[00:51] <xnox> slangasek, https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/354198
[00:52] <xnox> should kexec tools continue to be blogged because of a broken kernel in proposed? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1790513
[00:52] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1790513 in linux (Ubuntu Cosmic) "kdump-config status - not ready to kdump with v4.18 kernel" [Medium,Triaged]
[00:52] <xnox> it is not possible to run tests on a non-proposed kernel.
[03:25] <slangasek> xnox: your bug asks a question, but above you seem to assume an answer about whose bug it is; which package needs changed in order to fix this?  Since as things stand, this bug will not block linux 4.18 from reaching cosmic
[03:27] <xnox> slangasek, i was not sure if i should be bold enough to block linux v4.18
[03:27] <xnox> imho cannot kdump is severe
[03:27] <xnox> but what do i know.....
[03:28] <slangasek> xnox: well, all three of linux, kexec-tools, and makedumpfile are the responsibility of the kernel team, so perhaps make it their problem :)
[03:34] <xnox> ha
[03:38] <slangasek> xnox: kdump not working is certainly a serious problem, but whether they want that to block the new kernel reaching cosmic is something I would leave to them to decide
[04:48] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: new ones on top of the two that I analyzed
[04:48] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: taking a look
[04:52] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: oh yeah, I'll update the upstream bug
[04:52] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: feel free to stop the phasing for now
[04:52] <cpaelzer> unfortunately without more data than the partial stack traces in the reports it is hard to go on atm
[04:52] <cpaelzer> grml
[04:52] <cpaelzer> thanks for the ping
[04:53] <cpaelzer> at the time I sent the mail this was quite different to what it looks now
[05:02] <cpaelzer> got to your mail now - ack
[05:02] <cpaelzer> I hope I find something with this scarce info we have :-/
[05:06] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: FYI spawned bug 1791220 for this
[05:06] <ubot5> bug 1791220 in open-vm-tools (Ubuntu) "increased crash rate since 10.3 upgrade is available" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791220
[05:07] <cpaelzer> I'll need to finalize a few other things on my plate for today and then will take a look at a disassembly
[05:07] <cpaelzer> it all is at the same spot, so maybe I can find disasm -> source -> review to find the bug
[08:05] <Laney> slangasek: I missed that, sorry - what's the problem? Seems to be running here.
[08:07] <slangasek> Laney: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-r-cran-fastmatch
[08:09] <Laney> slangasek: That looks to be autopkgtest@bos02-ppc64el-20
[08:09] <slangasek> yes
[08:09] <Laney> OK, just checking, since you said autopkgtest@bos02-arm64-5.service earlier
[08:09] <slangasek> Laney: ah yes, I copy-pasted the wrong unit from history
[08:09] <Laney> :P
[08:10] <Laney> does Aug 25 07:44:36 correspond to some maintenance?
[08:11] <slangasek> not afaik; and there were a total of 7 units across multiple clouds in this state, with varying times
[08:13] <slangasek> cough, apologies for secureboot-db 1.2, it works fine if you install it on an actual secureboot system, notsomuch otherwise.  1.3 should fix this
[08:13] <Laney> right, I don't feel like I'll be able to be very lucky finding out what event caused the test to not finish
[08:13] <Laney> still at the very least sounds like a bug that autopkgtest hasn't timed out
[08:13] <slangasek> Laney: yeah, it was the latter I was more interested in
[08:20] <Laney> slangasek: I don't have any bright ideas for what I could do with this running process, do you?
[08:21] <slangasek> Laney: I tried everything I could with the running process and got nowhere
[08:21] <slangasek> so I left it in a state that you could inspect if you knew something I didn't
[08:21] <Laney> Guess we get to file a not so useful bug :(
[08:21] <slangasek> strace shows that one of the subprocesses is waiting on stdin
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra
[08:50]  * Laney kills it
[09:22] <doko> Laney: thanks for enabling the gcc autopkg tests. Now that we check for an empty libgcc1 package, please can you remove the artificial libreoffice autopkg test trigger?
[09:24] <doko> apw: gcc-8 migrated, gcc-7 not yet
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: julia [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: julia [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted julia [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted julia [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nova-lxd [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [18.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2]
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted julia [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted julia [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted darkmint-gtk-theme [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numix-icon-theme-circle [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [18-04-04-1]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ufonormalizer [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3.5-1]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fontpens [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fontpens [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: darkmint-gtk-theme [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ufonormalizer [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.3.5-1] (no packageset)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: numix-icon-theme-circle [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [18-04-04-1] (no packageset)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted darkmint-gtk-theme [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numix-icon-theme-circle [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [18-04-04-1]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fontpens [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ufonormalizer [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3.5-1]
[11:04] <xnox> sforshee, apw - all the git clones, over https, were successful in the last couple of linux runs. le sigh. i mean great, linux/s390x passed.
[11:05] <xnox> but i fear the cloning thing might come back
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset)
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset)
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset)
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mshr [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5] (no packageset)
[14:55] <jbicha> please remove sysprof/s390x/cosmic : it only built because we ignored build test failures in the previous release
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssh [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.5]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mshr [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.1.0+dfsg1-5]
[15:23] <didrocks> sil2100: is "building from a ppa" a new requirement for FFe?
[15:23] <didrocks> I have built it locally and tested it on cosmic (no build-dep changes btw)
[15:24] <didrocks> the "provide build logs" sound a little bit of lack of trust to the packager btw :p
[15:26] <didrocks> so, I can build it in a ppa and redo the whole manual testing from it, but this sounds like a waste of time to redo all this and ensuring it's stable as well
[15:41] <xnox> i wonder if the buildlogs req is there from before ppas...
[15:46] <sil2100> didrocks: I didn't invent that: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#FeatureFreeze_for_new_upstream_versions
[15:46] <sil2100> didrocks: it's been there since ages
[15:47] <sil2100> didrocks: when was the last time you checked it? You can provide any build logs, PPA seemed just convenient
[15:47] <didrocks> sil2100: right, but it's the first time that I was actually asked for a ppa and the build logs, sounds like other members and yourself in the past were more trusting us
[15:48] <didrocks> I mean, I can understand for a one time drive-by contributor, but it seems we are making things more and more full of paperwork, anyway…
[15:48] <sil2100> didrocks: ok, I guess if you say it builds then that's good enough-ish, I generally started following the procedures a bit more since I don't want to have double-standards, I guess it's better to be more strict than less
[15:49] <sil2100> didrocks: a PPA build is convenient because it tests more than one arch
[15:49] <didrocks> true, I'm not annoyed by pushing to a ppa, the second round of testing can be annoying though
[15:49] <sil2100> didrocks: we wouldn't want things to FTBFS suddenly on some untested arch and then delay things ;)
[15:50] <didrocks> won't be for today anymore though, we'll see on Monday now
[15:50] <sil2100> didrocks: anyway! Let's do it like this: just leave a comment stating that you have performed a successful local test build
[15:50] <didrocks> sil2100: if you prefer the ppa, I can do it… Just find it weird ;)
[15:51] <didrocks> the second round of testing will take more time as it's all manual and more "running and see it being stable", but oh my, that's for another week anyway
[15:51] <sil2100> didrocks: I guess it's fine this time, since it's early and I don't want you to feel untrusted!
[15:52] <sil2100> Like, by early I mean 'not that super late in the cycle'
[15:52] <didrocks> sil2100: ok, let me add the comment then! Thanks :)
[15:52] <didrocks> yep
[15:52] <sil2100> Just saying that I'm not inventing any new rules here, just going by the book here!
[15:53] <didrocks> oh, I didn't say that wasn't written on the wiki page, but this is the first time I saw it asked for a long time contributor
[15:53] <didrocks> we'll get used to it I guess :p
[15:53] <didrocks> sil2100: commented (but anyway, I'll only upload on Monday, don't want to break things during the week-end, just in case :p)
[15:56] <sil2100> didrocks: you know I trust you!
[15:57] <sil2100> didrocks: it's just you know, paperwork and such... ;p
[15:57] <sil2100> (and certainty that nothing's busted, but as said, there's still time to get things building in the worst case anyway)
[15:57] <didrocks> sil2100: no worry ;)
[15:57] <didrocks> and thanks!
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset)
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset)
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset)
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset)
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset)
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [i386] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-iscsi (bionic-proposed/main) [2.0.874-5ubuntu2.1 => 2.0.874-5ubuntu2.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: syslinux (bionic-proposed/main) [3:6.03+dfsg1-2 => 3:6.03+dfsg1-2ubuntu0.18.04.1] (core)
[21:20] <slangasek> I start processing the libreoffice SRU, and launchpad throws an oops trying to show me https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice
[21:20] <slangasek> it's an omen
[21:58] <xnox> slangasek, ok so i did $ sudo cat /proc/keys
[21:58] <xnox> slangasek, and I did not like this:
[21:58] <xnox> 30814288 I------     1 perm 1f030000     0     0 asymmetri sforshee: 00b28ddf47aef9cea7: X509.rsa []
[21:59] <slangasek> :D
[21:59] <slangasek> xnox: he's the upstream owner of the regdb key
[21:59] <slangasek> I've had this reaction before when watching him scroll by in dmesg
[22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.35.1+18.04]
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: mozjs60 (cosmic-proposed/primary) [60.1.0-1]
[22:50] <jbicha> feel free to kill mozjs38 now, it never was in Debian LP: #1728184
[22:50] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1728184 in mozjs38 (Ubuntu) "Please remove mozjs38 from Ubuntu" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1728184
[22:59] <jbicha> we know that mozjs60 has a build problem on i386 and we will file a FFe if we do switch to mozjs60 for 18.10