[13:35] <naturalblue> hey. is there anyone here who might answer me a question on maas with juju lxds and maas's builtin proxy feature
[13:41] <naturalblue> I have setup maas and juju. I have multiple VLANS and all of them have a gateway address on the maas controller. I have enabled builtin proxy but when I juju deploy an lxd container the proxy settings are not configured and i have to manually enter the lxd and create/add the maas proxy settings into apt.d/proxy.conf file
[13:42] <naturalblue> Is maas not supposed to pass down proxy settings to machines/lxds
[22:18] <xygn4l> roaksoax: commission bug updated
[22:22] <xygn4l> roaksoax: also, is it normal for rack controllers to do their probe for external DHCP servers check, and find its partner rack controllers IP each time?   should both nodes be answering DHCP?
[22:24] <xygn4l> roaksoax: i see 5 services running on both nodes,  rackd, http, tftp, dhcpd, and ntp all enabled on both
[23:13] <mpontillo> naturalblue: you might reach out in #juju; it's likely that when the container is deployed, the proxy settings from MAAS aren't being "inherited" (since juju operates with more clouds than just MAAS, it may not have been clear that this was a requirement)
[23:41] <roaksoax> xygn4l: if you could, please file a bug for that
[23:41] <xygn4l> re: ipmi?
[23:42] <roaksoax> xygn4l: the dhcp issue above
[23:42] <xygn4l> interesting.  not related to our commission ticket?
[23:44] <roaksoax> xygn4l: it may actually be, if you can provide that update on the bug report, it would be good, and we can later split it
[23:44] <roaksoax> xygn4l: for ipmi replied on pm