| icey | hey; I recall a tool to help identify the plugs that a new snap that's in development needs but can't find a reference to that, I'd rather not go spelunking through logs if I can help it ;-) | 05:19 |
|---|---|---|
| sergiusens | icey: snappy-debug | 05:58 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2279 closed: sanity checks: run properly on build VMs <Created by kyrofa> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2279> | 06:09 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2281 opened: build providers: re-exec as root <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2281> | 06:09 |
| icey | thanks sergiusens | 06:29 |
| mup | PR snapd#5713 closed: many: mount namespace mapping for parallel installs of snaps <Parallel installs> <Squash-merge> <Created by bboozzoo> <Merged by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5713> | 06:46 |
| jdstrand | popey: not to my knowledge. is it possible something in your staged packages got bigger? | 06:49 |
| popey | jdstrand: the snap contents are the same | 06:50 |
| popey | overnight a bunch of snaps got bigger | 06:50 |
| popey | it's just the squashfs is larger | 06:50 |
| jdstrand | popey: looking at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squashfs-tools I don't see any super recent changes | 06:51 |
| popey | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/OnGrwj4c/ | 06:51 |
| jdstrand | popey: do they still pass automated review? | 06:51 |
| popey | yes | 06:51 |
| popey | ^ 55 / 54 are unpacked squashfs | 06:51 |
| popey | perhaps the unsquash / resquash padded somehow? | 06:52 |
| jdstrand | popey: I'm gonna have to shrug. I don't know what caused that, certainly not overnight | 06:53 |
| popey | ah, not store resquash, as launchpad built it bigger | 06:54 |
| jdstrand | popey: popey is it possible that 54 was built without -no-fragments? | 06:54 |
| popey | i didnt change anything | 06:55 |
| jdstrand | 54 wouldn't pass automated review then | 06:55 |
| jdstrand | popey: was 54 built with the older squashfs-tools than what is in xenial now? | 06:56 |
| jdstrand | popey: it wouldn't surprise me based on the fscaps patch for it to be a bit bigger. not sure why it would be so much bigger... | 06:58 |
| popey | it's not the only one, others have grown | 06:59 |
| jdstrand | actually, reading that patch, it shouldn't be any bigger | 07:00 |
| jdstrand | popey: the review tools pass on both 54 and 55? | 07:01 |
| jdstrand | popey: does one contain the snap/manifest.yaml and one doesn't? probably not, you said the files are identical. did you diff 'unsquashfs -lls <snap>' for 54 and 55? | 07:04 |
| jdstrand | popey: I need to do a little meeting prep then attend a meeting | 07:04 |
| popey | jdstrand: i diffed the unpacked directories | 07:05 |
| popey | no worries, just wondered why it bloated overnight, with seemingly no changes | 07:05 |
| kyrofa | roadmr, nextcloud is still having troubles releasing revisions | 07:07 |
| kyrofa | What is going on? | 07:07 |
| roadmr | kyrofa: same thing as before? | 07:07 |
| jdstrand | popey: diffing the unsquashfs -lls output might also be interesting | 07:08 |
| kyrofa | roadmr, not quite, I'm no longer getting emails about failed or manual reviews | 07:08 |
| roadmr | kyrofa: I see no stuck uploads this time, they're all either released or ready to release | 07:08 |
| kyrofa | roadmr, but none of my dailies are actually being released, just uploaded | 07:08 |
| === nonzen is now known as Guest45582 | ||
| roadmr | kyrofa: I assume you're using Launchpad to do the builds? do the Launchpad logs for failed-to-release revisions tell anything? (If you point me to one I can have a look) | 07:09 |
| popey | jdstrand: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/KRqH7HP5NW/ | 07:09 |
| kyrofa | roadmr, indeed, it seems that the release failed, wonder why I didn't get an email. I don't see a log, though: https://code.launchpad.net/~nextcloud-snappy-dev/+snap/nextcloud-daily-master/+build/334596 | 07:16 |
| roadmr | checking, kyrofa | 07:17 |
| roadmr | kyrofa: hm... yes, no log about the upload failure... | 07:17 |
| roadmr | kyrofa: let me check with Colin (we're in a meeting so might take a bit) | 07:18 |
| icey | is it possible to configure a snap license as not Proprietary? | 07:26 |
| kyrofa | Thanks roadmr | 07:26 |
| roadmr | icey: it is | 07:27 |
| roadmr | icey: go to http://dashboard.snapcraft.io/, log in with your account if needed, click on the snap's name, and at the bottom of the overview page you can edit the license information | 07:28 |
| icey | thanks roadmr | 07:42 |
| mup | PR snapd#5839 closed: overlord/state: return latest LastAdded time in WarningsSummary <Created by chipaca> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5839> | 07:50 |
| === jero is now known as Guest43845 | ||
| mup | PR snapd#5724 closed: tests: new test for the cpu-control interface <Created by sergiocazzolato> <Closed by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5724> | 08:17 |
| cjwatson | roadmr,kyrofa: can't tell right now because our OOPS system is backlogged; I need to chase a vanguard about that once one appears | 08:21 |
| cjwatson | it'll be https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-80ef5e7e2eea921e55aac893b16c643f but that doesn't exist yet | 08:21 |
| roadmr | ohh :( thanks for having a look cjwatson | 08:21 |
| === CustosLiminis is now known as CustosLimen | ||
| === pbek_ is now known as pbek | ||
| mup | PR snapd#5838 closed: many: return real snap name in API response <Created by zyga> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5838> | 09:54 |
| mup | PR snapd#5836 closed: tests: try to build cmd/snap for darwin <Created by chipaca> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5836> | 09:56 |
| mup | PR snapd#5837 closed: daemon: make error responders not printf when called with 1 argument <Created by chipaca> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5837> | 09:56 |
| mup | PR snapd#5840 opened: interfaces/apparmor, interfaces/builtin: tweaks for parallel snap installs <Parallel installs> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5840> | 10:04 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2281 closed: build providers: re-exec as root <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2281> | 12:16 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2282 opened: build providers: cleaner start and launch messaging <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2282> | 12:43 |
| mup | PR snapd#5841 opened: interfaces/hotplug: hotplug spec takes one slot definition <Hotplug> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5841> | 14:20 |
| mup | PR snapd#5842 opened: interfaces/testiface: added TestHotplugInterface <Hotplug> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5842> | 14:56 |
| mup | PR core#96 opened: hooks: use relative path when unwinding /etc/alternatives <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/core/pull/96> | 15:34 |
| stokachu | all of a sudden my builds are failing, https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/yX2hdkDXDS/ | 16:25 |
| stokachu | supposedly this is a known issue with snapcraft? | 16:25 |
| stokachu | it also doesn't like snap/wrappers anymore | 16:26 |
| stokachu | https://github.com/conjure-up/conjure-up/tree/master/snap is where my snap stuff is | 16:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!