=== havenstance1 is now known as havenstance
=== havenstance1 is now known as havenstance
=== havenstance1 is now known as havenstance
[06:40] <didrocks> good morning
[06:53] <duflu> Hi didrocks
=== pstolowski|afk is now known as pstolowski
[07:40] <willcooke> morning all
[07:40] <willcooke> morning sun sprinters
[07:45] <didrocks> hey willcooke!
[07:46] <willcooke> morning didrocks, how goes?
[07:47] <didrocks> willcooke: sunny, trying to invite in the condo the morning cool temperature ;)
[07:47] <Laney> 😅
[07:47] <didrocks> hey Laney! How is Italy?
[07:47] <Laney> hey didrocks!
[07:48] <Laney> very pleasant so far
[07:48] <Laney> we got the country place at like 2am
[07:48] <Laney> so slightly late start today
[07:48] <Laney> not as warm here as the city but it's a nice temperature for working
[07:48] <Laney> those guys are messing around trying to make the gas work
[07:49] <didrocks> :p
[07:49] <didrocks> I still need Trevhino to fix the SRU branch!
[07:49] <duflu> Morning willcooke, Laney
[07:51] <didrocks> Trevinho: once you are aroud, your master branch is good. However, the maintenance branch isn't and isn't buildable: referencing an upstream branch which isn't needed, still referencing ubuntu/master. Just follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/git#Create_a_maintenance_branch as I pointed the other day please
[07:51] <didrocks> Trevinho: also, the bugs doesn't follow the SRU procedure despite asking multiple times :/
[08:00] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[08:00] <didrocks> hey seb128! How is Italy?
[08:01] <seb128> didrocks, he's making coffee/we are eating, as L_aney said, slightly delayed start today
[08:01] <didrocks> seb128: make him drinking double coffee so that he follow closely the link I gave to him :p
[08:01] <seb128> didrocks, great! Marco has been doing a great job at showing us around this w.e :) and his house here is great
[08:01] <seb128> haha
[08:01] <didrocks> (same than Friday, the link didn't change :p)
[08:01] <didrocks> nice!
[08:02] <didrocks> saw some pictures, seems you are all having fine
[08:02] <didrocks> and eating (or not) properly
[08:25] <seb128> lol
[08:29] <didrocks> apport……… bpport……… cpport……… dpport………
[08:30]  * didrocks is doing ascii art for tests, as apport has those (missing some as well, completing…)
[08:31] <seb128> hahaha
[08:31] <Trevinho> morninggg
[08:32] <andyrock> morning
[08:32] <Trevinho> didrocks: dbp.conf you mean?
[08:32] <didrocks> hey Trevinho, andyrock
[08:32] <Trevinho> Might be, as I had to revert things and back... I'm checking
[08:32] <didrocks> Trevinho: that, and the fact that you add commit after releasing cosmic
[08:32] <Trevinho> as per SRU bug, I wanted to be OK'd before, updating them is comging later, as I said
[08:33] <didrocks> I think you should fork on -1
[08:33] <Trevinho> didrocks: let me see
[08:33] <didrocks> Trevinho: I don't see how updating the blog is blocking on the branch
[08:42] <Trevinho> didrocks: as per the fork point, right now is before the C changelog, where you wanted that?
[08:47] <didrocks> Trevinho: not what I see
[08:48] <didrocks> 5742a8d2a8ecaf5b6f0c64d4434666910128e430 has the released commit as parent, no?
[08:49] <didrocks> let me check, maybe it's gitg playing with me
[08:49] <didrocks> Trevinho: yeah, ok, gitg is confusing, if I use my old good git log, this looks correct and we agreed, as I wanted
[08:49] <didrocks> so basically, only debian/gbp.conf is wrong
[08:58] <Trevinho> didrocks: yeah, I've fixed already I was waiting your answer to push. now it's there
[08:59] <Trevinho> didrocks: if you're ok with all the bugs, I'm going to update them
[08:59] <Trevinho> oh, need to tag
[09:00] <Trevinho> didrocks: you want me to change the ownership to ~canonical-desktop-team so you can then change it to ~desktop-team without having to re-push?
[09:00] <didrocks> Trevinho: I'm going to just repush it, that's fine, that way, it will prune the repo
[09:00] <didrocks> Trevinho: so, I can repull your bionic branch?
[09:01] <Trevinho> yeah, I've changed the tag and used debian/bionic
[09:02] <didrocks> ubuntu/bionic, you meant?
[09:03] <didrocks> Trevinho: ffs :/
[09:03] <didrocks> https://git.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/commit/?id=404375ee82c7899e8cfab905d7c0f1385c9b3da1
[09:03] <didrocks> seriously…
[09:03] <didrocks> where do you see in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/git#Create_a_maintenance_branch that you need to change upstream/latest to upstream/3.28.x ?
[09:03] <didrocks> have you tried to clone as well your branch and build it? Do you understand those parameters that you are changing? :/
[09:04] <didrocks> this is a total lost of time on my side…
[09:04] <didrocks> just take a read of the link I gave to you many times please, and do this, and only this :/
[09:05] <didrocks> it's more than a week that I'm regularly interrupting because you wanted to add more steps, and we aren't still done yet because you don't follow simple steps like 1. 2. 3.…
[09:14] <duflu> Note to self: Reboot the other machine
[09:14] <Trevinho> was just about to build, but I don't see much the sense of delaying something that will happen anyway, but it's ok. It's pushed again.
[09:14] <duflu> Not my desktop
[09:15] <didrocks> Trevinho: because if we want to release 3.28.3 and stay on 3.28
[09:15] <didrocks> that means you always have to resync 2 branches
[09:15] <didrocks> instead of one
[09:16] <didrocks> Trevinho: also, you could have asked before not following what was written
[09:21] <didrocks> Trevinho: changing 7b by 8b as you didn't rename the title when adding a step btw
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
=== pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|lunch
=== pstolowski|lunch is now known as pstolowski
[12:48] <kenvandine> Trevinho, could you please review https://github.com/ubuntu/snapcraft-desktop-helpers/pull/136
[12:48] <gitlab-bot> ubuntu bug (Pull request) 136 in snapcraft-desktop-helpers "Don't LD_PRELOAD bindtextdomain for classic snaps" (comments: 0) [Open]
[13:18] <Trevinho> kenvandine[m][m]: k
[14:18] <kenvandine> Trevinho, thx for the suggestion, pushed a fix
[14:19] <Laney> 😘
[14:41] <Laney> didrocks: I just updated the command for making the release tags on the wiki btw, gbp provides a command for that which reads gbp.conf amongst other things (like signing the tag if you have that configured, which is nice)
[14:43] <kenvandine> seb128, remember the issue with zenity dialogs being narrow on bionic for those snapd xdg-open dialogs?
[14:44] <kenvandine> seb128, was there a bug filed for that?
[14:44] <kenvandine> seb128, i remember you determined it was a zenity bug, in 16.04 it didn't wrap text and in bionic they fixed that
[14:45] <seb128> kenvandine, I don't think there was, it's not even clear to me if it's a bug of a wanted behaviour change
[14:47] <didrocks> Laney: oh nice!
[14:47] <didrocks> and so ubuntu/<version>
[14:47] <didrocks> I guess
[14:47] <Laney> yeah that's the right format
[14:47] <Laney> per dep14
[14:47] <didrocks> perfect :)
[14:47] <Laney> perfectO
[14:47]  * Laney is italian now
[14:47] <didrocks> heh
[14:49] <didrocks> Laney: gbp buildpackage --git-tag-only
[14:49] <didrocks> does this commit as well?
[14:49] <didrocks> or only append the tag to latest commit?
[14:49] <Trevinho> nope, only the tag
[14:49] <didrocks> so, you want to git commit first
[14:49] <didrocks> and then, run this command, no?
[14:50] <Laney> oh it tags the head
[14:50] <Laney> so if it's not committed yeah
[14:50] <Laney> you need to do that first
[14:50] <didrocks> yeah, and as you replaced debcommit…
[14:50] <didrocks> I'll let you update :)
[14:50] <Laney> ok I thought -r was just doing the tag
[14:50] <Laney> never used this before
[14:50] <didrocks> nope, it does commit as well
[14:50] <didrocks> with the content of the changelog
[14:50] <didrocks> and a generate message
[14:50] <didrocks> generic*
[14:50] <Laney> k
[14:50] <didrocks> like "Releasing blablabla"
[14:51] <Laney> there
[14:51] <didrocks> (thanks for adding the Vcs-Git mention as well)
[14:51] <Laney> de nada
[14:51] <didrocks> LGTM, thanks
[15:07] <k_alam> kenvandine: Hi, evolution changes it's name from evolution.desktop to org.gnome.Evolution.desktop.....as a result evolution-indicator doesn't work any more in unity.....the previous patches are made by you....Can you take a look?......Would "ln -s org.gnome.Evolution.desktop evolution.desktop" work? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-indicator/+bug/1778544
[15:07] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1778544 in evolution-indicator (Ubuntu) "evolution.desktop is now org.gnome.Evolution.desktop" [Undecided,New]
[15:09] <kenvandine> k_alam, i'll take a look
[15:09] <k_alam> kenvandine: Thanks. :)
[15:49] <Trevinho> didrocks: i've updated the bugs and the branch, I leave to you the changelog finalization though
[15:56] <didrocks> Trevinho: ok, it's going to be tomorrow now though
[15:58] <didrocks> Trevinho: you should update control.in in https://git.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/commit/?id=016388c7190cea749b43ce038a6ff454aa80d670
[15:58] <Trevinho> yes
[15:58] <Trevinho> repush
[15:58] <didrocks> the rest looks good to me, I didn't check every bugs though, but trust you updated them all :)
[16:01] <seb128> didrocks, trevinho, good work team, finally getting there :)
[16:01] <Trevinho> yeah andrea has done one, while two are of the .2
=== pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk
[16:38] <xnox> Laney, do you use Google Chrome or Chromium browsers?
[16:39] <xnox> for some reason i have a partial font rendering bug observed with those too
[16:39] <xnox> are there any fontconfig experts?
[16:41] <xnox> Basically in firefox window title & the page content, i get emojis; in chrome/chromium there is emoji in the window title, but not the page content. See for example https://launchpad.net/~xnox
[16:41] <xnox> instead chrome/chromium gets black&white content
[16:41] <xnox> =(
[16:41] <xnox> android chrome works correctly in full color
[17:11] <willcooke> xnox, are you running hidpi as well by any chance?  Prolly unrelated
[17:11] <willcooke> oh no,
[17:11] <willcooke> ignore
[17:12] <xnox> willcooke, not on this machine. regular dpi
[17:28] <willcooke> quittin time.  Night all