=== ubott2 is now known as ubottu | ||
acheronuk | tianon: do you happen to know when cosmic docker images are next likely to be updated? | 08:02 |
---|---|---|
mwhudson | acheronuk: when either he or i get around to clicking the button | 08:05 |
mwhudson | acheronuk: is there some change you are after? | 08:05 |
mwhudson | ah i guess the new glibc is probably a good reason to update | 08:06 |
acheronuk | mwhudson: Yeah. I have an issue with building Kubuntu CI cosmic container, which could be because glibc mismatch | 08:07 |
acheronuk | 07:04:10 /usr/bin/ruby: relocation error: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_files.so.2: symbol __libc_readline_unlocked version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference | 08:08 |
acheronuk | if I start with glibc all up to date, then hoping that goes away! | 08:08 |
mwhudson | hmm | 08:08 |
mwhudson | still sounds like something that shouldn't be happening... | 08:08 |
acheronuk | mwhudson: yeah, but I did not write the .rake and I'm not up to speed enough on docker/ruby to debug. so as said, rather hoping it goes away with upgraded images | 08:10 |
acheronuk | bionic and xenial container still build/deploy fine | 08:11 |
mwhudson | well i've started the process of updating | 08:11 |
mwhudson | will probably have to wait until tianon wakes up to finish though | 08:12 |
acheronuk | mwhudson: thanks. no problem. I'm busy with other stuff a lot of today, so won't look at this again until tonight or tomorrow anyway | 08:13 |
mwhudson | acheronuk: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/4809 | 08:19 |
* mwhudson puts the laptop away | 08:19 | |
acheronuk | thanks :) | 08:21 |
abeato | sil2100, hey, so what do you think of https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/ubuntu-image/pull/160 ? regardless of any redesign on how to handle grub.cfg on classic, would you be happy if I change it to remote /boot/grub/* instead of the whole folder? | 08:32 |
abeato | s/remote/remove/ | 08:32 |
ricotz | xnox, hi :), meson 0.47.2-1 seems an important package to merge | 10:49 |
LargePrime | Hi, i got a weird question. it is possible to modify a key mapping of a device at the driver level? on my own system | 15:03 |
ahasenack | no idea what you mean, nor how it relates to ubuntu development | 15:04 |
LargePrime | ya, i dont know where to ask. this is my first guess | 15:05 |
LargePrime | ahasenack, I have a mouse and i want to remap its buttons | 15:05 |
LargePrime | the tools and guides I find give remaps that do not survive rebboots, or even replugging the usb device | 15:06 |
LargePrime | So i was thinking to goto a lower level hack | 15:07 |
sladen | LargePrime: use 'udev' to make the change each time the mouse is inserted | 15:33 |
LargePrime | sladen, ya. I was hoping to hack something at a lower leve, so as to not have to do it each time | 15:33 |
sladen | LargePrime: udev does it for you, every time! | 15:34 |
sladen | LargePrime: much much easier than hacking and recompiling drivers... | 15:35 |
LargePrime | sladen, thanks. I missunderstood | 15:35 |
sladen | LargePrime: see https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/65891/how-to-execute-a-shellscript-when-i-plug-in-a-usb-device replies | 15:35 |
ahasenack | tjaalton: hey, is this something you could review? https://salsa.debian.org/sssd-team/sssd/merge_requests/2 | 17:37 |
tjaalton | ahasenack: there's noone else either, so.. | 17:37 |
ahasenack | tjaalton: you are the sole debian maintainer? | 17:38 |
tjaalton | yes | 17:38 |
ahasenack | happy to help whenever I can | 17:38 |
tjaalton | cool | 17:39 |
tjaalton | cyphermox: hi, there's a patch for grub2 that I need in cosmic for bug 1785033, do you want to handle it or can I? | 17:44 |
ubottu | bug 1785033 in HWE Next "GRUB needs to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1785033 | 17:44 |
cyphermox | tjaalton: I'll do it | 18:09 |
tjaalton | cyphermox: thanks. I've uploaded the patch to the t/x/b queue | 18:11 |
cyphermox | tjaalton: if you've already uploaded to the queues, please make sure you also upload grub2-signed. | 18:35 |
seb128 | slangasek, I don't remember what you said about the netplan.io autopkgtest regression that is blocking network-manager in cosmic-proposed ... is anyone looking at it? likely this week? | 19:24 |
slangasek | seb128: more likely this week than last | 19:26 |
slangasek | cyphermox: ^^ is the netplan.io autopkgtest failure on your list for this week? | 19:26 |
tjaalton | cyphermox: oh, ok | 20:08 |
cyphermox | slangasek: ok | 20:27 |
cyphermox | tjaalton: change of plans, I'll reupload grub2 in bionic along with grub2-signed | 20:28 |
cyphermox | seb128: won't be done today, but I'm cutting a release I'll address that. | 20:39 |
slangasek | cyphermox: does that mean the current tests are bad, rather than identifying a regression in network-manager, and I should hint around it? | 20:43 |
cyphermox | slangasek: there's a difference in how Networkmanager reports DNS, you can hint around it | 20:43 |
slangasek | ok | 20:44 |
cyphermox | it's not a bad test, it's watching for NM's output, and NM did like systemd-resolved and grew this stupid ~. domain. | 20:44 |
seb128 | cyphermox, great, thanks | 20:44 |
cyphermox | AFAICT there's no regression there, the expected "real" domain is still there. | 20:45 |
dadada | hi | 21:16 |
dadada | please package github.com/browsh-org/browsh/ --- www.brow.sh --- for Fedora. It's a text-based internet browser using Firefox as the backend. | 21:16 |
dadada | sorry, I mean for Ubuntu :D | 21:16 |
TJ- | dadada: we don't work like that. You'd need to find a package maintainer first, who would do the packaging. Ubuntu imports from Debian so if the package gets into Debian it'll percolate to Ubuntu later | 21:18 |
dadada | TJ-: okay, I think they already tried to get it into Debian, thanks... | 21:19 |
ginggs | dadada: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages#NEW_packages_through_Debian | 21:19 |
ahasenack | a snap could be another option, although the firefox dependency might make that difficult to bundle | 21:19 |
TJ- | yeah, it'd have to contain Firefox as well I guess. I like the idea though! | 21:20 |
=== giraffe is now known as Guest22183 | ||
blackboxsw | sorry for the general/basic question here. I'm about to sponsor my first upload to cloud-init package for rharper. I have upload rights, but I'd like to sponsor He generated the changeset into cosmic for cloud-init (and is the documented author of record in the most recent debian/changelog that I'll be uploading). My understanding is that I don't need to do anything special in addition to just reviewing the | 21:34 |
blackboxsw | changeset/approving it and uploading it as is. Is this correct? | 21:34 |
seb128 | slangasek, cyphermox, thanks for unblocking the n-m update! | 21:51 |
blackboxsw | looking over a previously sponsored change of mine. it seems that the changes email generated catalogs who signed the upload (the sponsor) and the author of the changeset (me) https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/cosmic-changes/2018-May/002547.html so I *think* that sponsorship tracking is automatically handled when signed-by != Changed-by | 21:53 |
nacc | blackboxsw: you will need to sign it, to upload it | 22:19 |
blackboxsw | nacc: thanks I actually typed a message to you and nearly submitted as you had sponsored one of my uploads. Thanks will do! | 22:26 |
Unit193 | Right, so is it possible to "stage" a sync from Debian, such that it's not yet in proposed but it does trigger autopkgtests? | 22:27 |
nacc | blackboxsw: :) | 22:28 |
nacc | blackboxsw: so often, I will build the unsigned source package locally, then use debsign to sign it before upload. | 22:28 |
blackboxsw | nacc: getting out for any pickup lately ? | 22:37 |
blackboxsw | ultimate that is | 22:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!