[05:19] <icey> hey; I recall a tool to help identify the plugs that a new snap that's in development needs but can't find a reference to that, I'd rather not go spelunking through logs if I can help it ;-)
[05:58] <sergiusens> icey: snappy-debug
[06:09] <mup> PR snapcraft#2279 closed: sanity checks: run properly on build VMs <Created by kyrofa> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2279>
[06:09] <mup> PR snapcraft#2281 opened: build providers: re-exec as root <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2281>
[06:29] <icey> thanks sergiusens
[06:46] <mup> PR snapd#5713 closed: many: mount namespace mapping for parallel installs of snaps <Parallel installs> <Squash-merge> <Created by bboozzoo> <Merged by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5713>
[06:49] <jdstrand> popey: not to my knowledge. is it possible something in your staged packages got bigger?
[06:50] <popey> jdstrand: the snap contents are the same
[06:50] <popey> overnight a bunch of snaps got bigger
[06:50] <popey> it's just the squashfs is larger
[06:51] <jdstrand> popey: looking at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squashfs-tools I don't see any super recent changes
[06:51] <popey> https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/OnGrwj4c/
[06:51] <jdstrand> popey: do they still pass automated review?
[06:51] <popey> yes
[06:51] <popey> ^ 55 / 54 are unpacked squashfs
[06:52] <popey> perhaps the unsquash / resquash padded somehow?
[06:53] <jdstrand> popey: I'm gonna have to shrug. I don't know what caused that, certainly not overnight
[06:54] <popey> ah, not store resquash, as launchpad built it bigger
[06:54] <jdstrand> popey: popey is it possible that 54 was built without -no-fragments?
[06:55] <popey> i didnt change anything
[06:55] <jdstrand> 54 wouldn't pass automated review then
[06:56] <jdstrand> popey: was 54 built with the older squashfs-tools than what is in xenial now?
[06:58] <jdstrand> popey: it wouldn't surprise me based on the fscaps patch for it to be a bit bigger. not sure why it would be so much bigger...
[06:59] <popey> it's not the only one, others have grown
[07:00] <jdstrand> actually, reading that patch, it shouldn't be any bigger
[07:01] <jdstrand> popey: the review tools pass on both 54 and 55?
[07:04] <jdstrand> popey: does one contain the snap/manifest.yaml and one doesn't? probably not, you said the files are identical. did you diff 'unsquashfs -lls <snap>' for 54 and 55?
[07:04] <jdstrand> popey: I need to do a little meeting prep then attend a meeting
[07:05] <popey> jdstrand: i diffed the unpacked directories
[07:05] <popey> no worries, just wondered why it bloated overnight, with seemingly no changes
[07:07] <kyrofa> roadmr, nextcloud is still having troubles releasing revisions
[07:07] <kyrofa> What is going on?
[07:07] <roadmr> kyrofa: same thing as before?
[07:08] <jdstrand> popey: diffing the unsquashfs -lls output might also be interesting
[07:08] <kyrofa> roadmr, not quite, I'm no longer getting emails about failed or manual reviews
[07:08] <roadmr> kyrofa: I see no stuck uploads this time, they're all either released or ready to release
[07:08] <kyrofa> roadmr, but none of my dailies are actually being released, just uploaded
=== nonzen is now known as Guest45582
[07:09] <roadmr> kyrofa: I assume you're using Launchpad to do the builds? do the Launchpad logs for failed-to-release revisions tell anything? (If you point me to one I can have a look)
[07:09] <popey> jdstrand: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/KRqH7HP5NW/
[07:16] <kyrofa> roadmr, indeed, it seems that the release failed, wonder why I didn't get an email. I don't see a log, though: https://code.launchpad.net/~nextcloud-snappy-dev/+snap/nextcloud-daily-master/+build/334596
[07:17] <roadmr> checking, kyrofa
[07:17] <roadmr> kyrofa: hm... yes, no log about the upload failure...
[07:18] <roadmr> kyrofa: let me check with Colin (we're in a meeting so might take a bit)
[07:26] <icey> is it possible to configure a snap license as not Proprietary?
[07:26] <kyrofa> Thanks roadmr
[07:27] <roadmr> icey: it is
[07:28] <roadmr> icey: go to http://dashboard.snapcraft.io/, log in with your account if needed, click on the snap's name, and at the bottom of the overview page you can edit the license information
[07:42] <icey> thanks roadmr
[07:50] <mup> PR snapd#5839 closed: overlord/state: return latest LastAdded time in WarningsSummary <Created by chipaca> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5839>
=== jero is now known as Guest43845
[08:17] <mup> PR snapd#5724 closed: tests: new test for the cpu-control interface <Created by sergiocazzolato> <Closed by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5724>
[08:21] <cjwatson> roadmr,kyrofa: can't tell right now because our OOPS system is backlogged; I need to chase a vanguard about that once one appears
[08:21] <cjwatson> it'll be https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-80ef5e7e2eea921e55aac893b16c643f but that doesn't exist yet
[08:21] <roadmr> ohh :( thanks for having a look cjwatson
=== CustosLiminis is now known as CustosLimen
=== pbek_ is now known as pbek
[09:54] <mup> PR snapd#5838 closed: many: return real snap name in API response <Created by zyga> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5838>
[09:56] <mup> PR snapd#5836 closed: tests: try to build cmd/snap for darwin <Created by chipaca> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5836>
[09:56] <mup> PR snapd#5837 closed: daemon: make error responders not printf when called with 1 argument <Created by chipaca> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5837>
[10:04] <mup> PR snapd#5840 opened: interfaces/apparmor, interfaces/builtin: tweaks for parallel snap installs <Parallel installs> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5840>
[12:16] <mup> PR snapcraft#2281 closed: build providers: re-exec as root <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2281>
[12:43] <mup> PR snapcraft#2282 opened: build providers: cleaner start and launch messaging <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2282>
[14:20] <mup> PR snapd#5841 opened: interfaces/hotplug: hotplug spec takes one slot definition <Hotplug> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5841>
[14:56] <mup> PR snapd#5842 opened: interfaces/testiface: added TestHotplugInterface <Hotplug> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/5842>
[15:34] <mup> PR core#96 opened: hooks: use relative path when unwinding /etc/alternatives <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/core/pull/96>
[16:25] <stokachu> all of a sudden my builds are failing, https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/yX2hdkDXDS/
[16:25] <stokachu> supposedly this is a known issue with snapcraft?
[16:26] <stokachu> it also doesn't like snap/wrappers anymore
[16:27] <stokachu> https://github.com/conjure-up/conjure-up/tree/master/snap is where my snap stuff is