[05:23] <mborzecki> morning
[07:02] <mborzecki> mvo: hi, looks like we might have a bug in time schedule, with some specific days of the month, i'm looking into it
[07:03] <mvo> mborzecki: ok, thank you
[07:18] <mborzecki> according to go hmm 2017-08-01 00:00:00 +0200 CEST is Tuesday
[07:18] <abeato> mvo, hey, I had to make this small change in MM and other interfaces: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5572
[07:18] <abeato> mvo, would appreciate if this can be incorporated to the nex release
[07:20] <mvo> abeato: checking
[07:20] <abeato> thx
[07:21] <mvo> abeato: we will need jdstrand for this - at least for a second review. but yeah, happy to merge into one of the release PRs once it got that review
[07:21] <abeato> mvo, sure, we indeed need him
[07:22] <mvo> abeato: slightly unfortunate timing :/ we did 2.34.3 on Friday so there will be a bit of time before the next regular release. how urgent is this for you?
[07:23] <abeato> mvo, well, urgent, but can wait a bit in principle. When is the next release planned?
[07:25] <mvo> abeato: the next regular release would be 2.35 which is ~4-6 weeks away. we can do a point release if its critical which will take ~2 weeks (because the 2.34.3 needs to be released first which is ~1 week)
[07:27] <abeato> mvo, ok, I see. I need to check these dates with the client, thanks for the info - will let you know
[07:27] <mvo> abeato: if does do not match we need talk and think about options
[07:28] <abeato> sure :)
[07:30] <mvo> mborzecki: woah, the amazon linux packaging is pretty neat, looks like someone (looking at Neal most likely) did a great job on the fedora packaging to make it pretty universal
[07:30] <mborzecki> mvo: yes, a couple of %if and it built just fine
[07:31] <mvo> mborzecki: why do we need "storage: preserve-isze" for there?
[07:31] <mvo> mborzecki: yeah, neat!
[07:31] <mborzecki> mvo: the default image is 25gb, and iirc if we resize it to 10gb it does not boot anymore
[07:31] <mvo> mborzecki: aha, right
[07:32] <mvo> mborzecki: and there is a spread bug that prevents setting this more fine grained(?)
[07:32] <mborzecki> mvo: cachio knows the details, he's proposed the intial pr to spread
[07:32] <mvo> mborzecki: ok
[07:42] <mvo> abeato: 5469 got two +1 but has some conflicts. do you think you have some cycles to look at those conflicts?
[07:42] <mborzecki> hm weird, so in the tests 2017-08-01 00:00:00 +0200 CEST .Weekday() is Tuesday, when I run a similar sample in play it's wednesday https://play.golang.org/p/i1-tcO-OzBx same sample ran locally is wednesday too :(
[07:43] <abeato> mvo, sure, let me take a look
[07:43] <mvo> cjwatson: quick question about building snaps on LP. I tried to build the openstreetmap editor josm directly from their svn in LP but get an error: svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk'
[07:43] <mvo> cjwatson: is this just not possible or anything I can do to fix it?
[07:45] <mvo> mborzecki: a second review for 5563 would be great, hopefully straightforward
[07:45] <mborzecki> mvo: looking
[07:47] <mvo> and 5450 needs a second review as well but its less important (just a small optimization)
[07:53] <cjwatson> mvo: It's in principle possible but needs some work in launchpad-buildd - see https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1668358
[07:57] <mvo> cjwatson: thank you
[07:59] <mvo> cjwatson: would it be https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpad-buildd/snap-git-proxy/+merge/323691 for svn? or is there more to it?
[08:01] <mvo> cjwatson: hm, probably not because this is using plain http for the checkout(?)
[08:02] <mborzecki> note to self, double check the year before swearing at go time parser
[08:02] <mvo> mborzecki: haha
[08:03] <mborzecki> i clearly need more coffee
[08:05] <cjwatson> mvo: I think it would involve writing out ~/.subversion/servers with proxy info
[08:06] <cjwatson> Probably not super-hard but needs testing ...
[08:56] <mborzecki> mvo: #5573 fixes the timers
[08:57] <mvo> mborzecki: thank you
[09:00] <Chipaca> moin moin
[09:00]  * Chipaca started a bit late
[09:00] <mborzecki> mvo: i'll label it 2.34 in case we do another .34 release
[09:00] <mborzecki> Chipaca: hi there, there's always a timezone in which it's early :)
[09:01] <Chipaca> clearly i'm on UTC and just on time
[09:02] <mvo> mborzecki: +1
[09:02] <mvo> Chipaca: hey, good morning!
[09:02] <Chipaca> mvo: how're you doing?
[09:03] <mvo> Chipaca: I'm doing well, thank you! how are you?
[09:03] <Chipaca> mvo: not bad! anything on fire?
[09:05] <mvo> Chipaca: no new fire afaict, git deb package builds are unhappy to a varying degree, s390x in particular is unhappy since some time. but thats not yet too much of a problem (it will be once we need to do a new release)
[09:05] <Chipaca> boo
[09:08] <mvo> Chipaca: also some review would be great but otherwise things are calm right now. we need to aim for a beta of snapd that supports booting core18 this week
[09:08] <mvo> Chipaca: so not entirely calm :)
[09:08] <Chipaca> heh
[09:13] <Chipaca> mvo: other than 5557 is there anything for core18 that needs a review?
[09:17] <mvo> Chipaca: only 5549 which will be needed as part of the failover code for snapd but its not super urgent as on its own its not super useful
[09:17] <mvo> Chipaca: 5570 is an easy win
[09:19] <mvo> Chipaca: and 4.15 does not boot today again, *maybe* the entropy bug again in a different form, I'm just looking into this
[09:19] <Chipaca> there's been a bunch of people on 18.04 that found all their snaps stopped working, btw
[09:20] <Chipaca> not sure if that's already been sorted
[09:20] <Chipaca> #1757284
[09:31] <mborzecki> #5572 probably needs a look from jdstrand
[09:37] <mvo> Chipaca: is this similar to the forum thread from last week?
[09:37] <mvo> Chipaca: I think we got a report that after an update there was suddenly havoc
[09:37] <Chipaca> mvo: ah, probably, i might've merged the two in my head
[09:37] <Chipaca> yeah sounds like it
[09:38] <mvo> https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/bug-broken-snaps-after-each-update/6536
[09:55] <mborzecki> mvo: Chipaca: have you seen this https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/all-snap-app-crashed-on-ubuntu-18-04/6596/2 ?
[09:56] <Chipaca> mborzecki: isn't that #1757284?
[10:01] <Chipaca> mborzecki: and given mvo replied to that thread, my magic ball says he's seen it
[10:03] <mborzecki> Chipaca: the forum topic feels like a mix of 2 different issues
[10:04] <mvo> could well be two similar issues, I have not tried to reproduce myself, no time :/ but I think we need to look at this
[10:04] <mborzecki> nice how firefox has connection refusded on display, chromium gets sigtrap, ohmyfiraffe just segfaults
[10:07] <mvo> hm, is mup actually back?
[10:08] <mvo> apparently not, pretty trivial PR https://github.com/snapcore/core18/pull/52
[10:09] <mvo> (this is the reason why core18 was hanging in my local spread run, testing this right now)
[10:45] <mvo> mborzecki, Chipaca did you figure anything out about the bugreport(s) above? sorry, was a bit distracted with looking into kernel hang (tricky to debug, easy once understood :/
[10:54] <mborzecki> mvo: left a note in the forum, my bet is on apparmor for now
[10:56] <mvo> ta
[11:05] <mvo> 5560 needs a second review (trivial I hope)
[11:13] <Chipaca> mvo: isn't it superseded?
[11:16] <mvo> Chipaca: I just updated it
[11:17] <Chipaca> ohhhh
[11:17] <Chipaca> mvo: lgtm, then :-)
[11:21] <mvo> Chipaca: ta
[11:37] <Chipaca> mvo: want to know something hilarious: the _internal_ copy of runtime has a BigEndian boolean
[11:38] <Chipaca> ah, no, internal/sys (so syscall)
[11:43] <mvo> Chipaca: oh, *fun*
[11:44] <mvo> Chipaca: I remember reading a long discussion why you shouldn't care about endianess in one of the bug bugs and I have given up on anything like official support for this
[11:45] <Chipaca> mvo: yeah
[11:45] <Chipaca> mvo: it's entirely possible they're right, and either our test is doing more work than it should, or udev is bonkers, or both
[11:45] <Chipaca> mvo: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[11:46] <Chipaca> it's also not outside of the realm of the possible that this particular bit is the exception
[11:46] <mvo> yeah
[11:47] <Chipaca> mvo: should I add IsBigEndian to osutil?
[11:48] <mvo> Chipaca: hm, that sounds like a nice idea
[11:48] <mvo> Chipaca: fwiw, for practical purposes the check for s390x is fine, we don't support mips and our ppc64 is little endian (I will double check that though)
[11:49] <mvo> Chipaca: yep - endian-little
[11:50] <Chipaca> mvo: yep, ppc64 vs ppc64el
[11:50]  * mvo nods
[11:50] <Chipaca> Let's write a cpu that _only_ works in bigendian bcd
[11:52] <Chipaca> mvo: anyway, just lunchtime rambling, not blocking or anything
[11:55] <mvo> Chipaca: ta
[11:55] <mvo> Chipaca: yeah, probably a good idea to make it pretty
[11:55] <mvo> (prettier than it currently is)
[11:55] <Chipaca> mvo: also, did you inhale lunch, or are you IRCing while eating, and in either case, dude
[11:55] <pedronis> mvo: mborzecki: Chipaca: anything I can still do for you today before calling it a week?  (after the standup I have a bunch of meetings)
[11:56] <mvo> Chipaca: was a bit optimist about it, its not quite ready, should be any minute hopefully :)
[11:56] <Chipaca> mvo: ah :-)
[11:57] <Chipaca> pedronis: I've got half a mind to drop the horizontal snapshot approach, close snapshotstate, and instead do verticals
[11:57] <mborzecki> pedronis: i'm finishin up with with some changes to 5561, would be great it you could date a look before you leave, i understand it's a bit mind numbing though so no worries if you cannot make it :)
[11:58] <Chipaca> pedronis: like, "this pr implements 'snap snapshots'", etc
[11:58] <Chipaca> and maybe then slice _those_ into horizontals
[11:58] <Chipaca> and maybe, maybe, i can get reviews
[11:58] <pedronis> Chipaca: that doesn't sound something like I can help today, unless you propose it this second
[11:58] <Chipaca> pedronis: no, it's a week's work imo
[11:59] <Chipaca> OTOH I could also do the arch-indep work
[11:59] <Chipaca> that's also a week + in my estimate
[11:59] <Chipaca> dunno
[12:00] <Chipaca> pedronis: to answer your question: I doubt I'll have anything for you to do for me today before the standup, thank you
[12:00] <pedronis> ok
[12:01] <mvo> pedronis: all good from my side
[12:02] <pedronis> mborzecki: I'll see what I can do, we should chat a bit in the standup about what is not there and the state overall of parallel installs
[12:03] <rbasak> error: open /var/lib/snapd/hostfs/home/ubuntu/snap/lxd/common/snapcraft7l7sklw8/core_4917.assert: no such file or directory
[12:04] <rbasak> Known issue? Sounds familiar but my Googling is failing me.
[12:04] <rbasak> subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['lxc', 'file', 'push', '/home/ubuntu/snap/lxd/common/snapcraft7l7sklw8/core_4917.assert', 'local:snapcraft-nondiffidently-overfastidious-luetta/run/core_4917.assert']' returned non-zero exit status 1
[12:05] <rbasak> Ah, bug 1746612.
[12:06] <rbasak> Except that I am using the lxd cnap.
[12:06] <rbasak> snap
[12:06] <rbasak> Oh no, I'm not. I thought I was.
[12:06] <rbasak> Never mind :-/
[12:14] <mborzecki> pedronis: regarding https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5561#discussion_r205805753 do you think it makes sense to verify this again in checkSnap() ?
[12:17] <pedronis> mborzecki: sorry I don't understand which PR are you referring to?  it doesn't seem to check that the name matches
[12:18] <pedronis> if you mean #5567
[12:25] <mborzecki> pedronis: what i meant that it's probably more applicable to snap.Validate(), as it feels like a part of sanity check, and snapstate checks seem more like functional checks
[12:26] <mborzecki> pedronis: pff nvm, was thinking about something else entirely :)
[12:26] <pedronis> mborzecki: maybe, but  but something has to give,  Validate takes an info, either that info already has a full intance name split into it
[12:26] <pedronis> but then it's late or something needs tweaking in that interface
[12:35] <pedronis> mborzecki: I removed my -1,  don't think I can manage to review it again fully, we can discuss a bit about state in the standup as I said
[12:36] <mborzecki> pedronis: ack, who do you tnink is equally well familiar with those internals that might take a look too?
[12:36] <pedronis> mborzecki: mvo, also John,   what you are likely to be blocked on is alias stuff
[12:37] <mborzecki> yeah, i remember pulling my hair on this not long ago
[12:38] <pedronis> otoh you might be able to attack some of the interface bits
[12:56] <mborzecki> pedronis: heh, i dug up the changes for that TODO in SetupSnap in some other branch i have, guess I'll refactor this to be in checkSnap instead
[12:59] <mborzecki> no link in the calendar for the standup?
[13:00] <mvo> mborzecki: strange
[13:00] <mborzecki> it's not in my calendar either
[13:01] <pedronis> mvo: I pinged Gustavo about this last week, it's probably related to hangout vs meet
[13:01] <abeato> mvo, https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5469 passed now the spread tests
[13:01] <mvo> abeato: cool, thank you
[13:01] <mvo> abeato: I have a look after the meeting
[13:01] <abeato> mvo, great, thanks
[13:06] <Chipaca> jdrab: in tty[a-zA-Z]*[0-9]*, doesn't that still match 'tty' (and 'ttyprintk')
[13:06] <Chipaca> ?
[13:06] <Chipaca> er
[13:06] <Chipaca> jdstrand: ^
[13:11] <jdstrand> Chipaca: it is shell glob matching, not regex, so, 'no'
[13:12] <jdstrand> Chipaca: eg: ls /dev/tty[a-zA-Z]*[0-9]*
[13:12] <Chipaca> jdstrand: ah! i thought it was regexps because of the alternation
[13:12] <jdstrand> it looks like a regex to be sure
[13:12] <jdstrand> but it isn't
[13:12] <Chipaca> :-) ok
[13:12] <Chipaca> jdstrand: i'll dig out my udev dunce hat in a moment
[13:13] <jdstrand> Chipaca: well, that is quite the subtlety for that hat!
[13:13] <jdstrand> I just assume you keep it in the drawer
[13:14] <Chipaca> jdstrand: under my pillow
[13:16] <jdstrand> heheh
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
[13:50] <cachio> mborzecki, that error on amazon PR is not a problem now
[13:50] <cachio> I took a look and everything is ready to be landed
[13:50] <cachio> I'll create the PR today on spread to setup the preserve at system level
[13:50] <mborzecki> cachio: great
[13:51] <mborzecki> cachio: could you do another review of #5552 too?
[13:51] <cachio> mvo, we got the +1 to go to candidate
[13:51] <cachio> mborzecki, sure
[13:51] <mborzecki> cachio: thank you
[13:52] <mvo> cachio: cool, lets do it
[14:03] <cachio> mvo, 2.34.3 in candidate now
[14:06] <mborzecki> mvo: could you upload a release tarball for snapd later on?
[14:07] <mvo> mborzecki: sure, let me do this now
[14:07] <mborzecki> mvo: thank you!
[14:09] <mvo> mborzecki: should be there now
[14:09] <mborzecki> mvo: it is, thanks a lot!
[14:17] <xnox> mvo, snapd will break on cosmic with usrmerge =) or possibly not, not sure.... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1784394
[14:18] <xnox> there is a small patch there.... =)
[14:20] <mvo> xnox: thanks, looking
[14:21] <mvo> xnox: thanks, will do, it probably won't break as this should just be a symlink but its more correct this way
[14:22] <xnox> yeah
[14:22] <mvo> xnox: will do a PR shortly!
[14:25] <mborzecki> arch package updated to 2.34.3
[14:25] <mvo> ta
[14:27] <mborzecki> 5573 is green, if anyone wants to do a 2nd review we could land it soon :)
[14:38] <cachio> mborzecki, #5552 merged
[14:42] <mborzecki> cachio: thanks!
[14:59]  * pedronis eows
[15:29] <ogra> EOWing on a monday ... nice :)
[15:43]  * genii slides ogra a mug of their favourite beverage
[15:54]  * ogra slurps
[16:10]  * cachio lunch}
[16:10] <mvo> Chipaca: this core18 snapd unit writing is a bit of a pita - but thanks a lot for your PR (and thanks to mborzecki  as well). I'm slowly moving forward here, the restarting is still a bit fiddly
[16:11] <Chipaca> mvo: when you say my PR, you mean my review of your PR?
[16:12] <mvo> Chipaca: yes! the heat make me take mental shortcuts
[16:13] <Chipaca> mvo: HLQP! :-)
[16:29] <Chipaca> mvo: why the // FIXME instead of changing the Start to a Restart?
[16:32] <mvo> Chipaca: because it does not work yet
[16:32] <mvo> Chipaca: I got errors with exitcode: -1
[16:33] <mvo> Chipaca: which is strange
[16:33] <Chipaca> mvo: boooo 👻👎
[16:33] <mvo> Chipaca: looking into this now but wanted to get a spread run with improved tests
[16:33] <mvo> Chipaca: yeah :) or rather: :(
[16:33] <Chipaca> mvo: ok :-)
[16:33] <mvo> Chipaca: the fact that we get -1 is a bug in itself
[16:33] <Chipaca> mvo: yeah
[16:33] <mvo> Chipaca: oh well
[16:43] <ogra> just add a +2 at the top !
[17:47] <mvo> Chipaca: you mention ReplaceAllString in pr#5557, content is byte, do you think this is still preferable? or am I misreading your comment?
[17:53] <cachio> mvo, I have seen the lxd issue
[17:54] <cachio> let me see the images because lxd should not be pre-installed
[18:00] <mvo> cachio: thanks, I'm not sure what is going on, the PR is mostly a stab at the problem, I have not run it locally
[18:03] <cachio> mvo, I'll fix the image
[18:05] <mvo> cachio: ok, in this case feel free to close my PR once the image is fixed
[18:15] <cachio> mvo, great, thanks
[18:17] <cachio> mvo, updating the image for xenial 32 bits, if tests pass I'll close the PR
[19:27] <mvo> Chipaca: the issue was RequiredBy vs WantedBy - oh well :) hopefully with that the restart is fine!
[19:34] <cachio> mvo, lxd issue fixed
[19:36] <cachio> I cloosed the PR and pasted the logs with the test results
[19:37] <mvo> cachio: great, thank you
[19:45] <cachio> mvo, np
[21:15] <jdstrand> tyhicks: fyi, https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5578 and https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5579
[21:17] <tyhicks> jdstrand: cool, thanks
[21:18] <jdstrand> tyhicks: hopefully it'll make it into a new 2.34 (the latest stable), but it might not and be only in 2.35. up to mvo
[21:22] <FreeBDSM> okay, I'm ready to build firefox 52.9.0esr into a snap, how do I do that?
[21:39] <FreeBDSM> `man snapcraft` `No manual entry for snapcraft`
[21:42] <FreeBDSM> `autoreconf -i`: `autoreconf: 'configure.ac' or 'configure.in' is required` `Failed to run 'autoreconf -i' for 'firefox': Exited with code 1.` `Verify that the part is using the correct parameters and try again.`
[21:52] <FreeBDSM> jesus christ, snaps are awful
[21:52] <FreeBDSM> I just took a look at what is inside skype snap
[21:52] <FreeBDSM> piles of shite
[21:58] <kyrofa> Hey cachio, you still around today?
[22:03] <jdstrand> FreeBDSM: I think that would be an indication that particular snap isn't to your taste. not all snaps are created equal
[22:11] <cachio> kyrofa, yes
[22:11] <cachio> kyrofa, what do you need?
[22:11] <FreeBDSM> jdstrand: true
[22:12] <FreeBDSM> I think it'll be easier to do `snap install firefox` and just replace firefox files with the ones from ESR 52.9.0
[22:12] <FreeBDSM> and just never update
[22:12] <FreeBDSM> however, that's not much portable
[22:16] <kyrofa> cachio, I'm trying to learn how snapd does spread testing in autopkgtests
[22:17] <kyrofa> cachio, I see the `autopkgtest` group in spread.yaml
[22:18] <kyrofa> Is that all there is to it?
[22:20] <kyrofa> Basically, just point the test to happen on localhost?
[22:21] <kyrofa> I don't understand why there are so many systems if that's all that happens, though
[22:55] <cachio> kyrofa, the systems which you see are the targat systems for autopkgtests
[22:58] <cachio> kyrofa, first you need to generate the machine with that systems
[22:58] <cachio> then you run the tests against that one