| === himcesjf_ is now known as him-cesjf | ||
| Laney | ha;lp | 14:23 |
|---|---|---|
| Laney | I'm getting https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1753518 | 14:25 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1753518 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu) "package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93+2.02-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 14:25 |
| Laney | + grub-install --target=x86_64-efi --auto-nvram | 14:25 |
| Laney | Installing for x86_64-efi platform. | 14:25 |
| Laney | Could not delete variable: Invalid argument | 14:25 |
| Laney | grub-install: error: efibootmgr failed to register the boot entry: Block device required. | 14:25 |
| Laney | dpkg: error processing package grub-efi-amd64-signed (--configure): | 14:25 |
| Laney | installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 | 14:25 |
| Laney | etc | 14:25 |
| Laney | grub-install: info: executing efibootmgr </dev/null >/dev/null. | 14:27 |
| Laney | grub-install: info: executing efibootmgr -b 0000 -B. | 14:27 |
| Laney | Could not delete variable: Invalid argument | 14:27 |
| Laney | grub-install: error: efibootmgr failed to register the boot entry: Block device required. | 14:27 |
| apw | Laney, uff, cyphermox ^ | 14:40 |
| apw | i asusme that is on upgrade of a grub2 ... | 14:41 |
| Laney | yeah grub-efi-amd64-signed | 14:41 |
| apw | cosmic ? | 14:41 |
| Laney | nope bionic | 14:41 |
| Laney | *** 1.93.3+2.02-2ubuntu8.2 500 | 14:41 |
| Laney | 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages | 14:41 |
| sforshee | LocutusOfBorg: we have a 4.17 kernel that's about ready for cosmic-release, except that it needs the virtualbox from -proposed to pass adt. Is that going to promote soon? | 14:43 |
| apw | Laney, what kernel are you runing | 14:43 |
| apw | when that fails | 14:43 |
| Laney | laney@nightingale> uname -a ~ | 14:44 |
| Laney | Linux nightingale 4.15.0-23-generic #25-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 23 18:02:16 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | 14:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sforshee, I'm not the one blocking it | 14:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ask release team | 14:44 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, what is blocking it | 14:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | when I requested to make xorg migrate, it was only blocked by qtbase | 14:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sorry, only blocked by xorg | 14:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | now it is entangled with qtbase too | 14:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | soooo, I don't care anymore | 14:46 |
| === SimonNL is now known as SimonNL_Afk | ||
| === SimonNL_Afk is now known as SimonNL | ||
| danieru98 | jsalisbury, just finished testing your test kernel for bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1783906 , i've posted an update there, long story short, you were right about reverting 2dc0b46b5ea3, that fixes that bug | 20:02 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1783906 in linux (Ubuntu Cosmic) "Linux 4.15 and onwards fails to initialize some hard drives" [Medium,In progress] | 20:02 |
| danieru98 | Should i mark that bug as fixed, or wait for any further updates? | 20:02 |
| jsalisbury | danieru98, wait for further updates. I need to investigate that commit further to see if it can be simply reverted or needs to be fixed properly. | 20:03 |
| jsalisbury | danieru98, I'll probably need to ping the patch author, but I'll cc the bug report, so it gets all the email exchange. | 20:04 |
| danieru98 | jsalisbury, okay, if you need me to test any other kernel feel free to just ask me. i'll keep my eyes on on that bug report for any updates | 20:05 |
| jsalisbury | danieru98, thanks! | 20:10 |
| tyhicks | sforshee: hey - for the /sys/class/net changes that I did for LXD, is it alright if I just "backport" them to ubuntu-unstable/master (currently 4.18 based) in order to land them in cosmic? I'd prefer to just ignore 4.15 for now | 20:28 |
| sforshee | tyhicks: yes however you may also want to backport to 4.17 (cosmic/master-next) | 20:29 |
| tyhicks | sforshee: oh, should I *only* do cosmic/master-next rather than unstable/master? | 20:30 |
| tyhicks | they cherry pick to unstable/master but I haven't tried cosmic/master-next yet | 20:31 |
| sforshee | should do both if it's easy, but if 4.17 is a big pain it's not that big of a deal | 20:33 |
| tyhicks | sforshee: I'll figure out how to do both but 4.17 is a pain because lxd still isn't working there due to the 55956b59df33 ("vfs: Allow userns root to call mknod on owned filesystems.") | 20:38 |
| sforshee | tyhicks: that's odd, lxd adt tests pass on our 4.17 kernel | 20:39 |
| tyhicks | sforshee: sorry, I meant 4.18 is a pain | 20:40 |
| tyhicks | 4.17 doesn't have that commit | 20:40 |
| sforshee | tyhicks: that makes more sense | 20:41 |
| sforshee | oh yes the mknod thing ... | 20:41 |
| tyhicks | right | 20:42 |
| tyhicks | that never got reverted | 20:42 |
| sforshee | tyhicks: I'll check in with brauner about that tomorrow, we're gonna need a resolution on that soon | 20:43 |
| tyhicks | sforshee: I think there's a workaround in lxd now but it hasn't been released yet, IIRC | 20:43 |
| sforshee | yeah I had thought they had a fix for lxd | 20:44 |
| sforshee | but still problems because of systemd's everywhere without the fix | 20:44 |
| tyhicks | right | 20:44 |
| stgraber | 3.0.2 liblxc will have the workaround but yeah, won't necessarily help with the containers... | 20:44 |
| stgraber | I think the LXD snap should also already include all the needed bits for 4.18 | 20:45 |
| stgraber | yeah, it does, so "snap install lxd" would get you a LXD with the needed liblxc bits | 20:45 |
| sforshee | stgraber: I do know that adt is failing for both lxc and lxd on 4.18, I haven't had ac hance to look into it yet | 20:45 |
| stgraber | yeah, that'll most likely fail until we push 3.0.2. We could cherry-pick just that one commit if that's the only thing that's blocking you with 4.18. | 20:48 |
| sforshee | oh no that's far from the only thing | 20:48 |
| stgraber | sforshee, tyhicks: btw, looks like the fix from jjohansen in bug 1780227 works fine, do you know if this is already in the relevant branches for the next round of SRUs? | 20:48 |
| ubot5 | bug 1780227 in linux (Ubuntu Bionic) "locking sockets broken due to missing AppArmor socket mediation patches" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1780227 | 20:48 |
| jjohansen | stgraber: it is not, in yet | 20:49 |
| tyhicks | stgraber: not your problem but it looks like something in snappy is broke on 4.18 so I can't install the snap: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/87rksWFPKk/ :) | 20:50 |
| tyhicks | I can work around this in my test kernel build so no worries | 20:50 |
| stgraber | tyhicks: sounds apparmor related, do you see a denial? | 20:51 |
| tyhicks | that's the first thing I looked for | 20:51 |
| tyhicks | hmm, there are some odd denials earlier in the logs | 20:52 |
| tyhicks | audit: type=1400 audit(1532983771.976:97): apparmor="DENIED" operation="ptrace" profile="/usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine" pid=1422 comm="snap-confine" requested_mask="read" denied_mask="read" peer="unconfined" | 20:52 |
| tyhicks | that sounds like a familiar issue | 20:52 |
| jdstrand | it is | 20:54 |
| jdstrand | jj fixed an issue that was a trace into a read | 20:55 |
| jdstrand | snapd isn't fixed yet | 20:55 |
| jdstrand | https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/custom-kernel-error-on-readlinkat-in-mount-namespace/6097/21 | 20:56 |
| tyhicks | jdstrand: ack, thanks - don't escalate priorities for it on my behalf as I can work around it in order to get my testing done | 20:56 |
| jdstrand | tyhicks: you are on 4.18? | 20:56 |
| tyhicks | jdstrand: yes | 20:56 |
| jdstrand | yeah | 20:56 |
| jdstrand | that is that | 20:56 |
| tyhicks | alright, good to know | 20:57 |
| jdstrand | tyhicks: it is pretty high on the list, but not all the way up | 20:58 |
| jdstrand | tyhicks: if it comes time when you think it should be escalated, ping me | 20:58 |
| tyhicks | jdstrand: as sforshee mentioned above, there are several other things blocking 4.18 landing in cosmic but it is coming soon | 20:59 |
| tyhicks | dropping a bare ptrace rule into /etc/apparmor.d/usr.lib.snapd.snap-confine.real is going to let me do what I need to do | 21:01 |
| jdstrand | tyhicks: so will 'ptrace read peer=unconfined,' :) | 21:04 |
| jdstrand | I'll do a quick PR for that, and do the interrogating later | 21:04 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!