[17:35] Hello, I have a bug here that I think should be set to "wishlist" level of importance. Can one of you do that? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/379015 [17:35] Ubuntu bug 379015 in thunderbird (Ubuntu) "Asterisk showing new messages is not shown at topmost level" [Undecided,New] [17:36] I will put a summary of the suggestion in there now. [18:01] Hello, I have a bug here that I think should be set to "wishlist" level of importance. Can one of you do that? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/379015 [18:01] Ubuntu bug 379015 in thunderbird (Ubuntu) "Asterisk showing new messages is not shown at topmost level" [Undecided,New] [18:10] Hi, how do I determine if a bug is qualified for the papercuts project ("trivial to fix")? I have a bug here that is a small annoyance to the user but might be big to fix (I don't know). Could someone look at it and see if I should associate it with the papercuts project? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/379015 [18:10] Ubuntu bug 379015 in thunderbird (Ubuntu) "Asterisk showing new messages is not shown at topmost level" [Undecided,New] [18:11] gf2: bug 379015 is now wishlist [18:11] bug 379015 in thunderbird (Ubuntu) "Asterisk showing new messages is not shown at topmost level" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/379015 [18:13] gf2: a papercut is meant for something that is easy to fix -- simple change in code, doc, whatever. This bug would only qualify if this were to be such a change (which IDK, I do not deal with TB). [18:14] gf2: anyway, this is a change to be performed upstream. You can, for example, propose a patch upstream [18:15] also, it would be good to check if a bug about this has already been submitted upstream; if so, then we will link it to the LP bug, if not we would create one upstream (and again link it here) [18:19] Thanks hggdh, for changing the status on that bug to wishlist. :) OK, I will look at upstream to see if there is already a proposal on this. Thanks again for the feedback. :) [18:20] Um, where do I go for "upstream"? [18:21] nevermind, I found the wiki page :)