[00:29] How goes vinodhini ? [00:40] anastasiamac: PTAL https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/9078? [00:40] * anastasiamac looking [00:41] ta [00:41] thumper: trivial review? https://github.com/juju/pubsub/pull/8 [00:42] hi rick_h i am good. [00:42] I fixed all minor test issues. [00:43] If u can take a look please. [00:43] babbageclunk: so neat! loved it :D [00:43] I'm going to put that quote on the cover of the paperback when it comes out! [00:44] Thanks anastasiamac [00:45] hmm, good question about 2.4 - rick_h_, what do you think? https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/9078 [00:46] rick_h : regarding the error handling issues.Where you able to test that same scenarios in GUI ? [00:48] babbageclunk: hmm I don't think oci is in 2.4 [00:48] rick_h_: ah, ok - then that makes it simpler. I'll just look [00:49] vinodhini: I didn't. What are we looking for or expecting? [00:50] rick_h_: yeah you're right - the package is there but it's all just NotImplemented stubs. [00:51] babbageclunk: cool [00:52] rick_h: approval for PR. Plus regarding the errorhandling issues u have mentioned. Yes. there is a delay until the whole setup comes up fully. [00:53] vinodhini: feedback inbound [00:54] vinodhini: yes, so thumper had some ideas around some of those, implementation-wise [00:54] vinodhini: so the version thing I think needs to be right for that PR other than that thanks so much for the great updates [00:56] ok. then i would like to discuss regarding that delay issues today. [00:57] let me fix the version so i can get that merged. [00:58] rick_h: isnt better not to have version in that error message so there wont be any misinterpretation. [00:59] vinodhini: that's ok for the moment. [01:00] vinodhini: do me one favor though, make sure to call it the "bundle export feature" [01:00] vinodhini: as any juju 2.x supports deploying bundles [01:00] vinodhini: just to be clear to users [01:01] sure then i will remove the version and update the message. [01:03] vinodhini: awesome [01:04] rick_h: i have push the commit now. [01:04] so, we are done with cosmetic changes related to export-bundle. [01:05] We have now: 3 pending [01:06] delay and error handling, series, machine constraints [01:06] vinodhini: k, approved [01:06] rick_h: ty [01:06] vinodhini: are you also able to get the good update in during your day so we can lock down 2.4.2? [01:06] Sorry, goose, not good [01:07] rick_h: goose - not good ? [01:09] vinodhini: so thumper says that we need to update the goose dependency with your fixes in the 2.4 branch to be part of the release we're locking up tomorrow morning. [01:12] rick_h: i have updated the goose dep with my changes i mean after merging goose stuffs and merged the juju PR: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/9049 [01:13] vinodhini: ok, so 2.4 branch is all caught up with your goose changes? [01:13] yes. [01:14] thumper: i have updated the juju side PR which got merged after the goose chnages landed with dependencies.tsv update. [01:15] Apologise i didnt inform but i did it. [01:15] vinodhini: cool ignore me then. Sounds good. [01:16] rick_h: sure. Its ok to double check. [01:20] thumper: that PR : https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/9076 - export-bundle in dev mode should go with 2.4.2 correct ? [01:21] i have answered ur question this morning. Could u please take a look when u get time ? [02:05] vinodhini: commented on PR, I'd like us to keep the file [02:06] thumper: sure [02:06] reverting now. [02:18] thumper: pushed to commit. [02:18] ack [02:18] approved [02:18] thumper: ty [02:37] bugger... [02:37] that thing that I knew was going to be a problem in the future is a problem [02:38] * thumper thinks how to fix with minimum impact [02:38] babbageclunk: busy? [02:40] i believe rick_h is offline. thumper: when u get time before you leave for the day i would like to discuss regarding the other issues in export-bundle. [02:40] vinodhini: sure [02:40] I can do now if you like [02:40] I have updated the doc with few questions which rick_h also can read thru [02:40] ok. [02:41] ho ? [02:42] yep, in 1:1 === jhebden is now known as jhebden-lunch [03:20] thumper: sorry, totally missed your ping [03:20] is now good? [03:23] yep [03:23] babbageclunk: ^^ [03:23] saw that one! [03:24] babbageclunk: I'm in our 1:1 [03:50] thumper: we have some fairly old PRs (say from Jan this year)... do we still want them around? [08:21] is it me or is JAAS really sad this morning? === ashipika is now known as ashipika|afk [11:12] magicaltrout: not sure just waking up. [11:18] magicaltrout: passed the report along. Any details? === cory_fu_ is now known as cory_fu [14:06] for a bundle without a `machines` section, is there a way to decide in which order the machines will be allocated for charms? [14:25] fnordahl: in what order? no. It just means juju will ask for machines that meet the application constraints and take what the underlying cloud gives it === salmankhan1 is now known as salmankhan [19:47] if anyone is still here can you give https://github.com/juju/layer-index/pull/42/files a merge before you all bugger off for the weekend [19:48] * rick_h_ wonders what an oozie is [19:49] magicaltrout: "The repository for this project is empty" :( [19:51] pfft [19:51] i was padding it out so someone could merge it :P [19:51] there is now a relation [19:51] magicaltrout: :) [19:51] in answer to your question, oozie is a big data workflow manager [19:52] in the bigtop stack [19:52] magicaltrout: ok, hit the merge button [19:52] magicaltrout: hope I don't get in any trouble :P [19:53] thanks. Just finishing up our hue charm [21:09] magicaltrout: did you mean to have #41 closed in favor of #42? https://github.com/juju/layer-index/pull/41 -- i see both included oozie, but jdbc was already there? i'm so confused. [21:58] don't think it matters kwmonroe [21:59] your user tip from yesterday worked a treat thanks [22:43] sweet and a working spark config for the thrift server [22:43] i'll have a couple of PR's for you on monday kwmonroe to complain about and throw back in my face