdg-open dialogs? | 14:43 |
| kenvandine | seb128, was there a bug filed for that? | 14:44 |
| kenvandine | seb128, i remember you determined it was a zenity bug, in 16.04 it didn't wrap text and in bionic they fixed that | 14:44 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, I don't think there was, it's not even clear to me if it's a bug of a wanted behaviour change | 14:45 |
| didrocks | Laney: oh nice! | 14:47 |
| didrocks | and so ubuntu/<version> | 14:47 |
| didrocks | I guess | 14:47 |
| Laney | yeah that's the right format | 14:47 |
| Laney | per dep14 | 14:47 |
| didrocks | perfect :) | 14:47 |
| Laney | perfectO | 14:47 |
| * Laney is italian now | 14:47 | |
| didrocks | heh | 14:47 |
| didrocks | Laney: gbp buildpackage --git-tag-only | 14:49 |
| didrocks | does this commit as well? | 14:49 |
| didrocks | or only append the tag to latest commit? | 14:49 |
| Trevinho | nope, only the tag | 14:49 |
| didrocks | so, you want to git commit first | 14:49 |
| didrocks | and then, run this command, no? | 14:49 |
| Laney | oh it tags the head | 14:50 |
| Laney | so if it's not committed yeah | 14:50 |
| Laney | you need to do that first | 14:50 |
| didrocks | yeah, and as you replaced debcommit… | 14:50 |
| didrocks | I'll let you update :) | 14:50 |
| Laney | ok I thought -r was just doing the tag | 14:50 |
| Laney | never used this before | 14:50 |
| didrocks | nope, it does commit as well | 14:50 |
| didrocks | with the content of the changelog | 14:50 |
| didrocks | and a generate message | 14:50 |
| didrocks | generic* | 14:50 |
| Laney | k | 14:50 |
| didrocks | like "Releasing blablabla" | 14:50 |
| Laney | there | 14:51 |
| didrocks | (thanks for adding the Vcs-Git mention as well) | 14:51 |
| Laney | de nada | 14:51 |
| didrocks | LGTM, thanks | 14:51 |
| k_alam | kenvandine: Hi, evolution changes it's name from evolution.desktop to org.gnome.Evolution.desktop.....as a result evolution-indicator doesn't work any more in unity.....the previous patches are made by you....Can you take a look?......Would "ln -s org.gnome.Evolution.desktop evolution.desktop" work? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-indicator/+bug/1778544 | 15:07 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1778544 in evolution-indicator (Ubuntu) "evolution.desktop is now org.gnome.Evolution.desktop" [Undecided,New] | 15:07 |
| kenvandine | k_alam, i'll take a look | 15:09 |
| k_alam | kenvandine: Thanks. :) | 15:09 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: i've updated the bugs and the branch, I leave to you the changelog finalization though | 15:49 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: ok, it's going to be tomorrow now though | 15:56 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: you should update control.in in https://git.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/commit/?id=016388c7190cea749b43ce038a6ff454aa80d670 | 15:58 |
| Trevinho | yes | 15:58 |
| Trevinho | repush | 15:58 |
| didrocks | the rest looks good to me, I didn't check every bugs though, but trust you updated them all :) | 15:58 |
| seb128 | didrocks, trevinho, good work team, finally getting there :) | 16:01 |
| Trevinho | yeah andrea has done one, while two are of the .2 | 16:01 |
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk | ||
| xnox | Laney, do you use Google Chrome or Chromium browsers? | 16:38 |
| xnox | for some reason i have a partial font rendering bug observed with those too | 16:39 |
| xnox | are there any fontconfig experts? | 16:39 |
| xnox | Basically in firefox window title & the page content, i get emojis; in chrome/chromium there is emoji in the window title, but not the page content. See for example https://launchpad.net/~xnox | 16:41 |
| xnox | instead chrome/chromium gets black&white content | 16:41 |
| xnox | =( | 16:41 |
| xnox | android chrome works correctly in full color | 16:41 |
| willcooke | xnox, are you running hidpi as well by any chance? Prolly unrelated | 17:11 |
| willcooke | oh no, | 17:11 |
| willcooke | ignore | 17:11 |
| xnox | willcooke, not on this machine. regular dpi | 17:12 |
| willcooke | quittin time. Night all | 17:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!