| LocutusOfBorg | please remove ldc and its reverse-deps from ppc64el, upstream doesn't want to support that architecture, and Debian asked to remove them too https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/2824 | 07:26 |
|---|---|---|
| gitbot | ldc-developers issue 2824 in ldc "Fails to build from source on ppc64el" [Open] | 07:26 |
| === M_hc[m] is now known as _hc | ||
| acheronuk | anyone looking at the r-cran-rgenoud test regression with glibc? not sure what the issue is there. it's been too many years now since I did r type things, and I never used r even then | 07:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.93.5] | 07:43 | |
| * acheronuk shudders at the memory of finite element in fortran! | 07:44 | |
| ginggs | acheronuk: I did have a quick look, they seem to do the same calculation with and without a seed. https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-rgenoud/blob/master/tests/testthat/test-genoud_fixed_seed.R#L92 https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-rgenoud/blob/master/tests/testthat/test-genoud_no_given_seed.R#L84 | 08:26 |
| ginggs | with the new glibc, the results without a given seed are now closer to the old results with a seed | 08:27 |
| ginggs | acheronuk: so adjusting the tolerance there might be safe, but it concerns me that the result only changed on amd64 and armhf | 08:30 |
| ginggs | infinity: do you have any thoughts ^ ? Is this expected? | 08:30 |
| acheronuk | indeed | 08:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw with the new ldc we finally gained full arm64 support, while reverse-deps never really worked / compiled on ppc64el | 08:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:8~svn340819-1] (no packageset) | 10:01 | |
| mwhudson | acheronuk, ginggs: i've spent far to long poking at r-cran-rgenoud and have nfi what's going on | 10:17 |
| mwhudson | it doesn't even call that many libc functions in its core loop | 10:18 |
| ginggs | mwhudson, acheronuk: did either of you find a repo or bug tracker for r-cran-rgenoud? | 10:42 |
| mwhudson | ginggs: no | 10:42 |
| acheronuk | ginggs: seems like a one man thing to me | 10:42 |
| mwhudson | it also has no rdeps so i hope some AA deletes it before i waste too much more time on it | 10:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | folks, please ignore symfony tests on armhf and s390x, they always failed, I did ignore test results because of deprecation warnings, and they started passing because of this reason... when I discovered that it was too late | 10:48 |
| acheronuk | looks like the unseeded run is wrongly finding the max from the seeded one? fun | 10:53 |
| acheronuk | ginggs: authors github? https://github.com/JasjeetSekhon/rgenoud | 10:57 |
| acheronuk | 2 commits and out of date! | 10:57 |
| ginggs | acheronuk: thanks, i couldn't find anything. i'll drop them an email | 11:05 |
| ginggs | the unseeded version just seems to pick a random number between 1 and 2^31 to use as a seed https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-rgenoud/blob/master/R/rgenoud.R#L20 but all the failed tests fail with the same result | 11:11 |
| === cascardo` is now known as cascardo | ||
| acheronuk | fun that running unseeded in R locally with old glib mostly gives the same answer, but occasionally it does a swerve and finds one of the other maxima! | 12:17 |
| acheronuk | so not sure I believe this is a hugely reliable test to start with | 12:20 |
| acheronuk | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/f3vtTNcw5t/ vs https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/mNqrRK2YXs/ | 12:22 |
| acheronuk | ^^ 2 following runs | 12:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rax-nova-agent (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.1.15-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 2.1.15-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 12:31 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | cjwatson, hello, can you please ack/nack libapache-session-perl sync/merge? (I mean, is this add-recommended-packages change still needed now that Debian has autopkgtests? they even dropped debian/test/control in the last upload... ) | 12:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | you did some of that perl changes, I'm merging them but I don't really know how to check if the bug is fixed or not... (and we have no ongoing perl transition fortunately) | 12:44 |
| cjwatson | I'd rather it be merged, but the worst case if you sync it is that somebody will have to reinvent the same thing for the next perl transition | 12:44 |
| cjwatson | so I don't care very deeply | 12:44 |
| === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:8~svn340819-1] (no packageset) | 12:57 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | so cjwatson reintroduce that file and that's all? | 13:07 |
| cjwatson | Sorry, I don't remember and am in the middle of two other things right now | 13:08 |
| cjwatson | If it's a difficult merge due to the underlying file not existing any more, then just sync instead and we can sort it out later | 13:08 |
| cjwatson | (if necessary) | 13:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | -Depends: @, pkg-perl-autopkgtest, libdbi-perl | 13:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | +Depends: @, pkg-perl-autopkgtest, libcgi-pm-perl, libdbi-perl | 13:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is the patch, in debian/test/control, but that file is now removed | 13:09 |
| cjwatson | Just drop it and sync then | 13:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it is recommended in the libapache-session-perl package, so maybe we can teach autopkgtest for perl to install recommends by default? | 13:10 |
| cjwatson | It was a subtle problem and it's possible it's been fixed; if it hasn't then we'll likely need to fix it somewhere else anyway | 13:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | maybe debian did that... | 13:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | [ gregor herrmann ] | 13:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | * Remove debian/tests/control; add libdbi-perl to Recommends. | 13:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the reason for adding libdbi-perl to recommends is similar, so maybe this is really already fixed | 13:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | in case we break on next perl transition, we will have a lot of "ubuntu1" previous packages in release, and we can quickly notice of the dropped delta, lets sync | 13:11 |
| cjwatson | ack | 13:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.34.2 => 2.35.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 13:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.34.2+18.04 => 2.35.1+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 13:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.34.2~14.04 => 2.35.1~14.04] (no packageset) | 13:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:8~svn340819-1] (no packageset) | 19:20 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, do you like the new diaspora-installer autopkgtest? | 20:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I can't in pbuilder environment install the package, not sure why | 20:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/diaspora-installer/cosmic/amd64 | 20:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but it seems good, I'm tempted to remove the block | 20:58 |
| mwhudson | hmm | 22:20 |
| tsimonq2 | hmm | 22:21 |
| acheronuk | hmm | 22:22 |
| mwhudson | looking at twisted/foolscap/txtorcon | 22:22 |
| mwhudson | current situation is that there's a txtorcon in proposed that does not build a python 2 package | 22:22 |
| mwhudson | but a previous upload built a totally broken one | 22:22 |
| mwhudson | i _guess_ the thing to do is remove the broken one and upload a txtorcon-for-python-2 source package that is the old txtorcon source | 22:23 |
| mwhudson | but all this requires an AA to sort out | 22:23 |
| mwhudson | well unless txtorcon-for-python-2 gets a ridiculous dishonest version i guess but well | 22:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!