| didrocks | good morning | 06:29 |
|---|---|---|
| didrocks | ok, gnome-shell .92 is now a valid candidate, pomodoro went in and glibc is ok | 06:31 |
| didrocks | only blocked by its extensions now: * amd64: gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel, gnome-shell-extension-multi-monitors, gnome-shell-extension-taskbar | 06:32 |
| duflu | Morning didrocks | 06:32 |
| didrocks | hey duflu | 06:33 |
| didrocks | none of the 3 are updated in Debian though | 06:34 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: when you merged with debian with those Breaks, were you involved in getting them updated? | 06:34 |
| oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 07:00 |
| duflu | Hi oSoMoN | 07:00 |
| oSoMoN | hey duflu | 07:00 |
| didrocks | salut oSoMoN | 07:13 |
| oSoMoN | salut didrocks | 07:13 |
| seb128 | lut oSoMoN didrocks | 07:19 |
| seb128 | good morning desktopers | 07:19 |
| seb128 | hey duflu | 07:19 |
| duflu | Hello seb128 | 07:19 |
| oSoMoN | salut seb128 | 07:20 |
| didrocks | salut seb128 | 07:21 |
| Nafallo | morning guys :-) | 07:31 |
| didrocks | hey Nafallo | 07:34 |
| didrocks | (btw, doing gdm3 and gnome-session) | 07:41 |
| * didrocks still waits for anyone with debian upload rights to sponsor my mutter & gnome-shell branches (see scrollback from yesterday evening) so that we can sync mutter and I can push my gnome-shell merge | 07:42 | |
| seb128 | didrocks, speaking of those, the backlog was not clear, you mentioned salsa yesterday but you didn't push anything to it? | 07:44 |
| seb128 | didrocks, https://salsa.debian.org/didrocks-guest has no recent activity | 07:45 |
| didrocks | seb128: I pushed them to launchpad, that's the link I referenced | 07:46 |
| didrocks | I can push them to salsa if people don't want just to pull/push | 07:47 |
| didrocks | (with with the finalize changelog commit that I needed for gnome-shell, having a merge is weird IMHO) | 07:47 |
| seb128 | didrocks, well, it would increase the chance to avoid someone on the Debian side not knowing you did the work and redoing it | 07:48 |
| seb128 | I mentioned it to jbicha yesterday, but he was busy updating the world and started arguing that you did push to Debian since you didn't push to salsa | 07:48 |
| didrocks | seb128: but if I propose a merge with the finalize commit that I needed to prepare the ubuntu branch, that's not giong to work | 07:49 |
| seb128 | maybe L_aney can pick them up when he gets online | 07:49 |
| seb128 | you mean? | 07:49 |
| didrocks | well, I needed to prepare ubuntu/master as well | 07:49 |
| didrocks | for gnome-shell | 07:49 |
| didrocks | to test it | 07:49 |
| seb128 | mutter is in sync, so if you did that one it should be no issue | 07:50 |
| didrocks | for this, you git merge from debian | 07:50 |
| didrocks | but if you do a merge instead of a pull/push, the history differs | 07:50 |
| didrocks | (a merge in salsa) | 07:50 |
| seb128 | and gnome-shell I would expect the update to be done in debian, including changelog/tagging | 07:50 |
| didrocks | so, your "rebase" is lying | 07:50 |
| seb128 | and then we merge on top? | 07:50 |
| didrocks | yeah, but it means, that I have to redo it a second time | 07:50 |
| didrocks | once it's merged | 07:50 |
| didrocks | and I couldn't test on ubuntu without merging my WIP debian work | 07:51 |
| seb128 | I see | 07:51 |
| didrocks | so, basically, we are doing twice the work, and adding delays | 07:51 |
| didrocks | this is really not motivating | 07:52 |
| seb128 | well, hopefully Laney can review/upload/commit that when he gets online in 10 min | 07:52 |
| didrocks | that's why I just asked for a pull/push | 07:52 |
| didrocks | instead of a merge | 07:52 |
| didrocks | yeah, let's see | 07:52 |
| seb128 | you could probably ask that on salsa as well if you have a merge request | 07:52 |
| seb128 | hopefully people would read and pull instead of just pressing the merge button :p | 07:52 |
| seb128 | but yeah, let's wait for Laney | 07:52 |
| didrocks | you think people are reading? I'm unsure ;) | 07:53 |
| didrocks | but yeah, we could try next time | 07:53 |
| didrocks | anyway, let's see, if we can't pull/push, that means I have to redo the work | 07:53 |
| didrocks | and so, that the process is even more cumbersome | 07:53 |
| willcooke | morning gang | 08:00 |
| duflu | Zoinks | 08:01 |
| duflu | Morning willcooke | 08:01 |
| Laney | yo | 08:02 |
| duflu | sup Laney? | 08:02 |
| didrocks | hey willcooke, Laney | 08:02 |
| seb128 | hey willcooke Laney, how are you today? | 08:02 |
| Laney | alright | 08:03 |
| Laney | what is the argument? | 08:03 |
| didrocks | I need someone to pull/push my branches for mutter/gnome-shell to salsa | 08:04 |
| didrocks | as I already prepared the gnome-shell branch for ubuntu, I would prefer a pull/push to not have to redo the work when remerging the debian package for ubuntu | 08:04 |
| didrocks | (so, the finalize commit for g-s is already in the branch) | 08:05 |
| Laney | some complaints about whether the eventual commits in salsa end up different? | 08:06 |
| Laney | in that case, what problem would another git merge be? | 08:06 |
| didrocks | it looks weird though via history | 08:06 |
| didrocks | you say "based on <…>", and then, you remerge from debian with the same version | 08:06 |
| Laney | right, based on proposed state in debian, that state changes, you merge in those additional changes | 08:07 |
| Laney | I don't think that's a problem personally | 08:07 |
| Laney | actually it seems like the right representation of the history | 08:07 |
| didrocks | sounds like a hard to read history to me | 08:07 |
| Laney | ok, sorry but I don't want another git argument | 08:07 |
| seb128 | oh git, we should write songs about it ;) | 08:09 |
| didrocks | Laney: still able to sponsor though? | 08:10 |
| Laney | can look | 08:10 |
| didrocks | thx! | 08:10 |
| didrocks | the branches are on launchpad, I can push them on salsa if you prefer and copy paste what I wrote | 08:11 |
| Laney | I am really clear in saying that there is no 'redo the work' in case I change anything or even merge the commits with a merge commit though, you simply merge an additional time and the history is correct in describing what happened | 08:12 |
| Laney | this is what I advised andyrock to do actually when preparing updates on both sides | 08:12 |
| * Laney takes a look | 08:12 | |
| Laney | actually let me finish gtk3 first, I started that one yesterday | 08:12 |
| didrocks | sure | 08:13 |
| andyrock | seb128: in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1786344 what's simpliefied english? | 08:16 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1786344 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "Default IBus input method ignored in live session" [High,In progress] | 08:16 |
| andyrock | *Simplified English | 08:16 |
| andyrock | maybe he meant Simplified Chinese? | 08:17 |
| seb128 | yes, I think he does | 08:17 |
| seb128 | I put the chinese description in google translator | 08:17 |
| seb128 | "18.10 Mirror (2018.8.7) Select Simplified Chinese to boot, unable to input Chinese. " | 08:17 |
| seb128 | so yeah, translations error :) | 08:17 |
| seb128 | and hey andyrock! | 08:17 |
| andyrock | hey :D | 08:18 |
| andyrock | I was also taking a look to gnome-screenshot 3.30 | 08:18 |
| andyrock | do we still need to carry out the patches for unity? | 08:18 |
| andyrock | *carry | 08:18 |
| seb128 | "need" | 08:18 |
| seb128 | if we can it's nicer to the unity users | 08:19 |
| seb128 | but it's too much work then we can argue it's not worth the effort | 08:19 |
| seb128 | so depends how difficult it is to rebase those | 08:19 |
| andyrock | should not be difficult | 08:19 |
| seb128 | better to keep them then I would say | 08:19 |
| andyrock | now I need to understand which chinese is the simpliefied in the boot menu | 08:20 |
| andyrock | :D | 08:20 |
| seb128 | I don't think it matter | 08:22 |
| seb128 | the problem is probably true on any locale that requires ibus | 08:22 |
| seb128 | or I would guess that to be the case | 08:22 |
| andyrock | seb128: but I'm able to type Chinese selecting Intelligent Pinyin in a live | 08:24 |
| andyrock | let me check how it works in Bionic | 08:24 |
| seb128 | andyrock, well I think the bug is that you shouldn't to go select it, that should be the default | 08:24 |
| seb128 | activated on login | 08:24 |
| seb128 | andyrock, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1786344/comments/10 has a bit more details | 08:26 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1786344 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "Default IBus input method ignored in live session" [High,In progress] | 08:26 |
| willcooke | jibel, do you vnc any desktop machines? | 08:50 |
| willcooke | gnome shell specifcally | 08:50 |
| * didrocks reboots with new gnome-session & gdm | 08:58 | |
| jibel | willcooke, I don't | 09:09 |
| jibel | willcooke, why this question? | 09:09 |
| willcooke | jibel, well... when ever I try to VNC in to my 18.04 desktop which is running as a server, I just get a black screen. It always "just worked" before 18.04. I did some google and found similar problems, but no obvious solution yet | 09:11 |
| willcooke | jibel, when you get a sec, and you test? Someone said it might be caused by the video drivers | 09:12 |
| willcooke | oh, I might be able to test on my other laptop | 09:12 |
| willcooke | which is intel | 09:12 |
| willcooke | I'll do that | 09:12 |
| didrocks | hum, various imports of upstream/laste and pristine-tar then doesn't match with our launchpad branch… :/ | 09:13 |
| didrocks | some fusion conflicts even | 09:13 |
| didrocks | seb128: I wonder if that's not related to your merge in https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+git/gnome-session | 09:14 |
| seb128 | didrocks, :-/ | 09:14 |
| seb128 | talk to Trevinho about it maybe? | 09:15 |
| seb128 | afaik I just pushed what he had submitted | 09:15 |
| didrocks | yeah, but I guess the issue is that we imported the same version than debian | 09:15 |
| didrocks | but then moved forward | 09:15 |
| didrocks | before reimported | 09:15 |
| didrocks | so both sides have new commits (with different version), and so, different content | 09:15 |
| seb128 | we did the update in Debian first | 09:15 |
| didrocks | and git can't know which side to pick | 09:15 |
| seb128 | then merges | 09:15 |
| didrocks | hum | 09:15 |
| seb128 | iirc | 09:15 |
| seb128 | but maybe Trevinho had both side ready at the same time | 09:16 |
| seb128 | and it got merged using the salsa web ui or something in debian and that created divergence | 09:16 |
| seb128 | I don't remember now | 09:16 |
| willcooke | jibel, yeah works fine on this other machine. So I think it could be nouveau | 09:16 |
| didrocks | could be, anyway, this is a real pb we can get (even if it's maybe a different one this time) ^ | 09:16 |
| seb128 | right | 09:17 |
| seb128 | the handle of those branches is a bit tricky | 09:17 |
| didrocks | I'm going to do a merge --this (or whatever the syntax is) to say to prefer the current version | 09:17 |
| didrocks | yeah | 09:17 |
| seb128 | unsure at this point how we could improve that though | 09:17 |
| didrocks | it wasn't done for having different distros using the same branch IMHO | 09:17 |
| didrocks | but we can't switch in and out | 09:18 |
| didrocks | tricky | 09:18 |
| willcooke | jibel, correction - it's Radeon | 09:18 |
| willcooke | jibel, which rather scuppers my plans to try a different driver | 09:19 |
| duflu | willcooke, are you using gnome-shell's native remote desktop or a legacy VNC server? If the latter then it probably won't work in (X)Wayland sessions, and will show all black | 09:23 |
| duflu | Because no external VNC server can read/see the desktop in Wayland, probably | 09:25 |
| willcooke | duflu, I tried both | 09:26 |
| willcooke | and I'm using the X session | 09:26 |
| willcooke | I now think that it's not "a black screen" | 09:26 |
| duflu | Very dark grey? | 09:26 |
| willcooke | I ran xev and moved the mouse around on the whole screen and xev saw nothing at all | 09:27 |
| willcooke | duflu, lol | 09:27 |
| willcooke | I might have to get a screen out of the loft and plug it in, maybe there is something on the screen like "do you want to allow...." | 09:27 |
| duflu | Actually I don't even know if gnome-shell's native remote desktop support is finished/enabled/built yet | 09:29 |
| duflu | When I build mutter myself it always says "no" | 09:29 |
| willcooke | It works using the built in one on my intel based laptop | 09:29 |
| duflu | Cool. I am probably just missing build-deps | 09:30 |
| jamesh | does VNC send mouse movement when no buttons are pressed? It's been ages since I've looked at the protocol | 09:30 |
| willcooke | jamesh, erm, yes I think so, but I will confirm | 09:30 |
| willcooke | well, I can see the mouse moving around on the laptop when I move it via vnc, so I would assume yes | 09:31 |
| jamesh | that'd be client related rather than server related, either way | 09:31 |
| willcooke | ah right | 09:32 |
| duflu | I doubt it. The client would be able to detect any local errors. The client can't detect the difference between a server that's meant to be reporting a black screen and one that's not | 09:32 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: mhmh... Normally to avoid this I always made sure debian side merged through same thing then merging with Ubuntu... But it's possible that some diversion happens and it's why I wanted some time ago wanted to discuss how to handle it | 09:37 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: yeah, it's an annoying thing we didn't anticipate | 09:38 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: btw, did you see my questions about the 3 extensions, were there any coordination (apart from the bug filing) in debian side to update the extensions? | 09:38 |
| didrocks | as right now, .92 is stuck in proposed due to this (breaks: other-extensions) | 09:39 |
| didrocks | (pomodoro is synced btw, and the autopkgtest works) | 09:39 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: nope, I didn't do anything on extensions... Maybe I should had 😢 | 09:53 |
| Trevinho | And that problem... I did anticipate but I was blamed for trying to handle the problems before they were a reality | 09:54 |
| didrocks | hum, I hope that those 3 upstreams we are blocked on released patches | 09:54 |
| didrocks | but we need to package it, and it's in sync in debian | 09:54 |
| didrocks | would be quicker for someone to do it directly in Debian and upload | 09:54 |
| didrocks | rather than diverging (or waiting for Debian to review the patches, waiting with gnome-shell blocked in -proposed meanwhile…) | 09:55 |
| Laney | it would be an option to kick them out to proposed | 10:08 |
| Laney | hmm, I can't type compose characters into my terminal | 10:35 |
| Laney | this is a problem for certain of my passphrases that I need to be able to type to upload /o\ | 10:35 |
| Laney | ok, I can paste them, but still ;_; | 10:36 |
| Laney | didrocks: I think they wanted 3.30 to go to unstable, so do you want to update the branch for that or should I do it? | 10:37 |
| * Laney has done mutter already | 10:37 | |
| Laney | but not gnome-shell (yet) | 10:38 |
| Trevinho | Laney: didier had https://code.launchpad.net/~didrocks/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+git/gnome-shell/ but from what I see there was no patches refresh yet, or did I miss the commit? | 10:56 |
| Laney | probably no updates were needed | 10:57 |
| Laney | those are the best kind of updates | 10:57 |
| Laney | I'll just get to work on merging exp into master for debian | 10:58 |
| Laney | https://git.launchpad.net/~laney/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell <- that's ubuntu/master with the new debian/master merged in | 11:16 |
| Laney | only difference is the commit I made to update references to exp branch & watch file | 11:17 |
| xnox | jibel, what are the rules around utah? whoever spots a bug, gets to fix it? | 11:19 |
| xnox | i see this change: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~utah/utah/dev/revision/1126 | 11:20 |
| xnox | however in https://platform-qa-jenkins.ubuntu.com/view/Desktop/job/ubuntu-cosmic-desktop-amd64-smoke-default/88/console | 11:20 |
| xnox | I see | 11:20 |
| xnox | UTAH exception: initrd file does have have gz or lz extension: /var/lib/utah/vm/utah_vm_G1kh05lzIYOIe4qu/tmpf2NIif/initrd | 11:20 |
| xnox | i wonder if UTAH is getting confused by are multi-initrd which has initrd, intel microcode, and amd microcode archives. | 11:21 |
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|lunch | ||
| didrocks | Laney: sounds good, thanks! | 12:08 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: yeah, no patch refresh needed | 12:08 |
| jibel | xnox, this one is fixed but there is another issue where the image fails to reboot after installation | 12:14 |
| jibel | xnox, heber is on it | 12:14 |
| === pstolowski|lunch is now known as pstolowski | ||
| Trevinho | didrocks: ah, ok... as I thought something went in, but I guess it's post .30 then | 12:41 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: can you merge this in the mean time https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+git/gnome-shell/+merge/354321? | 12:42 |
| Trevinho | I don't want to do the release now though, just leave unreleased as I prefer to wait 3.28.4 | 12:42 |
| Trevinho | or maybe we can do an upload just with the search fixes? seb128 mentioned that, but if we go with an official point release is quite easy to verify anyway | 12:43 |
| xnox | ok | 12:46 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: well, we need first to be released to cosmic | 12:48 |
| didrocks | your patch* | 12:49 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: yeah, sure but for the VCS we can still merge, then in case we change there, I mentioned just not to do back and froth with branches around, but as you prefer | 12:49 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: sure, I meant, in case you want to release it | 12:49 |
| Trevinho | sure sure... Although seb mentioned sometimes that is fine when a things i "on the way for sure", but I'm not rushing on releasing | 12:50 |
| didrocks | I guess there is no urgency, let me just merge it | 12:50 |
| Trevinho | exactly no urgency... just prefer not to loose track of things | 12:51 |
| Trevinho | I'm preparing other components too, while for calculator I'm also updating to .2 | 12:51 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: done | 12:51 |
| Trevinho | ta | 12:52 |
| Laney | didrocks: do you want me to upload gnome-shell? | 13:17 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: for gnome-calculator, the SRU can I merge on debian 3.28.2-1 first (no feature changes https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/T3wQfD7wnf/) and then apply that patch or I should just merge with updated upstream and do the versioning side alone? As since debian didn't really change anything I guess i can proceed this way, no? | 13:17 |
| didrocks | Laney: to debian? Please do, I can handle the mutter sync + gnome-shell upload to cosmic | 13:17 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: agreed, if the diff are minor and fix issues, I see no reason to separate your fix and the maintenance release upload | 13:18 |
| Laney | didrocks: no, to cosmic, since I re-merged, but feel free to handle | 13:19 |
| Laney | unstable is done done done | 13:19 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: need to do the classic merged with debian line though, right? | 13:20 |
| didrocks | Laney: oh, feel free to upload if you prefer | 13:20 |
| didrocks | I have no strong opinion :) | 13:20 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: unsure what is the classic merged? ;) | 13:21 |
| Trevinho | remaining changes... | 13:21 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: depends on the release team, they don't really like extra diff not fixing bugs, but if you can convince them… | 13:22 |
| Laney | should probably wait for the accepted emails from dak | 13:22 |
| didrocks | Laney: still unsure, you are handling it? (I'm fine with that, you did the commits on top…) | 13:23 |
| didrocks | ok yaru snap "fixed" ;) | 13:23 |
| Laney | sure! | 13:23 |
| didrocks | thx ;) | 13:23 |
| didrocks | next upstream release -> I'll sync a cosmic upload before UIF | 13:23 |
| Laney | yaruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuUuuuuuuuuUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuu | 13:23 |
| Laney | autopkgtest for autopilot-gtk/1.4+15.10.20150826-0ubuntu1: amd64: Regression ♻ , arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Regression ♻ , i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Regression ♻ | 13:24 |
| Laney | :< | 13:24 |
| didrocks | flaky tests for sure and you just got unlucky :p | 13:26 |
| didrocks | (or should play to $$$ game) | 13:26 |
| Laney | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/autopilot-gtk/cosmic/amd64 | 13:27 |
| Laney | really unlucky! | 13:27 |
| didrocks | 0, 1… it's quite close still! | 13:28 |
| Laney | still stuck behind glibc anyway | 13:28 |
| didrocks | are you sure? gnome-shell doesn't show it being stuck anymore by it | 13:28 |
| Laney | oh no glib2.0 | 13:29 |
| didrocks | ah ;) | 13:29 |
| Laney | but I didn't sync that so I'm not feeling too responsible for getting that to go in right now :-) | 13:29 |
| didrocks | heh | 13:30 |
| didrocks | wdyt we should do for gnome-shell? | 13:30 |
| didrocks | (regarding extensions) | 13:30 |
| Laney | kill them to cosmic-proposed | 13:30 |
| didrocks | it means that if we didn't look at it, there are some chances that dashtopanel and other aren't installable | 13:31 |
| Laney | they won't be in the release, that's right | 13:31 |
| Laney | same as what'll happen in debian | 13:31 |
| didrocks | (I don't know if people are using the extension websites or packages) | 13:31 |
| didrocks | oh, debian may remove them? | 13:31 |
| Laney | they'll be auto removed from testing | 13:31 |
| Laney | https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel | 13:31 |
| Laney | see the note there | 13:31 |
| didrocks | interesting | 13:32 |
| didrocks | ok, so removing them in the release pocket (and not -proposed), yeah mean? | 13:32 |
| Laney | there's a script demote-to-proposed or something | 13:32 |
| didrocks | not in ~ubuntu-archive | 13:32 |
| Laney | which copies to cosmic-proposed and delete from release | 13:32 |
| Laney | it's in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools | 13:33 |
| didrocks | oh, I didn't add it to my $PATH one this laptop… | 13:33 |
| * didrocks fixes | 13:33 | |
| Laney | should block them in proposed-migration too otherwise they might get copied straight back | 13:33 |
| didrocks | ok, I'll do that, makes sense | 13:33 |
| * Laney does | 13:33 | |
| didrocks | oh right ;) | 13:33 |
| Laney | there | 13:36 |
| Laney | now it should pick copying gnome-shell rather than the extensions | 13:36 |
| didrocks | ok, I'm running demote-to-proposed now | 13:36 |
| Laney | winning | 13:37 |
| Laney | I'll push gnome-shell to git, will upload once the new one moves over | 13:37 |
| didrocks | and done! yeah, sounds good to wait for the new one moving now | 13:37 |
| didrocks | thx Laney | 13:37 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: spotted another small thing https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+git/gnome-calculator/+merge/354328 | 13:39 |
| Laney | hmm there's already an ubuntu/3.30.0-1ubuntu1 tag there but that's a bit different to what I'm going to upload | 13:40 |
| Laney | shall I la la la and delete it? | 13:40 |
| didrocks | Laney: yeah, that was my thing about "need to be redone or pending review in debian", but that's fine, just delete and replace it | 13:41 |
| Laney | alright | 13:41 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: merged | 13:42 |
| didrocks | interesting, I didn't work on calculator, but I see that git push is failing on pristine-tar and upstream/latest and there are conflicts :p | 13:43 |
| didrocks | weird though, because it seems people used -f rather than merging, it's puzzling | 13:43 |
| Laney | O_O | 13:44 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: thanks, also this branch needs to be pulled to ~ubuntu-desktop as there's not a an ubuntu/bionic yet: | 13:50 |
| Trevinho | https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+git/gnome-calculator/+ref/ubuntu/bionic | 13:50 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: can't we create one so that I can see the diff? ;) | 13:52 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: yep, just do it with `git checkout -b ubuntu/bionic ubuntu/1%3.28.1-1ubuntu1` | 13:52 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: so I can prepare the MP | 13:52 |
| Laney | Trevinho is on the path to upload rights, I like it | 13:53 |
| Trevinho | not sure I want them :D | 13:54 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: ubuntu/bionic branch create | 13:54 |
| didrocks | created* | 13:54 |
| Trevinho | cool | 13:54 |
| Trevinho | I could have put the gbp and control commits before the merge... but meeh, I'm lazy now to rebase :) | 13:55 |
| Trevinho | lots of diff, but actually debian/ diff is small | 13:56 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: did you have a script for generating the Yaru changelog? | 13:57 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: mhmhmh, wait | 13:57 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: `gbp dch` just that | 13:57 |
| didrocks | interesting ;) | 13:58 |
| Laney | you have to re-order the entries because it doesn't group by person | 13:58 |
| didrocks | works well indeed | 13:58 |
| Laney | bit annoying | 13:58 |
| didrocks | ah ok Laney | 13:58 |
| didrocks | thx for mentionning! | 13:58 |
| Laney | like if it's Laney didrocks Laney, you get two [ Laney ] bits | 13:58 |
| Trevinho | yep.. | 13:58 |
| didrocks | yep, got you | 13:58 |
| Trevinho | I mentioned the same last day... need to fix that upstream, laney I saw you already sent a patch to Guido, so you're the good one to ask for fixing that too :) | 13:59 |
| Laney | nah, bus factor is bad 😌 | 14:00 |
| Trevinho | I think I screwed things in calculator... let me redo it | 14:00 |
| jbicha | gbp dch --multimaint-merge you can probably set that in debian/gbp.conf to | 14:01 |
| jbicha | too | 14:01 |
| Laney | --multimaint-merge Merge commits by maintainer, default is 'False' | 14:02 |
| Laney | yes | 14:02 |
| Laney | I just found that :> | 14:02 |
| Laney | ALSO https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881467 | 14:03 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 881467 in git-buildpackage "git-buildpackage: gbp dch should filter out commits behind upstream-vcs-tag" [Wishlist,Open] | 14:03 |
| Laney | the tip in there is going to change my life | 14:03 |
| Trevinho | oh, lovely... `dch dch debian` for life | 14:04 |
| Trevinho | s/dch/gbp/ | 14:04 |
| Laney | I've been manually deleting those entries | 14:04 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: mhmh so https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+git/gnome-calculator/+merge/354330 is the merge, but... there's lot of "garbage" because i think debian introduced to the VCS pre-compiled files, so the issue... however `git diff debian/3.28.2-1` is what you might look at or `git diff ubuntu/1%3.28.1-1ubuntu1 debian` as the rest is just garbage happened on merging with upstream that is not anymore in | 14:22 |
| Trevinho | debian/master but was there in debian/3.28.2-1 tree | 14:22 |
| Laney | ah, interesting, autopilot was relying on some defaults in ambiance | 14:23 |
| Trevinho | ambiance won't ever change! :) | 14:23 |
| didrocks | Laney: so, failing for quite a while? But I guess nothing triggered it | 14:23 |
| didrocks | Trevinho: ok, I'll have a look (maybe later though, testing Yaru for now) | 14:23 |
| Laney | it fails now that Yaru is default I guess | 14:23 |
| Trevinho | didrocks: sure, waiting new fresh look :) | 14:24 |
| Laney | but really it should be setting properties if it wants to test them, not assuming the theme is static | 14:24 |
| didrocks | waow, the over-amplification is interesting | 14:24 |
| * didrocks prefers it to default upstream one | 14:24 | |
| didrocks | Laney: yeah, on the other side, they want to test on the default | 14:24 |
| Trevinho | Laney: what pkgs? | 14:24 |
| didrocks | what are they relying on? | 14:25 |
| Laney | assuming some border width is 5 | 14:25 |
| didrocks | ah, yeah, so that's more debatable :) | 14:25 |
| Laney | it's like "give me all the boxes with this width" to test if selecting works | 14:26 |
| Laney | but the only reason they had that width was because of the theme | 14:26 |
| Laney | test's .ui file should set it | 14:26 |
| didrocks | right | 14:27 |
| Laney | 👍 | 14:28 |
| Laney | SHELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLlllllllllllllll | 14:38 |
| seb128 | tjaalton, thanks for the xorg minor update, I'm still going to annoy you a bit by mentioning that libxss has a minor update available (https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxscrnsaver/tags/libXScrnSaver-1.2.3) and libinput/wayland would be nice to update :) | 14:44 |
| didrocks | taking gnome-getting-started-docs, brain is fried ;) | 15:27 |
| Laney | was waiting ages for the autopilot-gtk build to finish, turned out my ssh connection to home had frozen /o\ | 15:35 |
| didrocks | "waow, that touch command was taking ageesssssss" | 15:38 |
| Laney | it was just after starting the testsuite | 15:39 |
| Laney | which sometimes doesn't output stuff for ages | 15:39 |
| didrocks | ok, easy to get missed then | 15:39 |
| Laney | terrible timing :P | 15:39 |
| didrocks | yep | 15:39 |
| Laney | 😸 (ok, can paste emoji, new gnome-characters works enough) | 15:44 |
| willcooke | :) | 15:52 |
| Trevinho | seb128: do you remember you should redo the upload of https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+git/nautilus/+merge/350174 ? :) | 15:59 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, yes, I asked you the other day if you could amend the vcs to have the right version if you remember? | 16:08 |
| Trevinho | seb128: ah, I forgot that bit... But release was fine with such version eventually, no? | 16:09 |
| seb128 | no since they rejected asking to change and reupload | 16:12 |
| Trevinho | seb128: yes, but then sil corrected: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1782681/comments/3 | 16:14 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1782681 in nautilus (Ubuntu Bionic) "Upgrade to 3.26.4 and SRU it" [High,In progress] | 16:14 |
| tjaalton | seb128: the problem with libxss for instance is that it's lacking six years of janitorial pkg maintenance, and the upstream changes are worthless | 16:24 |
| tjaalton | one manpage typo fix, five autogen cleanup commits, one warning fix | 16:25 |
| tjaalton | libinput 1.12rc is in a staging ppa, final expected next week | 16:25 |
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk | ||
| tomreyn | hi, i noticed there is http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/bionic/daily-live/current/ - but the name seems to be misleading, it was last built in july. | 16:37 |
| tomreyn | was this meant to be just a temporary build, is it going to go away soon, or will there likley be dailies, and the build scripts just dont work out, yet? | 16:38 |
| Laney | They are promoted to that directory when they pass automated testing - I think the QA guys are looking into why it's failing | 16:38 |
| Laney | the raw daily images end up in http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/bionic/daily-live/pending/ | 16:38 |
| tomreyn | thanks Laney! | 16:39 |
| Laney | no problemo 🤠 | 16:39 |
| seb128 | tjaalton, k, thanks, fair enough for libxss I'll mark to ignore for our report (and good to know for libinput) | 16:46 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, reuploaded nautilus bionic | 16:50 |
| popey | willcooke: kenvandine Wimpress I added a spreadsheet link to our desktop doc we were in. It has some screenshots for some of the apps | 16:56 |
| kenvandine | popey, thx | 16:56 |
| willcooke | thanks popey | 17:07 |
| willcooke | popey, can we get edit rights? | 17:09 |
| willcooke | on that note, quittin time. Night all | 17:13 |
| Trevinho | seb128: thanks | 17:56 |
| tjaalton | seb128: wayland uploaded | 17:57 |
| Laney | looks like my autopilot didn't work properly | 18:38 |
| Laney | despite having run the autopkgtests locally | 18:38 |
| Laney | WAH | 18:38 |
| Laney | oh yeah, it'll need the new gtk :/ | 18:39 |
| seb128 | tjaalton, great :) | 19:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!