| alkisg | Hi, I go to https://code.launchpad.net/~alkisg/epoptes/+git/gsoc2018/+delete and press Delete to delete a branch, and I'm getting: | 05:35 |
|---|---|---|
| alkisg | Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad. (Error ID: OOPS-f88803aaefa0c88e45ff767c15ade9e8) | 05:35 |
| ubot5 | https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-f88803aaefa0c88e45ff767c15ade9e8 | 05:35 |
| alkisg | I'll keep trying, but I thought I'd mention it here in case it persists... | 05:35 |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| alkisg | Btw, I've asked again a few months ago but I'll ask again in case something changed: | 05:38 |
| alkisg | Translations can only sync with bzr branches, not git branches, correct? | 05:38 |
| cjwatson | alkisg: File it as a bug if it persists. It seems to be taking a long time deleting old jobs; we may need to look into why that's happening | 07:18 |
| cjwatson | alkisg: Translations are still bzr-only, yes | 07:18 |
| alkisg | Thank you, will do | 07:18 |
| === Naka is now known as Nakaori | ||
| alkisg | I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1793266 | 07:58 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1793266 in Launchpad itself "Unable to delete repository" [Undecided,New] | 07:58 |
| ssbarnea | hi! can someone have a look at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/674042 ? | 08:52 |
| wgrant | ssbarnea: You'll need to talk to the owners of the projects. | 09:05 |
| ssbarnea | wgrant: these projects were not used on LP for years, so I doubt there are any owners around. | 09:07 |
| ssbarnea | https://launchpad.net/python-jenkins | 09:08 |
| wgrant | ssbarnea: The admins of the owning team are definitely still active. | 09:10 |
| wgrant | Well, James is, at least. | 09:11 |
| wgrant | It requires a very exceptional circumstance for LP admins to hijack a project -- much easier for you to talk to the existing owner and get them to transfer ownership or grant the relevant access. | 09:12 |
| ssbarnea | wgrant: sure. I didn't see the join option. I will cc him on the question. | 09:20 |
| tintou | Are packages in `Dependency wait` state checked daily/weekly or is there a hook when a package changes in the PPA? | 09:28 |
| ssbarnea | wgrant: thanks! I updated the question. | 09:28 |
| wgrant | tintou: Every couple of hours, usually. | 09:29 |
| tintou | wgrant: alright, thanks :) | 09:29 |
| cjwatson | I think it's hourly in fact | 09:42 |
| tintou | One tricky question, will it work if a build for one architecture of the missing package failed https://code.launchpad.net/~elementary-os/+recipe/signond-daily | 10:00 |
| wgrant | tintou: All the builds are treated individually. | 10:10 |
| cjwatson | Will what work? | 10:10 |
| cjwatson | It won't automatically retry that specific build. | 10:11 |
| wgrant | Oh yeah, the check is two-hourly, but the script is hourly, read the wrong line | 10:11 |
| cjwatson | But, as wgrant says, the status of that build will have no effect on whether other dependency-wait builds are retried. | 10:11 |
| tintou | So 3 to 4 hours since signond is available https://code.launchpad.net/~elementary-os/+recipe/signond-daily and this https://code.launchpad.net/~elementary-os/+recipe/libsignon-glib-daily is still waiting (I can wait more but if it's two-hourly there is probably something I'm missing there | 11:30 |
| cjwatson | Ah, that's slightly amusing | 11:36 |
| cjwatson | Only .deb builds get auto-retried | 11:36 |
| cjwatson | That one's a recipe build, and doesn't | 11:36 |
| tintou | Ah, alright, so I have to make another build request? | 11:37 |
| cjwatson | Yeah | 11:38 |
| cjwatson | Could you file a bug about this? I don't know if it's something we would schedule to fix particularly soon, but it's weird that we have non-auto-retried depwait states | 11:38 |
| tintou | Alright, will do :) | 11:38 |
| cjwatson | (Recipe builds aren't normally retryable; but we could auto-schedule new ones I suppose) | 11:39 |
| tintou | Opened against Launchpad itself https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1793296 | 11:45 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1793296 in Launchpad itself "Recipe build with missing dependencies aren't retried" [Undecided,New] | 11:45 |
| ijohnson | cjwatson: did you ever find a fix for the snap package edit issue? I just tried again today and still same problem re: load balancer | 13:17 |
| cjwatson | We haven't tracked it down yet, I'm afraid - we got sidetracked by another super-weird problem | 13:17 |
| cjwatson | Have you tried making the change using the API? | 13:17 |
| cjwatson | as a workaround | 13:17 |
| ijohnson | No, I'm not familiar with using the API, are there docs on how to do that somewhere? | 13:18 |
| cjwatson | https://help.launchpad.net/API/launchpadlib | 13:18 |
| cjwatson | But if you tell me what changes you're trying to make I can give you an informal script | 13:18 |
| ijohnson | I'm just trying to enable the snap to build automatically on new commits; just enable the tick for "Automatically build when branch changes" | 13:19 |
| ijohnson | Thanks for the docs, I can take a look at that | 13:19 |
| cjwatson | Should be basically | 13:19 |
| cjwatson | lp-shell production devel | 13:19 |
| cjwatson | [authenticate as needed] | 13:19 |
| cjwatson | snap = lp.load('/~docker/+snap/docker') | 13:20 |
| cjwatson | snap.auto_build = True | 13:20 |
| cjwatson | snap.lp_save() | 13:20 |
| cjwatson | (lp-shell is in the lptools package) | 13:20 |
| ijohnson | Cool, I'll give it a try | 13:20 |
| cjwatson | I wonder if it objects to you not having auto_build_{archive,pocket} set | 13:22 |
| ijohnson | So now I get a 500 server error with an actual OOPS ID | 13:22 |
| ijohnson | OOPS ID: OOPS-db2a7493cde4157b19ac6c18178254c8 | 13:22 |
| ubot5 | https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-db2a7493cde4157b19ac6c18178254c8 | 13:22 |
| cjwatson | IntegrityError: new row for relation "snap" violates check constraint "consistent_auto_build" | 13:23 |
| cjwatson | OK, so that's essentially saying that you need to set both "Source archive for automatic builds" and "Pocket for automatic builds" to something | 13:23 |
| cjwatson | Could you possibly screenshot the +edit UI page for me - the bit that includes those fields? | 13:24 |
| ijohnson | Ah... Okay so now that I do that it lets me update it | 13:24 |
| cjwatson | Ah, too late for the screenshot then :) | 13:24 |
| ijohnson | The default radio button box was empty for "Source archive for automatic builds" | 13:24 |
| ijohnson | So maybe a UI bug | 13:24 |
| ijohnson | The "Pocket for automatic builds" did default to "Updates" | 13:25 |
| cjwatson | OK, so that's an actionable bug report (please file it?) - you should have got a form validation error in this case, and/or there should be a sensible default | 13:27 |
| cjwatson | Even the API shouldn't have OOPSed | 13:27 |
| ijohnson | Sure, thanks for the help! | 13:27 |
| cjwatson | But at least you're out of the woods | 13:27 |
| ijohnson | Indeed. Filed as #1793311 | 13:34 |
| cjwatson | Cheers | 13:35 |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| gQuigs | is there way for private PPA subscribers to see changelogs? (without download the source packages) | 22:22 |
| gQuigs | this https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/253119 kinda indicates to me the only option may be to use the API? but would really prefer any web based way | 22:30 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 253119 in Launchpad itself "PPA packages do not show a changelog in update-manager" [Low,Triaged] | 22:30 |
| nacc | gQuigs: you want the full changelog? | 22:33 |
| nacc | gQuigs: or just the changes in that upload to the ppa? | 22:34 |
| gQuigs | full is likely better.. | 22:45 |
| gQuigs | nacc: sometimes there will be more than one update to the PPA in the timeframe between them wanting to understand changes | 22:46 |
| nacc | gQuigs: ah i see, yeah, the .changes file contents are available, and depending on the -v used to build, you can get the 'new' entries in the web interface from the ppa | 22:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!