| dva5912 | Really trying to wrap my head around this whole net plan deal. My google-fu isnt working well tonight and id like some help if you all can! https://pastebin.com/XhZrq3VG Im trying to take my two nic cards, and bond them together in a balance-rr mode to reduce the bottle neck of just one card | 01:29 |
|---|---|---|
| dva5912 | Folks, never mind. Went static instead of DHCP and the issue resolved itself. used https://serverfault.com/questions/882758/nic-teaming-on-ubuntu-17-10-via-netplan to answer my own question | 01:36 |
| lordievader | Good morning | 06:07 |
| tribaal | exit | 08:16 |
| tribaal | (sorry) | 08:16 |
| jamespage | coreycb: horizon finally uploaded with py3 support | 08:48 |
| jamespage | that was fiddly | 08:48 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: hi, around? I got asked to add a copyright statement to my salsa mr: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/krb5/merge_requests/2 | 12:12 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: o/ | 12:18 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: how do I add that? Who owns the copyright? | 12:18 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: that's fine. I'll send you a link to our internal documentation. We license contributions to software under the same licence of the work itself. | 12:19 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: I think it should be sufficient to say that this is Canonical's internal documented policy and therefore your work is licensed under the existing license. | 12:19 |
| coreycb | jamespage: great! i got aodh py3 uploaded on friday and will be focused entirely on py3 this week. | 12:28 |
| === chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
| ahasenack | rbasak: the previous apache2 sru is done, would you be willing to push the upload tag for https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+git/apache2/+merge/348632 so that I can dput it? | 13:38 |
| ahasenack | or would you rather wait for christian to get back? | 13:38 |
| ahasenack | you can also start a new review from scratch if you prefer | 13:38 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: you have upload rights so I trust your judgement :) | 13:53 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: what's the git commit hash I'm upload tagging please? The git clone line to grab that would be helpful. | 13:53 |
| ahasenack | still, it's how our team works | 13:53 |
| rbasak | Is it already peer reviewed by Christian? | 13:54 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: yes, he gave a +1 | 13:54 |
| ahasenack | the hash is what's pushed: 8b6ec8cea379f63aa0e907cec8f70dc4d86e7e83 | 13:54 |
| rbasak | Then I think all the requirements are met and I'm happy to essentially blindly push whatever hash you want upload tagged :) | 13:55 |
| ahasenack | ok, thanks | 13:55 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: upload tag pushed | 13:58 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: thanks | 13:58 |
| DammitJim | is there a maximum file name length in Ubuntu? | 14:14 |
| blackflow | DammitJim: such limits are defined by filesystem used. | 14:17 |
| DammitJim | so, I have logical volumes and formatted to ext4 | 14:18 |
| blackflow | and a google prompt nearby? | 14:20 |
| DammitJim | yeah | 14:21 |
| DammitJim | I just want to make sure I'm not assuming something | 14:21 |
| DammitJim | All I saw was that there is a limit for fat32 of 255 characters | 14:21 |
| blackflow | I thought FAT was limited to 8.3 | 14:25 |
| DammitJim | but I'm confused if there is a limit for the file name vs the full path name | 14:25 |
| blackflow | there are limits to both. In fact, I even think linux kernel has some hard limits, lemme unearth that... | 14:25 |
| blackflow | DammitJim: yah, PATH_MAX and NAME_MAX, defined in limits.h, and if you have kernel headers installed, see eg. /usr/src/linux-headers-4.15.0-24/include/uapi/linux/limits.h | 14:28 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: hi, one more upload tag push if you will: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+git/exim4/+merge/348895 | 14:55 |
| ahasenack | I can dput | 14:55 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: just a sec, let me drop that ~ppa1 | 14:56 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: now it's good, 524946598222abae1016435ffded0961343e92f8 is HEAD in that MP and good for upload tag push | 14:57 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: pushed | 15:24 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: thanks | 15:27 |
| === freyes__ is now known as freyes | ||
| subvhome | I have a server with http service running on it. I've port forwarded my firewall appliance so that I have access from the web. I would like to block access from the private network... server ip is 10.0.1.10 ... so the network is 10.0.1.0/24 ... can this be done with UFW without breaking my port forwarding? | 18:47 |
| RoyK | subvhome: iirc "ufw block from 10.0.1.0/24 to any proto tcp port 80" | 19:35 |
| jdstrand | s/block/deny/ | 19:36 |
| RoyK | jdstrand: thanks | 19:45 |
| jdstrand | RoyK: thanks for the rule :) | 19:45 |
| === RoyK^ is now known as RoyK_Heime | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!