| slangasek | xnox: s390x is being very unhelpful wrt gnucash | 00:20 |
|---|---|---|
| slangasek | xnox: n/m, it's just guile being segfaulty | 00:36 |
| ahasenack | do you guys need any help with some migration or dep8 test? | 01:42 |
| ahasenack | man, so many tests in progress | 01:44 |
| === ahasenack is now known as Guest4879 | ||
| === kirkland is now known as Guest54596 | ||
| === tyhicks is now known as Guest8831 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.14.8] | 04:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted console-setup [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.178ubuntu2.7] | 07:43 | |
| === agateau_ is now known as agateau | ||
| cjwatson | So, uh, shouldn't we be in Debian import freeze now, per the release schedule? | 10:27 |
| cjwatson | Or has that changed? | 10:27 |
| acheronuk | tsimonq2 did mention in passing he might ask for FF to be pushed back a week, but I have no clue if anything came of that | 10:29 |
| === Guest4879 is now known as ahasenack | ||
| ahasenack | per #topic, we are not in FF yet | 10:54 |
| cjwatson | Yeah, I know that, but the release schedule on the wiki says otherwise so something has to give :) | 11:03 |
| cjwatson | (also, FF isn't necessarily the same as DIF ...) | 11:04 |
| ahasenack | I think there are not enough builders to cope with the huge queue, it will be a while | 11:11 |
| ahasenack | just guessing | 11:11 |
| cjwatson | That normally isn't a factor, since it's OK for things to land provided they were at least uploaded before the deadline | 11:22 |
| ahasenack | I'm counting on that actually | 11:22 |
| cjwatson | (You possibly mean autopkgtest runners. The Launchpad build farm is mostly idle right now.) | 11:22 |
| ahasenack | true | 11:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: devscripts-el (cosmic-proposed/primary) [40.1] | 13:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: dpkg-dev-el (cosmic-proposed/primary) [37.4] | 13:11 | |
| xnox | slangasek, who cares about guile, when emacs is busted =) please accept above two NEW packages, which got split out of emacs-goodies-el (which i forced synced now) | 13:12 |
| xnox | once above is in, i will readd ubuntu suite names to the dpkg-dev-el one | 13:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: spirv-tools (cosmic-proposed/primary) [2018.2-0ubuntu1] | 13:44 | |
| teward | did something happen to FeatureFreeze? | 15:17 |
| teward | (proxy-requesting because dpb1 posted it in #ubuntu-server) | 15:17 |
| ddstreet | slangasek can you approve nodejs upload to bionic please | 15:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted devscripts-el [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [40.1] | 16:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpkg-dev-el [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [37.4] | 16:42 | |
| slangasek | cjwatson: yeah, we should be in DIF now, switch flipped | 16:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: devscripts-el [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [40.1] (no packageset) | 16:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dpkg-dev-el [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [37.4] (no packageset) | 16:45 | |
| cjwatson | thanks | 16:49 |
| === slangasek changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Xenial 16.04.5, Bionic 18.04.1 | Archive: Feature Freeze | Cosmic Release Coordination | Please don't upload things during freezes where you shouldn't, or be prepared to apologise to the release team | We accept payment in cash, check or beer | melius malum quod cognoscis | ||
| slangasek | xnox: your new emacs-goodies-el has a pile of component-mismatches too | 16:52 |
| xnox | slangasek, which i solved by dropping emacs-goodies-el from the seed. | 16:53 |
| slangasek | ok | 16:53 |
| xnox | slangasek, it's the other ones from new that we will want to keep in main, i.e. the debian/control|changelog modes which are now split out | 16:53 |
| jbicha | slangasek: could you promote guile-2.2 to main and once aisleriot migrates, we can demote guile-2.0? | 16:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted devscripts-el [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [40.1] | 16:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpkg-dev-el [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [37.4] | 16:57 | |
| xnox | doko, apw - sigh | 17:04 |
| xnox | /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/statx.h:25:8: error: redefinition of ‘struct statx_timestamp’ | 17:04 |
| xnox | /usr/include/linux/stat.h:56:8: note: originally defined here | 17:05 |
| xnox | ah, infinity ^ | 17:13 |
| xnox | i think there is misscompat somehow between headers or something | 17:14 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity, slangasek: Ping, I'd like an opinion on bug 1788904 when someone has the chance. | 17:20 |
| ubot5 | bug 1788904 in lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Blanket Feature Freeze Exception: Lubuntu's LXQt Transition" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1788904 | 17:20 |
| tsimonq2 | Basically, I'm asking a policy to be formalized which has seemingly already been in effect for the Ubuntu Desktop Team among others. | 17:21 |
| infinity | xnox: I can haz larger example? | 17:26 |
| xnox | infinity, sbuild of systemd fails now =) | 17:26 |
| infinity | xnox: Oh, that's no big loss. | 17:26 |
| * infinity ducks. | 17:26 | |
| xnox | infinity, so $ sbuild -A -d cosmic systemd_239-7ubuntu4 | 17:26 |
| xnox | infinity, well you asked for a larger example, afterall =) | 17:27 |
| infinity | xnox: Hahaha. A slightly smaller one? :P | 17:27 |
| infinity | xnox: But yeah, looks like statx is new to glibc (and the kernel, probably), and needs all the usual guards. | 17:28 |
| infinity | Hate this dance. | 17:28 |
| infinity | xnox: Of course, you might also be able to fix it by not including linux/stat.h | 17:28 |
| xnox | infinity, #include <linux/stat.h> #include <sys/stat.h> -> is that broken to include both now? | 17:36 |
| xnox | and #include <sys/xattr.h> | 17:36 |
| infinity | xnox: It's almost always wrong for userspace to include anything in linux/ | 17:36 |
| infinity | Not always always, but almost always. | 17:37 |
| xnox | there is a mega comment saying that we want to use statx() cause it's exposed from v4.11+ and that it might not be there and fallback to something else. | 17:37 |
| xnox | i guess if statx is available now in userspace there is no need for linux/stat.h anymore..... | 17:37 |
| xnox | infinity, i'm just curious if this is a bug in systemd, or headers, or both. | 17:38 |
| infinity | It's certainly possible for glibc and the kernel to guard against this. | 17:38 |
| xnox | infinity, i mean i will fix systemd obviously, but not sure if the headers can be "better" (stupid-compatible?!) somehow. | 17:38 |
| infinity | On the other hand, Florian was the committer, and he's usually smarter than that. | 17:39 |
| infinity | So unless there appears to be a valid reason to want both, the conflict might be intentional. | 17:39 |
| xnox | 4/* Missing glibc definitions to access certain kernel APIs */ | 17:39 |
| xnox | is the heading used for these includes in systemd tree | 17:39 |
| infinity | And I don't see any reason to want the kernel version, at a glance. | 17:39 |
| xnox | so possibly obsolete now. | 17:39 |
| infinity | Unfortunate that an upstream fix will have to have a conditional include. | 17:40 |
| infinity | But not world-ending either. | 17:40 |
| infinity | include sys/stat, ifndef foo, include linux/statx | 17:41 |
| infinity | xnox: I'm assuming Fedora already ran into this, since they probably shipped glibc 2 weeks ago. | 17:41 |
| infinity | xnox: Unless they've not rebuilt systemd since. | 17:42 |
| infinity | Now, if I could remember how to find fedora sources.. | 17:42 |
| xnox | i'll propose conditional upstream i think. | 17:43 |
| xnox | (systemd) | 17:43 |
| infinity | Yeah, I'm going to look at what Fedora's done here for kicks. | 17:44 |
| infinity | Ahh, and that's that answer. systemd in Fedora hasn't been built since mid-July. | 17:46 |
| infinity | Oh, wait. | 17:47 |
| infinity | xnox: https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/systemd.git/commit/?h=f29&id=5306894742943e5d46ac705a3f2d5db1a48a0a67 | 17:48 |
| infinity | xnox: Looks like a Googler has already proposed a patch (and F29 is carrying it). | 17:49 |
| infinity | xnox: So, cheers. | 17:49 |
| xnox | infinity, lovely, cause propose to fedora and not to upstream? | 17:50 |
| * xnox checks master again | 17:50 | |
| infinity | Gah, GitHub is all wonky. | 17:51 |
| infinity | WHY. | 17:51 |
| infinity | xnox: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/75720bff62a84896e9a0654afc7cf9408cf89a38 | 17:52 |
| infinity | xnox: Looks upstreamish to me. | 17:52 |
| teward | infinity: because GH is owned by Microsoft now? *shot* (no but seriously...) | 17:52 |
| infinity | teward: I suspect it doesn't particularly relate (except maybe Github higher-ups trying to look "busy" and "useful" to not get "fired" and made "homeless" by their new overlords) | 17:53 |
| infinity | Either way, this dashboard landing page madness is... Busy. | 17:53 |
| infinity | And useless. | 17:53 |
| xnox | infinity, it got replaced by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/9c869d08d82c73f62ab3527567858ce4b0cf1257#diff-969b60ad3d206fd45c208e266ccfed38 | 17:53 |
| teward | infinity: indeed. (It's why I've been shifting to other providers, or running my own GitLab instead for my projects, but I digress) | 17:54 |
| teward | (I was going to ask "what happened to feature freeze" but I just saw the emails about it, so don't mind me :P ) | 17:54 |
| infinity | xnox: Fancy. Definitely a step in the not-silly direction. Maybe. | 17:54 |
| xnox | we have thousands of things in autopkgtest queue backlog still.... | 17:54 |
| xnox | hence to me FF is a bit meaningless | 17:54 |
| infinity | FF isn't about migration, it's about uploads. | 17:55 |
| teward | ^ that | 17:55 |
| infinity | Certainly not meaningless to say "okay, stop uploading MORE feature changes". | 17:55 |
| teward | indeed. which reminds me, roaksoax has a proposed change to Cosmic that'd alter the package structure, that'd need an FFe review right? | 17:56 |
| teward | to Cosmic nginx* | 17:56 |
| teward | (at this point it's not yet 'tested' or 'accepted' as working so it didn't get included in the latest uploads I did for it) | 17:56 |
| infinity | xnox: Anyhow, based on those two commits, I'd say the systemd community is accepting that it's their bug, and not a bug in the headers. And Lennart would argue six ways to Tuesday if he even 5% thought it was our bug, so I'm going to call that definitive. :P | 17:56 |
| xnox | infinity, he may have been on holiday since july and has not seen this commit yet | 17:58 |
| infinity | xnox: He committed the first one. | 18:00 |
| infinity | filbranden authored and poettering committed on Jul 15 | 18:01 |
| infinity | Oh look, and my build failed on two arches, despite testing it earlier. | 18:09 |
| * infinity looks. | 18:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rax-nova-agent (bionic-proposed/main) [2.1.15-0ubuntu1~18.04.0 => 2.1.15-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 18:21 | |
| tsimonq2 | doko: My updated assessment on the KDE autopkgtest situation is that there's enough library interdependencies that a build needs to be done for autopkgtest accuracy. | 18:47 |
| tsimonq2 | doko: Alternatively we're exploring just really tightening the autopkgtest deps on the packages, but Santa was working on that and he's been in and out (likely on vac) lately. | 18:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.17.0-9.10] (core, kernel) | 19:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.17.0-9.10] (core, kernel) | 19:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: murano-agent [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:3.5.1-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 20:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.17.0-9.10] | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [4.17.0-9.10] | 20:31 | |
| slangasek | jbicha: guile-2.2 promoted | 20:53 |
| slangasek | jbicha: did you see my question about whether you've received britney nagmails about zc.lockfile? | 20:53 |
| slangasek | anyone care yet about node + rollup? or should I just remove the lot from -proposed? | 21:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, I care about node+rollup | 21:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | at least after all the work I did | 21:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | let me try to find a way | 21:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, is it possible to remove automake-1.15 from archive? useless now | 21:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | NBS | 21:51 |
| slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: 'NBS' - it doesn't show up on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html , what do you mean? | 21:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the "automake" binary is now part of src:automake-1.16, migrated in cosmic hours ago | 21:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, the src:automake-1.15 is producing nothing, I don't know what is the best wording :) | 21:53 |
| slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: sounds like a source package whose removal we would pick up via Debian | 21:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | [2018-08-10] automake-1.15 REMOVED from testing (Britney) | 21:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh indeed, still part of unstable, meh | 21:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906928 | 21:57 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 906928 in ftp.debian.org "RM: automake-1.15 -- RoQA; binary package now built by automake-1.16" [Normal,Open] | 21:57 |
| slangasek | yah, not worth putting extra effort into those kinds of removals, they'll eventually get reaped | 21:57 |
| slangasek | I run process-removals several times between FF and release | 21:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nice | 22:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: debian-el (cosmic-proposed/primary) [37.6] | 22:31 | |
| xnox | slangasek, one more NEW package needed for the emacs-goodies-el split.... sorry that i missed that one. ^ | 22:31 |
| slangasek | xnox: done | 22:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-el [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [37.6] | 22:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-el [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [37.6] (no packageset) | 22:38 | |
| slangasek | jbicha: and guile-2.0 demoted | 23:38 |
| slangasek | LocutusOfBorg, acheronuk: I see you both retried the kdeconnect/s390x autopkgtest failure; it looks entirely reproducible and looks to me like there's a good chance it's a big-endian bug. How should we proceed with this? | 23:52 |
| jbicha | slangasek: I didn't see your question the first time but I'll take a look at zc.lockfile | 23:53 |
| slangasek | jbicha: ok, thanks for looking - and did you previously receive emails? | 23:54 |
| slangasek | because I'm trying to figure out if we have a bug generally in not notifying people of stuck force-syncs | 23:54 |
| jbicha | I get lots of email from the Release Team :) | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!