[00:15] <Unit193> LocutusOfBorg: Heh, hopefully you're happy now?  Started the DD process.
[06:54] <doko> tsimonq2: fyi, qtubuntu ftbfs
[07:01] <ginggs> doko: ack, he is aware
[07:24] <doko> oSoMoN: please could you have a look at the libreoffice ftbfs in -proposed? it also blocks xmlsec1 migration
[07:25] <doko> and gcc-N of course ...
[07:26] <oSoMoN> doko, sure thing
[07:42] <LocutusOfBorg> Unit193, I'll be really happy once you become core-dev too :p
[07:42] <Unit193> LocutusOfBorg: I'm trying for MOTU right now, also why would I want core-dev?
[07:52] <LocutusOfBorg> motu is fine :D
[08:11] <tsimonq2> doko: Was just following up with the Mir team on bug 1708326; they seemed surprised it hadn't been removed yet. :P
[09:21] <juliank> Looking for feedback to my interpretation about libomxil-bellagio triggers: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1780996/comments/49
[09:21] <juliank> s/to/on/
[11:18] <cpaelzer> hi, I have a case where an apt upgrade will upgrade 6 packages belonging together
[11:18] <cpaelzer> I'm suspicious that the one we looked at so far does all right but another one in the transaction does trigger bad things
[11:18] <cpaelzer> I wonder is there a way to e.g. step through all actions triggered
[11:19] <cpaelzer> so this goes through all unpack/remove/maintscript calls of these packages
[11:19] <cpaelzer> and I'd want to watch status while I can go forward slowly
[11:19] <rbasak> I think you can do everything apt does by calling dpkg manually?
[11:19] <rbasak> Is that what you mean?
[11:19] <cpaelzer> I wondered, but won't that insist on the same dependencies done in one pass
[11:20] <cpaelzer> e.g. dpdk -i on one of them breaks due to missing depends
[11:20] <rbasak> Oh, I see
[11:20] <cpaelzer> and on all of them would be the same as what an apt uprgade would give me
[11:20] <rbasak> looking at the manpage, dpkg has --unpack and --configure
[11:21] <rbasak> So you might be able to do it that way using --force-depends etc if necessary
[11:21] <rbasak> (IIRC, dpkg won't complain about depends until the configure stage, so I don't think force should be necessary)
[11:52] <rbasak> Could I have a second ~ubuntu-sru opinion on bug 1750356 please?
[11:52] <rbasak> The patch feels (necessarily) quite invasive, changing API between modules, etc.
[11:52] <rbasak> So higher regression risk, in my view.
[11:52] <rbasak> Is the impact worth it?
[11:57] <rbasak> bdmurray_: since you're already familiar with bug 1780501, do you want to take the SRU review for that? Or are you wanting someone else to take it as you're involved?
[14:24] <bdmurray_> rbasak: I'll write up the test case etc but it'd probably be good to have someone else review it
[14:27] <rbasak> bdmurray_: OK no problem, but I think I'm just about out of time today :-/
[14:30] <bdmurray_> rbasak: No problem, its a lower priority than the 18.04 point release anyway.
[15:31] <dmj_s76> Trevinho: did the patches for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786929 ever get into the Ubuntu packages?
[15:33] <dmj_s76> I'm getting reports that sound very much like that bug.
[16:36] <coreycb> doko: do you know if anyone is working on an imagemagick merge? (for python-wand)
[16:39] <doko> coreycb: no, not yet
[16:42] <coreycb> doko: ok i'll work on that then if that is ok, since it's blocking me
[16:44] <doko> coreycb: much appreciated
[18:03] <ricotz> doko, hi, while there are a lot of transitions happening, is there an eta for icu 62?
[18:05] <doko> ricotz: I didn't plan for that
[18:05] <ricotz> doko, ok
[20:23] <Trevinho> dmj_s76: not yet, I've cherry-picked them for gnome-3-28 but we need a new release for that, I've already asked Florian... Maybe you can enforce the request :)
[20:31] <dmj_s76> Trevinho: So we just need a 3.28 point release of mutter?
[20:31] <Trevinho> Yep
[21:46] <Unit193> teward: Going to fix CVE-2018-14055 and CVE-2018-14056? ;)
[21:46] <Unit193> Fancy that, lp 1781925.
[23:54] <Unit193> Hi.  http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/cosmic/update_excuses.html#xfce4-terminal seems to have been uploaded at a bad time as apport is now failing.  The buildd is now yelling at me, can someone fix apport? :)