[00:08] <rbasak> Looks like apport regularly fails and people tend to retry until it works :-/
[00:08] <rbasak> Based on http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/apport/cosmic/amd64
[00:36] <Unit193> rbasak: AFAIK, I can't hammer that button (nor does it quite seem like the right thing to do, but *clearly* the Xfce terminal didn't break it...)
[00:37] <sarnold> aww rats. they show me the button but I can't hit the button either. :(
[00:38] <Unit193> Well if it's big and red...
[00:38] <sarnold> push the button, frank
[00:40] <Unit193> Also, unfortunately limnoria has had issues with the 'scheduler' plugin's tests, so I have had to hammer the button ~4 times but that was a PPA. :/
[00:51] <tsimonq2> I hammered the button.
[00:52]  * sarnold dubs thee Thor
[00:53] <tsimonq2> :D
[07:13] <doko> tsimonq2: vlc ftbfs with new qt
[07:17] <tsimonq2> doko: known issue, I'll poke Sebastinas
[07:22] <tsimonq2> .
[08:09] <Laney> Would be nice if someone could look at why the tests are unreliable rather than just retrying them all the time
[08:09] <Laney> Or just delete them if nobody cares
[08:13] <ginggs> Laney: fwiw, there is a bug LP: #1780767
[08:14] <Laney> I saw it
[08:14] <Laney> So maybe I should say it would be nice if somebody would fix that bug?
[08:16] <ginggs> Laney: can you tell which version of autodep8 is installed on the autopkgtesters? i believe there are changes in 0.13 needed for the octave* autopkgtests
[08:16] <Laney> ok
[08:18] <Laney> there we go, it's updated
[08:18] <Laney> this is a git checkout, manually pulled
[08:23] <ginggs> Laney: thanks!
[09:00] <doko> tsimonq2: I'll leave the qtwebengine-opensource-src no-change upload (ffmpeg) for you ....
[09:00] <tsimonq2> Thanks
[10:48] <doko> nine chromium builds on armhf/arm64 ...
[11:10] <GunnarHj> Hi mvo, was the snapd POT generation issue fixed also in 2.33?
[11:10] <GunnarHj> https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5408#issuecomment-403242613
[11:10] <GunnarHj> Would be good to be able to close bug #1758684.
[11:12] <mvo> GunnarHj: it is fixed in 2.34 which just hit -proposed
[11:13] <mvo> GunnarHj: afaict 2.33 does not have the fix yet
[11:15] <GunnarHj> mvo: Shouldn't it have it too so we make sure that also bionic, xenial etc. has a correct template?
[11:18] <mvo> GunnarHj: I uploaded 2.34 with the i18n fix to {trusty,xenial,bionic,comsic}-proposed, so hopefully the template is fixed really soon. or am I misunderstanding the question?
[11:19] <GunnarHj> mvo: Aha, thanks, I missed that. Please disregard my question then.
[11:19] <mvo> GunnarHj: sure, thank you and thanks again for noticing the issue in the first place, that was a nice catch
[11:20] <GunnarHj> np
[11:36] <tsimonq2> doko: qtwebengine> . but minimum 25 hour build time on arm64, assuming it passes...
[12:03] <doko> tsimonq2: well yes, we need to ...
[12:04] <tsimonq2> doko: I don't see any reason why it shouldn't pass.
[12:05] <tsimonq2> O_o https://launchpadlibrarian.net/379223521/buildlog_ubuntu-cosmic-i386.qtwebengine-opensource-src_5.11.1+dfsg-2ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz
[12:11] <tsimonq2> doko: What do you think about this patch for that FTBFS? https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/libqt5-qtwebengine/chromium-66.0.3359.170-gcc8-alignof.patch?expand=1
[12:18] <doko> tsimonq2: looks fine to me
[12:20] <doko> cancelling the builds
[12:21] <tsimonq2> doko: Did you want to apply the patch or should I?
[12:21] <tsimonq2> (I don't care either way)
[12:52] <cjwatson> seb128: LP has emitted the first cosmic language pack build, and it looks reasonably sensible.  Following https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/Translations/UbuntuOpenings, I've unhidden translations for cosmic.
[12:53] <seb128> cjwatson, excellent, thanks!
[12:53] <cjwatson> seb128: Can you arrange for langpack-o-matic to start building langpack uploads, and announce to translators etc. if everything looks sensible to you?
[12:54] <seb128> cjwatson, I will do!
[12:54] <cjwatson> Cheers
[12:54] <cjwatson> Sorry it took so long ...
[13:00] <LocutusOfBorg> acheronuk, dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-tbIFQg/022-cantor-backend-lua_4%3a18.04.3-0ubuntu2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
[13:00] <LocutusOfBorg>  trying to overwrite '/etc/xdg/cantor_lua.knsrc', which is also in package cantor 4:18.04.3-0ubuntu2
[13:00] <acheronuk> LocutusOfBorg: I know. looking at it
[13:00] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks! it is currently blocking some autopkgtests, this is why I'm worried
[13:00] <LocutusOfBorg> (octave btw, don't ask me why)
[13:11] <acheronuk> LocutusOfBorg: fix uploaded I hope. simply forgot that file is separately installed by debian/rules, hence duplication
[13:20] <LocutusOfBorg> ack thanks!
[13:36] <abeato> cyphermox, hi, did you have a chance to take a look at my MPs for NM? : https://code.launchpad.net/~alfonsosanchezbeato/network-manager/+git/network-manager/+merge/349468 and https://code.launchpad.net/~alfonsosanchezbeato/network-manager/+git/network-manager/+merge/349465
[13:39] <seb128> abeato, it would make sense to have a bug with the rational/test plan and have it mentioned in the changelog, also would probably make sense to update cosmic to 1.12 rather than doing backports like that
[13:40] <abeato> seb128, this is the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1781597
[13:40] <abeato> seb128, yes, I am plus one in having 1.12 in cosmic if that is possible
[13:41] <abeato> seb128, I'll also update the MPs to add the bug number, I forgot about that
[13:41] <doko> a lot of ftbfs with the new ffmpeg ...
[13:43] <seb128> abeato, thanks, and yes, the mp was neither linked to the bug nor having the reference in its changelog
[13:45] <abeato> seb128, the MPs are in the bug description, I have just tried to link the branch, but it looks like that is not working for git repos
[13:48] <seb128> :/
[13:49] <rbasak> I've linked them for you.
[13:49] <rbasak> You can't link to a git branch directly. AIUI this is intentional as git branches are typically ephemeral
[13:49] <rbasak> But you can link to an MP.
[13:49] <rbasak> To do that link to the bug from the MP.
[13:49] <abeato> rbasak, thanks, I had not tried that :)
[13:50] <seb128> I was looking for that since I though it used to be possible
[13:50] <seb128> but I didn't find the button on the mp page
[13:53] <abeato> seb128, I've added the bug to the changelog in both MPs
[13:54] <rbasak> seb128: it's "Link a bug report". Under the Status, Proposed branch, etc table.
[13:59] <cyphermox> abeato: sorry, I will definitely not have time today to look at NM -- and I haven't really touched NM in nearly two years
[14:01] <abeato> cyphermox, ok, I guess maybe I should have ping jbicha too :)
[14:02] <abeato> jbicha, fyi I'd like to SRU LP: #1781597
[14:18] <seb128> rbasak, thx, I see it now :)
[14:18] <seb128> abeato, jbicha is not around recently, I wouldn't count on it
[14:19] <seb128> we need a n-m maintainer :/ willcooke was trying to get headcount for that
[15:06] <dmj_s76> Looks like a new 3.28 Mutter release!
[15:57] <acheronuk> LocutusOfBorg: can you get new abi-compliance-checker uploaded?
[17:36] <LocutusOfBorg> acheronuk, in debian?
[17:37] <LocutusOfBorg> this would require a bug and a patch probably...
[17:49] <acheronuk> LocutusOfBorg: header compile tests fail with GCC-8 in proposed. fix is in a-c-c 2.3
[20:06] <coreycb> doko: have you seen any hangs in py3.7 in waiter.acquire()? for example: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/SwXsCcghjt/
[20:09] <coreycb> seems to be a race somewhere with thread locking but need to dig more
[20:20] <danialbehzadi> Hi. I put two apps in my ppa and set one of them as a dependency in control file of the other one like this: traktor (>= 1.4)
[20:20] <danialbehzadi> But when I try to install it, I get this strange error: carburetor : Depends: traktor (>= 1.4) but 1.4-0~201807171920~ubuntu18.04.1 is installed
[20:20] <danialbehzadi> I wonder what does it mean…
[20:22] <nacc> danialbehzadi: you have asked in #launchpad already
[20:23] <danialbehzadi> nacc: Yeah. I wondered if there was the wrong place, cause it doesn't relate to launchpad itself, but to development on a debian platform
[20:24] <nacc> danialbehzadi: ah ok; is the version you mentioned (1.4-0... ) the one from your ppa?
[20:24] <danialbehzadi> nacc: Yes