[04:47] <ejat> anyone facing slack & skype crashed on cosmic ?
[04:50] <ejat> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1790966
[04:50] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1790966 in glibc (Ubuntu) "Electron apps segfault on glibc 2.28 (cosmic)" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[06:50] <didrocks> good morning
[06:51] <jibel> Salut didrocks, le week end était bon?
[07:05] <duflu> Morning didrocks, jibel
[07:05] <duflu> jibel, do you have a secret stash of older cosmic images? I need something older than 5 Sept
=== pstolowski|eow is now known as pstolowski
[07:05] <duflu> Well, I have some myself but need other people to be able to download an older image for testing
[07:10] <duflu> ^ for mvo
[07:10] <jibel> duflu, I don't. sorry
[07:10] <duflu> Hmm. Wonder if I can upload somewhere
[07:12] <mvo> duflu: you could probably just use people.c.c to make the specific one available? and unfortunately I also don't have older comisc images available
[07:13] <duflu> I keep a collection for this reason, but haven't ever had to share one before
[07:14] <duflu> mvo, can I scp to that? or some other protocol?
[07:17] <mvo> duflu: yeah, scp should work
[07:17] <mvo> duflu: only from the vpn though
[07:19] <didrocks> salut jibel, oui, le week-end allait, et toi ?
[07:19] <didrocks> hey duflu
[07:20] <duflu> Ah! mvo try this (I know 20180822 was a good one): http://mirrors.piconets.webwerks.in/ubuntu-mirror/ubuntu-cdimage/daily-live/20180822/
[07:22] <duflu> Their published SHA1SUM matches my original authentic one
[07:24] <duflu> ... which is 7dcc2e28de480bb14a958de4132d3b5a323ef3e7
[07:25] <mvo> duflu: nice
[07:26] <mvo> duflu: this is one that will expose the upgrade hang?
[07:26]  * mvo downloads
[07:31] <andyrock> good morning!
[07:43] <duflu> Morning andyrock
[07:44] <didrocks> hey andyrock
[07:45] <duflu> mvo, I assume so. I think I have installed a couple of machines from 20180822 and then hit the bug
[07:45] <duflu> Until today that was the newest "current" image I knew of
[07:45] <duflu> Now it's old :)
[07:46] <mvo> duflu: cool
[07:46] <mvo> duflu: I mean, cool that I'm (hopefully) now able to reproduce it
[07:46] <duflu> As cool as we can hope
[07:46] <mvo> duflu: people got quite personal about this bug
[07:46] <duflu> Did they?
[07:46] <mvo> duflu: I got mails like "can't you test your upgrades"
[07:47] <mvo> duflu: or "why don't you break snapd"
[07:47] <duflu> Ignore them I guess. We need as many testers as possible, even if sometimes they get angry
[07:48] <mvo> duflu: yeah, I'm not fuzzed, its just unusual, hasn't happend in a long time
[07:48] <mvo> duflu: anyway, now that I have a test image I will try to get to the bottom of this. thanks again for your help!
[07:49] <duflu> On that note, my own experience with angry users in bugs is somewhere around 1 in 400. And someone else recently told me they see about the same
[07:54] <willcooke> morning
[07:56] <didrocks> hey willcooke
[08:00] <duflu> Hi willcooke
[08:00] <Laney> yo
[08:01] <willcooke> morning didrocks Laney.  Afternoon duflu
[08:01] <duflu> Hi Laney
[08:03] <Laney> what ho
[08:05] <didrocks> hey Laney
[08:16] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[08:16] <Laney> hey seb128 didrocks
[08:16] <Laney> what is going on
[08:16] <willcooke> hey seb128
[08:17] <seb128> hey Laney, willcooke
[08:17] <seb128> did you have a good w.e?
[08:17] <duflu> Hi seb128
[08:18] <seb128> hey duflu
[08:31] <mvo> duflu: yay, I can reproduce
[08:32] <duflu> Good-ish
[08:33] <mvo> and the winner: seeding :/
[08:34] <mvo> so it looks like the seeding is not complete on this image, I wonder if there is something wrong with the order, looking now. anyway, thanks duflu that was the crucial missing piece of information
[08:35] <duflu> mvo, you're welcome but I don't understand which type of seeding you're referring to. Also don't need to
[08:35] <duflu> Deb seeding maybe
[08:36] <mvo> duflu: snap seeding is broken on the cd
[08:36] <mvo> duflu: well, "broken"
[08:36] <mvo> duflu: but yeah, no worries unless you want to I will not bother you with the details :)
[08:37] <jbicha> mvo: you've seen bug 1785388 right?
[08:37] <ubot5> bug 1785388 in snapd (Ubuntu) "seeds.yaml needs updating in cosmic in order that all snaps are initialised" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1785388
[08:38] <jbicha> seb128: it looks like you tagged but didn't upload totem-pl-parser in Debian
[08:40] <seb128> did I?
[08:40] <mvo> jibel: now I did, I did not connect the dots earlier
[08:41] <mvo> jbicha: -^
[08:41] <mvo> jibel: sorry
[08:41] <mvo> jibel: wrong nick completion but still "good morning" :)
[08:41] <didrocks> maybe we'll wait for Ken, but any idea why the snaps don't use the system theme icons?
[08:42] <mvo> jbicha: we work on this on our side now but note that I don't agree with the rational to leave this open in comisc and let our users run into a hard to recover failure scenario when there is a trivial workaround availalbe (but directed at you juts a general comment)
[08:42] <seb128> didrocks, they .desktop has an absolute path for Icon= no?
[08:43] <didrocks> mvo: hey, maybe this is in your realm? As we define an icon via the generated .desktop file in snapd, it doesn't match the theme (and people open bug reports about it)
[08:43] <didrocks> Icon=/snap/gnome-calculator/222/meta/gui/gnome-calculator.png
[08:43] <didrocks> that wasn't the case before, correct? I remember to have seen our old theme icon before
[08:43] <didrocks> or did just Ken used the Humanity one in the past and changed?
[08:43] <didrocks> (in the snap)
[08:43] <mvo> didrocks: I'm not aware of this change but let me look at the code
[08:43] <seb128> didrocks, back to GNOME idea that theming needs to be killed for icons :p
[08:44] <didrocks> yeah :p
[08:44] <mvo> didrocks: what is the expected behavior? Icon=gnome-calculator without a full path?
[08:44] <didrocks> maybe it's just Ken changing the icon within the snap
[08:44] <didrocks> mvo: I *think* it should be the expect behavior if we don't provide an icon in the snap
[08:44] <didrocks> expected*
[08:45] <didrocks> ah, maybe, that was what Ken was doing, and he got bug reports on other distros? unsure
[08:45] <didrocks> that, or if nothing changed on snapd side, he may just have used the Humanity icon and changed it
[08:45] <seb128> does snapd let you "not provide an icon"?
[08:45] <didrocks> unsure
[08:47] <seb128> there was a technical reason they used the full path but I don't remember which one
[08:47] <didrocks> well, I can that kind of makes sense if you want to enforce your icon as part of your snap
[08:47] <didrocks> think*
[08:48] <didrocks> but maybe we don't want for our default snaps which can be rebranded? unsure
[08:48] <didrocks> the issue is that if we replace the icon with the Suru/Yaru one, it will be the default on all distros and env
[08:49] <seb128> ah, I remember the issue
[08:49] <seb128> snaps can't install an icon in /usr/share/icons
[08:49] <seb128> so if they just specifiy a name and not a path, the icon they provide can't be found
[08:50] <seb128> we would need some hook that installs icons in a xdg_path like for the .desktop
[08:50] <seb128> (https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/02/22/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t09:03 was a conversation about that)
[08:50] <didrocks> how did it work in the paste? We only shipped the Humanity icon?
[08:50] <didrocks> (because the icon changed)
[08:50] <didrocks> past*
[08:50] <didrocks> grrrr, can't type
[08:51] <seb128> we are doing the full path thing for ever afaik
[08:51] <didrocks> so, I guess Ken just changed the icon, let's confirm once he's back
[08:51] <seb128> do you have an issue about a specific snap?
[08:52] <didrocks> no, they only mention: https://community.ubuntu.com/t/call-for-participation-an-ubuntu-default-theme-lead-by-the-community/1545/1708 and https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/gnome-calculator-theming-issues/7290
[08:52] <didrocks> I don't know where to direct them to open an issue on our snaps, do we have now a "distro" in launchpad for this?
[08:52] <seb128> gnome-calculator then
[08:53] <didrocks> yep
[08:54] <seb128> well https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calculator/commit/1afbe22e
[08:54] <seb128>  	
[08:54] <seb128> 	Icon=gnome-calculator
[08:54] <seb128> 	
[08:54] <seb128> 	Icon=org.gnome.Calculator
[08:54] <seb128> upstream
[08:54] <seb128> sorry, gitlab copy/paste of diff fail
[08:54] <didrocks> :p
[08:54] <seb128> but they changed the icon name upstream
[08:54] <didrocks> ah, that explains then!
[08:54] <didrocks> funny that in the "about" dialog, they are using the old icon name
[08:54] <didrocks> (and you have the Yaru one ;))
[08:55] <seb128> :)
[08:55] <didrocks> great findings! unsure how we are going to fix this, but nice
[08:55] <didrocks> so, I'm puzzle how with the correct name, it's picking the right one
[08:56] <didrocks> as it's hardcoded
[08:58] <seb128> we are sure it was picking the themed icon for the snap?
[08:58] <seb128> that sounds weird to me
[08:58] <didrocks> yeah, it definitively was. I remember to have seen twice the same icon (deb and snap)
[08:58] <didrocks> and people just recently (on those forum threads) are mentioning the same, they would have mentionned it earlier
[08:59] <didrocks> so why did it work? puzzling :/
[08:59] <didrocks> (that was why I was pinging m_vo about potential snapd changes)
[09:02] <seb128> didrocks, the previous snap had "Icon=gnome-calculator" but the snapcraft.yaml doesn't have any icon mention
[09:03] <seb128> I bet snapd/snacraft have some magic when icon_name == snap_name
[09:03] <seb128> which stopped being true
[09:03] <willcooke> jibel, I think the black screen when remote controlling might have had something to do with not having a screen plugged in on the server.  Or a reboot fixed it.  On a related note, the reason my HDD failed was because, I think, the case fans were jammed up with dirt and dust and the old HDD over heated and died.
[09:03] <seb128> mvo, hey, I did a
[09:03] <seb128> $ snap refresh --beta gnome-calculator
[09:03] <seb128> Automatically connect eligible plugs and slots of snap "gnome-calculator"      |
[09:04] <seb128> but it's spinning endless for some minutes now on that line
[09:04] <seb128> seems stuck
[09:04] <seb128> should I ctrl-C it?
[09:04] <seb128> (I tried beta because that has 3.28.1)
[09:04] <seb128> ah
[09:04] <seb128> it finished
[09:04] <seb128> wonder why it took minutes to do that
[09:04] <seb128> mvo, unping
[09:05] <didrocks> seb128: ahah, ok, so something really changed, let's see then ;)
[09:05] <seb128> didrocks, well, "something" is upstream that renamed their icon yes :)
[09:05] <didrocks> thanks for looking!
[09:05] <seb128> np
[09:05] <didrocks> yeah
[09:05] <didrocks> let's wait for kenvandine once he's around (Ken, please backlog ^)
[09:06] <didrocks> I like the fact that they renamed it but didn't change the about dialo
[09:06] <didrocks> dialog*
[09:06] <didrocks> something to check for the one doing the update, if there are broken icons due to that
[09:07] <seb128> it has been poorly coordinated imho
[09:07] <seb128> didrocks, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calculator/commit/05fa1ab3
[09:08] <didrocks> urgh, indeed
[09:09] <didrocks> hum, where my n-m-applet has gone?
[09:09] <didrocks> no email, uploaded an hour ago though
[09:10] <willcooke> didrocks, someone else said the same thing last week
[09:10] <didrocks> hum, network-manager-applet_1.8.16-1ubuntu1_source.ubuntu.upload
[09:10] <didrocks> let me reupload, just in case
[09:11] <didrocks> ah, got the reject email this time :)
[09:12] <didrocks> and the second one at the same time, weird
[09:12]  * didrocks reuploads with -sa
[09:20] <didrocks> and n-m-applet which is FTBFS now. Was passing on my install on Friday which was mostly up to date…
[09:20] <didrocks> error: macro "G_UNAVAILABLE" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
[09:21] <didrocks> who is changing macro # of args? grrr
[09:22] <didrocks> I guess cherry-picking 1.12.2-2 for n-m will be needed
[09:24] <didrocks> ah, n-m 1.12.2-0ubuntu3 was published on 2018-09-05 (I guess due to glibc)
[09:24] <didrocks> so, I wasn't up to date when building n-m-applet. Anyway, there is a patch in debian, will first confirm the FTBFS locally, backport the patch and see
[09:26] <xnox> I see that https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/3.26.0-0ubuntu1 is stuck due to FTBFS but there is 3.30 out in debian
[09:26] <seb128> didrocks, n-m was blocked for a while because of netplan.io autopkgtest regression, which foundations investigated/decided to skip (it was just due a format change in the nm command output)
[09:26] <xnox> can we try force-syncing that one? or does it need a proper merge?
[09:26] <seb128> xnox, no, it needs proper merge
[09:27] <xnox> awww shame
[09:27] <xnox> ok
[09:27] <didrocks> seb128: ok, but anyway, at least, I have my explanation why it was working here
[09:27] <seb128> sorry about that
[09:27] <didrocks> and sounds like it will be easy to fix, so let's try
[09:27] <didrocks> well, bad timing, not your fault :p
[09:28] <didrocks> if you didn't already, I'll backport as well 1.12.2-3, sounds worthy
[09:28] <didrocks> (  * Apply patch from upstream to fix FTBFS with GLib 2.57 (Closes: #906965))
[09:29] <seb128> didrocks, I didn't, thx!
[09:33] <seb128> xnox, do you need the new gnome-screenshot for some urgent reason?
[09:34] <xnox> not really no.
[09:34] <seb128> xnox, there are plenty of foundations packages that need to be updated if you are borred btw, no need to look at our desktop ones :)
[09:34] <xnox> the one in release pocket is fine
[09:34] <xnox> i just looked into it, as it was part of the reverse stack. but it doesn't appear to be "broken because omg ubuntu is broken" just by itself borked
[09:35] <seb128> right, andyrock is looking at this upate for us, it's going to be resolved probably this week
[09:36] <andyrock> seb128: I've already a branch ready
[09:36] <seb128> andyrock, ah ok, it's not linked/mentioned on the launchpad bug?
[09:36] <andyrock> not a MP yet, I'll do asap
[09:36] <seb128> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1760192
[09:36] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1760192 in gnome-screenshot (Ubuntu) "Update gnome-screenshot to version 3.30" [Low,In progress]
[09:36] <seb128> k
[09:36] <seb128> great
[09:36] <andyrock> and hey :)
[09:36] <seb128> thx andyrock, happy monday btw :)
[09:37] <andyrock> seb128: btw I dropped the patches to remove headerbar in unity
[09:38] <andyrock> seb128: I guess it's not worth
[09:38] <andyrock> other apps are broken anyway
[09:38] <andyrock> seb128: and I added this: https://git.launchpad.net/~azzar1/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/commit/?id=25553d04c67f0169b7a36edf230e8c817d4d8ca4
[09:38] <seb128> andyrock, seems fine
[09:39] <seb128> what is that? save dialog when?
[09:39] <andyrock> in unity if you click e.g. PrintScreen you get a save dialog
[09:39] <seb128> ah, printscreen in GNOME just does nothing visible right?
[09:40] <andyrock> in gnome-shell it just saves the screenshot under "Pictures/"
[09:40] <seb128> right
[09:40] <seb128> does unity session include "ubuntu"?
[09:40] <seb128> or should we check for either unity || ubuntu?
[09:40] <andyrock> ubuntu includes both
[09:41] <andyrock> let me check again
[09:41] <seb128> thx
[09:41] <didrocks> (yep, ubuntu includes both)
[09:41] <didrocks> it imapcts MATE though as well
[09:41] <didrocks> impacts*
[09:42] <seb128> if they don't want to be impacted by ubuntu choices they shouldn't claim to be an ubuntu session I guess?
[09:42] <andyrock> thx didrocks
[09:42] <seb128> or said differently, I think it's fine
[09:42] <didrocks> agreed, or they can add their own override
[09:42] <didrocks> I agree, just wanted to mention it :)
[09:43] <andyrock> seb128: I also prepared a MP to upload gnome-screenshot 3.30 in debian
[09:43] <andyrock> not sure what's going on but our gnome-software gbp'config is broken
[09:44] <andyrock> the pristine-tar and upstream/latest branches are not in sync
[09:44] <willcooke> andyrock, hey! Thats great, thanks for working on that.
[09:44] <andyrock> I was preparing the branch to support XCancelUbuntu in gnome-softwares shell-search-provider and I noticed that
[09:45] <andyrock> *gnome-software 3.30 in debian
[09:45] <andyrock> willcooke: hey hey
[09:45] <andyrock> np!
[09:56]  * didrocks did 2 dputs for network-manager as well, and no upload proceeded, no email, let's do that after lunch
[09:56] <ahayzen> Hey, who do i need to ask to review this change for ubuntu's gnome-software, is it Robert or is anyone on the desktop team able to do it? https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome-software/merge_requests/5  I've reported an ubuntu bug here as well https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553
[09:56] <didrocks> (at least, that fixes n-m-applet FTBFS locally)
[09:56] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1791553 in gnome-software (Ubuntu) "Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed" [Undecided,New]
[09:56] <gitbot> Ubuntu issue (Merge request) 5 in gnome-software "gs-shell.c: Show update preferences when flatpak plugin is enabled" [Opened]
[09:56] <didrocks> ahayzen: I would say Robert
[09:57] <ahayzen> ok thanks :-)
[10:36] <seb128> andyrock, sorry got sidetracked and forgot to reply here, gnome-screenshot got updated in Debian meanwhile by someone who didn't check pending MRs :/
[10:38] <seb128> ahayzen, Robert is best but others can upload/review if needed
[10:39] <ahayzen> seb128, ok thanks for the info :-)
[10:54] <RAOF> seb128: have I asked you to upload the new, and buildable, colord yet?
[10:54] <RAOF> If not... 😉
[10:55] <seb128> RAOF, no you didn't, also did you decide on the version for cosmic?
[10:55] <RAOF> 1.4.3 should be good, yeah.
[10:56] <RAOF> I guess I'll stop hitting C++ dynamic_cast and file an ffe tomorrow.
[10:57] <RAOF> Although, really, the colord we already have is mostly fine...
[12:21] <PaulePanter> Hi. The PulseAudio packages creates the user *pulse*. I thought PulseAudio does not need that anymore, bcause it is a user(?) daemon now.
[12:24] <PaulePanter> /usr/sbin/useradd -d /var/run/pulse -g pulse -s /usr/sbin/nologin -u 78 pulse
[12:52] <andyrock> seb128: yeah saw that, but I was talking about gnome-software
[12:52] <andyrock> is Robert a DD?
[12:53] <Trevinho> didrocks, Laney: maybe we could make this default in our pkgs too? https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/vte2.91/commit/e9de01fa94c0b81cc86160148c5afd55c1da0edc
[12:53] <Laney> sounds ok
[12:54] <Laney> we will get it through merging for most things no?
[12:56] <didrocks> yeah, lgtm
[12:56] <Laney> https://wiki.debian.org/Gnome/Git#gbp.conf is probably a more future proof link
[12:57] <seb128> andyrock, no
[12:58] <seb128> andyrock, unsure why the pristine-tar and upstream/latest are diverging, maybe Robert doesn't pull from Debian, unsure how familiar he is with the gbp workflow and sharing with Debian
[12:59] <andyrock> seb128: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/merge_requests these MPs will take care of salsa
[13:00] <seb128> andyrock, that doesn't explain why we see divergences though?
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
[13:00] <andyrock> seb128: I guess robert forgot to push the 'pristine-tar' and 'upstream/latest' branches
[13:00] <Laney> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+git/gnome-software
[13:00] <Laney> looks to me like he forgot to put
[13:00] <Laney> push
[13:01] <Laney> not really divergence per se
[13:01] <andyrock> seb128: the best approach is to upload them in salsa and then do a "git merge debian/3.30..."
[13:01] <andyrock> yeah divergence was not the correct word
[13:01] <seb128> I though those should be handled through "git pull" and not "git merge"?
[13:01] <seb128> also unsure if Robert has commit access to salsa
[13:02] <andyrock> well "git pull" will behave as a merge
[13:02] <seb128> maybe he didn't forget but just can't push/isn't interested by doing the extra work there
[13:02] <andyrock> seb128: still the ubuntu branches are broken
[13:03] <seb128> how so?
[13:03] <Laney> you can push to launchpad and ask someone to push them on to salsa
[13:03] <seb128> Laney, you know robert? ;)
[13:03]  * Laney runs
[13:03] <andyrock> Laney: I can't push to launchpad
[13:03] <Laney> not you
[13:03] <Laney> the updater
[13:04] <andyrock> anyway nothing that urgent
[13:06] <Laney> andyrock: you can probably find the upstream/xxx commit he used by looking in the ubuntu/master branch for the merge commit
[13:06] <Laney> I mean assuming gbp import-orig was used ...
[13:09] <Laney> looks like not, the upstream source is out of date there
[13:10] <seb128> andyrock, Laney, I let you sort that one out, seems another case where I'm getting lost in git workflow details and I don't want to spend an hour today fighting with tools
[13:10] <andyrock> seb128: kk
[13:10] <Laney> ok
[13:10] <Laney> the explanation is that he just committed the debian directory update
[13:10] <Laney> not so many details there
[13:11] <andyrock> I suggest that we merge the MPs in debian before
[13:11] <andyrock> I mean salsa
[13:11] <seb128> I'm unsure if Robert is familiar with the workflow to use
[13:12] <seb128> andyrock, "Changes 118+"
[13:12] <seb128> that's just too much to me to review properly today
[13:12] <andyrock> seb128: most of the are from upstream
[13:12] <seb128> also I don't know enough about what Debian does/wants to do with the plugins (especially the snap one)
[13:12] <seb128> right
[13:12] <seb128> but salsa doesn't make it easy to split out the downstream changes to review
[13:13] <andyrock> gitg does
[13:13] <andyrock> btw it can wait
[13:13] <seb128> right, as said I don't want to get too much sidetracked
[13:13] <seb128> I can have a look this week
[13:13] <Laney> pushed the upstream and pristine-tar bits
[13:13] <seb128> but it's not trivial enoguh that I want to deal with it now
[13:13] <seb128> Laney, thx
[13:13] <Laney> didn't review the pkging yet
[13:13] <Laney> that can wait as said
[13:14] <Laney> I fixed the launchpad branch too, what that required was 'git merge upstream/3.30.0' (andyrock's tag that he pushed to salsa)
[13:14] <andyrock> someone should improve the way launchpad shows diff
[13:14] <andyrock> starting from merge commits
[13:14] <andyrock> merge commits are kind of broken in gitlab too
[13:15] <didrocks> andyrock: how broken in gitlab? the diff looks very similar in general to what github is showing up
[13:18] <Laney> ok I just rm -rf a git checkout :-O
[13:18] <Laney> git remote add lp <wrong package> --fetch
[13:18] <andyrock> didrocks: I would prefer if they showed the additional diff in the merge commit
[13:18] <Laney> that gives you a bad time
[13:19] <didrocks> andyrock: yeah, GH doesn't do as well, but I agree with you
[13:19] <andyrock> when you merge and apply additional changes, I would prefer if gitlab highlights the additional changes (like git show does...)
[14:02] <andyrock> Laney: do you mind pushing in gnome-software a gbp.conf file too
[14:03] <andyrock> or maybe I should just propose the change in https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome-software
[14:03] <andyrock> and robert will take care of it
[14:20] <seb128> andyrock, so we have a vcs in gitlab for ubuntu and one in launchpad now? should we deprecate one of those?
[14:23] <andyrock> seb128: let's wait for robert
[14:23] <andyrock> robert seems to prefer to handle things without gbp
[14:23] <seb128> didrocks, unlucking, there is another n-m-applet version out since friday :)
[14:23] <seb128> andyrock, right, let sync up with it (or keep that for discussion next week)
[14:24] <seb128> andyrock, unless you have changes you need to get uploaded on gnome-software this week?
[14:24] <Trevinho> Laney: in terminal do we still need debian/patches/0001-Add-the-style-context-provider-with-FALLBACK-priorit.patch ?
[14:24] <Trevinho> Laney: there's no bug reference on that!
[14:24] <andyrock> seb128: yeah I've the XUbuntuCancel one
[14:24] <seb128> ah, right
[14:25] <andyrock> seb128: I'm testing it right now
[14:25] <andyrock> it's a small one
[14:25] <Trevinho> ah debian's 787104 ?
[14:26] <didrocks> seb128: do we really want it? :p
[14:26] <seb128> didrocks, it fixes regressions in g-c-c apparently... ;)
[14:27] <didrocks> humf…
[14:27] <didrocks> :/
[14:27] <seb128> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/network-manager-applet/issues/20
[14:27] <gitbot> GNOME issue 20 in network-manager-applet "Cannot import VPN configuration from standard ovpn files" [Closed]
[14:27] <didrocks> that will be for tomorrow
[14:28] <seb128> yeah, no hurry, it's bugfixing and minor
[14:29] <didrocks> thanks for the head's up!
[14:30] <Laney> it's not "vcs in gitlab for ubuntu and one in launchpad *now*", there was always two
[14:30] <seb128> np, sorry I'm just a less-red-on-version's maniac atm :p (though going to shift away from that now than we are post ff)
[14:30] <Laney> andyrock: feel free to include your gbp.conf in your MP(S) imho
[14:30] <Laney> Trevinho: I pushed a commit adding that (vte not terminal, that confused me for a minute :P)
[14:30] <seb128> Laney, I though the fullsource in git in launchpad would deprecate the gitlab ubuntu variant, probably wrong assumption from my part
[14:30] <Laney> the answer is yes, probably
[14:31] <seb128> Laney, I guess gnome-software is good to have a discussion over with Robert next week
[14:32] <Laney> sure
[14:32] <Laney> it had a fork of upstream because there are/were so many patches that it's easier to maintain them like a fork
[14:33] <Laney> it used to be a branch in the actual upstream repository but that changed, not sure why
[14:33] <Laney> maybe to let other people commit there who don't have gnome rights
[14:33] <seb128> yeah, I don't know
[14:34] <seb128> I know that for gnome-initial-setup Robert is maintaining the diff as a big patch that he keeps rebasing since he said that from experience maintaining a fork as a stack of git isn't working well
[14:34] <seb128> that sounds a bit like our gbp branches
[14:34] <seb128> unsure if gnome-software is in the same bucket though
[14:35] <seb128> anyway, it's going to be easier to discuss that together next week, especially with Robert since he's not online at the same hours as we do otherwise
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
=== Class7_ is now known as Class7
[15:40] <Trevinho> seb128: in terminal we had "Install compatibility version of gnome-terminal.desktop", I guess I can drop that now, right?
[15:42] <Laney> yes those can be dropped
=== ecloud_away is now known as ecloud
=== pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk
[16:46] <seb128> Trevinho, can be removed
[17:06] <tsimonq2> Could someone please steal my gtk+2.0 merge? I don't want to deal with it anymore ;)
[17:06] <tsimonq2> Laney, jbicha: ^
[17:39] <dupondje> Let do another try to build firefox with wayland :)
[18:19] <dupondje>  0:34.62 /build/firefox-62.0+build2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/dist/include/nsISupportsImpl.h:17:10: fatal error: prthread.h: No such file or directory
[18:19] <dupondje> bleh :(
[21:14] <xnox> dupondje, so much optimism!