[08:16] <mispp> which section to add in snapcrafft.yaml to add a runtime dependency (like libmysqlclient). i dont want to build that, but rather use the lib that's already compiled and in repos
[12:56] <dave_uy> I'm trying to automate my snap but the cleanbuild fails on snapcraft.io. https://build.snapcraft.io/user/dmp1ce
[12:57] <dave_uy> I try to reproduce locally on my Vagrant setup but it fails in a different way. Do I need to initialize lxd in a certain way to get the same results as on snapcraft.io?
[13:56] <popey> dave_uy: looks like a proxy/firewall problem in the datacentre
[13:56] <popey> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/385194928/buildlog_snap_ubuntu_xenial_armhf_30ab74512c9e3b64356085921b1cdfd1-xenial_BUILDING.txt.gz
[13:56] <popey> Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: services.gradle.org
[14:09] <dave_uy> Thank you.
[15:36] <om26er> Is there a way for a snap to check if its running on UbuntuCore system (vs a desktop)
[15:44] <ogra> om26er, not sure if  snap can read /proc/cmdline ... but if you find snap_core= on there you are definitely on core
[15:44] <ogra> *if a snap
[15:50] <om26er> ogra: snap_core= wher ?
[15:50] <om26er> *where
[15:52] <mup> PR snapcraft#2224 closed: snapcraftctl: run in isolation mode <Created by kyrofa> <Merged by kyrofa> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2224>
[15:57] <om26er> if, this will do
[15:57] <om26er> if [[ $(cat /proc/cmdline) = *"snap_core="* ]]; then echo 1; fi
[15:57] <om26er> thanks ogra
[20:06] <Son_Goku> zyga, hey
[20:06] <Son_Goku> zyga, I'm having compilation failures trying to upgrade to 2.35 on s390x: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4897/29294897/build.log
[20:33] <Son_Goku> zyga, hmm, may be a bug in golang: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622312
[21:15] <om26er> is there a specific interface that Is should be using to avoid that denial ?
[21:15] <om26er> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NSGrxDhHh8/
[21:16] <om26er> ignore the fonts related denial, I am more concerned about the name="/proc/1465/mem" denial.
[21:17] <om26er> diddledan: ^ can you help ?
[21:21] <diddledan> I don't know of which plug, if any, would cover `/proc/<pid>/mem`
[21:21] <diddledan> maybe process-control?
[21:29] <diddledan> from a quick scan of of the interfaces I can't see any that include a rule referencing @{PROC}/@{PID}/mem
[21:34] <om26er> diddledan: I have been doing that as well, didn't find any
[21:34] <om26er> found this old issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1644810
[21:34] <mup> Bug #1644810: snapd system-observe interface is missing rules to allow memory usage analysis <snapd-interface> <Snappy:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1644810>
[21:52] <Son_Goku> zyga, niemeyer, snapd 2.35 update proposed: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapd-updates-in-fedora/4342/6
[22:51] <ogra> om26er, "if [[ $(cat /proc/cmdline) = *"snap_core="* ]]; then echo 1; fi" ?? geez ...
[22:52] <ogra> om26er, "if grep -q snap_core= /proc/cmdline; then ... "
[22:53] <ogra> (you might want to quote "snap_core=" for beautification, but thats not strictly necessary)
[22:53] <ogra> :)