[01:29] <dva5912> Really trying to wrap my head around this whole net plan deal. My google-fu isnt working well tonight and id like some help if you all can! https://pastebin.com/XhZrq3VG Im trying to take my two nic cards, and bond them together in a balance-rr mode to reduce the bottle neck of just one card
[01:36] <dva5912> Folks, never mind. Went static instead of DHCP and the issue resolved itself. used https://serverfault.com/questions/882758/nic-teaming-on-ubuntu-17-10-via-netplan to answer my own question
[06:07] <lordievader> Good morning
[08:16] <tribaal> exit
[08:16] <tribaal> (sorry)
[08:48] <jamespage> coreycb: horizon finally uploaded with py3 support
[08:48] <jamespage> that was fiddly
[12:12] <ahasenack> rbasak: hi, around? I got asked to add a copyright statement to my salsa mr: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/krb5/merge_requests/2
[12:18] <rbasak> ahasenack: o/
[12:18] <ahasenack> rbasak: how do I add that? Who owns the copyright?
[12:19] <rbasak> ahasenack: that's fine. I'll send you a link to our internal documentation. We license contributions to software under the same licence of the work itself.
[12:19] <rbasak> ahasenack: I think it should be sufficient to say that this is Canonical's internal documented policy and therefore your work is licensed under the existing license.
[12:28] <coreycb> jamespage: great! i got aodh py3 uploaded on friday and will be focused entirely on py3 this week.
[13:38] <ahasenack> rbasak: the previous apache2 sru is done, would you be willing to push the upload tag for https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+git/apache2/+merge/348632 so that I can dput it?
[13:38] <ahasenack> or would you rather wait for christian to get back?
[13:38] <ahasenack> you can also start a new review from scratch if you prefer
[13:53] <rbasak> ahasenack: you have upload rights so I trust your judgement :)
[13:53] <rbasak> ahasenack: what's the git commit hash I'm upload tagging please? The git clone line to grab that would be helpful.
[13:53] <ahasenack> still, it's how our team works
[13:54] <rbasak> Is it already peer reviewed by Christian?
[13:54] <ahasenack> rbasak: yes, he gave a +1
[13:54] <ahasenack> the hash is what's pushed: 8b6ec8cea379f63aa0e907cec8f70dc4d86e7e83
[13:55] <rbasak> Then I think all the requirements are met and I'm happy to essentially blindly push whatever hash you want upload tagged :)
[13:55] <ahasenack> ok, thanks
[13:58] <rbasak> ahasenack: upload tag pushed
[13:58] <ahasenack> rbasak: thanks
[14:14] <DammitJim> is there a maximum file name length in Ubuntu?
[14:17] <blackflow> DammitJim: such limits are defined by filesystem used.
[14:18] <DammitJim> so, I have logical volumes and formatted to ext4
[14:20] <blackflow> and a google prompt nearby?
[14:21] <DammitJim> yeah
[14:21] <DammitJim> I just want to make sure I'm not assuming something
[14:21] <DammitJim> All I saw was that there is a limit for fat32 of 255 characters
[14:25] <blackflow> I thought FAT was limited to 8.3
[14:25] <DammitJim> but I'm confused if there is a limit for the file name vs the full path name
[14:25] <blackflow> there are limits to both. In fact, I even think linux kernel has some hard limits, lemme unearth that...
[14:28] <blackflow> DammitJim: yah, PATH_MAX and NAME_MAX, defined in limits.h, and if you have kernel headers installed, see eg.  /usr/src/linux-headers-4.15.0-24/include/uapi/linux/limits.h
[14:55] <ahasenack> rbasak: hi, one more upload tag push if you will: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+git/exim4/+merge/348895
[14:55] <ahasenack> I can dput
[14:56] <ahasenack> rbasak: just a sec, let me drop that ~ppa1
[14:57] <ahasenack> rbasak: now it's good, 524946598222abae1016435ffded0961343e92f8 is HEAD in that MP and good for upload tag push
[15:24] <rbasak> ahasenack: pushed
[15:27] <ahasenack> rbasak: thanks
[18:47] <subvhome> I have a server with http service running on it. I've port forwarded my firewall appliance so that I have access from the web. I would like to block access from the private network... server ip is 10.0.1.10 ... so the network is 10.0.1.0/24 ... can this be done with UFW without breaking my port forwarding?
[19:35] <RoyK> subvhome: iirc "ufw block from 10.0.1.0/24 to any proto tcp port 80"
[19:36] <jdstrand> s/block/deny/
[19:45] <RoyK> jdstrand: thanks
[19:45] <jdstrand> RoyK: thanks for the rule :)