/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/08/30/#ubuntu-release.txt

tsimonq2slangasek: Do you typically require bugs for demotion to -proposed?00:45
tsimonq2slangasek: node-grunt-contrib-concat should be demoted so node-source-map can migrate (along with a few rdeps).00:45
tsimonq2slangasek: Debian bug 878337, https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-contrib-concat/issues/18800:45
gitbotgruntjs issue 188 in grunt-contrib-concat "update for source-map 0.7.x" [Open]00:45
ubot5Debian bug 878337 in src:node-grunt-contrib-concat "node-grunt-contrib-concat: FTBFS and Debci failure with node-source-map 0.6" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/87833700:45
tsimonq2https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/node-d3-request/1.0.6-3/+build/14813077 O_o wat?00:47
tsimonq2"Build for superseded Source"00:47
tsimonq2slangasek: Perhaps even completely remove node-d3-request and node-d3-hierarchy, depending on what this error is. :P00:48
tsimonq2vim-youcompleteme could be removed as well; ycmd doesn't look like it'll be fixed anytime soon (isn't even in Cosmic at all).00:49
cjwatsonThe build must have been superseded when it was previously removed from cosmic-proposed.00:51
cjwatsonRetrying such a build works now that it has an active publishing record again, though.  I've done that.00:51
tsimonq2Huh.00:52
tsimonq2That's a new one (for me).00:52
cjwatsonThe package was probably removed when the build wasn't in a terminal state.00:52
cjwatsonSomewhat unusual but happens occasionally.00:52
tsimonq2Ah.00:52
cjwatson(Or, more specifically, when it was in "Needs building".)00:53
cjwatsonThat state more usually happens when the source package is superseded by a newer version (hence the name) before the previous builds had been dispatched.00:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-d3-request [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-3] (no packageset)00:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-d3-request [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.6-3]00:57
tsimonq2cjwatson: Could you do binary NEW processing on the other package when it goes in the queue as well?00:59
tsimonq2node-d3-hierarchy00:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-d3-hierarchy [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.5-2] (no packageset)01:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-7 [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:7~+rc2-1~exp2]01:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-d3-hierarchy [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.5-2]01:55
slangasektsimonq2: I don't typically /do/ demotions to proposed; if it's bad enough to be removed from release I usually don't want it hanging around in -proposed either03:52
tsimonq2slangasek: Ah.03:52
slangasektsimonq2: node-grunt-contrib-concat has 5 reverse-build-dependencies, I'm not going to remove it without a plan for sorting those04:03
tsimonq2slangasek: ack04:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tkblt (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.7-1 => 3.2.7-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)07:02
acheronuk[07:20] <acheronuk> slangasek: suddenly getting some armhf tests fail with "mkdir: cannot create directory ‘//.config’: Permission denied"07:20
acheronukanother http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kcoreaddons/cosmic/armhf07:20
acheronukthinking home is / by the looks of it07:21
acheronuksomething amiss with armhf runners07:21
jibelThe pending sru report is out of date (last update 2 days ago), could someone have a look?07:24
tsimonq2cjwatson: ^ This wouldn't happen to be related to MoM, would it?07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1023.24]07:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1023.24~16.04.1]07:43
cjwatsontsimonq2: no, they're pretty independent08:27
cjwatsonjibel: I've killed the stuck run, so it should recover soon08:28
jibelcjwatson, thanks08:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.5 => 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.6] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:50
LocutusOfBorginfinity, hello, diaspora-installer is regressed testsuite, because of glibc10:43
LocutusOfBorgunfortunately testsuite is downloading a gem file from internet, and there is no new upstream version...10:43
LocutusOfBorgwhat do you propose?10:43
LocutusOfBorgthe result seems clear: linux_sigar.c:1177:22: error: called object ‘major’ is not a function or10:43
LocutusOfBorgof course release pocket is fine because of old glibc10:44
LocutusOfBorgI'm testing diaspora-installer from debian10:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected magnum [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.1.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected magnum [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.1.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected magnum [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.1.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.1ubuntu2.3]11:03
slashdo/ sil2100, can you please release gdm3 for 'X' when you have a moment today | LP: #1782152 ?11:20
ubot5Launchpad bug 1782152 in gdm3 (Ubuntu Bionic) "GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/178215211:20
slashdsil2100, and 'python-urllib3' for 'X' as well | LP: #177198811:21
ubot5Launchpad bug 1771988 in Ubuntu Cloud Archive mitaka "certificate validation with IP address based SAN's fails" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/177198811:21
sil2100slashd: hey! I'll take a look after lunch, my problem with gdm3 when I was doing releases in the morning was that bionic isn't verified yet - e.g. there's 3 bugs in it but 2 not verified yet11:34
sil2100slashd: usually we want later series to be released - not a hard rule though11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.6-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)11:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0~bionic => 1.3.0~18.04] (no packageset)12:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.6-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)12:13
slashdsil2100, tks for python-urllib312:19
sil2100slashd: as for gdm3... I would prefer to wait for bionic in this case, especially that it's a new upstream release12:21
sil2100So even though small, there's a risk it might introduce some regressions and actually get removed from -proposed12:21
sil2100Problem is I think Lan_ey is away this week still, so someone else would have to verify it12:22
slashdsil2100, ack thanks12:23
slashddgadomski, fyi ^12:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maas [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.2-7034-g2f5deb8b8-0ubuntu1]12:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.14.8]12:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtdeclarative-opensource-src [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.9.5-0ubuntu1.1]12:55
Trevinhosil2100: hey, could you please accept glib from bionic queue?13:01
Trevinhoactually I've an extra fix on https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3393 but needs to be published first13:02
sil2100Trevinho: ok, I'll get to it in a minute13:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.7 => 2.525.8] (desktop-core)13:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.8]13:13
LocutusOfBorgany AA wants to fix this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anbox/+bug/178065513:16
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1780655 in anbox (Ubuntu) "RoM: please remove this from ubuntu, doesn't work" [Undecided,New]13:16
Trevinhosil2100: thanks13:19
Trevinhoalso if you can land that ppa would be nice :)13:19
Trevinhoso we get both in a shot13:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.8]13:25
sil2100Trevinho: so just to know for sure, you want to overwrite the upload that's in Unapproved with the one in the silo?13:35
Trevinhosil2100: if that's possible yes, otherwise we can reiterate later13:36
Trevinhobut I was waiting upstream to apply that patch before adding it, now it's merged, so...13:36
sil2100I need to see how the .changes file looks13:45
sil2100Since I guess right now if I publish this, the SRU tools will miss the previous upload13:46
sil2100Because the .changes file was generated without -v, so no mention of .1 in it13:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unbound [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.7-1ubuntu2.2]13:48
sil2100Trevinho: ok, in this case I can either review the one that's already in the queue or I guess I'd have to ask you prepare a new upload that would include both the fixes13:51
sil2100(or have both versions mentioned in the .changes file)13:51
Trevinhosil2100: well, so go with queue, I'll prepare the sru of the other later13:54
Trevinhoas i also wanted to mention the commit in the dep13:54
sil2100Trevinho: ok!14:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (xenial-proposed/main) [2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.6 => 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.7] (core)14:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vmware-nsx [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [13.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)14:15
seb128Trevinho, it reminds me we need to reupload your nautilus SRU that got rejected because the version was not "standard enough" :/14:15
Trevinhoseb128: at this point if you want to wait for the search fix....14:16
seb128no14:16
seb128because that's another set of packages14:16
seb128and I don't want to make the SRU too complicated14:16
seb128I would prefer the search fix set to be that onlu14:16
seb128only14:16
Trevinhook14:17
seb128Trevinho, can you "fix"/amend the bionic branch in git to what it should14:17
seb128your git foo is better than mine, I would probably manage after some googling and poking around, but "uncommit" is not something I know how to do properly yet14:17
seb128shrug, it's annoying that we delay fixes for our LTS users and create work for ourself just to be pedentic of versioning14:18
seb128but oh well, let's keep the ranting for another day14:18
ahasenackany idea why txtorcon is "missing build"? 18.0.2-2 build on Aug 21st http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#txtorcon14:23
ahasenackoh, it's looking for a "python-txtorcon" deb...14:24
seb128ahasenack, because it is, see the changelog on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/txtorcon/18.0.2-214:24
seb128  * No longer builds a Python 2 package (Closes: #905253)14:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.93.4 => 1.93.5] (core)14:24
seb128that binary needs to be deleted from cosmic if it has no rdepends14:25
ahasenackso it needs a manual poke when a deb goes missing14:25
seb128reverse-depends lists ooniprobe though14:25
seb128so that might need to be fixed first14:25
sergiusenssil2100: evening! I have a request for you if you can spare the moment, mind taking a look at getting snapcraft into the -updates (LP: #1787419)?14:26
ubot5Launchpad bug 1787419 in snapcraft (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] New stable micro release 2.43" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/178741914:26
ahasenackseb128: thanks14:26
seb128ahasenack, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905211 is a request to remove that one from Debian, maybe the path to go14:26
ubot5Debian bug 905211 in ftp.debian.org "RM: ooniprobe -- ROM; not easily maintained; too many js deps" [Normal,Open]14:26
seb128yw!14:26
ahasenackthat is blocking twisted now14:27
ahasenackafter a long chain of deps14:27
ahasenackiiuic14:27
sil2100sergiusens: sure!14:29
ahasenacktwisted -> foolscap -> txtorcon14:29
seb128should be fine to rm ooniprobe and python-txtorcon14:34
sergiusenssil2100: as always, thank you very much!14:42
slangasekacheronuk: tests shouldn't be writing to $HOME anyway, this would be a buggy test, not a broken test runner14:50
slangasekacheronuk: if the software requires $HOME to be set somewhere sane, then it should be pointed somewhere in the tree by the test itself14:51
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson
acheronukslangasek: it is https://git.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kcoreaddons/tree/debian/tests/testsuite?h=kubuntu_cosmic_archive15:27
acheronukbut clearly the armhf runners have changed so if is skipping that with a home of / it can't write to15:28
acheronukslangasek: test for update manager on armf are also sometimes getting the same15:30
acheronukslangasek: mkdir() failed: '[Errno 13] Permission denied: '/.cache''.15:30
slangasekacheronuk: yes, it's categorically wrong to use a $HOME from the environment in a package build or autopkgtest15:36
acheronukslangasek: I can change kde tests not to, but I can't for update-manager15:37
slangasekwell, Foundations should certainly fix our bug also :)15:37
slangasekbdmurray: ^^ ?15:37
bdmurrayslangasek: update-manager uses $HOME in its autopkgtests is that correct?15:39
acheronukbdmurray: it's filing some tests with "mkdir() failed: '[Errno 13] Permission denied: '/.cache''."15:39
acheronuk*failing15:40
slangasekbdmurray: sounds like it's relying on $HOME from the caller environment yes, and it shouldn't; it should set its own local $HOME for use15:40
acheronuknot sure of the package's fault or somthing like pytest/nose15:41
acheronukhttps://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/armhf/u/update-manager/20180829_133612_1ecf1@/artifacts.tar.gz15:42
acheronuknose-tests-stout with the error15:42
acheronukagain, only on armhf15:43
acheronukhttps://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/armhf/u/update-manager/20180829_133612_1ecf1@/log.gz15:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (trusty-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu318.43 => 20101020ubuntu318.44] (core)16:45
bdmurrayxnox: Can you add SRU info to bug 1781242?17:55
ubot5bug 1781242 in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems "as segfault with invalid -march= option" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/178124217:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]18:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-openconnect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.4-1ubuntu1]18:38
jbichabdmurray: sorry about the ridiculous 16.4 MB diff for fonts-noto-color-emoji/bionic18:40
bdmurrayjbicha: Its so ridiculous I'm going to save it for last18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova-lxd [source] (bionic-proposed) [17.0.1-0ubuntu1]18:42
jbichano problem18:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted avahi [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7-3.1ubuntu1.1]19:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fpc [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.4+dfsg-18ubuntu2]19:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tkblt [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.7-1ubuntu1]19:19
bdmurrayrbalint: Can you add SRU info to bug 1785093?19:24
ubot5bug 1785093 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) "RecursionError error in call_adjusted() when package is pinned < 100" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/178509319:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0~18.04]19:34
bdmurrayjbicha: Could you add some more details to the regression potential of that fonts-noto-color-emoji bug?19:46
jbichado you have suggestions? that part of an SRU is the hardest for me to come up with something that feels useful19:49
jbichamy point there was that Google ships this to their customers. But we are rebuilding it so our version isn't necessarily exactly what they test and release19:51
rbalintbdmurray, updated the SRU, but the test is missing for now because i suspected pinning to be the trigger but it turned reading (down-)pinning did not work in python-apt basically at all20:28
bdmurrayjbicha: What could go wrong in the rebuild process? How would we know something was busted?20:53
jbichathere is a test case20:53
jbichaI've never seen a problem building it yet20:53
jbichado you like the regression potential in bug 1766736? 🤠 (it was accepted before release so wasn't an SRU)20:56
ubot5bug 1766736 in fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Bionic) "Update Noto Emoji to April 2018" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176673620:56
bdmurrayjbicha: The Regression Potential is an estimate of severity or likelihood rather what could go wrong and how can we watch out for it.20:58
bdmurrays/is/isn't/20:58
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
jbichaI added a sentence now. Sorry if I seem to be making this difficult :(21:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-7.8] (core, kernel)21:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-7.8] (core, kernel)21:39
slangaseksomeone here know why lubuntu images failed with a complaint that libreoffice-kde4 is not installable (which indeed it is not, it is only in cosmic-proposed)?22:05
slangasekhas someone been removing binaries that have revdeps?22:05
slangasekperhaps this was meant to be removal of the NBS libreoffice-kde4 binary that's in cosmic-proposed22:06
* slangasek attempts to resuscitate22:07
tsimonq2That's interesting, because we depend on libreoffice-kde, not kde4, because the kde5 one should (!) land either in this cycle or next.22:07
tsimonq2Thanks slangasek.22:07
tsimonq2Oh, so it *did* land, and it's in -proposed...22:09
tsimonq2Nice.22:09
slangasekyeah, seb128 removed the wrong one by mistake (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/cosmic/amd64/libreoffice-kde4)22:09
tsimonq2Ah.22:09
acheronuklinux-image-generic/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: linux-image-4.18.0-7-generic23:11
acheronuknot good23:11
slangasekwhy are you pulling from cosmic-proposed?23:12
acheronukpulling what?23:15
slangasekacheronuk: linux-image-generic23:17
acheronukwas a test failure: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/amd64/a/akonadi-search/20180830_223519_e60a9@/log.gz23:17
slangasekok23:18
slangasekso pulling from cosmic-proposed because --all-proposed, fair enough :)23:18
slangasekshould be fixable with a retry23:18
acheronukwell, I triggered against several package versions in -proposed instead. but if that fixing itself anyway, then :)23:21

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!