tsimonq2 | slangasek: Do you typically require bugs for demotion to -proposed? | 00:45 |
---|---|---|
tsimonq2 | slangasek: node-grunt-contrib-concat should be demoted so node-source-map can migrate (along with a few rdeps). | 00:45 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Debian bug 878337, https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-contrib-concat/issues/188 | 00:45 |
gitbot | gruntjs issue 188 in grunt-contrib-concat "update for source-map 0.7.x" [Open] | 00:45 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 878337 in src:node-grunt-contrib-concat "node-grunt-contrib-concat: FTBFS and Debci failure with node-source-map 0.6" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/878337 | 00:45 |
tsimonq2 | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/node-d3-request/1.0.6-3/+build/14813077 O_o wat? | 00:47 |
tsimonq2 | "Build for superseded Source" | 00:47 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Perhaps even completely remove node-d3-request and node-d3-hierarchy, depending on what this error is. :P | 00:48 |
tsimonq2 | vim-youcompleteme could be removed as well; ycmd doesn't look like it'll be fixed anytime soon (isn't even in Cosmic at all). | 00:49 |
cjwatson | The build must have been superseded when it was previously removed from cosmic-proposed. | 00:51 |
cjwatson | Retrying such a build works now that it has an active publishing record again, though. I've done that. | 00:51 |
tsimonq2 | Huh. | 00:52 |
tsimonq2 | That's a new one (for me). | 00:52 |
cjwatson | The package was probably removed when the build wasn't in a terminal state. | 00:52 |
cjwatson | Somewhat unusual but happens occasionally. | 00:52 |
tsimonq2 | Ah. | 00:52 |
cjwatson | (Or, more specifically, when it was in "Needs building".) | 00:53 |
cjwatson | That state more usually happens when the source package is superseded by a newer version (hence the name) before the previous builds had been dispatched. | 00:54 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-d3-request [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-3] (no packageset) | 00:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-d3-request [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.6-3] | 00:57 | |
tsimonq2 | cjwatson: Could you do binary NEW processing on the other package when it goes in the queue as well? | 00:59 |
tsimonq2 | node-d3-hierarchy | 00:59 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-d3-hierarchy [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.5-2] (no packageset) | 01:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-7 [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:7~+rc2-1~exp2] | 01:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-d3-hierarchy [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.5-2] | 01:55 | |
slangasek | tsimonq2: I don't typically /do/ demotions to proposed; if it's bad enough to be removed from release I usually don't want it hanging around in -proposed either | 03:52 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Ah. | 03:52 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: node-grunt-contrib-concat has 5 reverse-build-dependencies, I'm not going to remove it without a plan for sorting those | 04:03 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: ack | 04:04 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tkblt (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.7-1 => 3.2.7-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 07:02 | |
acheronuk | [07:20] <acheronuk> slangasek: suddenly getting some armhf tests fail with "mkdir: cannot create directory ‘//.config’: Permission denied" | 07:20 |
acheronuk | another http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kcoreaddons/cosmic/armhf | 07:20 |
acheronuk | thinking home is / by the looks of it | 07:21 |
acheronuk | something amiss with armhf runners | 07:21 |
jibel | The pending sru report is out of date (last update 2 days ago), could someone have a look? | 07:24 |
tsimonq2 | cjwatson: ^ This wouldn't happen to be related to MoM, would it? | 07:26 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1023.24] | 07:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1023.24~16.04.1] | 07:43 | |
cjwatson | tsimonq2: no, they're pretty independent | 08:27 |
cjwatson | jibel: I've killed the stuck run, so it should recover soon | 08:28 |
jibel | cjwatson, thanks | 08:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.5 => 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.6] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 08:50 | |
LocutusOfBorg | infinity, hello, diaspora-installer is regressed testsuite, because of glibc | 10:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | unfortunately testsuite is downloading a gem file from internet, and there is no new upstream version... | 10:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | what do you propose? | 10:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | the result seems clear: linux_sigar.c:1177:22: error: called object ‘major’ is not a function or | 10:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | of course release pocket is fine because of old glibc | 10:44 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm testing diaspora-installer from debian | 10:45 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected magnum [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.1.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 10:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected magnum [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.1.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 10:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected magnum [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.1.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 10:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.1ubuntu2.3] | 11:03 | |
slashd | o/ sil2100, can you please release gdm3 for 'X' when you have a moment today | LP: #1782152 ? | 11:20 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1782152 in gdm3 (Ubuntu Bionic) "GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1782152 | 11:20 |
slashd | sil2100, and 'python-urllib3' for 'X' as well | LP: #1771988 | 11:21 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1771988 in Ubuntu Cloud Archive mitaka "certificate validation with IP address based SAN's fails" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771988 | 11:21 |
sil2100 | slashd: hey! I'll take a look after lunch, my problem with gdm3 when I was doing releases in the morning was that bionic isn't verified yet - e.g. there's 3 bugs in it but 2 not verified yet | 11:34 |
sil2100 | slashd: usually we want later series to be released - not a hard rule though | 11:34 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.6-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 11:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0~bionic => 1.3.0~18.04] (no packageset) | 12:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.6-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 12:13 | |
slashd | sil2100, tks for python-urllib3 | 12:19 |
sil2100 | slashd: as for gdm3... I would prefer to wait for bionic in this case, especially that it's a new upstream release | 12:21 |
sil2100 | So even though small, there's a risk it might introduce some regressions and actually get removed from -proposed | 12:21 |
sil2100 | Problem is I think Lan_ey is away this week still, so someone else would have to verify it | 12:22 |
slashd | sil2100, ack thanks | 12:23 |
slashd | dgadomski, fyi ^ | 12:23 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maas [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.2-7034-g2f5deb8b8-0ubuntu1] | 12:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.14.8] | 12:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtdeclarative-opensource-src [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.9.5-0ubuntu1.1] | 12:55 | |
Trevinho | sil2100: hey, could you please accept glib from bionic queue? | 13:01 |
Trevinho | actually I've an extra fix on https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3393 but needs to be published first | 13:02 |
sil2100 | Trevinho: ok, I'll get to it in a minute | 13:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.7 => 2.525.8] (desktop-core) | 13:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.8] | 13:13 | |
LocutusOfBorg | any AA wants to fix this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anbox/+bug/1780655 | 13:16 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1780655 in anbox (Ubuntu) "RoM: please remove this from ubuntu, doesn't work" [Undecided,New] | 13:16 |
Trevinho | sil2100: thanks | 13:19 |
Trevinho | also if you can land that ppa would be nice :) | 13:19 |
Trevinho | so we get both in a shot | 13:19 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.8] | 13:25 | |
sil2100 | Trevinho: so just to know for sure, you want to overwrite the upload that's in Unapproved with the one in the silo? | 13:35 |
Trevinho | sil2100: if that's possible yes, otherwise we can reiterate later | 13:36 |
Trevinho | but I was waiting upstream to apply that patch before adding it, now it's merged, so... | 13:36 |
sil2100 | I need to see how the .changes file looks | 13:45 |
sil2100 | Since I guess right now if I publish this, the SRU tools will miss the previous upload | 13:46 |
sil2100 | Because the .changes file was generated without -v, so no mention of .1 in it | 13:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unbound [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.7-1ubuntu2.2] | 13:48 | |
sil2100 | Trevinho: ok, in this case I can either review the one that's already in the queue or I guess I'd have to ask you prepare a new upload that would include both the fixes | 13:51 |
sil2100 | (or have both versions mentioned in the .changes file) | 13:51 |
Trevinho | sil2100: well, so go with queue, I'll prepare the sru of the other later | 13:54 |
Trevinho | as i also wanted to mention the commit in the dep | 13:54 |
sil2100 | Trevinho: ok! | 14:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (xenial-proposed/main) [2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.6 => 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.7] (core) | 14:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vmware-nsx [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [13.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:15 | |
seb128 | Trevinho, it reminds me we need to reupload your nautilus SRU that got rejected because the version was not "standard enough" :/ | 14:15 |
Trevinho | seb128: at this point if you want to wait for the search fix.... | 14:16 |
seb128 | no | 14:16 |
seb128 | because that's another set of packages | 14:16 |
seb128 | and I don't want to make the SRU too complicated | 14:16 |
seb128 | I would prefer the search fix set to be that onlu | 14:16 |
seb128 | only | 14:16 |
Trevinho | ok | 14:17 |
seb128 | Trevinho, can you "fix"/amend the bionic branch in git to what it should | 14:17 |
seb128 | your git foo is better than mine, I would probably manage after some googling and poking around, but "uncommit" is not something I know how to do properly yet | 14:17 |
seb128 | shrug, it's annoying that we delay fixes for our LTS users and create work for ourself just to be pedentic of versioning | 14:18 |
seb128 | but oh well, let's keep the ranting for another day | 14:18 |
ahasenack | any idea why txtorcon is "missing build"? 18.0.2-2 build on Aug 21st http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#txtorcon | 14:23 |
ahasenack | oh, it's looking for a "python-txtorcon" deb... | 14:24 |
seb128 | ahasenack, because it is, see the changelog on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/txtorcon/18.0.2-2 | 14:24 |
seb128 | * No longer builds a Python 2 package (Closes: #905253) | 14:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.93.4 => 1.93.5] (core) | 14:24 | |
seb128 | that binary needs to be deleted from cosmic if it has no rdepends | 14:25 |
ahasenack | so it needs a manual poke when a deb goes missing | 14:25 |
seb128 | reverse-depends lists ooniprobe though | 14:25 |
seb128 | so that might need to be fixed first | 14:25 |
sergiusens | sil2100: evening! I have a request for you if you can spare the moment, mind taking a look at getting snapcraft into the -updates (LP: #1787419)? | 14:26 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1787419 in snapcraft (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] New stable micro release 2.43" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1787419 | 14:26 |
ahasenack | seb128: thanks | 14:26 |
seb128 | ahasenack, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905211 is a request to remove that one from Debian, maybe the path to go | 14:26 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 905211 in ftp.debian.org "RM: ooniprobe -- ROM; not easily maintained; too many js deps" [Normal,Open] | 14:26 |
seb128 | yw! | 14:26 |
ahasenack | that is blocking twisted now | 14:27 |
ahasenack | after a long chain of deps | 14:27 |
ahasenack | iiuic | 14:27 |
sil2100 | sergiusens: sure! | 14:29 |
ahasenack | twisted -> foolscap -> txtorcon | 14:29 |
seb128 | should be fine to rm ooniprobe and python-txtorcon | 14:34 |
sergiusens | sil2100: as always, thank you very much! | 14:42 |
slangasek | acheronuk: tests shouldn't be writing to $HOME anyway, this would be a buggy test, not a broken test runner | 14:50 |
slangasek | acheronuk: if the software requires $HOME to be set somewhere sane, then it should be pointed somewhere in the tree by the test itself | 14:51 |
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
acheronuk | slangasek: it is https://git.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kcoreaddons/tree/debian/tests/testsuite?h=kubuntu_cosmic_archive | 15:27 |
acheronuk | but clearly the armhf runners have changed so if is skipping that with a home of / it can't write to | 15:28 |
acheronuk | slangasek: test for update manager on armf are also sometimes getting the same | 15:30 |
acheronuk | slangasek: mkdir() failed: '[Errno 13] Permission denied: '/.cache''. | 15:30 |
slangasek | acheronuk: yes, it's categorically wrong to use a $HOME from the environment in a package build or autopkgtest | 15:36 |
acheronuk | slangasek: I can change kde tests not to, but I can't for update-manager | 15:37 |
slangasek | well, Foundations should certainly fix our bug also :) | 15:37 |
slangasek | bdmurray: ^^ ? | 15:37 |
bdmurray | slangasek: update-manager uses $HOME in its autopkgtests is that correct? | 15:39 |
acheronuk | bdmurray: it's filing some tests with "mkdir() failed: '[Errno 13] Permission denied: '/.cache''." | 15:39 |
acheronuk | *failing | 15:40 |
slangasek | bdmurray: sounds like it's relying on $HOME from the caller environment yes, and it shouldn't; it should set its own local $HOME for use | 15:40 |
acheronuk | not sure of the package's fault or somthing like pytest/nose | 15:41 |
acheronuk | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/armhf/u/update-manager/20180829_133612_1ecf1@/artifacts.tar.gz | 15:42 |
acheronuk | nose-tests-stout with the error | 15:42 |
acheronuk | again, only on armhf | 15:43 |
acheronuk | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/armhf/u/update-manager/20180829_133612_1ecf1@/log.gz | 15:44 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (trusty-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu318.43 => 20101020ubuntu318.44] (core) | 16:45 | |
bdmurray | xnox: Can you add SRU info to bug 1781242? | 17:55 |
ubot5 | bug 1781242 in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems "as segfault with invalid -march= option" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1781242 | 17:55 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 18:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-openconnect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.4-1ubuntu1] | 18:38 | |
jbicha | bdmurray: sorry about the ridiculous 16.4 MB diff for fonts-noto-color-emoji/bionic | 18:40 |
bdmurray | jbicha: Its so ridiculous I'm going to save it for last | 18:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova-lxd [source] (bionic-proposed) [17.0.1-0ubuntu1] | 18:42 | |
jbicha | no problem | 18:43 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted avahi [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7-3.1ubuntu1.1] | 19:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fpc [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.4+dfsg-18ubuntu2] | 19:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tkblt [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.7-1ubuntu1] | 19:19 | |
bdmurray | rbalint: Can you add SRU info to bug 1785093? | 19:24 |
ubot5 | bug 1785093 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) "RecursionError error in call_adjusted() when package is pinned < 100" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1785093 | 19:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0~18.04] | 19:34 | |
bdmurray | jbicha: Could you add some more details to the regression potential of that fonts-noto-color-emoji bug? | 19:46 |
jbicha | do you have suggestions? that part of an SRU is the hardest for me to come up with something that feels useful | 19:49 |
jbicha | my point there was that Google ships this to their customers. But we are rebuilding it so our version isn't necessarily exactly what they test and release | 19:51 |
rbalint | bdmurray, updated the SRU, but the test is missing for now because i suspected pinning to be the trigger but it turned reading (down-)pinning did not work in python-apt basically at all | 20:28 |
bdmurray | jbicha: What could go wrong in the rebuild process? How would we know something was busted? | 20:53 |
jbicha | there is a test case | 20:53 |
jbicha | I've never seen a problem building it yet | 20:53 |
jbicha | do you like the regression potential in bug 1766736? 🤠 (it was accepted before release so wasn't an SRU) | 20:56 |
ubot5 | bug 1766736 in fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Bionic) "Update Noto Emoji to April 2018" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766736 | 20:56 |
bdmurray | jbicha: The Regression Potential is an estimate of severity or likelihood rather what could go wrong and how can we watch out for it. | 20:58 |
bdmurray | s/is/isn't/ | 20:58 |
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
jbicha | I added a sentence now. Sorry if I seem to be making this difficult :( | 21:23 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-7.8] (core, kernel) | 21:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-7.8] (core, kernel) | 21:39 | |
slangasek | someone here know why lubuntu images failed with a complaint that libreoffice-kde4 is not installable (which indeed it is not, it is only in cosmic-proposed)? | 22:05 |
slangasek | has someone been removing binaries that have revdeps? | 22:05 |
slangasek | perhaps this was meant to be removal of the NBS libreoffice-kde4 binary that's in cosmic-proposed | 22:06 |
* slangasek attempts to resuscitate | 22:07 | |
tsimonq2 | That's interesting, because we depend on libreoffice-kde, not kde4, because the kde5 one should (!) land either in this cycle or next. | 22:07 |
tsimonq2 | Thanks slangasek. | 22:07 |
tsimonq2 | Oh, so it *did* land, and it's in -proposed... | 22:09 |
tsimonq2 | Nice. | 22:09 |
slangasek | yeah, seb128 removed the wrong one by mistake (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/cosmic/amd64/libreoffice-kde4) | 22:09 |
tsimonq2 | Ah. | 22:09 |
acheronuk | linux-image-generic/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: linux-image-4.18.0-7-generic | 23:11 |
acheronuk | not good | 23:11 |
slangasek | why are you pulling from cosmic-proposed? | 23:12 |
acheronuk | pulling what? | 23:15 |
slangasek | acheronuk: linux-image-generic | 23:17 |
acheronuk | was a test failure: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/amd64/a/akonadi-search/20180830_223519_e60a9@/log.gz | 23:17 |
slangasek | ok | 23:18 |
slangasek | so pulling from cosmic-proposed because --all-proposed, fair enough :) | 23:18 |
slangasek | should be fixable with a retry | 23:18 |
acheronuk | well, I triggered against several package versions in -proposed instead. but if that fixing itself anyway, then :) | 23:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!