=== brainwash_ is now known as brainwash === pbek_ is now known as pbek [07:40] git push webhooks look to be stalled again [08:35] acheronuk: Thanks; should be recovering now [11:32] how much disk space do builders have at their disposal when building debs? [11:39] oSoMoN: The instances have 60GB root volumes, and all but a couple of gigabytes should be usable by the build [11:41] wgrant, thanks! was this increased in the last few years by any chance? I'm asking because the libreoffice package was artificially separated into two source packages because of a disk space limitation, and I'm wondering whether we could get rid of this workaround now [11:41] 60GB should be enough for that purpose [11:42] but I'd like to understand what the limitation was previously [11:54] oSoMoN: It's slowly increased over the years. The -l10n split was back in the Xen days. [11:54] I really don't remember what things were set to back then [11:54] Probably 40GB, but not sure [11:56] Many Thanks to David Callé. God Bless you always. Happy Ubuntu. [11:58] oSoMoN: Hmm, the split actually predates virtualised builders at all, so there's really no way to tell unless you can find IRC logs from 12 years ago [12:17] wgrant, ack, in any case it looks like it's worth trying to reconcile the two source packages now, there's a good chance it will work [12:18] oSoMoN: Worth a try indeed [12:29] Until a few years ago builders weren't particularly clean, either. [12:30] cjwatson, so less disk space available due to leftovers? [12:30] Certainly in the pre-virtualised days you could very well end up with piles of junk left around from old kernels, previous builds, etc. [12:30] And it wouldn't have been consistent across builders. [12:33] wgrant, cjwatson: thanks, I filed bug #1791943 to track attempts at merging the two source packages [12:33] bug 1791943 in libreoffice-l10n (Ubuntu) "Packaging: merge libreoffice-l10n into libreoffice" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791943 [12:35] (old) virtual builders were affected too ;) I even made a list of working builders for libreoffice back in the days [12:36] Yeah, the original virtual builders were deliberately extremely diverse hardware [12:36] Often extremely bad hardware too :/ [13:20] the ubuntuBSD project seems to be dead https://launchpad.net/ubuntubsd [13:21] the homepage links leads to some ad website, and there has not been any project activity in a long time also [13:21] homepage link [14:40] I'm seeing a snap build fail because the builder fails to clone the git repository, which is hosted on LP (it's a mirror of a github repo): https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+snap/gtk-common-themes/+build/330380 [14:41] it wasn't doing that 15min ago, is it affecting only https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/gtk-common-themes/+git/master or could it be a more general issue? [14:41] (trying to clone locally hangs, too) [14:41] yep. git clone of a LP repo is kaput [14:42] darn [14:42] cjwatson: ^^ issue you are ware of? [14:42] *aware [14:43] ah, a local cloning operation just completed, after seemingly hanging for 5+ mins [14:44] Cloning into 'git'... [14:44] fatal: Could not read from remote repository. [14:44] another is cloning at less than 56k modem rate [14:45] is git.launchpad.net being DDoSed? [14:52] No, just scales badly [14:52] It's apparently recovering [14:53] (Well, I mean possibly, but more likely just normal activity ...) [14:54] Not me. I was admittedly about to clone 336 repos, but it never got started as it hung on number 1! [23:27] suggested to try here: If I `ubuntu-bug evince`to report an issue, apport window appears ("Collecting..") then "Send problem report to devs" (with details) with send/don't-send, but on send it closes and nothing appears to be sent.. (not via my https://errors.ubuntu.com/user/ceaac5c412433... --- am i missing something? or issues currently? [23:41] guiverc_d: ubuntu-bug questions are probably better in #ubuntu [23:41] thanks wgrant [23:41] ubuntu-bug can use the Launchpad API for some of its work, but it's not something that we have much to do with. [23:41] except that seems like a launchpad error? [23:42] Which error? [23:42] oh maybe i'm wrong, actually. that's errors.u.c. [23:42] i've ubuntu-bug reported; but none appear in errors.ubuntu.com/user/.. for my box [23:44] Right, errors.u.c is not related to LP [23:45] no issues with lp currently? or someone I can monitor in future? [23:45] sorry somwhere (not someone)( [23:46] guiverc_d: Here is the best place for Launchpad issues. But there's nothing awry at present. [23:46] thanks again ~ [23:46] s/~/!]