[00:03] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-zip/commit/c2b41627b94269940c2cd4aa40f48c0b47c865a2 looks just as odd. [00:07] new file mode 100644 [00:07] index 0000000..e74ee19 [00:07] --- /dev/null [00:07] +++ b/test/data/symlink.zip [00:12] rbasak: A day or two extra is no big deal. Would be good if you could consult with sil2100 soon. [02:12] why is booting on ubuntu 18.04 slower than 16.04 [02:50] entropy [02:51] oh wait, sorry i though i was in a different channel :) [02:51] lovepopsickle: systemd-analyze blame? [02:58] mwhudson, not sure [02:58] mwhudson, its not a huge difference about 15 seconds added time [02:59] lovepopsickle: miiight be something to do with waiting for ipv6 ras? [02:59] lovepopsickle: but with the info you've provided we really can't say [02:59] i think i have ipv6 disabled [02:59] lovepopsickle: if you pastebin the output of systemd-analyze blame for both systems, at least that's something to start with [03:01] mwhudson, https://zerobin.net/?f842c3137adfb4a3#XVRu0obOxXb9e11nj6jU2HFtlucVFkLtRsMxzXA5ptE= [03:07] mwhudson, https://askubuntu.com/questions/1029050/long-boot-times-on-18-04 [03:10] https://askubuntu.com/questions/1038368/slow-boot-on-ubuntu-18-04 [03:10] https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/8dws67/can_we_talk_about_the_boot_time_on_ubuntu_1804/ [03:10] https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Ubuntu-18-04-slow-down-on-booting-How-do-I-solve-it?share=1 [03:10] looks like there is a bug going on [03:12] plymouth-quit-wait.service looks like the major cause [03:17] bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1742063 [03:17] Launchpad bug 1742063 in systemd (Ubuntu) "Systemd taking long time to boot into desktop 18.04" [Undecided,Confirmed] [03:18] mwhudson, did you see the blame link? [03:18] lovepopsickle: i did but it didn't mean very much to me i'm afraid [03:19] i mean its basically the same issue as those other links [03:19] i'm not sure that's true [03:20] there's no wait-online on there for example [03:21] not sure what you mean. What I was saying is that plymouth-quit-wait.service seems to be taking about 30 secs and there is a bug report on it [03:22] your saying i should have had a wait-online? [03:22] its the plymouth-quit-wait that seems to be the common theme [03:23] or is that the total seconds? [03:26] well its not a huge deal and maybe it will get fixed later. Those links did not see to have any good solutions maybe it will get worked out later [03:27] it doesnt take that long but it was noticeable from before. [06:30] doko: re zvmcloudconnector I've re-uploaded with a tidied d/copyright - I could not find any missing copyright information, but there did appear to be a surplus copyright holder in d/copyright === gurmble is now known as grumble [09:15] juliank, hey, you previously merged wpa, could you do it again for the current revision? it fixes a CVE so would be nice to get into cosmic [09:15] https://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wpa/news/20180808T210425Z.html [09:21] seb128: ack [09:21] thx [09:25] I should really do some more merges [09:26] Merges are nice, dropping delta is even better. :> [09:30] true [09:30] very true [10:27] doko: ta ;) [10:27] on the assumption it was you === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch [13:00] so I'm investigating reports of grub postinst failures and it looks like set -e is terminating the script on this line: [13:00] device_map="$(grub-mkdevicemap -m - | grep -v '^(fd[0-9]\+)' || true)" [13:01] shouldn't that || true catch any errors and keep the entire pipeline from failing and so it should not be possible to terminate the script here? [13:02] You'd have thought. I'd suggest trying to construct smaller test cases [13:03] set -e has a few weird edge cases [13:03] And they're likely highly shell-dependent, so check what /bin/sh is [13:04] cjwatson: grub-pc.postinst's shbang calls for /bin/bash [13:05] so it does === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g [13:08] replacing either side with false doesn't seem to bail out of the script.... [13:10] hrm... what if the child is terminated with a signal? [13:13] nope... script still continues.... [13:13] how could that grep be the last thing that is run before the postinst errors out? weird... === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open (Cosmic Cuttlefish), auto-sync disabled temporarily | 18.04 released | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Trusty-Bionic | If you can't send messages here, authenticate to nickserv first [15:00] Laney: something is wrong with the armhf autopkgtests (excuses says Test in Progress for all of them), I retried the ones from today, but there is more from yesterday [15:01] jbicha: Please additionally ping slangasek, sil2100 (although not here atm), juliank [15:01] this is not a one person show any more [15:01] thankfully, because I can't really look atm [15:01] ok, good :) [15:01] * juliank has meeting now [15:04] an example of one that you accuse of going missing would be helpful for $person to look in the logs [15:09] ah, what the hell, I just restarted everything, looks like the machine got a reboot :( [15:10] thanks [16:33] roaksoax: It looks like there may be a regression with the maas SRU. https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/243e461131f7d9c36fd09fee3e90d74a01401d5c [16:37] rbasak: hi, can you click the lander signoff one more time please? :) https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3351 [16:50] ahasenack: done [16:50] rbasak: thanks [16:51] sil2100 isn't here, I wanted to ask him why I can't do that step [16:51] Perhaps it's restricted to uploaders but bileto doesn't know about packagesets and things? [16:58] it's probably related yes [16:58] but that restriction should apply to the "publish" button [16:58] I can do that step with krb5, which I can upload [16:59] squid (not squid3) is NEW [18:09] bdmurray: howdy, yes I saw that email. That said, who maintains the registration form ? [18:18] roaksoax: I do [19:45] bdmurray: ok, its not a regression. The same happens in older versions of MAAS [19:54] roaksoax: Could you show the error with previous versions? [20:24] Hi! [20:24] I'm looking for a breakdown of the standard options of the /etc/lsb_release file as I'm trying to modify it to describe a custom release [20:25] Are there any options beyond the DISTRIB_ID, RELEASE, CODENAME, and DESCRIPTION fields? === Son_Goku is now known as Conan_Kudo === Conan_Kudo is now known as Son_Goku [20:34] howard: see the lsb_release manpage. I believe the standard interface is the command, and the /etc/lsb_release file is an implementation detail. [20:35] If you want to parse a file, then you might find https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/os-release.html more useful. [20:35] (/etc/lsb_release file is an implementation detail which you cannot rely on to be stable) [20:39] I felt more okay with relying on it because I'm going to be writing the file. It's not a user lib trying to read OS information [20:40] rbasak: like, I guess I mean I'm trying to edit the implementation detail === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand === Guest48018 is now known as RAOF