| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) | 00:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) | 00:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) | 00:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) | 00:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) | 00:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) | 00:02 | |
| xnox | vorlon, agree, the testsuite's ThreadedEchoServer implementation is no gunicorn... | 00:15 |
|---|---|---|
| vorlon | xnox: sounds like we should badtest this after all, as it's a bug in the tests not in the implementation? | 00:47 |
| xnox | vorlon, the ssl bits are all correct and all working fine. | 00:49 |
| xnox | vorlon, https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1795999 | 00:49 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1795999 in python3.6 (Ubuntu) "python3.6 test_ssl fails reliably on systems under load" [Undecided,New] | 00:49 |
| xnox | vorlon, is the bug. I do want to file upstream bug report | 00:49 |
| xnox | vorlon, but also want to see if this is TLSv1.3 induced.... or not. | 00:49 |
| xnox | vorlon, ie. if setting no-tls1.3 flag makes them all actually work fine.... or not. | 00:50 |
| xnox | $ git push lp:~xnox/autopkgtest-cloud | 00:50 |
| xnox | fatal: remote error: Unexpected Zope exception: TimeoutError: timeout exceeded. | 00:50 |
| xnox | loving it =) | 00:50 |
| xnox | vorlon, also possibly doing this https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/356110 is better than badtesting it. | 00:52 |
| doko | xnox: add python3.8 as well please | 00:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjfx (cosmic-proposed/universe) [8u171-b11-2ubuntu1 => 11+26-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 00:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjfx [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [11+26-1] | 00:55 | |
| xnox | doko, updated | 00:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] | 00:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] | 00:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] | 00:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] | 00:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] | 00:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] | 00:57 | |
| vorlon | so somebody decided to accept git? | 01:10 |
| xnox | wgrant, vorlon - so if I disable tls v1.3 on the echo server..... all tests pass reliably with and without load. | 01:17 |
| wgrant | Ahh, so buggy *new* code. | 01:17 |
| wgrant | The best kind. | 01:18 |
| wgrant | Interesting, though | 01:18 |
| xnox | wgrant, which is abi compatible, cause little did the testcode know it's doing tlsv1.3 now.... | 01:18 |
| wgrant | Is TLS 1.3 slower, or is there a new race in the 1.3 code. | 01:18 |
| wgrant | Indeed | 01:18 |
| xnox | wgrant, it should be faster, with quicker handshake, and lingering connections with fast reconnect..... | 01:18 |
| vorlon | xnox: so that sounds like I shouldn't just merge your autopkgtest-cloud change yet | 01:19 |
| xnox | vorlon, well. i think we are overdue migrating openssl 1.1.1 | 01:19 |
| tsimonq2 | or | 01:20 |
| tsimonq2 | whoops | 01:20 |
| xnox | vorlon, and tls 1.3 shit like this will catch "connectivity" issues like this. | 01:20 |
| tsimonq2 | (irssi alias, /or, grr) | 01:20 |
| vorlon | xnox: ok, because when I asked you if I should badtest it you said you wanted to check if it was tls1.3-induced, and it was, but being tls1.3-induced doesn't change the outcome of whether you want the problem worked around? :) | 01:21 |
| xnox | vorlon, correct. | 01:21 |
| xnox | vorlon, and imho running python on big machines will be nice. the test-suite is parallizable, and takes 2h on single core VMs. | 01:22 |
| xnox | vorlon, if we move it to big_packages, it will test quicker. | 01:22 |
| xnox | vorlon, so independant of this, imho python testsuite is big enough for big_packages | 01:22 |
| xnox | so i'd rather see this both big_packages + badtested | 01:23 |
| vorlon | badtested or skiptested? | 01:23 |
| vorlon | should moving to big_packages be enough to make the test reliable again? | 01:23 |
| xnox | vorlon, i don't know the difference between badtested and skiptested. I have openssl -> python3.6/i386 regression, so "skiptest openssl"? | 01:24 |
| xnox | i believe that yes, moving to big_packages will be enough to make it reliable. | 01:25 |
| vorlon | xnox: skiptest openssl is "let the new openssl through"; badtest python3.6 is "ignore all future test failures of python3.6" | 01:25 |
| xnox | experimenting locally cpushare of 4%+ is good enough | 01:25 |
| vorlon | xnox: anyway I've possibly managed to land the change to big_packages, if you want to retest | 01:25 |
| xnox | vorlon, i need the "let the new openssl through" because python3.6 itself has passed all tests already and is green to go | 01:26 |
| xnox | only openssl itself is blocked at the moment. | 01:26 |
| xnox | (python3.6 is >= 1.1.1 because it was rebuild with new openssl, and uses new apis.... hence it did green, over the weekend when things were quiet, with new ssl) | 01:27 |
| vorlon | xnox: hinted | 01:27 |
| vorlon | afk | 01:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1001.2] | 04:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: varconf (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-5 => 1.0.1-6] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted varconf [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.1-6] | 06:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:20180908-1ubuntu1 => 1:20181004-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:20181004-1ubuntu1] | 06:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:0.5.0-1 => 1:0.5.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, xorg) | 07:15 | |
| tjaalton | please approve -fbdev ^ | 07:42 |
| tjaalton | reverts a commit which broke it when grub gfxpayload=keep is used | 07:43 |
| tjaalton | which is used by default.. | 07:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bluedevil (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 07:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: breeze (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kactivitymanagerd (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeplasma-addons (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kinfocenter (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kscreen (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ksysguard (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kwin (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: breeze-gtk (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kde-cli-tools (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmenuedit (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kwallet-pam (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.4-0ubuntu1.3 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: drkonqi (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kscreenlocker (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: khotkeys (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libkscreen (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.4-0ubuntu1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: milou (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-desktop (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-integration (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-pa (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-vault (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plymouth-kcm (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: powerdevil (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemsettings (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libksysguard (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-discover (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-sdk (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polkit-kde-agent-1 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oxygen (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-workspace (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-nm (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm-kcm (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: user-manager (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-desktop-portal-kde (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.4-0ubuntu2 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-artwork [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.9.7] | 08:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-music [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.1-1] | 08:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hplip [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.18.7+dfsg1-2ubuntu1] | 08:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:0.5.0-1ubuntu1] | 08:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.54.0-1] | 08:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2:13.0.1-0ubuntu1] | 08:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted graphviz [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.40.1-5] | 08:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-gsconnect (cosmic-proposed/universe) [11+wip2018.07.26-0ubuntu2 => 11+wip2018.10.03-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-gsconnect [source] (cosmic-proposed) [11+wip2018.10.03-0ubuntu1] | 08:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: orca (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.29.3-3ubuntu1 => 3.30.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 08:36 | |
| oSoMoN | can someone please approve https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/britney/hints-ubuntu-libreoffice/+merge/356085 to unblock migration of libreoffice? | 08:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected flatpak-builder [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.9-1ubuntu1] | 09:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-138.164] (core, kernel) | 09:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-138.164] | 09:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mailman-hyperkitty (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-8ubuntu1 => 1.1.0-9] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mailman-hyperkitty [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.0-9] | 09:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gimp-help (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.8.2-0.1 => 2.8.2-0.2] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gimp-help [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.8.2-0.2] | 09:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keyrings.alt (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.0-1 => 3.1-1] (core) (sync) | 09:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-161.211] (core, kernel) | 09:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grilo-plugins (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.3.8-1ubuntu1 => 0.3.8-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 10:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1022.23~16.04.1] (kernel) | 10:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-161.211] | 10:07 | |
| jbicha | sil2100: are you an AA? | 10:08 |
| jbicha | if so, LP: #1795077 and LP: #1795094 need AA help | 10:09 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1795077 in brotli (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport brotli 1.0.3 to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1795077 | 10:09 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1795094 in woff2 (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport woff2 to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1795094 | 10:09 |
| sil2100 | jbicha: hey! Yes, let me take a look | 10:12 |
| sil2100 | jbicha: ok, let me review brotli in a moment | 10:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1022.23~16.04.1] | 10:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dune-istl (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.6.0-1build1 => 2.6.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 10:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dune-istl [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.6.0-2] | 10:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-curl (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.2-2build1 => 3.2-2build2] (no packageset) | 11:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-curl [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.2-2build2] | 11:08 | |
| sil2100 | jbicha: ok, might be able to accept brotli soon, just need to do a few more check - good that it has some basic autopkgtests now | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | Just need to jump out for lunch now | 11:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:18.10.9 => 1:18.10.10] (core) | 11:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polari (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.30.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 11:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted polari [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.0-1] | 11:53 | |
| rbalint_ | sil2100, could you please reject update-manager from cosmic? i'm adding one more fix to avoid crash upon upgrade | 12:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:18.10.10] | 13:01 | |
| apw | rbalint_, ^ | 13:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (bionic-proposed/main) [1.19.0.5ubuntu2 => 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.1] (core) | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (xenial-proposed/main) [1.18.4ubuntu1.4 => 1.18.4ubuntu1.5] (core) | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-discover (cosmic-proposed/universe) [5.13.5-1ubuntu3 => 5.13.5-1ubuntu4] (kubuntu) | 13:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-curl (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.2-2build2 => 3.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-discover (cosmic-proposed/universe) [5.13.5-1ubuntu3 => 5.13.5-1ubuntu4] (kubuntu) | 13:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-curl [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.2-2ubuntu1] | 13:05 | |
| acheronuk | plasma-discover uploaded twice. oops. obviously please reject one :) | 13:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak-builder (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.9-1 => 0.10.9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected plasma-discover [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.13.5-1ubuntu4] | 13:13 | |
| ahasenack | hi, can someone fetch the reason for the reject in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/cosmic/+queue?queue_state=4&queue_text=strongswan ? I think it's because it was superseeded by security updates | 13:18 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer, the uploader, is on pto | 13:18 |
| Laney | they're not stored | 13:19 |
| Laney | Sometimes people paste them into a bug - if there are any linked ones (didn't check), maybe look at those | 13:19 |
| ahasenack | not the case here | 13:20 |
| ahasenack | but thanks | 13:20 |
| apw | Laney, that is sru-reject that does that isn't it ? | 13:21 |
| * Laney claims extreme ignorance of tools that start with 'sru' 🙉 | 13:21 | |
| Laney | I think the release team generally just use the queue's controls directly | 13:22 |
| ahasenack | I found the bot message | 13:22 |
| ahasenack | set 28 17:03:54 -queuebot/#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected strongswan [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.6.3-1ubuntu2] | 13:22 |
| ahasenack | but just that | 13:22 |
| acheronuk | only record is in the email sent directly to uploader IIRC? | 13:24 |
| apw | correct the only guarentted record is the uploaded email | 13:24 |
| apw | if it is rejected using sru-reject that goes to the bugs too | 13:25 |
| apw | ahasenack, in this case there was an accept at ubuntu2 followed by a reject at ubuntu2 which implies there were clashing versions in the queue | 13:25 |
| ahasenack | apw: yeah, I think it was the secteam's upload | 13:28 |
| acheronuk | accepted: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/390254692/strongswan_5.6.3-1ubuntu1_5.6.3-1ubuntu2.diff.gz | 13:28 |
| acheronuk | rejected: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/390406930/strongswan_5.6.3-1ubuntu1_5.6.3-1ubuntu2.diff.gz | 13:28 |
| apw | well they would have trumped you :) | 13:28 |
| ahasenack | definitely, and that's fine | 13:28 |
| acheronuk | seems so | 13:28 |
| ahasenack | it got lost due to the uploader's pto | 13:29 |
| ahasenack | (the fact that the upload didn't make it) | 13:29 |
| ahasenack | I'll resubmit | 13:29 |
| ahasenack | thx for checking | 13:29 |
| apw | i wonder if we send that to the uploader, or to the maintainer too | 13:29 |
| apw | oh well | 13:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-aws (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1023.23 => 4.18.0-1001.2] (kernel) (sync) | 13:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-aws (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1023.23 => 4.18.0.1001.1] (kernel) (sync) | 13:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: fwupd-snap (cosmic-proposed/primary) [1.0] | 13:44 | |
| mfo | xnox, hi :) sorry to bother for updates but i have to (customer case) -- do you have any news on the upload for LP 1795658 that we talked about a couple days ago, please? | 13:48 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1795658 in systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) "xenial systemd reports 'inactive' instead of 'failed' for service units that repeatedly failed to restart / failed permanently" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1795658 | 13:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (cosmic-proposed/main) [139 => 140] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:06 | |
| xnox | mfo, i need to prepare an upload with all of these https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/systemd =/ | 14:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caffe (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-8build1 => 1.0.0-8ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grilo-plugins (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.3.8-1ubuntu1 => 0.3.8-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:10 | |
| mfo | xnox, heh, i understand -- man, you're busy! :-) so, i see it's in progress, thanks. do you have any idea about when that might land? may be rough, like this week, next week, etc. | 14:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caffe [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-8ubuntu1] | 14:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nodejs (cosmic-proposed/universe) [8.11.2~dfsg-1ubuntu2 => 8.11.4~dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 14:11 | |
| xnox | mfo, aiming to get it accepted into proposed within a week. | 14:12 |
| mfo | xnox, sounds good. thanks again, and good luck there :-) | 14:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (cosmic-proposed) [140] | 14:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grilo-plugins [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3.8-2ubuntu1] | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keyrings.alt [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [3.1-1] | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-discover [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.13.5-1ubuntu4] | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grilo-plugins [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3.8-2ubuntu1] | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted orca [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.0-1ubuntu1] | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (cosmic-proposed/main) [139 => 140] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:16 | |
| xnox | nodejs is a security update + fixups to use old openssl1.0 binary instead of incompatible openssl 1.1.1 (given the package was reverted to openssl1.0, this completes that work) | 14:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (cosmic-proposed) [140] | 14:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted packagekit [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.9-1ubuntu2.18.04.2] | 14:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted packagekit [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.8.17-4ubuntu6~gcc5.4ubuntu1.4] | 14:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu5 => 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu6] (core) | 14:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.107 => 1.108] (core) | 14:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brotli [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 14:48 | |
| jbicha | thank you | 14:49 |
| handsome_feng | By any chance, could someone help upload ubuntukylin-wallpapers and ubuntukylin-theme? LP: #1791416 LP: #1794709, I file the bug almost 1 mouth ago, These two are very important for us :( | 14:51 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1791416 in ubuntukylin-wallpapers (Ubuntu) "Please upgrade ubuntukylin-wallpapers to 18.10.1" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791416 | 14:51 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1794709 in ubuntukylin-theme (Ubuntu) "Please upgrade ubuntukylin-theme to 1.7.9.2" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1794709 | 14:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:54 | |
| === lool- is now known as lool | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [arm64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [i386] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [armhf] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:02 | |
| oSoMoN | can someone please approve https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/britney/hints-ubuntu-libreoffice/+merge/356085 to unblock migration of libreoffice? | 15:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysvinit (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.88dsf-59.10ubuntu1 => 2.88dsf-59.10ubuntu2] (core) | 15:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (cosmic-proposed/main) [5.6.3-1ubuntu3 => 5.6.3-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server) | 15:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.16.3-1 => 1.16.3-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: whoopsie-preferences (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.19 => 20] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak-builder [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.9-1ubuntu1] | 16:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strace (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.21-1ubuntu1 => 4.21-1ubuntu2] (core) | 16:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squashfs-tools (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:4.3-6ubuntu1 => 1:4.3-6ubuntu2] (core) | 16:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rootskel (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.124ubuntu1 => 1.124ubuntu2] (core) | 16:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reiserfsprogs (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:3.6.27-2 => 1:3.6.27-2ubuntu1] (core) | 16:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-openstackclient (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.16.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.16.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 16:52 | |
| tjaalton | is anyone reviewing the new queue anymore? | 16:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.424 => 1.425] (core) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.40 => 0.40.1] (core) | 17:46 | |
| cyphermox | tjaalton: many people are away today and tomorrow | 17:55 |
| tjaalton | cyphermox: I've tried to ping folks for quite a while now | 18:01 |
| tjaalton | but ok, doubt anyone heard this one, so I'll try again next week :) | 18:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libinput (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.12.0-1 => 1.12.1-1] (desktop-core) (sync) | 18:04 | |
| cyphermox | tjaalton: yeah, well, like I said, most people are away or EOD today at least | 18:04 |
| cyphermox | sil2100: you still around? | 18:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.40~18.04.1 => 0.40.1~18.04.1] (core) | 18:05 | |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: hey! Still a bit, what's up? | 18:09 |
| cyphermox | sil2100: tjaalton and I have stuff in the queue that might benefit review, if you ahve time. | 18:10 |
| sil2100 | tjaalton: I am an AA but I'm not sure if my training wheels have been removed already or not, so most probably I'd need to get a double-check from someone else anyway | 18:11 |
| cyphermox | ah | 18:11 |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: what did you want to have reviewed? | 18:11 |
| tjaalton | sil2100: ah ok | 18:12 |
| cyphermox | netplan.io 0.40.1 in cosmic and bionic | 18:12 |
| sil2100 | Technically I shouldn't have my training wheels anymore, but no one explicitly told me: "hey, you can review stuff on your own now, kthxbye" | 18:12 |
| cyphermox | fixing a small regression there | 18:12 |
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| sil2100 | cyphermox: ok | 18:12 |
| tjaalton | well mine is basically a package split mandated by upstream.. so not "new" in that sense | 18:12 |
| tjaalton | spirv-tools is though | 18:13 |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: I'm looking at the cosmic part now, but please in the meantime SRUify the LP: #1795343 bugy | 18:14 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1795343 in netplan "netplan backported on bionic (0.40~18.04.1) crash when there is an empty YAML configuration file" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1795343 | 18:14 |
| sil2100 | tjaalton: I can try looking at the vulkan packages tomorro | 18:16 |
| sil2100 | w | 18:16 |
| sil2100 | tjaalton: but as said, I'll have to see them to decide if it's safe for me to do it on my own or not | 18:16 |
| tjaalton | sil2100: sure, thanks! | 18:18 |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: btw. why is netplan.io shipping .pyc files anyway? | 18:18 |
| tjaalton | spirv-tools is a dependency of vulkan-validationlayers (it used to be bundled in src:vulkan) | 18:18 |
| tjaalton | bundled but not packaged, only used for building layers | 18:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.40.1] | 18:20 | |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: ok, I'm good with the SRU, the change seems very non-regressionable and the test case is already present in the bug so I'll accept it | 18:23 |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: but for formalities sake, could you clean up the description when you have a moment? | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | Thanks! | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | Ok, now I need to go EOD as I am needed elsewhere | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 18:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.40.1~18.04.1] | 18:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdebian-installer (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.110ubuntu2 => 0.110ubuntu3] (core) | 18:41 | |
| bdmurray | Why does xenial-Contents-amd64.gz have an intro in it? neither bionic nor cosmic do. | 19:13 |
| bdmurray | infinity: ^ | 19:13 |
| infinity | bdmurray: They all used to, and it was changed because some silly tools hated the header. | 19:22 |
| infinity | bdmurray: But we don't regenerate old releases, so there you go. | 19:22 |
| infinity | bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1638219 | 19:23 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1638219 in Launchpad itself "launchpad: remove headers from Contents files" [Low,Fix released] | 19:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hplip (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.18.7+dfsg1-2ubuntu1 => 3.18.7+dfsg1-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 19:28 | |
| bdmurray | infinity: got it, thanks! | 19:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parted (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.2-21 => 3.2-21ubuntu1] (core) | 19:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.40.1 => 0.40.2] (core) | 20:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-parsel (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.5.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-etcd (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.4.3-2 => 0.4.3-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-etcd [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [0.4.3-3] | 20:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-parsel [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.5.0-2] | 20:36 | |
| xnox | infinity, awwww nice that it was finally removed! | 21:13 |
| * xnox remembers having to parse "debian" and "ubuntu" contents and it was annoying that they are different | 21:14 | |
| xnox | infinity, also, could you please review https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/cosmic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=nodejs ? it would be nice to get that one in, such that tls1.3 capable curl can migrate. | 21:16 |
| infinity | xnox: Given that's a dfsg repack, is that the same orig that Debian will be using, or will we have a bit of a fakesync issue until the next upstream? | 21:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: awscli (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.15.79-1 => 1.16.26-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) | 21:23 | |
| infinity | xnox: Other than that minor concern, it looks somewhat sensible. | 21:24 |
| xnox | infinity, 8.12 is out, the 8.11.4 is "pointrelease-1" so i expect next release to have new upstream release instantly. | 21:25 |
| xnox | both still part of the 8.x LTS "track" | 21:25 |
| xnox | so i expect to fakesync bussiness in DD-series | 21:25 |
| xnox | so i expect _no_ fakesync bussiness in DD-series | 21:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strongswan [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.6.3-1ubuntu4] | 21:26 | |
| infinity | xnox: Mmkay. And if you're wrong, I assume you're happy (for some value of "happy") to deal with the merges until the 8.12 is a thing? | 21:26 |
| infinity | s/until the/until/ | 21:26 |
| xnox | yeah | 21:26 |
| xnox | we/i will have to merge, cause our openssl1.0 is different from debian's too | 21:27 |
| xnox | and we are keeping 8.x on LTS | 21:27 |
| infinity | xnox: Right, there's clearly merging to do either way, was just pointing out that merging is sometimes a bit more of a pain when the origes don't match. | 21:27 |
| xnox | i was going to proposed backporting this upload as a security upload into bionic too | 21:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nodejs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [8.11.4~dfsg-0ubuntu1] | 21:27 | |
| xnox | infinity, yeah, i don't have a good solution on how to do dfsg's right | 21:27 |
| xnox | it would be nice that the automatic repack thing is reproducible. | 21:28 |
| infinity | xnox: We do it in glibc. Took some effort, but our orig is 100% reproducible now, which is nice. | 21:28 |
| xnox | it would be nice _if_ the automatic repack thing was reproducible. | 21:28 |
| infinity | xnox: Means it doesn't matter who does the first upload in which distro, as long as we build the orig with the makefile goop we wrote to do it. | 21:28 |
| xnox | infinity, i wonder if i should use .bz2 compression, such that when debian uploads .gz it is syncable ;-) | 21:30 |
| infinity | seb128: Randomly deleting binaries on arches isn't sane (cf: random gnome binary deletions on s390x) | 21:32 |
| xnox | hahahahhahahah | 21:32 |
| xnox | infinity, we are following debian really ;-) | 21:33 |
| infinity | xnox: Uhh, no we aren't. | 21:33 |
| infinity | xnox: gdm3 builds on s390x in both Debian and Ubuntu, and is published on s390x in Debian, and was deleted in Ubuntu. It'll come right back in the next upload. | 21:34 |
| xnox | infinity, apparently RISC is the future, where RISC is https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mozjs60 | 21:34 |
| jbicha | Debian is like the older brother that talked us into doing it first | 21:34 |
| xnox | infinity, please comment on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909536 then =) | 21:35 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 909536 in src:mozjs60 "mozjs60: FTBFS on s390x: around 80% of tests crash" [Serious,Open] | 21:35 |
| infinity | xnox: I'm also failing to see how that's relevant, if these removed packages don't depend on that library... | 21:35 |
| xnox | infinity, but that's the one that will provide gnome-shell's js going forward. and gdm3 is the same js frontend.... | 21:36 |
| infinity | xnox: That's not an argument for removing working binaries today. :P | 21:36 |
| jbicha | infinity: I guess we can have gdm3 build-depend on either gjs or gnome-shell? | 21:36 |
| jbicha | it's not working because gdm3 depends on gnome-shell which isn't satisfiable | 21:36 |
| xnox | infinity, well, they are trying to land it all coherently. | 21:36 |
| xnox | somehow, and that was one way to shove it in | 21:37 |
| infinity | jbicha: Uhh, gnome-shell was removed the same way. | 21:37 |
| infinity | jbicha: "We removed a working binary, so now others don't work" isn't much of an argument. | 21:37 |
| jbicha | gnome-shell actually does build-depend on libgjs-dev which isn't available on s390x because mozjs60 isn't available there | 21:37 |
| xnox | infinity, they are removing binaries that have become FTBFS - despite currently existing =) | 21:37 |
| jbicha | we switched gjs from mozjs52 to mozjs60 today | 21:38 |
| jbicha | LP: #1794721 | 21:38 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1794721 in gjs (Ubuntu) "Remove gjs from s390x" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1794721 | 21:38 |
| infinity | jbicha: Okay, so it the plan to rebuild everything against the new one? | 21:38 |
| infinity | jbicha: Cause that's not the current state of the world, afaict. | 21:38 |
| xnox | the plan is to ship mozjs60 alone, yes. | 21:39 |
| xnox | (as far as i understood / followed #ubuntu-desktop chatter) | 21:39 |
| infinity | Or, wait. So confused. | 21:39 |
| infinity | Yeah, gnome-shell depends on the new one here. But it's the same version as was removed on s390x. | 21:39 |
| infinity | So, how did it build on s390x? | 21:39 |
| infinity | Ignored tests? | 21:39 |
| jbicha | yes | 21:40 |
| xnox | infinity, yes, it used to ignore tests and fail shortly after exec but before anything could be initialized. | 21:40 |
| xnox | infinity, it was a pile of garbage in ELF format | 21:40 |
| jbicha | the first build of mozjs60 ignored the build tests but we stopped ignoring them for s390x since we assume it's badly broken there (compared to mozjs52) | 21:40 |
| infinity | Okay, that makes a bit more sense. | 21:40 |
| xnox | mozjs52 managed a bit of ECMA ECMA scripty scripty | 21:41 |
| infinity | I'll still reiterate that removing binaries that would pop right back up with a copy is poor form. | 21:41 |
| jbicha | you want no-change rebuilds for all of those? | 21:41 |
| xnox | it could have been done better, yes, by using e.g. force-migrate and the like | 21:41 |
| xnox | or adding a virtual s390x provides package to britney to smooth the migration | 21:42 |
| jbicha | sorry we only do this like once per year and forget 😿 | 21:42 |
| infinity | xnox: Ew, what? | 21:42 |
| infinity | xnox: Those are all horrible options. | 21:42 |
| xnox | infinity, you know what i like ;-) | 21:42 |
| infinity | xnox: THe correct way is to upload packages that don't build on s390x. | 21:42 |
| xnox | infinity, but you say to keep packages FTBFS on ports arches! =) | 21:42 |
| xnox | infinity, they did what you last said to do ;-) | 21:43 |
| infinity | (either because of build-deps, build failures, or arch restriction) | 21:43 |
| xnox | fair | 21:43 |
| * xnox is trolling | 21:43 | |
| infinity | xnox: I don't mean use arch restriction (that's the last hammer available in a long line), I mean that removing a built package without a new upload where it fails is asking for trouble. | 21:43 |
| jbicha | infinity: you want no-change rebuilds now, right? | 21:43 |
| xnox | jbicha, they would not be no-change rebuilds. | 21:44 |
| xnox | jbicha, no change rebuild would pop binary in NEW again | 21:44 |
| infinity | Wouldn't they be? | 21:44 |
| infinity | Now if they build-dep on libgjs-dev.. | 21:44 |
| infinity | s/Now/Not/ | 21:44 |
| xnox | jbicha, he wants an upload of mozjs60 that does /not/ ignore test results, such that s390x arch is FTBFS | 21:44 |
| xnox | jbicha, has that been done already? | 21:44 |
| infinity | Or whatever. | 21:44 |
| infinity | xnox: THat's already happened. | 21:45 |
| xnox | ah, good! | 21:45 |
| infinity | xnox: I'm talking about all the GNOME stuff that was just removed, not mozjs. | 21:45 |
| infinity | And all that gnome stuff should be dep-wait or FTBFS, not built-but-mysteriously-missing. | 21:45 |
| infinity | Unfortunately, I don't know how much "GNOME stuff" that entails. | 21:46 |
| infinity | Based on the ubuntu-meta that just got uploaded, I assume gdm3, gnome-shell, and gnome-session, but maybe there were more. | 21:46 |
| infinity | xnox: So, on the other hand, "80% of the tests fail with a segv in garbage collection on shutdown" sort of implies this is a single bug in mozjs that it wouldn't actually be hard to find and fix. | 21:47 |
| infinity | xnox: I wonder why no one bothered to do that. | 21:47 |
| xnox | infinity, we asked firefox upstream -> not interested; asked IBM multiple times -> not interested; chris -> was not interested either; and desktop team now maintains firefox -> i somehow suspect they are not interested either | 21:48 |
| xnox | infinity, it was known that the day will come when we will need to move off 52 | 21:49 |
| xnox | infinity, even if we fix it this one time; it is pain without upstream/ibm/somebody caring going forward, as it tends to regress often. | 21:49 |
| xnox | we had xenial-release or some such manage to even build firefox; but the subsequent security sru already regressed. | 21:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-characters (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.29.91-1 => 3.29.91-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntugnome) | 21:51 | |
| infinity | xnox: "asked upstream -> not interested"? The bug seems to disagree. | 21:51 |
| infinity | You know, the one that's had back and forth acitivity for the last month. | 21:52 |
| xnox | infinity, my asks were from before this round of asks. | 21:52 |
| infinity | I think it's more "upstream doesn't have s390x, so they're playing back and forth with someone who is testing patches". | 21:52 |
| xnox | infinity, i'm talking about myself of the engagement i've tried to drum up around this in 2017.... | 21:52 |
| xnox | infinity, i believe we have offered them a community z/vm for ci | 21:53 |
| xnox | from maryst | 21:53 |
| infinity | xnox: Anyhow, there's clearly an upstream person working on it. Helping that upstream person might have been nice. Not going to go on about it, though. | 21:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-documents (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.30.0-1 => 3.30.0-1build1] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome) | 21:54 | |
| infinity | My complaint was with the poorly-handled removals. | 21:54 |
| infinity | (But I indeed also have a long-standing issue with "it doesn't work on something other than my laptop, drop !laptop from architecture line") | 21:55 |
| infinity | s390x is just the current Belle of that ball. | 21:55 |
| xnox | infinity, i dislike publishing arch:all packages in s390x Packages file that are known to be uninstallable | 21:56 |
| xnox | imho arch:all publication should be smarter than that. | 21:56 |
| infinity | xnox: Okay, and that's relevant to the removal of these s390x packages, how? :P | 21:56 |
| infinity | xnox: I don't disagree, that misfeature annoys me, but also, it has nothing to do with the topic of gdm3, gnome-session, and gnome-shell, all of which are arch-dep. | 21:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-maps (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.30.1-1 => 3.30.1-1build1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntugnome) | 21:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-sushi (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.30.0-1 => 3.30.0-1build1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntugnome) | 21:57 | |
| infinity | And another WAT. | 21:59 |
| infinity | Package: libgjs0g | 21:59 |
| infinity | Provides: libgjs0-libmozjs-52-0 | 21:59 |
| infinity | Depends: libmozjs-60-0 | 21:59 |
| infinity | Uh huh. | 21:59 |
| * xnox slowly backs away to hack on systemd | 22:00 | |
| infinity | jbicha: ^-- lol? | 22:00 |
| infinity | jbicha: Should that have been libgjs0h? | 22:00 |
| infinity | jbicha: And a new Provides? | 22:00 |
| infinity | jbicha: Then these rebuilds would be an actual sane transition. :P | 22:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (cosmic-proposed/main) [239-7ubuntu9 => 239-7ubuntu10] (core) | 22:01 | |
| jbicha | I think it's ok for it to still be libgjs0g, we didn't actually need rebuilds for gjs apps to keep working | 22:03 |
| jbicha | the provides field obviously needs updated though | 22:03 |
| infinity | jbicha: Yeah, I just pasted the same to Simon. | 22:03 |
| infinity | Ahh, and indeed, Simon mentioned in the new upstream bug log that the ABI didn't break. | 22:04 |
| jbicha | I'm uploading the provides fix to experimental now | 22:04 |
| infinity | But yes, the provides seems silly. | 22:04 |
| * infinity shrugs. | 22:04 | |
| jbicha | apt-cache showpkg libgjs0-libmozjs-52-0 shows only gnome-shell & gnome-sushi will be affected by that | 22:07 |
| jbicha | I'll wait to hear back from smcv to make sure | 22:09 |
| jbicha | you can reject gnome-sushi since we're not ready for that rebuild yet | 22:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:18.10.9 => 1:18.10.10] (core) | 23:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.5 => 1:18.04.11.6] (core) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-themes (cosmic-proposed/main) [16.10+18.04.20180421.1-0ubuntu1 => 16.10+18.10.20181004.1-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync) | 23:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-themes (bionic-proposed/main) [16.10+18.04.20180421.1-0ubuntu1 => 16.10+18.04.20181004-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ostree (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.8-2~salsa1 => 2018.8-2] (ubuntugnome) (sync) | 23:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ostree [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.8-2] | 23:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (cosmic-proposed/universe) [178-1 => 179-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [179-1] | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1 => 1.0.3-1] (ubuntugnome) (sync) | 23:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.3-1] | 23:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak-builder (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1 => 1.0.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 23:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak-builder [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.1-1] | 23:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eris (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.3.23-6ubuntu1 => 1.3.23-7] (no packageset) (sync) | 23:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eris [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.3.23-7] | 23:42 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!