| === brainwash_ is now known as brainwash | ||
| Unit193 | bluesabre: The elementary-xfce bug has nobody 'important' assigned. | 08:38 |
|---|---|---|
| bluesabre | Unit193: ah | 10:13 |
| bluesabre | Resolved | 10:14 |
| Spass | Whisker Menu search field doesn't take launcher's keywords under consideration at all, is that right? | 12:28 |
| Spass | I've tried adding "Thunar" as a keyword in MenuLibre to the "File Manager" launcher trying to solve this issue - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-default-settings/+bug/1774046 | 12:30 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1774046 in xubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) "Thunar should show up by name, if user searches the app by typing in 'thunar' in whiskermenu" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 12:30 |
| Spass | but I guess keywords are ignored | 12:30 |
| bluesabre | Seems so | 12:37 |
| bluesabre | one solution might be to patch whiskermenu to display hidden launchers if the full binary is entered | 12:37 |
| Unit193 | >_> | 12:40 |
| brainwash | just don't hide thunar | 12:50 |
| Spass | too bad, I think searching for keywords also would be a good thing | 12:50 |
| bluesabre | brainwash: we hid it after folks complained about having 2 file managers | 13:09 |
| bluesabre | either way, folks will complain | 13:09 |
| Spass | bluesabre, and what's your opinion about adding "keyword search" capability to Whisker? should I suggest that to the WM's dev? | 13:15 |
| Spass | that could potentially solve that kind of complains | 13:15 |
| bluesabre | Spass: certainly, I think it'd be a welcome option | 13:21 |
| Spass | ok, I'll suggest that later to Graeme on the Bugzilla | 14:13 |
| === SwissBot_ is now known as SwissBot | ||
| brainwash | bluesabre: it would be listed as "Thunar File Manager" in the whisker menu | 16:56 |
| brainwash | just like "Web Browser" and "Firefox Web Browser" | 16:56 |
| brainwash | xubuntu does not hide firefox | 16:57 |
| bluesabre | brainwash: that's a good point | 17:46 |
| ochosi | bluesabre, knome: if someone uses the symbolic setting of the statusnotifier plugin the wifi icon in the panel and the one in the menu will be visually inconsistent | 20:16 |
| ochosi | specifically the signal strength | 20:16 |
| ochosi | in the original upstream theme, they have switched to three waves instead of the four we currently feature | 20:17 |
| ochosi | it actually does look a bit better or more balanced, especially in smaller sizes | 20:17 |
| ochosi | i tried making a 4 waves symbolic icon, but with 16px that's hard, it simply looks crappy (you can actually see in nm-applet's menu how crappy and distorted that looks) | 20:18 |
| ochosi | what's your take, shall we switch to the three waves instead of four to make things consistent again? | 20:18 |
| ochosi | flocculant: sorry to hear that... thanks for your time and effort! and all the best! (yeah, i know you'll stick around for the rest of the cycle, but still...) | 20:19 |
| brainwash | Spass: why make these changes xubuntu specific? bug 1792788 | 20:32 |
| ubottu | bug 1792788 in xubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) "[Suggestion] Adding more elements to Atril's toolbar" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1792788 | 20:32 |
| Spass | brainwash, I was told to submit my proposition there, Atril is a MATE application, I'm not familiar with MATE development, so I mostly care about the defaults in Xubuntu | 20:37 |
| brainwash | so, MATE or any other users would not benefit from having additional toolbar elements? | 20:38 |
| Spass | brainwash, I guess you're suggesting to submit that here also - https://github.com/mate-desktop/atril | 20:45 |
| brainwash | right. only if the MATE devs refuse to expose more elements by default, it may be worth to consider changes in (x)ubuntu | 20:47 |
| Spass | I see, then I'll try that and I'll wait for the upstream devs' response in that matter | 20:49 |
| brainwash | in any case it would help to have their opinion on that matter | 20:50 |
| bluesabre | ochosi: 3 seems fine to me... the only time I care about the bars is when there is 1 or 0 :) | 21:13 |
| ochosi | bluesabre: heh, i agree. the signal strength is overrated anyway, it's never really *that* accurate (and doesn't tell you much about throughput, latency etc) | 21:16 |
| bluesabre | :) | 21:16 |
| ochosi | alright, i can try to prep a branch pulling in stuff from upstream | 21:17 |
| ochosi | probably loads of icons, maybe i'll wait for knome's feedback | 21:17 |
| -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: Release 18.10.1 @ http://git.launchpad.net/xubuntu-artwork/commit/?id=8dcc679049d8db559da76004a4856a74f86648e7 (by Sean Davis) | 21:48 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!