| benl90 | thanks rbasak nacc . Leaving now | 00:33 |
|---|---|---|
| cpaelzer | good morning | 04:43 |
| lordievader | Good morning | 06:01 |
| tobias-urdin | coreycb: did something change in the tempest packages? we dont get the neutron tempest plugin anymore | 07:57 |
| tobias-urdin | http://logs.openstack.org/22/583222/14/check/puppet-openstack-integration-5-scenario004-tempest-ubuntu-bionic-mimic/cc35e59/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-08-14_23_31_33_113245 | 07:57 |
| === popey_ is now known as popey | ||
| ahasenack | good morning | 12:20 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: both of your samba uploads got trumped by security :-/ | 13:12 |
| ahasenack | oh | 13:13 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: if you can rebase and reupload soon, I'll try and review immediately? I would review now but I'm a bit thrown by the tooling parenting it wrong, so the diff looks bad. I could work around to review what you uploaded, but possibly not worth it. | 13:13 |
| rbasak | (well, technically the tooling is parenting it correctly, which is why I noticed :) | 13:13 |
| ahasenack | I'll rebase it, but where is the package now? Not in proposed yet, right? | 13:14 |
| ahasenack | it's in limbo? | 13:14 |
| rbasak | It's in unapproved | 13:15 |
| rbasak | I can reject. Might as well do it now I guess. | 13:15 |
| ahasenack | can you reject it? | 13:15 |
| rbasak | ack | 13:15 |
| rbasak | Done | 13:15 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: I rebased xenial-samba-include-1583324 and pushed/forced, can you do a quick check if that's what you expect in terms of tags and branches? | 13:43 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: same for trusty-samba-include-1583324 | 13:48 |
| rbasak | Looking | 13:50 |
| ahasenack | funny, debian rebooted gitlab | 13:52 |
| ahasenack | and the cached login was lost | 13:52 |
| ahasenack | must be in memory, or in /tmp | 13:53 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: the diff against the tip of those branches and what's in the archive looks OK. That's what I review for SRU purposes. | 13:57 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: ok, I need sponsoring then I'm afraid :) | 13:57 |
| ahasenack | (can't upload samba yet) | 13:57 |
| rbasak | I'm not supposed to sponsor and also SRU review | 13:58 |
| ahasenack | even if the same diff was sponsored before? | 13:58 |
| rbasak | That'd be OK, but then I need to confirm it was the same diff | 13:58 |
| rbasak | Let's see | 13:58 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: do you know what's missing here https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3355 for me to select "lander signoff"? It's gray and unclickable by me. What did I forget? | 13:59 |
| ahasenack | or is it because I can't upload krb5? | 13:59 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: taking a look | 14:00 |
| cpaelzer | maybe, it seems I can set it | 14:00 |
| cpaelzer | should I try to? | 14:00 |
| ahasenack | :/ | 14:00 |
| ahasenack | yes please | 14:00 |
| cpaelzer | to see what happens | 14:00 |
| cpaelzer | yeah worked | 14:01 |
| cpaelzer | if that really is the ACL I'm not sure | 14:01 |
| ahasenack | sad | 14:01 |
| cpaelzer | but you are working on more upload permissions anyway, so we will see if that opens up more | 14:01 |
| ahasenack | it should block the publish button, not this step | 14:01 |
| cpaelzer | we might ask sil if that even is what is blocking it | 14:02 |
| cpaelzer | not around atm thou | 14:02 |
| CheckmateX | Hi can anyone guide me to edit fail2ban to block users who multiple POST's on a php page ? | 14:04 |
| cpaelzer | CheckmateX: like https://yaleman.org/2014/12/16/using-fail2ban-to-mitigate-apache-post-flooding/ maybe? | 14:06 |
| CheckmateX | cpaelzer i have a php search page and some bad people avail the page to POST multiple request this exhausts everything i'm not sure if the Recaptcha service will block them or what i need to do | 14:08 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: verified the diff is the same for both | 14:08 |
| rbasak | I'll sponsor | 14:08 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: thanks | 14:08 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: is that for the smb security release killing the SRUs | 14:09 |
| cpaelzer | ? | 14:09 |
| ahasenack | yep | 14:09 |
| smb | cpaelzer, I did what? | 14:09 |
| cpaelzer | hehe | 14:10 |
| CheckmateX | cpaelzer you think the guide you give me gonna work ? | 14:10 |
| cpaelzer | you got released by security | 14:10 |
| cpaelzer | CheckmateX: I don't know, it just pretty much matched your search terms | 14:10 |
| smb | cpaelzer, wished I would let go... :) | 14:10 |
| rbasak | smb: aren't you deprecated now? I heard you were insecure or something? :) | 14:11 |
| CheckmateX | cpaelzer you know when i check the logs i found the same ip was maked many search POST's per minute | 14:11 |
| cpaelzer | smb: you started it :-P | 14:11 |
| * rbasak is amused by having typed "git branch -r|grep aha" | 14:12 | |
| smb | rbasak, certainly outdated and an (hr) hazard .. ;) | 14:12 |
| cpaelzer | rharper: aha | 14:13 |
| CheckmateX | cpaelzer i can custome the php page right ? | 14:14 |
| CheckmateX | on fail2ban | 14:14 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Hello! The installer of ubuntu-18.04-server-amd64.iso get down at 12% of the Software Selection and Installation section. So I quited to install 18.04 server directly. | 14:40 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: how do you mean "goes down"? what's the hardware, which non default choices did you make during installation? | 14:41 |
| tomreyn | and what does "install directly" mean? | 14:42 |
| tomreyn | did you verify the iso downloaded properly and is unmodified? | 14:42 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | The "software selection and installation" get down and is restarted. / Directly means that I tried to install Ubuntu Server 18.04 from the DVD of that ISO. | 14:43 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | ok. I verify now. | 14:43 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | tomreyn: Where can I get the checksums? | 14:48 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: nex tto where you downloaded the iso from | 14:49 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Now I cannot find the site of ubuntu-18.04.1-server-amd64.iso ... | 14:50 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: do you remember the history behind this squid delta we have been carrying? https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/fythxdS5Pc/ | 14:50 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/18.04.1/release/ | 14:50 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: there is the squid-deb-proxy package, with more modern and complete refresh patterns for deb repositories | 14:50 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: I wonder how much I should improve this delta we have, or just drop it entirely in favor of the squid-deb-proxy package | 14:50 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: squid-deb-proxy has this relevant config, more complete: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nDrczbfmCY/ | 14:51 |
| ahasenack | the regexps could be better, though | 14:51 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | tomaw: ok... The checksum doesn't match now. | 14:52 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: i assume you meant to address me. if checksums dont match then you better download again until they do. | 14:54 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | ok. | 14:54 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: in case your connectivity is not reliable, there should also be torrents, which may help then. | 14:55 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | I download it via torrent. | 14:55 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | The torrents' ISO's sha1sum doesn't match SHA1SUMS | 14:58 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | tomreyn: Probably, that's the trouble...... | 14:59 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: I'm not sure, sorry. I wouldn't be surprised if I were involved with that at some point though. | 15:00 |
| rbasak | I use squid rather than squid-deb-proxy, but also for debs. | 15:00 |
| ahasenack | I'm tempted to improve that patch, taking some bits from squid-deb-proxy | 15:01 |
| rbasak | What does squid-deb-proxy get us apart from those rules and locking down to the archive (or is it debs?)? | 15:01 |
| ahasenack | like adding .bz2, .xz | 15:01 |
| rbasak | Improving it makes sense. | 15:01 |
| ahasenack | squid-deb-proxy also has acls, runs another copy of squid in another port | 15:01 |
| ahasenack | it's more tailored indeed | 15:01 |
| ahasenack | but I think we can take the improved patterns from there | 15:01 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: it matches for me | 15:02 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | ok. I try again. | 15:02 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: I'm comparing the sha1sum over the .iso file downloaded using the .torrent at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/18.04/release/ubuntu-18.04.1-server-amd64.iso.torrent against http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/18.04/release/SHA1SUMS | 15:03 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | >87bedd68607f059ca973f86346bbdf1caa6e1077 *ubuntu-18.04.1-server-amd64.iso | 15:04 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | What does the astarisk mean? | 15:04 |
| sdeziel | '*' is for binary | 15:05 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | ok. | 15:05 |
| sdeziel | that's the input mode | 15:05 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | tomreyn: I don't know why. But SHA1SUMS says that line and my result doesn't match yet. | 15:06 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | $ sha1sum -b ubuntu-18.04-server-amd64.iso | 15:06 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | 73ae6579ef7c51d944a0be5c4c48f748bfd689df *ubuntu-18.04-server-amd64.iso | 15:06 |
| sdeziel | Emmanuel_Chanel: you could use "sha1sum -c --ignore-missing SHA1SUMS" for easier comparison | 15:07 |
| sdeziel | Emmanuel_Chanel: isn't the SHA1SUMS file you downloaded the one for 18.04 and the ISO for 18.04.1 ? | 15:08 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: didnt you mean to download 18.04.*1* ? | 15:09 |
| tomreyn | oh i'm late ;) | 15:09 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Yes, I downloaded ubuntu 18.04 server's. | 15:09 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | sha1sum -c --ignore-missing SHA1SUMS says ok. | 15:09 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | now. | 15:09 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | $ sha1sum -c --ignore-missing SHA1SUMS | 15:09 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | ubuntu-18.04.1-server-amd64.iso: OK | 15:09 |
| tomreyn | glad you worked it out. | 15:10 |
| sdeziel | odd, both http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/18.04/release/SHA1SUMS and http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/18.04.1/release/SHA1SUMS serve the same file | 15:10 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | So my ISO was verified stuff...... | 15:11 |
| rbasak | --ignore-missing? Handy! | 15:22 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | $ sha1sum -b /dev/sr1 | 15:22 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | 87bedd68607f059ca973f86346bbdf1caa6e1077 */dev/sr1 | 15:22 |
| rbasak | I always used grep | 15:22 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | SHA1SUM matches my Ubuntu 18.01.1 Server DVD...... | 15:22 |
| blackflow | rbasak: TIL after all these years.... :) me too. | 15:22 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | tomreyn: So I found that the error is on the released ISO image itself... | 15:23 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Around 12% point, "Software Selection and Installation" restarts. And it repeats forever. | 15:28 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | It's same for Ubuntu 18.01 Server DVD. | 15:28 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: have yu verified this against copletely separate hardware and installation media? | 15:29 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | I don't understand what separate hardware means. I checked the installation media completely with SHA1SUM on http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/18.04.1/release/SHA1SUMS | 15:31 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: chances are you just have a bad dimm or something. i'll try on a VM. | 15:32 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Maybe... Well, I've installed Ubuntu 16.04.5 Server on the server and upgrade it to 18.04 now. I don't have another test environment. So I cannot check now. | 15:33 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: can you tell me about your hardware please | 15:36 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Yes. HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2 | 15:38 |
| tomreyn | booting uefi or legacy? | 15:38 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | legacy. | 15:38 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: how did you partition? | 15:39 |
| tomreyn | i assume you have multiple disks form the installers' point of view? | 15:40 |
| tomreyn | these are the options you had during installation, the highlighted one is default: http://i.imgur.com/wU2Sfzc.png | 15:41 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | /dev/sda1 bios boot /dev/sda2 /boot /dev/sda3 main LVM and another space on /dev/sdb1 | 15:41 |
| tomreyn | thanks, ext4 file systems? also on sdb1? | 15:41 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | I've selected btrfs then. | 15:42 |
| tomreyn | where? | 15:42 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | The multiple disks caused the problem? | 15:42 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | /dev/sdb1 | 15:42 |
| tomreyn | so file systems on sda are ext4? | 15:42 |
| tomreyn | i don't know of any problem, yet | 15:42 |
| tomreyn | i'm trying to reproduce what you reported | 15:43 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | $ ls /dev/mapper/ | 15:43 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | control gateway--vg-root gateway--vg-var | 15:43 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | gateway--vg-home gateway--vg-swap_1 | 15:43 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Now the LVM volumes are such and execpt home and swap, they are ext4 partitions. | 15:43 |
| tomreyn | okay, and sdb1 is just this partition with btrfs directly on top, no lvm etc? | 15:44 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Yes. on top. | 15:44 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: is /dev/sda > 2TB or did you create a GPT partition table there beforehand? | 15:47 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | 6TB with GPT if I didn't mistake. | 15:48 |
| tomreyn | with this size the installer should automatically use GPT. i think it does use msdos & MBR for disks with <2TB capacity | 15:48 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | I thought so, too. And it's working now. | 15:50 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | tomreyn: You have that HP server? | 15:58 |
| tomreyn | no | 15:58 |
| tomreyn | i'm just another random user | 15:59 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | ok. | 16:01 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Actually, what does the correct name of "Software Selection and Installation"? | 16:02 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | I selected Japanese environment since I'm actually a Japanese man. ( Emmanuel_Chanel is just a handle. ) | 16:02 |
| tomreyn | i don't understand the question, please clarify. | 16:04 |
| tomreyn | thanks for pointing out japanese, so it might be multi byte issue | 16:05 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: hey around still? | 16:09 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | You would see what I call "Software Selection and Installation" of the Ubuntu Server's installer. But I don't really know. So I asked its correct name. | 16:09 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Does that correct English shown name? | 16:11 |
| cpaelzer | jamespage: no more here, but coming by every now and then | 17:06 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: sorry, didnt see your reply. i understand the installation step you mean (and do not remember the exact title myself). i did postpone testing this until there will be more indication that this is an actuall installer issue. | 17:16 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | At 12% or so, the dialog window(?) occurs. And the step crashes and restarts. That error process repeats forever. | 17:21 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | It says that it's down by segfault. And I don't find what segfault occurred. | 17:22 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: I'll ping you tomorrow am re python-libvirt and py3.7 | 17:30 |
| cpaelzer | jamespage: I think you don' thave to | 17:51 |
| cpaelzer | jamespage: 1786157 ? | 17:51 |
| cpaelzer | coreycb: already pinged me, the issue is quite clear | 17:51 |
| cpaelzer | to resolve we just need anything >=libvirt 4.5 in cosmic | 17:51 |
| cpaelzer | and that I work on since a week | 17:52 |
| cpaelzer | it is close to be ready, but I wait on upstream and Debian response to a lot of things and a MP review from the team | 17:52 |
| cpaelzer | My plan was to push that on Friday (and worst case clean up minor things later if upstream feedback is more complex than ack/nack) | 17:52 |
| cpaelzer | that in turn will unlick the new version whcih would work for you | 17:52 |
| cpaelzer | OTOH if my assumption on the particular bug is wrong, then let me know | 17:53 |
| cpaelzer | kstenerud: o/ | 18:02 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: while it's a live linux, the installer is a linux installation. you can switch tty's and the installer has an option to spawn a shell. it will have a 'dmesg' command and a syslog, too. | 18:09 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Sorry, I haven't checked dmesg. Just I remember that something got segfault to lead the Software Selection and Installation to restart. | 18:11 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | tomreyn: You couldn't reproduce my situation? Sorry for not collecting more info. to tell. | 18:11 |
| tomreyn | Emmanuel_Chanel: no, i wasn't able to reproduce it. (but i don't have the same hardware available.) | 18:16 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | Around 12%, on that steop, what software is started? | 18:18 |
| * RoyK guesses disk issues | 18:18 | |
| RoyK | check dmesg | 18:19 |
| RoyK | or memory failure | 18:20 |
| RoyK | http://memtest.org/ is good | 18:20 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | I should've done that. But now my server of that problem is back to ordinary operating. | 18:20 |
| Emmanuel_Chanel | tomreyn: Thanks for experiments! | 18:24 |
| tomreyn | welcome | 18:37 |
| runelind_q | if I'm running on HWE can I apt-get purge linux-image-generic? | 20:37 |
| sarnold | I'd expect that to work; report back if it gives you trouble :) | 20:39 |
| runelind_q | especially since I'm remote from the server :) | 20:43 |
| tobias-urdin | jamespage: heard from coreycb that he was away until friday so just reposting to you | 21:17 |
| tobias-urdin | 09:48 < tobias-urdin> coreycb: did something change in the tempest packages? we dont get the neutron tempest plugin anymore | | 21:17 |
| tobias-urdin | 09:48 < tobias-urdin> | 21:17 |
| tobias-urdin | http://logs.openstack.org/22/583222/14/check/puppet-openstack-integration-5-scenario004-tempest-ubuntu-bionic-mimic/cc35e59/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-08-14_23_31_33_113245 | 21:17 |
| tobias-urdin | hopefully you'll see this tomorrow :) see you later | 21:17 |
| arrrghhh | Hey all. I have a mdadm raid1 array (NOT the OS disk) - I'd like to tear it down back to be a simple JBOD | 21:18 |
| arrrghhh | It appears I should be able to umount the mdadm array, stop the array and zero the superblocks... but I can't stop the array or zero the superblocks, it seems *something* is still calling it... but I have successfully done the 'umount' | 21:19 |
| tomreyn | arrrghhh: are you hopeing to preserve the data this way? | 21:21 |
| arrrghhh | tomreyn, ideally if I could preserve the data on one disk... I do have backups | 21:21 |
| arrrghhh | but I would prefer to not have to resort to the backups as that takes time | 21:21 |
| tomreyn | arrrghhh: okay, i don't know whether this approach will work for doing so. it might, but not sure. | 21:22 |
| arrrghhh | tomreyn, well even if it does destroy the data, meh. Whatever method gets it done... | 21:22 |
| tomreyn | arrrghhh: i can, however, comment on the tearing-things-apart-part. | 21:22 |
| tomreyn | so just unmounting the file systems wont be sufficient, you need to stop the array | 21:23 |
| arrrghhh | right, I can't stop the array :) | 21:23 |
| tomreyn | oh you actually planned that step, sorry | 21:23 |
| arrrghhh | I assume something is still accessing it... I don't know what. lsof isn't very helpful | 21:23 |
| arrrghhh | Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group? | 21:23 |
| arrrghhh | I stopped all the docker containers and samba/nfs | 21:24 |
| tomreyn | "dmsetup ls" sometimes helps getting new ideas onwhat to try there | 21:24 |
| arrrghhh | hm ok | 21:24 |
| tomreyn | maybe you'll the the major/minor still mounted or otherwise 'used' this way? | 21:25 |
| arrrghhh | tomreyn, is that for LVM? I only see my LVM volumes | 21:25 |
| tomreyn | but i know of no better way either | 21:25 |
| arrrghhh | I figured if I unmounted it, nothing else could be using it... | 21:25 |
| tomreyn | umm you're right, sorry, lvm and cryptsetup would use dmsetup | 21:25 |
| arrrghhh | I guess I can reboot the server | 21:25 |
| tomreyn | not mdraid | 21:25 |
| arrrghhh | comment the mount in fstab | 21:26 |
| arrrghhh | I'll try that when I get home. | 21:26 |
| arrrghhh | will bbiab, if anyone else has any ideas I'll read them when I get home :) | 21:26 |
| tomreyn | can you post /proc/mdstat | 21:26 |
| tomreyn | you mentioned you have lvm, if that's on top of /dev/md0 you'll need to vgchange -a n | 21:32 |
| tomreyn | (and, i think optionally, pvremove) | 21:32 |
| === whislock_ is now known as whislock | ||
| arrrghhh | well I seem to have dropped the channel... oh well, a reboot did get the array to stop | 22:09 |
| arrrghhh | oh the reboot. derp lol | 22:09 |
| qman | arrrghhh: yeah, you have to luksclose or other wise un-crypto the thing and turn off the volume group | 22:18 |
| qman | And even then, lvm doesn't always let go without rebooting | 22:19 |
| qman | That's just a lovely lvm thing, it's been a persistent issue for years | 22:19 |
| qman | Well, a device mapper thing, more accurately | 22:20 |
| arrrghhh | hm I am not using LVM on this disk | 22:20 |
| arrrghhh | ah | 22:20 |
| === SJrX is now known as SJr | ||
| arrrghhh | so after I zero the superblock, is there something I need to do to change the disks back to JBOD? | 22:56 |
| arrrghhh | I am trying to find the UUID with blkid so I can setup the individual disks in fstab and these two RAID disks are not showing up in blkid... | 22:57 |
| blackflow | arrrghhh: mdadm based software raid? | 22:58 |
| arrrghhh | blackflow, yes correct mdadm | 22:59 |
| arrrghhh | it was RAID1, I am trying to break the array and just have two plain ole disks.. | 23:00 |
| arrrghhh | ideally preserving the data on one, but not essential. | 23:00 |
| blackflow | arrrghhh: did you mdadm --stop the array first? | 23:01 |
| arrrghhh | yep | 23:01 |
| blackflow | not sure then. you can always reboot. | 23:01 |
| arrrghhh | oh ok | 23:01 |
| blackflow | or wait... see what partprobe does | 23:01 |
| arrrghhh | sure | 23:02 |
| arrrghhh | well without sudo it was mad. with sudo, nothing. just paused for a bit and went to the next line, nothing in the output | 23:02 |
| blackflow | arrrghhh: yeah but does blkid now list individual disks/partitions? | 23:02 |
| blackflow | which btw... should've been listed even before. | 23:03 |
| arrrghhh | nope | 23:03 |
| arrrghhh | /dev/sdb1 and /dev/sdc1 are not in blkid | 23:03 |
| blackflow | mdadm devices don't change the visibility of individual disks/partitions to the kernel. are you sure that's all mdadm? no hardware raid anywhere? not evne bios fakeraid? | 23:03 |
| arrrghhh | no fakeraid | 23:03 |
| arrrghhh | this is how they show up in fdisk -l: "/dev/sdb1 2048 1953525167 1953523120 931.5G fd Linux raid autodetect" | 23:04 |
| arrrghhh | https://hastebin.com/wicosezequ.coffeescript | 23:04 |
| blackflow | hm, maybe the partition type is confusing blkid. you can always reset those to 83 | 23:05 |
| arrrghhh | that's what I was thinking, that raid autodetect type | 23:05 |
| arrrghhh | ok | 23:05 |
| blackflow | it's been a while since I last used mdadm. I've been ZFS-ing for years now :) | 23:06 |
| sarnold | :) | 23:06 |
| blackflow | sarnold: oh yeah, you like ZFS too! ;) *highfive* | 23:06 |
| * sarnold ^5 blackflow | 23:06 | |
| arrrghhh | hm. well even after a reboot they do not show up in blkid... | 23:10 |
| blackflow | arrrghhh: changed partition types? | 23:11 |
| arrrghhh | well on one of the disks I did | 23:11 |
| arrrghhh | but neither show up... hm | 23:11 |
| blackflow | are those partitions linked in /dev/disk/by-uuid? | 23:13 |
| blackflow | blkid is just... summarizing the information you already have available in /dev | 23:13 |
| arrrghhh | hm there are some dm-1, dm-2 etc devices | 23:14 |
| arrrghhh | but I don't see sdb1 or sdc1 | 23:14 |
| arrrghhh | there are four of these "dm-#" devices... | 23:15 |
| blackflow | arrrghhh: how about blkid -g ? | 23:15 |
| arrrghhh | not sure what -g does, but it is empty | 23:15 |
| blackflow | `man blkid` will explain :) | 23:15 |
| arrrghhh | garbage collect the cache | 23:16 |
| arrrghhh | yea I looked at the help sorry | 23:16 |
| blackflow | well, I'm guessing those partitions are lacking any meaningful identifiers to be noted as individual devices, being part of the raid array. missing labels, uuids, or something. | 23:16 |
| arrrghhh | so... reformat? | 23:17 |
| blackflow | repartition, reformat, something like that. | 23:17 |
| arrrghhh | hm bummer. well this is why I took a backup lol | 23:17 |
| arrrghhh | I thought it would be possible to break the array tho without data loss... oh well | 23:18 |
| blackflow | arrrghhh: try removing the partition layout and then repartitioning exactly the same way, sector-wise | 23:18 |
| blackflow | eg with parted, mklabel msdos and then mkpart for each, using sector numbers to have _exactly_ the same layout | 23:18 |
| blackflow | that should give them partuuid at least, and blkid/kernl should be able to see them as such. might need to run partprobe after you re-partition | 23:19 |
| blackflow | note that partitioning only changes the partition tables. if you re-partition in exactly the same way, the data under them should stay intact and at the same offsets. | 23:20 |
| arrrghhh | right | 23:20 |
| arrrghhh | I'm just looking up how this works, I don't use parted all that often | 23:21 |
| blackflow | there are other tools, parted is just something I'm used to | 23:22 |
| arrrghhh | I just get the start/end with fdisk right? | 23:25 |
| arrrghhh | hm parted shows it as well | 23:27 |
| arrrghhh | but it seems odd... not precise I guess | 23:27 |
| blackflow | that's why I mention using sectors and not MB or MiB | 23:29 |
| arrrghhh | blackflow, mklabel says it will destroy data...? | 23:34 |
| arrrghhh | Warning: The existing disk label on /dev/sdb will be destroyed and all data on this disk will be lost. Do you | 23:34 |
| arrrghhh | want to continue? | 23:34 |
| arrrghhh | oops. | 23:34 |
| sarnold | it might not actually overwrite all data, but just the user know the most likely outcome | 23:35 |
| sarnold | if you're playing games behind the back of the system it might still work. and if not, well, you've got backups, right? right? :) | 23:35 |
| arrrghhh | yep I do | 23:37 |
| arrrghhh | was hoping to avoid using them, as it will take a lot longer to restore.... but they are there | 23:37 |
| sarnold | good good. then you can carry on with your wild experiment :) | 23:38 |
| arrrghhh | I didn't think breaking a raid array would be this hard... | 23:38 |
| arrrghhh | oh there is no 'file system' listed when I print this disk | 23:39 |
| arrrghhh | that may be an issue... | 23:39 |
| arrrghhh | I guess I have to format at that point? | 23:39 |
| sirvictory4 | is it safe to mix input- and output-type filter rules in a single custom iptables chain? Or should I have something like webserver-in and webserver-out chains? | 23:44 |
| arrrghhh | well after a reboot and a format the one disk is showing... that sucks tho :( | 23:46 |
| whislock | sirvictory4: What are you trying to achieve? | 23:47 |
| whislock | arrrghhh: Completely irrelevant, but I keep thinking of Monty Python/Holy Grail when I see your name. | 23:49 |
| sirvictory4 | whislock: just organizing my iptables rules, thats all | 23:49 |
| arrrghhh | well that castle was one of the inspirations | 23:49 |
| sirvictory4 | they are getting long | 23:49 |
| whislock | sirvictory4: Doesn't really help me much. | 23:49 |
| whislock | sirvictory4: Are you doing anything overly complicated? | 23:50 |
| sirvictory4 | whislock: ok, a simple matching rule of "-p icmp -j my-icmp-table" for both INPUT and OUTPUT | 23:51 |
| arrrghhh | so is there any other way after doing a mkfs.ext4 on the partition I can get blkid to pick it up without rebooting? | 23:53 |
| arrrghhh | wait nvm. /dev/disk/by-uuid has it. | 23:53 |
| whislock | sirvictory4: Honestly, I long ago gave up trying to manage iptables myself. I just use ufw/firewalld these days. Just as good, 1% of the effort. | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
