[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.28.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: zvmcloudconnector (cosmic-proposed/primary) [1.2.3-0ubuntu1]
[06:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted equinox-bundles [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.7.3-1]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted iraf-fitsutil [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.07.06-2]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted iraf-fitsutil [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.07.06-2]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted iraf-fitsutil [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.07.06-2]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted iraf-fitsutil [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.07.06-2]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted iraf-fitsutil [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.07.06-2]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.28.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [1.28.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.28.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.28.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [1.28.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1.28.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: dconf (cosmic-proposed/primary) [0.28.0-2]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dconf [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [0.28.0-2]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zvmcloudconnector [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.2.3-0ubuntu1]
[09:26] <LocutusOfBorg> since we are approaching a new "big one" transition, what about disabling autosync?
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zvmcloudconnector [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.2.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:35] <Ukikie> Which transition?
[09:39] <LocutusOfBorg> qt+everything
[09:40] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean, we are closing to make it migrate
[09:40] <LocutusOfBorg> "getting closer"
[09:59] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. sndio is getting autosyncd, involving "only 10 packages", but maybe it might be better to entangle more stuff
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zvmcloudconnector [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.2.3-0ubuntu1]
[12:31] <LocutusOfBorg> please turn DOWN autosync!
[12:32] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, ^^ :D
[12:32] <LocutusOfBorg> we are getting near to see it migrate
[12:34] <cjwatson> somebody else please
[13:23] <Laney> I did it
[13:26] <Laney> if I copy and paste the hint from update_output.txt it crashes tilix
[13:26] <Laney> /o\
[13:42] <apw> quality
[14:14] <LocutusOfBorg> lol
[14:20] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, apw emacs25 is now called emacs, so can you please do the "move to main and the other to universe" thing?
[14:20] <LocutusOfBorg> emacs/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: emacs-gtk | emacs-lucid | emacs-nox
[14:20] <LocutusOfBorg> emacs25/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: emacs-gtk
[14:20] <LocutusOfBorg> emacs25-nox/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: emacs-nox
[14:21] <LocutusOfBorg> (it is a sad thing, I know)
[14:21] <LocutusOfBorg> 3 RC bugs :/
[14:24] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: no
[14:24] <Laney> I can't do that
[14:29] <Laney> hhvm and openjfx need something too
[14:39] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, openjfx is uploading in some second
[14:39] <LocutusOfBorg> hhvm on todo
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> problem is ffmpeg and what needs porting/fixes...
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> /Note: this function must return int, despite the fact it doesn't conform to XIMProc type.
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> / This is required in documentation of XIM
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> static int im_preedit_start(XIM im_xim, XPointer client, XPointer call) {
[14:43] <LocutusOfBorg> this is the openjfx failure... I'm going to do "-Wno-error=cast-function-type"
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20180710.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20180710.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20180710.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:28] <Laney> performous tupi vcmi
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1]
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[16:15] <Laney> that'll do, IMHO everything left apart from emacs should be booted out
[16:19] <acheronuk> LP: #1772588
[16:20] <acheronuk> not sure if that needs to be actioned instead of rebuilds? tjaalton?
[16:20] <Laney> yes very good, but I can't do anything about that
[16:20] <Laney> what I can do is rebuild things so that they don't block this transition
[16:22] <acheronuk> fair enough. just wasn't sure
[16:58] <Laney> paraview is failing too
[17:00] <Laney> and those two octave-* regressions are maybe just things to punt out
[17:01] <Laney> would be nice if someone could file all those removal / demotions in a bug unless they really want to fix them
[17:02] <Laney> strigi is probably good to remove completely if amarok is temporarily demoted (IIRC)
[17:02] <Laney> night
[17:17] <acheronuk> yes, the amarok in proposed has been rebuilt without strigi. so the amarok in release could be deleted to allow strigi to be removed
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.17.0-8.9] (core, kernel)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.17.0-8.9] (core, kernel)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20180710.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.2] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20180710.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.2] (no packageset)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20180710.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (no packageset)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.2]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.2]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20180814.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[18:10] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, what about merging the mariadb-10.1 hint request?
[18:17] <LocutusOfBorg> this one https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/352783
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (xenial-proposed/main) [0.8.3-0ubuntu3 => 0.8.3-0ubuntu4] (desktop-core)
[19:10] <tjaalton> acheronuk: it needs an archive admin to remove the drivers already
[19:11] <tsimonq2> Oh thank god, finally.
[19:11] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: <43
[19:12] <tsimonq2> *<3
[19:12] <tsimonq2> And Laney too
[19:12] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Could bug 1772588 be dealt with please? If I understand correctly it's blocking the megatransition.
[19:18] <slangasek> tsimonq2: I'm not sure I see the relationship between that bug and the transition being blocked; e.g. xorg-server is listed as one of the uninstallables resulting from the hint, and that's certainly not an obsolete X11 driver
[19:19] <tsimonq2> slangasek: I see a lot of uninstallables; regardless, could you do the removing if it looks sane? :)
[19:20] <slangasek> tsimonq2: I am currently processing kernel SRUs, after that I will take a look.  In the meantime, my above is an "are you sure?" since maybe it won't fix the root cause and you want to investigate more
[19:21] <tsimonq2> slangasek: I know it won't fix the root cause but it's likely to clear things up just a little more.
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-33.36~16.04.1] (kernel)
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1022.22~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-33.36~16.04.1] (kernel)
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1022.22~16.04.1]
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-33.36~16.04.1]
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-33.36~16.04.1]
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-134.160] (core, kernel)
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected maas [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.1-7032-g11e4fa330-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[21:25] <slangasek> tsimonq2: well I'm looking at LP: #1772588 and now I don't understand why tjaalton is asking for packages which are in sync from Debian to be removed from Ubuntu only
[21:42] <tsimonq2> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-33.36] (core, kernel)
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-33.36] (core, kernel)
[22:40] <tjaalton> slangasek: being in sync isn't the point. and yes maybe some of them have been updated there since 2+ months ago
[22:40] <slangasek> tjaalton: but why go to the effort of removing them from Ubuntu and blacklisting them here, but not remove them from Debian?
[22:41] <slangasek> tjaalton: (they also aren't causing any transition problems)
[22:43] <tjaalton> slangasek: ok, what is, at this point? the transitional pkg should've cleared some, right?
[22:43] <slangasek> there's a smattering of packages now blocking, none of them X-ish
[22:44] <tjaalton> huh, ok
[22:44] <slangasek> emacs needed a binary promotion (because emacs stole emacs25 source)
[22:44] <slangasek>     * amd64: dvdrip, emacs25, emacs25-lucid, hhvm, hhvm-dbg, libopenjfx-java, libopenjfx-jni, libsearchclient-dev, libstreamanalyzer-dev, libstreamanalyzer0v5, libstrigihtmlgui-dev, libstrigihtmlgui0v5, mediathekview, openjfx, paraview, paraview-dev, paraview-python, pdfsam, performous, pfsglview, pfstools, pfsview, rbdoom3bfg, ring, ring-daemon, ripmake, strigi-client, strigi-daemon,
[22:44] <slangasek> strigi-dbg, strigi-utils, subtitleripper, transcode, transcode-dbg, tupi, vcmi, vdr-plugin-softhddevice
[22:44] <slangasek> short list
[22:44] <slangasek> hhvm is probably a disaster but I haven't looked yet
[22:45] <cyphermox> slangasek: I think I'm looking at the same list, and if I didn't mess up too much the only thing catching was emacs25?
[22:45] <cyphermox> but I suspect I must have messed up somewhere anyway
[22:46] <slangasek> cyphermox: what do you mean "catching"?
[22:46] <tjaalton> from update_output.txt?
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-134.160]
[22:47] <cyphermox> slangasek: same as you mentioned, emacs stealing emacs25; which I saw when I try to script doing the same thing britney does
[22:48] <mwhudson> slangasek: hhvm does look "fun"
[22:48] <slangasek> the other packages listed don't depend on emacs
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-33.36]
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-33.36]
[22:48] <cyphermox> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/dxDp39XtCC/
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1022.23] (kernel)