| eangulo | I am searching for devs so I came here. I have modeled a 32bit computer with logisim and have working pseudo-assy compiler. Thinking on next step I want to use a real compiler that, in this state of development, must generate my own pseudo-assy. Is that possible? See it working: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpXJ4YQjSkt5EWqJIXcYN9w | 01:24 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | hello juliank ... feature request... | 07:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | E: Type 'deb[trusted=yes]' is not known on line 3 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list | 07:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can we please have apt working also when I forget to put the space? :) | 07:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | or having a better error message might help too ;) | 07:24 |
| === Unit193 is now known as Guest71156 | ||
| tseliot | slangasek, bdmurray: hey, can you approve ubuntu-drivers-common in LP: #1778011 , please? It's blocking my SRU. | 07:49 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1778011 in ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Bionic) "SRU: PRIME Power Saving mode draws too much power" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1778011 | 07:49 |
| andrewsh | jbicha: fwiw, that patch alone doesn’t fix all issues Unity has | 07:59 |
| andrewsh | but only the most notable ones | 07:59 |
| andrewsh | juliank: could you please remove old/unnecessary patches from wpa? | 09:06 |
| andrewsh | e.g. debian/patches/session-ticket.patch | 09:06 |
| andrewsh | or android_hal_fw_path_change.patch | 09:06 |
| andrewsh | or CONFIG_ANDROID_HAL | 09:07 |
| andrewsh | I don’t think Android support is used these days by anyone | 09:07 |
| realitix | Hello Ubuntu team. Can someone merge this patch for Xenial: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat8/+bug/1644144 | 09:29 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1644144 in tomcat8 (Ubuntu Xenial) "Tomcat 8.0.32 has ClassLoader Issues" [Medium,In progress] | 09:29 |
| realitix | Thanks a lot | 09:29 |
| rbasak | realitix: it can be done, but it looks like nobody responded to nacc's request to test his trial fix. | 09:32 |
| rbasak | If nobody can be bothered to test our work, then I'm not sure it's worth spending the time on fixing it. | 09:33 |
| realitix | I have a client that can test it | 09:33 |
| realitix | What is the procedure to test the fix ? | 09:34 |
| rbasak | Please use nacc's PPA that he linked in the bug. | 09:35 |
| realitix | ok, I will tell my client to do it, are you sure the ppa is for xenial ? | 09:35 |
| rbasak | https://launchpad.net/~nacc/+archive/ubuntu/tomcat8v2/+packages says Xenial | 09:37 |
| rbasak | Note that the current PPA version will be a downgrade and will undo security fixes, so use it for testing only | 09:38 |
| rbasak | If it is confirmed to still work, then it'll need rebasing on top of the security fixes | 09:38 |
| rbasak | Then tested again. And then we can look into releasing it officially | 09:39 |
| realitix | ok thanks | 09:39 |
| gpunk | bumblebee broken on ubuntu? | 09:44 |
| sarnold | gpunk: what bug number? perhaps someone can suggest something | 09:48 |
| gpunk | I dont have in mind the bug number, i am using 18.10 | 09:49 |
| gpunk | i found it broken on 18.04 too | 09:49 |
| juliank | andrewsh: I don't know | 10:20 |
| juliank | LocutusOfBorg: um | 10:20 |
| juliank | LocutusOfBorg: We do need better parsers for everything in apt | 10:21 |
| juliank | andrewsh: The Android HAL is probably used by ubports | 10:23 |
| juliank | session ticketing patch idk | 10:23 |
| cyphermox | ubports? | 10:23 |
| juliank | Also we're frozen | 10:23 |
| cyphermox | it tended to be used for the phone IIRC. | 10:23 |
| juliank | cyphermox: yes | 10:23 |
| juliank | cyphermox: ubports are maintaining ubuntu phone | 10:23 |
| cyphermox | eh | 10:24 |
| andrewsh | juliank: session ticketing definitely not needed anymore | 10:24 |
| andrewsh | juliank: ubports could ship the patch themselves? | 10:24 |
| juliank | andrewsh: Does it do harm? | 10:24 |
| juliank | Is it wise to drop it weeks before the release? | 10:24 |
| andrewsh | juliank: umm… why ship extra patches with no purpose? | 10:24 |
| juliank | because we're close to release | 10:24 |
| andrewsh | mm, okay… | 10:25 |
| cyphermox | andrewsh: I tend to agree session ticketing is perhaps not needed | 10:25 |
| cyphermox | OTOH, if it's not clearly busted, we probably best avoid changing wpa | 10:25 |
| cyphermox | I'm no longer really in any position to test WPA enterprise, for one thing | 10:26 |
| cyphermox | oh | 10:26 |
| cyphermox | actually, that's not quite true, I could set it up at home easier now. | 10:26 |
| cyphermox | andrewsh: I'm +1 on dropping the patches when we're not frozen and after checking that the android HAL is no longer necessary (but I suspect it always will be, because android hardware tends to have half-baked badly written drivers with tons of missing features that make them unsuitable to being included in a real kernel | 10:28 |
| andrewsh | cyphermox: the bug in question has been fixed ages ago in a different way as I remember | 10:29 |
| cyphermox | ie. proper firmware loading, proper rfkill, etc. | 10:29 |
| cyphermox | ah? | 10:29 |
| cyphermox | re ticketing or android? | 10:29 |
| andrewsh | it's not android-specific | 10:29 |
| andrewsh | cyphermox: well, but if Ubuntu doesn't run on Android hardware anymore, and UBports build their own packages anyway, why can't they ship wpa with Android things enabled? | 10:31 |
| cyphermox | the android patch did use android-specific APIs to get/change fw path | 10:31 |
| andrewsh | (btw I do agree re freeze, I didn't know it is on now) | 10:31 |
| cyphermox | I don't think they do anything that isn't in the ubuntu archive? | 10:31 |
| andrewsh | oh | 10:31 |
| cyphermox | tbh, I don't know | 10:31 |
| andrewsh | I thought they run a separate packaging infra | 10:31 |
| cyphermox | fwiw, I'm not particularly proud of that patch, I'll be happy when it dies | 10:31 |
| andrewsh | oh, it was you who wrote it :) | 10:32 |
| tdaitx | cjwatson: I added you to 2 merge proposals (xenial and bionic sru) for initramfs-tools as it includes the sync change | 10:32 |
| tdaitx | wouldn't mind another pair of eyes looking over the old-dkms change as well if you happen to have the time ;-) | 10:32 |
| cyphermox | I prefer when the evidence of my ugly hacks don't stick around indefinitely ;) | 10:32 |
| mwhudson | cyphermox: just waiting until all current LTSes are EOL is hardly indefinite!! | 11:40 |
| doko | didrocks: you started with LP: #1709164, today I was called out to not process this further. Please could you follow-up on that, setting it to Committed if appropriate? | 11:44 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1709164 in bubblewrap (Ubuntu) "[MIR] bubblewrap" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1709164 | 11:44 |
| bluesabre | Is anybody familiar with how the live session gdm doesn't ask (and knows not to ask) for a password? I'd like to do the same with lightdm-gtk-greeter and xubuntu | 12:31 |
| jbicha | bluesabre: casper package, scripts/casper-bottom/15autologin , there is also an adjustment in 25adduser | 12:34 |
| bluesabre | jbicha: excellent, thanks! | 12:35 |
| teward | doko: jbicha: can you confirm whether exim (who technically owns PCRE2 supposedly?) supports PCRE2 over PCRE3? | 15:57 |
| teward | doko: jbicha: http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/2018-September/011448.html is why I asked - I don't think PCRE2 is actually 'supported' everywhere... | 15:58 |
| jbicha | I'm not really working on getting old pcre out of main (and I would be surprised if that happened before 20.04 LTS), I just want the new pcre in | 16:02 |
| teward | jbicha: is there any reason to not have both in `main`? | 16:05 |
| teward | other than the headaches of "Which do we support" | 16:05 |
| slangasek | It's not a question of confusion over which we support. It's a matter that actually supporting them costs, and we seek to avoid code duplication wherever possible. | 16:06 |
| jbicha | Ubuntu generally only has one of a "thing" in main but there are exceptions. So the question is whether pcre and pcre2 are the same thing or whether an exception is appropriate | 16:06 |
| jbicha | pcre does have a security vulnerability history so it is going to be some amount of extra work for the Security team | 16:07 |
| nacc | rbasak: i can rebase it at some point, if i'm reminded :) | 16:30 |
| tsimonq2 | rbasak, bdmurray: In hindsight, I believe I politely deferred bug 1773811, but can I get some confirmation that these changes are not suitable for an SRU? | 23:23 |
| ubottu | bug 1773811 in gazebo (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1773811 | 23:23 |
| tsimonq2 | (If not a violation of Debian Policy.) | 23:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!