[09:47] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I'm attempting a python-networkx mere
[09:47] <LocutusOfBorg> *merge
[09:47] <LocutusOfBorg> this should unblock: givaro fflas-ffpack linbox sagemath
[09:47] <LocutusOfBorg> and probably more
[12:52] <didrocks> bdmurray: hey, around? Did you get time to look at my questions about apport/whoopsie?
[14:10] <bdmurray> didrocks: Yeah, sorry still thinking about it.
[14:17] <didrocks> bdmurray: sure! As you saw, I fixed one on the 2 bugs, for the other, I'm currently heading thinking we should put the systemd units in apport binary package and removing them from apport-noui, but tell me once you are settled on it
[14:17] <bdmurray> didrocks: apport-noui seemed good for servers, what do you see apport-noui still doing?
[14:18] <didrocks> bdmurray: it's not installed on servers though?
[14:19] <didrocks> bdmurray: and people still need to use whoopsie API to autoreport (or drop the file)
[14:19] <didrocks> basically, just to create /var/lib/apport/autoreport file
[14:19] <bdmurray> didrocks: right, but if you install apport-noui the thought was crash reporting would just work
[14:19] <didrocks> (so, installing apport-noui alone isn't enough to autoreport)
[14:19] <didrocks> hum
[14:20] <bdmurray> Its been a while since I looked at this though.
[14:20] <didrocks> let me look again, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't create that file
[14:20] <didrocks> bdmurray: yeah, it doesn't from what I see… So, basically, you install apport-noui and nothing happens
[14:22] <didrocks> ah
[14:22] <didrocks> the postinst is touching /var/lib/apport/autoreport
[14:22] <bdmurray> Okay, good!
[14:22] <didrocks> bdmurray: so, basically, what we could is move the systemd services to apport (binary package)
[14:22] <didrocks> and have apport-noui just touching that file (and depending on whoopsie)
[14:23] <didrocks> then, it enables
[14:23] <didrocks> others to have the autoreport functionality without installing it
[14:23] <didrocks> as the whoopsie-preferences API is doing the same (touching or removing that file, based on what you request)
[14:24] <didrocks> does it make sense to you?
[14:24] <bdmurray> Okay, I just wanted to make sure there was still an easy way to setup automatic crash reporting without using a UI.
[14:25] <bdmurray> Yes, this sounds reasonable to me.
[14:26] <didrocks> I think we fix the bug and still cover this use case
[14:26] <didrocks> bdmurray: ok, I'll MP that later on :)
[14:26] <didrocks> thanks for raising this on the bug report, I was just assuming the API was working :p
[14:26] <bdmurray> didrocks: Great thanks! It'll be good to get this sorted and get more crash reports. :-|
[14:27] <bdmurray> Well get more data. ;-)
[14:28] <didrocks> bdmurray: ahah, yes, in some ways… :p
[15:39] <didrocks> bdmurray: do you mind refreshing ~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/cosmic/apport/ubuntu (and maybe bionic? didn't check yet) with your latest uploads?
[15:40] <didrocks> (weird, it seems 2.20.10-0ubuntu3 has been uploaded as a native package where bzr bd clearly requests an upstream tarball)