| slangasek | mfo: libuv1> a very thorough patch explanation. Please file this patch upstream in the Debian BTS and adjust the patch header to include Bug-Ubuntu: and Bug-Debian: references (in accordance with https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/) and I will gladly sponsor | 06:21 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cross-toolchain-base (bionic-proposed/main) [25ubuntu6 => 25ubuntu7] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [20ubuntu4 => 21ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 07:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [9ubuntu2 => 18ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 07:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [6ubuntu3 => 9ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 07:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-defaults (bionic-proposed/main) [1.176ubuntu2 => 1.176ubuntu2.1] (core) | 07:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-defaults-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.176ubuntu1 => 1.176ubuntu1.1] (no packageset) | 07:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.6-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 07:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.6-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cross-toolchain-base-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [21ubuntu3 => 22ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 08:32 | |
| === andrewc is now known as Guest47672 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [20ubuntu4 => 21ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:40 | |
| === andrewc is now known as Guest7430 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-7-cross [source] (bionic-proposed) [21ubuntu0.1] | 09:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [source] (bionic-proposed) [21ubuntu0.1] | 09:45 | |
| sbeattie | why did golang-1.7 come back into cosmic? | 10:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross [source] (bionic-proposed) [18ubuntu0.1] | 10:17 | |
| doko | synced? | 10:20 |
| cjwatson | odd auto-sync / proposed-migration race possibly? | 10:21 |
| cjwatson | auto-sync doesn't sync previously-removed packages of its own volition | 10:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I think doko did the remove while autosync was running? | 10:21 |
| cjwatson | could be, should be discoverable from auto-sync logs | 10:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nack, logs seems to be it didn't get autosyncd? | 10:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | *say | 10:24 |
| cjwatson | the LP publication history seems to think auto-sync did it, but I haven't checked in detail | 10:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I see what LP says, but I can't find references here http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/2018-05-05/ | 11:24 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, that publishing history says it was removed from proposed by britney, removed from release by doko, and copied into release by britney in that order; so think that is an overlap | 11:27 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, the autosync would not necessarily have been that day | 11:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh... ok | 11:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but I don't get how the same version can be in both pockets at the same time, but I'm not AA and I don't want to know probably :) | 11:35 |
| apw | a version can be in multiple pockets, that is pretty normal | 11:35 |
| apw | look at anything in -security and -updates | 11:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, but this shouldn't be normal for -proposed and -release, modulo when brintey and publisher are running... | 11:38 |
| cjwatson | could be while it was running, or could be that the post-move removal failed | 11:39 |
| cjwatson | *post-copy | 11:39 |
| cjwatson | the proposed-migration logs should make that clear | 11:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [6ubuntu3 => 9ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 11:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-8-cross-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [9ubuntu0.1] | 11:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu4 => 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu4] (core) | 11:59 | |
| mfo | slangasek, thanks for reviewing. sure, the new debdiff in LP now has both Bug-Ubuntu and Bug-Debian tags. o/ | 12:07 |
| mfo | LP #1792647 | 12:08 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1792647 in libuv1 (Ubuntu) "libuv1 calls readlink() with buffer size zero for /proc/self (nodejs test-case failure on s390x and LXD)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1792647 | 12:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [16ubuntu4 => 17ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 12:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [9ubuntu0.1] | 12:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [17ubuntu0.1] | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~14.04.3 => 20180905+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 13:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.1 => 20180905+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 13:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cross-toolchain-base (bionic-proposed/main) [25ubuntu6 => 26ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 13:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cross-toolchain-base [source] (bionic-proposed) [25ubuntu7] | 13:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cross-toolchain-base [source] (bionic-proposed) [26ubuntu0.1] | 13:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cross-toolchain-base-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [22ubuntu0.1] | 14:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-defaults [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu2.1] | 14:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu1.1] | 14:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cross-toolchain-base-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [22ubuntu0.1 => 22ubuntu0.2] (no packageset) | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu4~18.04.1 => 20180905+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20180510+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.1 => 20180905+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:16 | |
| mdeslaur | doesn't look like the publisher ran in the past 5 hours, is something wrong? (ie: privoxy in trusty-security isn't showing up...) | 14:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cross-toolchain-base-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [22ubuntu0.2] | 14:18 | |
| mdeslaur | (showing up in http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/p/privoxy/ , for example) | 14:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (bionic-proposed) [20180905+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] | 14:22 | |
| infinity | mdeslaur: Publisher has definitely been running. | 14:37 |
| mdeslaur | infinity: any idea why the binaries aren't showing up? | 14:37 |
| infinity | mdeslaur: Mirrors could be broken. | 14:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (bionic-proposed) [20180905+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] | 14:38 | |
| infinity | mdeslaur: Looks like archive frontends haven't updated since 7am UTC. | 14:39 |
| mdeslaur | hrm | 14:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20180905+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] | 14:39 | |
| mdeslaur | infinity: who do I bug about that? | 14:40 |
| infinity | mdeslaur: Wait, are you in Belgium? | 14:40 |
| mdeslaur | was just thinking there may be a transparent proxy here | 14:40 |
| mdeslaur | one sec, looking | 14:40 |
| infinity | (base)adconrad@nosferatu:~$ host archive.ubuntu.com | 14:40 |
| infinity | archive.ubuntu.com has address 10.155.0.2 | 14:40 |
| infinity | mdeslaur: ^ | 14:40 |
| infinity | mdeslaur: That's not the real archive. :P | 14:40 |
| mdeslaur | ARGH | 14:40 |
| mdeslaur | infinity: sorry for the trouble | 14:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1020.21~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1020.21~16.04.1] | 14:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20180905+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20180905+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 15:15 | |
| === andrewc is now known as Guest48864 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu4 => 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu4] (core) | 15:42 | |
| === andrewc is now known as Guest37259 | ||
| === andrewc is now known as Guest43894 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu4] | 20:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu4] | 20:24 | |
| wxl | can anyone explain to me why xfsprogs is not in the lubuntu images? it's in our seeds.. | 21:06 |
| wxl | https://git.launchpad.net/~lubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/lubuntu/tree/live#n32 | 21:08 |
| jbicha | wxl: it's already in https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/tree/live-common#n3 | 21:25 |
| jbicha | you're missing jfsutils too | 21:37 |
| tsimonq2 | Wat. I just looked in debian-cd, ubuntu-cdimage, and livecd-rootfs and I can't find anything. | 21:57 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity, slangasek: Either of you have any ideas? ^ | 21:57 |
| slangasek | have you walked germinate output? | 21:58 |
| slangasek | and compared build logs? | 21:59 |
| tsimonq2 | I have compared build logs, but I'll look at Germinate now. It seems to be including the live-common seed but for some reason not the packages inside. Peeking at Germinate. | 22:00 |
| tsimonq2 | It's in here: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/lubuntu.cosmic/all | 22:01 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Perhaps there's another log file that I'm missing? | 22:03 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: the image build logs? | 22:06 |
| slangasek | those are the ones I meant | 22:06 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: There's no output when "Resolving live-common dependencies ..." is outputted, but I also see xfsprogs as being in the "d-i-requirements" file, and with the line "! Duplicated seed: xfsprogs". | 22:10 |
| tsimonq2 | There is no other relevant output it seems. | 22:10 |
| tsimonq2 | (I'm looking at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/lubuntu/cosmic/daily-live-20180917.log ) | 22:10 |
| slangasek | isn't this a question of the livefs contents, since it's in the live-common seed | 22:11 |
| slangasek | ? | 22:11 |
| slangasek | so you'd need to drill down into the livefs log | 22:11 |
| slangasek | otherwise I'm afraid I won't be able to help with this now, it's after midnight in local TZ | 22:11 |
| tsimonq2 | Alright. | 22:12 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: There doesn't seem to be anything relevant in there either; it would be good to get your thoughts when you wake up. | 22:17 |
| slangasek | the next thing I would tend to suggest is to look at STRUCTURE to make sure there aren't any differences relative to other flavors that don't have this problem | 22:19 |
| slangasek | and also probably check if lubuntu-meta needs updating | 22:20 |
| slangasek | I do see that jfsutils has a task header for all the other live tasks but not for lubuntu | 22:20 |
| tsimonq2 | Already there, and I'll do a quick lubuntu-meta update now to confirm. | 22:20 |
| slangasek | so archive metadata is wrong, so why | 22:20 |
| tsimonq2 | Which is why my first instinct was to check the tooling for Lubuntu-specific hacks. :P | 22:21 |
| jbicha | um, check the tasksel package | 22:21 |
| tsimonq2 | Good idea. | 22:22 |
| jbicha | wxl: I think tasksel not being updated for the new lubuntu is the problem | 22:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibm-java80 [source] (xenial-proposed) [8.0.5.20-0ubuntu1] | 23:30 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!