xnox | slangasek, https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/354198 | 00:51 |
---|---|---|
xnox | should kexec tools continue to be blogged because of a broken kernel in proposed? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1790513 | 00:52 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1790513 in linux (Ubuntu Cosmic) "kdump-config status - not ready to kdump with v4.18 kernel" [Medium,Triaged] | 00:52 |
xnox | it is not possible to run tests on a non-proposed kernel. | 00:52 |
slangasek | xnox: your bug asks a question, but above you seem to assume an answer about whose bug it is; which package needs changed in order to fix this? Since as things stand, this bug will not block linux 4.18 from reaching cosmic | 03:25 |
xnox | slangasek, i was not sure if i should be bold enough to block linux v4.18 | 03:27 |
xnox | imho cannot kdump is severe | 03:27 |
xnox | but what do i know..... | 03:27 |
slangasek | xnox: well, all three of linux, kexec-tools, and makedumpfile are the responsibility of the kernel team, so perhaps make it their problem :) | 03:28 |
xnox | ha | 03:34 |
slangasek | xnox: kdump not working is certainly a serious problem, but whether they want that to block the new kernel reaching cosmic is something I would leave to them to decide | 03:38 |
cpaelzer | bdmurray: new ones on top of the two that I analyzed | 04:48 |
cpaelzer | bdmurray: taking a look | 04:48 |
cpaelzer | bdmurray: oh yeah, I'll update the upstream bug | 04:52 |
cpaelzer | bdmurray: feel free to stop the phasing for now | 04:52 |
cpaelzer | unfortunately without more data than the partial stack traces in the reports it is hard to go on atm | 04:52 |
cpaelzer | grml | 04:52 |
cpaelzer | thanks for the ping | 04:52 |
cpaelzer | at the time I sent the mail this was quite different to what it looks now | 04:53 |
cpaelzer | got to your mail now - ack | 05:02 |
cpaelzer | I hope I find something with this scarce info we have :-/ | 05:02 |
cpaelzer | bdmurray: FYI spawned bug 1791220 for this | 05:06 |
ubot5 | bug 1791220 in open-vm-tools (Ubuntu) "increased crash rate since 10.3 upgrade is available" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791220 | 05:06 |
cpaelzer | I'll need to finalize a few other things on my plate for today and then will take a look at a disassembly | 05:07 |
cpaelzer | it all is at the same spot, so maybe I can find disasm -> source -> review to find the bug | 05:07 |
Laney | slangasek: I missed that, sorry - what's the problem? Seems to be running here. | 08:05 |
slangasek | Laney: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-r-cran-fastmatch | 08:07 |
Laney | slangasek: That looks to be autopkgtest@bos02-ppc64el-20 | 08:09 |
slangasek | yes | 08:09 |
Laney | OK, just checking, since you said autopkgtest@bos02-arm64-5.service earlier | 08:09 |
slangasek | Laney: ah yes, I copy-pasted the wrong unit from history | 08:09 |
Laney | :P | 08:09 |
Laney | does Aug 25 07:44:36 correspond to some maintenance? | 08:10 |
slangasek | not afaik; and there were a total of 7 units across multiple clouds in this state, with varying times | 08:11 |
slangasek | cough, apologies for secureboot-db 1.2, it works fine if you install it on an actual secureboot system, notsomuch otherwise. 1.3 should fix this | 08:13 |
Laney | right, I don't feel like I'll be able to be very lucky finding out what event caused the test to not finish | 08:13 |
Laney | still at the very least sounds like a bug that autopkgtest hasn't timed out | 08:13 |
slangasek | Laney: yeah, it was the latter I was more interested in | 08:13 |
Laney | slangasek: I don't have any bright ideas for what I could do with this running process, do you? | 08:20 |
slangasek | Laney: I tried everything I could with the running process and got nowhere | 08:21 |
slangasek | so I left it in a state that you could inspect if you knew something I didn't | 08:21 |
Laney | Guess we get to file a not so useful bug :( | 08:21 |
slangasek | strace shows that one of the subprocesses is waiting on stdin | 08:21 |
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
* Laney kills it | 08:50 | |
doko | Laney: thanks for enabling the gcc autopkg tests. Now that we check for an empty libgcc1 package, please can you remove the artificial libreoffice autopkg test trigger? | 09:22 |
doko | apw: gcc-8 migrated, gcc-7 not yet | 09:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: julia [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 09:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: julia [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 09:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted julia [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1] | 10:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted julia [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] | 10:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nova-lxd [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [18.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2] | 10:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted julia [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1] | 10:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted julia [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] | 10:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted darkmint-gtk-theme [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.0-1] | 10:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numix-icon-theme-circle [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [18-04-04-1] | 10:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ufonormalizer [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3.5-1] | 10:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fontpens [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.0-1] | 10:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1] | 10:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 10:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 10:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fontpens [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 10:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: darkmint-gtk-theme [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 10:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ufonormalizer [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.3.5-1] (no packageset) | 10:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: numix-icon-theme-circle [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [18-04-04-1] (no packageset) | 10:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 10:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 10:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset) | 10:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1] | 10:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1] | 10:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1] | 10:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1] | 10:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1] | 10:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1] | 10:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted darkmint-gtk-theme [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.0-1] | 10:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numix-icon-theme-circle [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [18-04-04-1] | 10:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fontpens [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.0-1] | 10:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ufonormalizer [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3.5-1] | 10:56 | |
xnox | sforshee, apw - all the git clones, over https, were successful in the last couple of linux runs. le sigh. i mean great, linux/s390x passed. | 11:04 |
xnox | but i fear the cloning thing might come back | 11:05 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset) | 14:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset) | 14:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset) | 14:24 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset) | 14:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset) | 14:28 | |
jbicha | please remove sysprof/s390x/cosmic : it only built because we ignored build test failures in the previous release | 14:55 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssh [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.5] | 15:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] | 15:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] | 15:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] | 15:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] | 15:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] | 15:11 | |
didrocks | sil2100: is "building from a ppa" a new requirement for FFe? | 15:23 |
didrocks | I have built it locally and tested it on cosmic (no build-dep changes btw) | 15:23 |
didrocks | the "provide build logs" sound a little bit of lack of trust to the packager btw :p | 15:24 |
didrocks | so, I can build it in a ppa and redo the whole manual testing from it, but this sounds like a waste of time to redo all this and ensuring it's stable as well | 15:26 |
xnox | i wonder if the buildlogs req is there from before ppas... | 15:41 |
sil2100 | didrocks: I didn't invent that: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#FeatureFreeze_for_new_upstream_versions | 15:46 |
sil2100 | didrocks: it's been there since ages | 15:46 |
sil2100 | didrocks: when was the last time you checked it? You can provide any build logs, PPA seemed just convenient | 15:47 |
didrocks | sil2100: right, but it's the first time that I was actually asked for a ppa and the build logs, sounds like other members and yourself in the past were more trusting us | 15:47 |
didrocks | I mean, I can understand for a one time drive-by contributor, but it seems we are making things more and more full of paperwork, anyway… | 15:48 |
sil2100 | didrocks: ok, I guess if you say it builds then that's good enough-ish, I generally started following the procedures a bit more since I don't want to have double-standards, I guess it's better to be more strict than less | 15:48 |
sil2100 | didrocks: a PPA build is convenient because it tests more than one arch | 15:49 |
didrocks | true, I'm not annoyed by pushing to a ppa, the second round of testing can be annoying though | 15:49 |
sil2100 | didrocks: we wouldn't want things to FTBFS suddenly on some untested arch and then delay things ;) | 15:49 |
didrocks | won't be for today anymore though, we'll see on Monday now | 15:50 |
sil2100 | didrocks: anyway! Let's do it like this: just leave a comment stating that you have performed a successful local test build | 15:50 |
didrocks | sil2100: if you prefer the ppa, I can do it… Just find it weird ;) | 15:50 |
didrocks | the second round of testing will take more time as it's all manual and more "running and see it being stable", but oh my, that's for another week anyway | 15:51 |
sil2100 | didrocks: I guess it's fine this time, since it's early and I don't want you to feel untrusted! | 15:51 |
sil2100 | Like, by early I mean 'not that super late in the cycle' | 15:52 |
didrocks | sil2100: ok, let me add the comment then! Thanks :) | 15:52 |
didrocks | yep | 15:52 |
sil2100 | Just saying that I'm not inventing any new rules here, just going by the book here! | 15:52 |
didrocks | oh, I didn't say that wasn't written on the wiki page, but this is the first time I saw it asked for a long time contributor | 15:53 |
didrocks | we'll get used to it I guess :p | 15:53 |
didrocks | sil2100: commented (but anyway, I'll only upload on Monday, don't want to break things during the week-end, just in case :p) | 15:53 |
sil2100 | didrocks: you know I trust you! | 15:56 |
sil2100 | didrocks: it's just you know, paperwork and such... ;p | 15:57 |
sil2100 | (and certainty that nothing's busted, but as said, there's still time to get things building in the worst case anyway) | 15:57 |
didrocks | sil2100: no worry ;) | 15:57 |
didrocks | and thanks! | 15:57 |
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset) | 16:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset) | 16:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset) | 16:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset) | 16:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset) | 16:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset) | 16:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-iscsi (bionic-proposed/main) [2.0.874-5ubuntu2.1 => 2.0.874-5ubuntu2.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 18:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: syslinux (bionic-proposed/main) [3:6.03+dfsg1-2 => 3:6.03+dfsg1-2ubuntu0.18.04.1] (core) | 20:38 | |
slangasek | I start processing the libreoffice SRU, and launchpad throws an oops trying to show me https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice | 21:20 |
slangasek | it's an omen | 21:20 |
xnox | slangasek, ok so i did $ sudo cat /proc/keys | 21:58 |
xnox | slangasek, and I did not like this: | 21:58 |
xnox | 30814288 I------ 1 perm 1f030000 0 0 asymmetri sforshee: 00b28ddf47aef9cea7: X509.rsa [] | 21:58 |
slangasek | :D | 21:59 |
slangasek | xnox: he's the upstream owner of the regdb key | 21:59 |
slangasek | I've had this reaction before when watching him scroll by in dmesg | 21:59 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.35.1+18.04] | 22:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: mozjs60 (cosmic-proposed/primary) [60.1.0-1] | 22:49 | |
jbicha | feel free to kill mozjs38 now, it never was in Debian LP: #1728184 | 22:50 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1728184 in mozjs38 (Ubuntu) "Please remove mozjs38 from Ubuntu" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1728184 | 22:50 |
jbicha | we know that mozjs60 has a build problem on i386 and we will file a FFe if we do switch to mozjs60 for 18.10 | 22:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!