| === brainwash_ is now known as brainwash | ||
| === pbek_ is now known as pbek | ||
| acheronuk | git push webhooks look to be stalled again | 07:40 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwatson | acheronuk: Thanks; should be recovering now | 08:35 |
| oSoMoN | how much disk space do builders have at their disposal when building debs? | 11:32 |
| wgrant | oSoMoN: The instances have 60GB root volumes, and all but a couple of gigabytes should be usable by the build | 11:39 |
| oSoMoN | wgrant, thanks! was this increased in the last few years by any chance? I'm asking because the libreoffice package was artificially separated into two source packages because of a disk space limitation, and I'm wondering whether we could get rid of this workaround now | 11:41 |
| oSoMoN | 60GB should be enough for that purpose | 11:41 |
| oSoMoN | but I'd like to understand what the limitation was previously | 11:42 |
| wgrant | oSoMoN: It's slowly increased over the years. The -l10n split was back in the Xen days. | 11:54 |
| wgrant | I really don't remember what things were set to back then | 11:54 |
| wgrant | Probably 40GB, but not sure | 11:54 |
| mIk3_08 | Many Thanks to David Callé. God Bless you always. Happy Ubuntu. | 11:56 |
| wgrant | oSoMoN: Hmm, the split actually predates virtualised builders at all, so there's really no way to tell unless you can find IRC logs from 12 years ago | 11:58 |
| oSoMoN | wgrant, ack, in any case it looks like it's worth trying to reconcile the two source packages now, there's a good chance it will work | 12:17 |
| wgrant | oSoMoN: Worth a try indeed | 12:18 |
| cjwatson | Until a few years ago builders weren't particularly clean, either. | 12:29 |
| oSoMoN | cjwatson, so less disk space available due to leftovers? | 12:30 |
| cjwatson | Certainly in the pre-virtualised days you could very well end up with piles of junk left around from old kernels, previous builds, etc. | 12:30 |
| cjwatson | And it wouldn't have been consistent across builders. | 12:30 |
| oSoMoN | wgrant, cjwatson: thanks, I filed bug #1791943 to track attempts at merging the two source packages | 12:33 |
| ubot5 | bug 1791943 in libreoffice-l10n (Ubuntu) "Packaging: merge libreoffice-l10n into libreoffice" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791943 | 12:33 |
| ricotz | (old) virtual builders were affected too ;) I even made a list of working builders for libreoffice back in the days | 12:35 |
| wgrant | Yeah, the original virtual builders were deliberately extremely diverse hardware | 12:36 |
| wgrant | Often extremely bad hardware too :/ | 12:36 |
| brainwash | the ubuntuBSD project seems to be dead https://launchpad.net/ubuntubsd | 13:20 |
| brainwash | the homepage links leads to some ad website, and there has not been any project activity in a long time also | 13:21 |
| brainwash | homepage link | 13:21 |
| oSoMoN | I'm seeing a snap build fail because the builder fails to clone the git repository, which is hosted on LP (it's a mirror of a github repo): https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+snap/gtk-common-themes/+build/330380 | 14:40 |
| oSoMoN | it wasn't doing that 15min ago, is it affecting only https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/gtk-common-themes/+git/master or could it be a more general issue? | 14:41 |
| oSoMoN | (trying to clone locally hangs, too) | 14:41 |
| acheronuk | yep. git clone of a LP repo is kaput | 14:41 |
| oSoMoN | darn | 14:42 |
| acheronuk | cjwatson: ^^ issue you are ware of? | 14:42 |
| acheronuk | *aware | 14:42 |
| oSoMoN | ah, a local cloning operation just completed, after seemingly hanging for 5+ mins | 14:43 |
| acheronuk | Cloning into 'git'... | 14:44 |
| acheronuk | fatal: Could not read from remote repository. | 14:44 |
| acheronuk | another is cloning at less than 56k modem rate | 14:44 |
| oSoMoN | is git.launchpad.net being DDoSed? | 14:45 |
| cjwatson | No, just scales badly | 14:52 |
| cjwatson | It's apparently recovering | 14:52 |
| cjwatson | (Well, I mean possibly, but more likely just normal activity ...) | 14:53 |
| acheronuk | Not me. I was admittedly about to clone 336 repos, but it never got started as it hung on number 1! | 14:54 |
| guiverc_d | suggested to try here: If I `ubuntu-bug evince`to report an issue, apport window appears ("Collecting..") then "Send problem report to devs" (with details) with send/don't-send, but on send it closes and nothing appears to be sent.. (not via my https://errors.ubuntu.com/user/ceaac5c412433... --- am i missing something? or issues currently? | 23:27 |
| wgrant | guiverc_d: ubuntu-bug questions are probably better in #ubuntu | 23:41 |
| guiverc_d | thanks wgrant | 23:41 |
| wgrant | ubuntu-bug can use the Launchpad API for some of its work, but it's not something that we have much to do with. | 23:41 |
| wxl | except that seems like a launchpad error? | 23:41 |
| wgrant | Which error? | 23:42 |
| wxl | oh maybe i'm wrong, actually. that's errors.u.c. | 23:42 |
| guiverc_d | i've ubuntu-bug reported; but none appear in errors.ubuntu.com/user/.. for my box | 23:42 |
| wgrant | Right, errors.u.c is not related to LP | 23:44 |
| guiverc_d | no issues with lp currently? or someone I can monitor in future? | 23:45 |
| guiverc_d | sorry somwhere (not someone)( | 23:45 |
| wgrant | guiverc_d: Here is the best place for Launchpad issues. But there's nothing awry at present. | 23:46 |
| guiverc_d | thanks again ~ | 23:46 |
| guiverc_d | s/~/!] | 23:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!