[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) [00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) [00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) [00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) [00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) [00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xxhash [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset) [00:15] vorlon, agree, the testsuite's ThreadedEchoServer implementation is no gunicorn... [00:47] xnox: sounds like we should badtest this after all, as it's a bug in the tests not in the implementation? [00:49] vorlon, the ssl bits are all correct and all working fine. [00:49] vorlon, https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1795999 [00:49] Ubuntu bug 1795999 in python3.6 (Ubuntu) "python3.6 test_ssl fails reliably on systems under load" [Undecided,New] [00:49] vorlon, is the bug. I do want to file upstream bug report [00:49] vorlon, but also want to see if this is TLSv1.3 induced.... or not. [00:50] vorlon, ie. if setting no-tls1.3 flag makes them all actually work fine.... or not. [00:50] $ git push lp:~xnox/autopkgtest-cloud [00:50] fatal: remote error: Unexpected Zope exception: TimeoutError: timeout exceeded. [00:50] loving it =) [00:52] vorlon, also possibly doing this https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/356110 is better than badtesting it. [00:54] xnox: add python3.8 as well please [00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjfx (cosmic-proposed/universe) [8u171-b11-2ubuntu1 => 11+26-1] (no packageset) (sync) [00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjfx [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [11+26-1] [00:56] doko, updated [00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] [00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] [00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] [00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] [00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] [00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xxhash [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.6.5-1] [01:10] so somebody decided to accept git? [01:17] wgrant, vorlon - so if I disable tls v1.3 on the echo server..... all tests pass reliably with and without load. [01:17] Ahh, so buggy *new* code. [01:18] The best kind. [01:18] Interesting, though [01:18] wgrant, which is abi compatible, cause little did the testcode know it's doing tlsv1.3 now.... [01:18] Is TLS 1.3 slower, or is there a new race in the 1.3 code. [01:18] Indeed [01:18] wgrant, it should be faster, with quicker handshake, and lingering connections with fast reconnect..... [01:19] xnox: so that sounds like I shouldn't just merge your autopkgtest-cloud change yet [01:19] vorlon, well. i think we are overdue migrating openssl 1.1.1 [01:20] or [01:20] whoops [01:20] vorlon, and tls 1.3 shit like this will catch "connectivity" issues like this. [01:20] (irssi alias, /or, grr) [01:21] xnox: ok, because when I asked you if I should badtest it you said you wanted to check if it was tls1.3-induced, and it was, but being tls1.3-induced doesn't change the outcome of whether you want the problem worked around? :) [01:21] vorlon, correct. [01:22] vorlon, and imho running python on big machines will be nice. the test-suite is parallizable, and takes 2h on single core VMs. [01:22] vorlon, if we move it to big_packages, it will test quicker. [01:22] vorlon, so independant of this, imho python testsuite is big enough for big_packages [01:23] so i'd rather see this both big_packages + badtested [01:23] badtested or skiptested? [01:23] should moving to big_packages be enough to make the test reliable again? [01:24] vorlon, i don't know the difference between badtested and skiptested. I have openssl -> python3.6/i386 regression, so "skiptest openssl"? [01:25] i believe that yes, moving to big_packages will be enough to make it reliable. [01:25] xnox: skiptest openssl is "let the new openssl through"; badtest python3.6 is "ignore all future test failures of python3.6" [01:25] experimenting locally cpushare of 4%+ is good enough [01:25] xnox: anyway I've possibly managed to land the change to big_packages, if you want to retest [01:26] vorlon, i need the "let the new openssl through" because python3.6 itself has passed all tests already and is green to go [01:26] only openssl itself is blocked at the moment. [01:27] (python3.6 is >= 1.1.1 because it was rebuild with new openssl, and uses new apis.... hence it did green, over the weekend when things were quiet, with new ssl) [01:27] xnox: hinted [01:27] afk [04:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1001.2] [06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: varconf (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-5 => 1.0.1-6] (no packageset) (sync) [06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted varconf [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.1-6] [06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:20180908-1ubuntu1 => 1:20181004-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:20181004-1ubuntu1] [07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:0.5.0-1 => 1:0.5.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, xorg) [07:42] please approve -fbdev ^ [07:43] reverts a commit which broke it when grub gfxpayload=keep is used [07:44] which is used by default.. [07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bluedevil (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: breeze (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kactivitymanagerd (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeplasma-addons (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kinfocenter (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kscreen (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ksysguard (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kwin (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: breeze-gtk (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kde-cli-tools (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmenuedit (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kwallet-pam (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.4-0ubuntu1.3 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: drkonqi (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kscreenlocker (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: khotkeys (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libkscreen (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.4-0ubuntu1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: milou (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-desktop (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-integration (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-pa (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-vault (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plymouth-kcm (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: powerdevil (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemsettings (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libksysguard (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-discover (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-sdk (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polkit-kde-agent-1 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oxygen (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-workspace (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-nm (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm-kcm (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: user-manager (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.6-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-desktop-portal-kde (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.4-0ubuntu2 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-artwork [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.9.7] [08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-music [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.1-1] [08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hplip [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.18.7+dfsg1-2ubuntu1] [08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:0.5.0-1ubuntu1] [08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.54.0-1] [08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2:13.0.1-0ubuntu1] [08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted graphviz [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.40.1-5] [08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-gsconnect (cosmic-proposed/universe) [11+wip2018.07.26-0ubuntu2 => 11+wip2018.10.03-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-gsconnect [source] (cosmic-proposed) [11+wip2018.10.03-0ubuntu1] [08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: orca (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.29.3-3ubuntu1 => 3.30.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [08:37] can someone please approve https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/britney/hints-ubuntu-libreoffice/+merge/356085 to unblock migration of libreoffice? [09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected flatpak-builder [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.9-1ubuntu1] [09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-138.164] (core, kernel) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-138.164] [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mailman-hyperkitty (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-8ubuntu1 => 1.1.0-9] (no packageset) (sync) [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mailman-hyperkitty [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.0-9] [09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gimp-help (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.8.2-0.1 => 2.8.2-0.2] (no packageset) (sync) [09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gimp-help [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.8.2-0.2] [09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keyrings.alt (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.0-1 => 3.1-1] (core) (sync) [09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-161.211] (core, kernel) [10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grilo-plugins (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.3.8-1ubuntu1 => 0.3.8-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1022.23~16.04.1] (kernel) [10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-161.211] [10:08] sil2100: are you an AA? [10:09] if so, LP: #1795077 and LP: #1795094 need AA help [10:09] Launchpad bug 1795077 in brotli (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport brotli 1.0.3 to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1795077 [10:09] Launchpad bug 1795094 in woff2 (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport woff2 to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1795094 [10:12] jbicha: hey! Yes, let me take a look [10:13] jbicha: ok, let me review brotli in a moment [10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1022.23~16.04.1] [10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dune-istl (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.6.0-1build1 => 2.6.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dune-istl [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.6.0-2] [11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-curl (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.2-2build1 => 3.2-2build2] (no packageset) [11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-curl [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.2-2build2] [11:28] jbicha: ok, might be able to accept brotli soon, just need to do a few more check - good that it has some basic autopkgtests now [11:30] Just need to jump out for lunch now [11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:18.10.9 => 1:18.10.10] (core) [11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polari (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.30.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) [11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted polari [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.0-1] [12:55] sil2100, could you please reject update-manager from cosmic? i'm adding one more fix to avoid crash upon upgrade [13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:18.10.10] [13:01] rbalint_, ^ [13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (bionic-proposed/main) [1.19.0.5ubuntu2 => 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.1] (core) [13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (xenial-proposed/main) [1.18.4ubuntu1.4 => 1.18.4ubuntu1.5] (core) [13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-discover (cosmic-proposed/universe) [5.13.5-1ubuntu3 => 5.13.5-1ubuntu4] (kubuntu) [13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-curl (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.2-2build2 => 3.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-discover (cosmic-proposed/universe) [5.13.5-1ubuntu3 => 5.13.5-1ubuntu4] (kubuntu) [13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-curl [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.2-2ubuntu1] [13:07] plasma-discover uploaded twice. oops. obviously please reject one :) [13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak-builder (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.9-1 => 0.10.9-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected plasma-discover [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.13.5-1ubuntu4] [13:18] hi, can someone fetch the reason for the reject in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/cosmic/+queue?queue_state=4&queue_text=strongswan ? I think it's because it was superseeded by security updates [13:18] cpaelzer, the uploader, is on pto [13:19] they're not stored [13:19] Sometimes people paste them into a bug - if there are any linked ones (didn't check), maybe look at those [13:20] not the case here [13:20] but thanks [13:21] Laney, that is sru-reject that does that isn't it ? [13:21] * Laney claims extreme ignorance of tools that start with 'sru' 🙉 [13:22] I think the release team generally just use the queue's controls directly [13:22] I found the bot message [13:22] set 28 17:03:54 -queuebot/#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected strongswan [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.6.3-1ubuntu2] [13:22] but just that [13:24] only record is in the email sent directly to uploader IIRC? [13:24] correct the only guarentted record is the uploaded email [13:25] if it is rejected using sru-reject that goes to the bugs too [13:25] ahasenack, in this case there was an accept at ubuntu2 followed by a reject at ubuntu2 which implies there were clashing versions in the queue [13:28] apw: yeah, I think it was the secteam's upload [13:28] accepted: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/390254692/strongswan_5.6.3-1ubuntu1_5.6.3-1ubuntu2.diff.gz [13:28] rejected: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/390406930/strongswan_5.6.3-1ubuntu1_5.6.3-1ubuntu2.diff.gz [13:28] well they would have trumped you :) [13:28] definitely, and that's fine [13:28] seems so [13:29] it got lost due to the uploader's pto [13:29] (the fact that the upload didn't make it) [13:29] I'll resubmit [13:29] thx for checking [13:29] i wonder if we send that to the uploader, or to the maintainer too [13:29] oh well [13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-aws (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1023.23 => 4.18.0-1001.2] (kernel) (sync) [13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-aws (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1023.23 => 4.18.0.1001.1] (kernel) (sync) [13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: fwupd-snap (cosmic-proposed/primary) [1.0] [13:48] xnox, hi :) sorry to bother for updates but i have to (customer case) -- do you have any news on the upload for LP 1795658 that we talked about a couple days ago, please? [13:48] Launchpad bug 1795658 in systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) "xenial systemd reports 'inactive' instead of 'failed' for service units that repeatedly failed to restart / failed permanently" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1795658 [14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (cosmic-proposed/main) [139 => 140] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [14:09] mfo, i need to prepare an upload with all of these https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/systemd =/ [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caffe (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-8build1 => 1.0.0-8ubuntu1] (no packageset) [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grilo-plugins (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.3.8-1ubuntu1 => 0.3.8-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:11] xnox, heh, i understand -- man, you're busy! :-) so, i see it's in progress, thanks. do you have any idea about when that might land? may be rough, like this week, next week, etc. [14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caffe [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-8ubuntu1] [14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nodejs (cosmic-proposed/universe) [8.11.2~dfsg-1ubuntu2 => 8.11.4~dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [14:12] mfo, aiming to get it accepted into proposed within a week. [14:13] xnox, sounds good. thanks again, and good luck there :-) [14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (cosmic-proposed) [140] [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grilo-plugins [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3.8-2ubuntu1] [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keyrings.alt [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [3.1-1] [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-discover [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.13.5-1ubuntu4] [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grilo-plugins [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3.8-2ubuntu1] [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted orca [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.0-1ubuntu1] [14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (cosmic-proposed/main) [139 => 140] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [14:17] nodejs is a security update + fixups to use old openssl1.0 binary instead of incompatible openssl 1.1.1 (given the package was reverted to openssl1.0, this completes that work) [14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (cosmic-proposed) [140] [14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted packagekit [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.9-1ubuntu2.18.04.2] [14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted packagekit [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.8.17-4ubuntu6~gcc5.4ubuntu1.4] [14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu5 => 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu6] (core) [14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.107 => 1.108] (core) [14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brotli [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [14:49] thank you [14:51] By any chance, could someone help upload ubuntukylin-wallpapers and ubuntukylin-theme? LP: #1791416 LP: #1794709, I file the bug almost 1 mouth ago, These two are very important for us :( [14:51] Launchpad bug 1791416 in ubuntukylin-wallpapers (Ubuntu) "Please upgrade ubuntukylin-wallpapers to 18.10.1" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791416 [14:51] Launchpad bug 1794709 in ubuntukylin-theme (Ubuntu) "Please upgrade ubuntukylin-theme to 1.7.9.2" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1794709 [14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) [14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) [14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) === lool- is now known as lool [14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [arm64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) [15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [i386] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) [15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [armhf] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) [15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: brotli [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) [15:36] can someone please approve https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/britney/hints-ubuntu-libreoffice/+merge/356085 to unblock migration of libreoffice? [15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysvinit (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.88dsf-59.10ubuntu1 => 2.88dsf-59.10ubuntu2] (core) [15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (cosmic-proposed/main) [5.6.3-1ubuntu3 => 5.6.3-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server) [16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.16.3-1 => 1.16.3-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: whoopsie-preferences (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.19 => 20] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak-builder [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.9-1ubuntu1] [16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strace (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.21-1ubuntu1 => 4.21-1ubuntu2] (core) [16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squashfs-tools (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:4.3-6ubuntu1 => 1:4.3-6ubuntu2] (core) [16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rootskel (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.124ubuntu1 => 1.124ubuntu2] (core) [16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reiserfsprogs (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:3.6.27-2 => 1:3.6.27-2ubuntu1] (core) [16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-openstackclient (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.16.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.16.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [16:59] is anyone reviewing the new queue anymore? [17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.424 => 1.425] (core) [17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.40 => 0.40.1] (core) [17:55] tjaalton: many people are away today and tomorrow [18:01] cyphermox: I've tried to ping folks for quite a while now [18:02] but ok, doubt anyone heard this one, so I'll try again next week :) [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libinput (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.12.0-1 => 1.12.1-1] (desktop-core) (sync) [18:04] tjaalton: yeah, well, like I said, most people are away or EOD today at least [18:04] sil2100: you still around? [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.40~18.04.1 => 0.40.1~18.04.1] (core) [18:09] cyphermox: hey! Still a bit, what's up? [18:10] sil2100: tjaalton and I have stuff in the queue that might benefit review, if you ahve time. [18:11] tjaalton: I am an AA but I'm not sure if my training wheels have been removed already or not, so most probably I'd need to get a double-check from someone else anyway [18:11] ah [18:11] cyphermox: what did you want to have reviewed? [18:12] sil2100: ah ok [18:12] netplan.io 0.40.1 in cosmic and bionic [18:12] Technically I shouldn't have my training wheels anymore, but no one explicitly told me: "hey, you can review stuff on your own now, kthxbye" [18:12] fixing a small regression there === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [18:12] cyphermox: ok [18:12] well mine is basically a package split mandated by upstream.. so not "new" in that sense [18:13] spirv-tools is though [18:14] cyphermox: I'm looking at the cosmic part now, but please in the meantime SRUify the LP: #1795343 bugy [18:14] Launchpad bug 1795343 in netplan "netplan backported on bionic (0.40~18.04.1) crash when there is an empty YAML configuration file" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1795343 [18:16] tjaalton: I can try looking at the vulkan packages tomorro [18:16] w [18:16] tjaalton: but as said, I'll have to see them to decide if it's safe for me to do it on my own or not [18:18] sil2100: sure, thanks! [18:18] cyphermox: btw. why is netplan.io shipping .pyc files anyway? [18:18] spirv-tools is a dependency of vulkan-validationlayers (it used to be bundled in src:vulkan) [18:19] bundled but not packaged, only used for building layers [18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.40.1] [18:23] cyphermox: ok, I'm good with the SRU, the change seems very non-regressionable and the test case is already present in the bug so I'll accept it [18:24] cyphermox: but for formalities sake, could you clean up the description when you have a moment? [18:24] Thanks! [18:24] Ok, now I need to go EOD as I am needed elsewhere [18:24] o/ [18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.40.1~18.04.1] [18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdebian-installer (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.110ubuntu2 => 0.110ubuntu3] (core) [19:13] Why does xenial-Contents-amd64.gz have an intro in it? neither bionic nor cosmic do. [19:13] infinity: ^ [19:22] bdmurray: They all used to, and it was changed because some silly tools hated the header. [19:22] bdmurray: But we don't regenerate old releases, so there you go. [19:23] bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1638219 [19:23] Ubuntu bug 1638219 in Launchpad itself "launchpad: remove headers from Contents files" [Low,Fix released] [19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hplip (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.18.7+dfsg1-2ubuntu1 => 3.18.7+dfsg1-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [19:36] infinity: got it, thanks! [19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parted (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.2-21 => 3.2-21ubuntu1] (core) [20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.40.1 => 0.40.2] (core) [20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-parsel (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.5.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-etcd (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.4.3-2 => 0.4.3-3] (no packageset) (sync) [20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-etcd [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [0.4.3-3] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-parsel [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.5.0-2] [21:13] infinity, awwww nice that it was finally removed! [21:14] * xnox remembers having to parse "debian" and "ubuntu" contents and it was annoying that they are different [21:16] infinity, also, could you please review https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/cosmic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=nodejs ? it would be nice to get that one in, such that tls1.3 capable curl can migrate. [21:22] xnox: Given that's a dfsg repack, is that the same orig that Debian will be using, or will we have a bit of a fakesync issue until the next upstream? [21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: awscli (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.15.79-1 => 1.16.26-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) [21:24] xnox: Other than that minor concern, it looks somewhat sensible. [21:25] infinity, 8.12 is out, the 8.11.4 is "pointrelease-1" so i expect next release to have new upstream release instantly. [21:25] both still part of the 8.x LTS "track" [21:25] so i expect to fakesync bussiness in DD-series [21:25] so i expect _no_ fakesync bussiness in DD-series [21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strongswan [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.6.3-1ubuntu4] [21:26] xnox: Mmkay. And if you're wrong, I assume you're happy (for some value of "happy") to deal with the merges until the 8.12 is a thing? [21:26] s/until the/until/ [21:26] yeah [21:27] we/i will have to merge, cause our openssl1.0 is different from debian's too [21:27] and we are keeping 8.x on LTS [21:27] xnox: Right, there's clearly merging to do either way, was just pointing out that merging is sometimes a bit more of a pain when the origes don't match. [21:27] i was going to proposed backporting this upload as a security upload into bionic too [21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nodejs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [8.11.4~dfsg-0ubuntu1] [21:27] infinity, yeah, i don't have a good solution on how to do dfsg's right [21:28] it would be nice that the automatic repack thing is reproducible. [21:28] xnox: We do it in glibc. Took some effort, but our orig is 100% reproducible now, which is nice. [21:28] it would be nice _if_ the automatic repack thing was reproducible. [21:28] xnox: Means it doesn't matter who does the first upload in which distro, as long as we build the orig with the makefile goop we wrote to do it. [21:30] infinity, i wonder if i should use .bz2 compression, such that when debian uploads .gz it is syncable ;-) [21:32] seb128: Randomly deleting binaries on arches isn't sane (cf: random gnome binary deletions on s390x) [21:32] hahahahhahahah [21:33] infinity, we are following debian really ;-) [21:33] xnox: Uhh, no we aren't. [21:34] xnox: gdm3 builds on s390x in both Debian and Ubuntu, and is published on s390x in Debian, and was deleted in Ubuntu. It'll come right back in the next upload. [21:34] infinity, apparently RISC is the future, where RISC is https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mozjs60 [21:34] Debian is like the older brother that talked us into doing it first [21:35] infinity, please comment on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909536 then =) [21:35] Debian bug 909536 in src:mozjs60 "mozjs60: FTBFS on s390x: around 80% of tests crash" [Serious,Open] [21:35] xnox: I'm also failing to see how that's relevant, if these removed packages don't depend on that library... [21:36] infinity, but that's the one that will provide gnome-shell's js going forward. and gdm3 is the same js frontend.... [21:36] xnox: That's not an argument for removing working binaries today. :P [21:36] infinity: I guess we can have gdm3 build-depend on either gjs or gnome-shell? [21:36] it's not working because gdm3 depends on gnome-shell which isn't satisfiable [21:36] infinity, well, they are trying to land it all coherently. [21:37] somehow, and that was one way to shove it in [21:37] jbicha: Uhh, gnome-shell was removed the same way. [21:37] jbicha: "We removed a working binary, so now others don't work" isn't much of an argument. [21:37] gnome-shell actually does build-depend on libgjs-dev which isn't available on s390x because mozjs60 isn't available there [21:37] infinity, they are removing binaries that have become FTBFS - despite currently existing =) [21:38] we switched gjs from mozjs52 to mozjs60 today [21:38] LP: #1794721 [21:38] Launchpad bug 1794721 in gjs (Ubuntu) "Remove gjs from s390x" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1794721 [21:38] jbicha: Okay, so it the plan to rebuild everything against the new one? [21:38] jbicha: Cause that's not the current state of the world, afaict. [21:39] the plan is to ship mozjs60 alone, yes. [21:39] (as far as i understood / followed #ubuntu-desktop chatter) [21:39] Or, wait. So confused. [21:39] Yeah, gnome-shell depends on the new one here. But it's the same version as was removed on s390x. [21:39] So, how did it build on s390x? [21:39] Ignored tests? [21:40] yes [21:40] infinity, yes, it used to ignore tests and fail shortly after exec but before anything could be initialized. [21:40] infinity, it was a pile of garbage in ELF format [21:40] the first build of mozjs60 ignored the build tests but we stopped ignoring them for s390x since we assume it's badly broken there (compared to mozjs52) [21:40] Okay, that makes a bit more sense. [21:41] mozjs52 managed a bit of ECMA ECMA scripty scripty [21:41] I'll still reiterate that removing binaries that would pop right back up with a copy is poor form. [21:41] you want no-change rebuilds for all of those? [21:41] it could have been done better, yes, by using e.g. force-migrate and the like [21:42] or adding a virtual s390x provides package to britney to smooth the migration [21:42] sorry we only do this like once per year and forget 😿 [21:42] xnox: Ew, what? [21:42] xnox: Those are all horrible options. [21:42] infinity, you know what i like ;-) [21:42] xnox: THe correct way is to upload packages that don't build on s390x. [21:42] infinity, but you say to keep packages FTBFS on ports arches! =) [21:43] infinity, they did what you last said to do ;-) [21:43] (either because of build-deps, build failures, or arch restriction) [21:43] fair [21:43] * xnox is trolling [21:43] xnox: I don't mean use arch restriction (that's the last hammer available in a long line), I mean that removing a built package without a new upload where it fails is asking for trouble. [21:43] infinity: you want no-change rebuilds now, right? [21:44] jbicha, they would not be no-change rebuilds. [21:44] jbicha, no change rebuild would pop binary in NEW again [21:44] Wouldn't they be? [21:44] Now if they build-dep on libgjs-dev.. [21:44] s/Now/Not/ [21:44] jbicha, he wants an upload of mozjs60 that does /not/ ignore test results, such that s390x arch is FTBFS [21:44] jbicha, has that been done already? [21:44] Or whatever. [21:45] xnox: THat's already happened. [21:45] ah, good! [21:45] xnox: I'm talking about all the GNOME stuff that was just removed, not mozjs. [21:45] And all that gnome stuff should be dep-wait or FTBFS, not built-but-mysteriously-missing. [21:46] Unfortunately, I don't know how much "GNOME stuff" that entails. [21:46] Based on the ubuntu-meta that just got uploaded, I assume gdm3, gnome-shell, and gnome-session, but maybe there were more. [21:47] xnox: So, on the other hand, "80% of the tests fail with a segv in garbage collection on shutdown" sort of implies this is a single bug in mozjs that it wouldn't actually be hard to find and fix. [21:47] xnox: I wonder why no one bothered to do that. [21:48] infinity, we asked firefox upstream -> not interested; asked IBM multiple times -> not interested; chris -> was not interested either; and desktop team now maintains firefox -> i somehow suspect they are not interested either [21:49] infinity, it was known that the day will come when we will need to move off 52 [21:49] infinity, even if we fix it this one time; it is pain without upstream/ibm/somebody caring going forward, as it tends to regress often. [21:50] we had xenial-release or some such manage to even build firefox; but the subsequent security sru already regressed. [21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-characters (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.29.91-1 => 3.29.91-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntugnome) [21:51] xnox: "asked upstream -> not interested"? The bug seems to disagree. [21:52] You know, the one that's had back and forth acitivity for the last month. [21:52] infinity, my asks were from before this round of asks. [21:52] I think it's more "upstream doesn't have s390x, so they're playing back and forth with someone who is testing patches". [21:52] infinity, i'm talking about myself of the engagement i've tried to drum up around this in 2017.... [21:53] infinity, i believe we have offered them a community z/vm for ci [21:53] from maryst [21:54] xnox: Anyhow, there's clearly an upstream person working on it. Helping that upstream person might have been nice. Not going to go on about it, though. [21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-documents (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.30.0-1 => 3.30.0-1build1] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome) [21:54] My complaint was with the poorly-handled removals. [21:55] (But I indeed also have a long-standing issue with "it doesn't work on something other than my laptop, drop !laptop from architecture line") [21:55] s390x is just the current Belle of that ball. [21:56] infinity, i dislike publishing arch:all packages in s390x Packages file that are known to be uninstallable [21:56] imho arch:all publication should be smarter than that. [21:56] xnox: Okay, and that's relevant to the removal of these s390x packages, how? :P [21:57] xnox: I don't disagree, that misfeature annoys me, but also, it has nothing to do with the topic of gdm3, gnome-session, and gnome-shell, all of which are arch-dep. [21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-maps (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.30.1-1 => 3.30.1-1build1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntugnome) [21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-sushi (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.30.0-1 => 3.30.0-1build1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntugnome) [21:59] And another WAT. [21:59] Package: libgjs0g [21:59] Provides: libgjs0-libmozjs-52-0 [21:59] Depends: libmozjs-60-0 [21:59] Uh huh. [22:00] * xnox slowly backs away to hack on systemd [22:00] jbicha: ^-- lol? [22:00] jbicha: Should that have been libgjs0h? [22:00] jbicha: And a new Provides? [22:00] jbicha: Then these rebuilds would be an actual sane transition. :P [22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (cosmic-proposed/main) [239-7ubuntu9 => 239-7ubuntu10] (core) [22:03] I think it's ok for it to still be libgjs0g, we didn't actually need rebuilds for gjs apps to keep working [22:03] the provides field obviously needs updated though [22:03] jbicha: Yeah, I just pasted the same to Simon. [22:04] Ahh, and indeed, Simon mentioned in the new upstream bug log that the ABI didn't break. [22:04] I'm uploading the provides fix to experimental now [22:04] But yes, the provides seems silly. [22:04] * infinity shrugs. [22:07] apt-cache showpkg libgjs0-libmozjs-52-0 shows only gnome-shell & gnome-sushi will be affected by that [22:09] I'll wait to hear back from smcv to make sure [22:59] you can reject gnome-sushi since we're not ready for that rebuild yet [23:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:18.10.9 => 1:18.10.10] (core) [23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.5 => 1:18.04.11.6] (core) [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-themes (cosmic-proposed/main) [16.10+18.04.20180421.1-0ubuntu1 => 16.10+18.10.20181004.1-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync) [23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-themes (bionic-proposed/main) [16.10+18.04.20180421.1-0ubuntu1 => 16.10+18.04.20181004-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ostree (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2018.8-2~salsa1 => 2018.8-2] (ubuntugnome) (sync) [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ostree [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2018.8-2] [23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (cosmic-proposed/universe) [178-1 => 179-1] (no packageset) (sync) [23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [179-1] [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1 => 1.0.3-1] (ubuntugnome) (sync) [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.3-1] [23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak-builder (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1 => 1.0.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak-builder [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.1-1] [23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eris (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.3.23-6ubuntu1 => 1.3.23-7] (no packageset) (sync) [23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eris [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.3.23-7]