[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qpdf (bionic-proposed/main) [8.0.2-3 => 8.1.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qpdf (bionic-proposed/main) [8.0.2-3 => 8.1.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[13:31] <LocutusOfBorg> hello AA, how do you feel about removing openjfx binaries on armhf arm64 and ppc64el?
[13:31] <LocutusOfBorg> the reverse-deps are all arch:all, so nobody should care about what is not amd64 and i386...
[13:31] <LocutusOfBorg> at least until debian fixes the failures, so we can move forward with the transition
[15:09] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: openjfx> sounds like a pragmatic approach.  Looking
[15:10] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: done
[15:10] <slangasek> anyone working on transcode?  It's two years removed from Debian, I would just remove it from Ubuntu as well but it has revdeps
[15:10] <slangasek> looks like doko fixed transcode last
[15:12] <slangasek> also looks like demoting/removing dvdrip,ripmake,subtitleripper,transcode is enough to resolve, so will probably just do that if unresolved when the other blockers are sorted
[15:15] <slangasek> tsimonq2: anyone after the strigi build failure?
[15:21] <slangasek> was already ftbfs in bionic release apparently
[15:32] <acheronuk> slangasek: strigi is dead and removed in debian. amarok in -proposed is built without it, which was the last thing that wanted it
[15:32] <slangasek> ok
[15:33] <slangasek> acheronuk: in fact, it appears amarok in cosmic has only an unused build-dep on it, so I can go ahead and remove strigi from cosmic now, thanks
[15:33] <acheronuk> :)
[15:43] <slangasek> strigi gone
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-134.160~14.04.1] (kernel)
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-134.160~14.04.1]
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.15]
[17:17] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvdrip/+bug/1787222
[17:17] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transcode/+bug/1784612
[17:17] <LocutusOfBorg> I would prefer to follow with removals
[18:15] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, I fixed transcode, because I want to see less stuff in update_output. but *please* remove it anyway, it is not maintainable anymore
[18:15] <LocutusOfBorg> and I'm really sure the patches we have now are making the program not behaving correctly
[18:30] <tsimonq2> slangasek: If I needed to sed a single line in the Lubuntu squashfs that shouldn't be in the package, can I add a one-liner to livecd-rootfs?
[18:31] <tsimonq2> It's pending an upstream solution but it just neans sedding one line.
[18:31] <tsimonq2> (I know it's hacky... heh)
[19:05] <LocutusOfBorg> can we please have nodejs hinted so curl can migrate?
[19:06] <LocutusOfBorg> it is regressed with new libuv, but the test doesn't really run against release (because of transition or other meh)
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-extras [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-extras [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-extras [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-extras [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-extras [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-extras [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[20:49] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: well, not sure it was worth your time to fix transcode when I was already talking about removing it.  I'll take care of these now
[20:50] <slangasek> tsimonq2: you mean that the line you're sedding out shouldn't be in the package? livecd-rootfs is not a place to hack contents of packages
[23:20] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Is there a place other than livecd-rootfs for temporary hacks?