[02:58] <b-jazz> _ami_: Cheers! :)
[02:58] <b-jazz> It will be interesting in the next couple of years to see if the spacecraft part of the BFS is in fact flying or is long delayed.
[03:29] <seanhly> it can be whatever yo uwant
[03:29] <seanhly> Why "add"?
[03:56] <Guest92658> define good performance
[03:56] <Guest92658> can someone highlight the dude
[04:11] <Guest43342> wangtiaoke: cloaks don't hide your IP well
[04:40] <daniel90> In short: enjoy proxychains… (I gave that up and am using weechat where I need a socks proxy.)
[04:40] <daniel90> ok PHilipines
[09:21] <extremx> Dan0maN_bncr: 16.04.1 is older already
[09:22] <extremx> it seems so. it's been a thing i've been meaning to use since i started with haskell
[13:54] <Guest68333> I might go that route.
[13:54] <Guest68333> duncan^, Gagis : there are two filters, a global one and a filter per buffer.
[14:40] <Guest68723> how do you think the performance with raid 10 and a slow hdd would be?
[14:40] <Guest68723> Akuli: Or I am missing somewhere?
[14:40] <Guest68723> kepler: internets?
[14:41] <Guest68723> The semantics are fine; the grammar is weird
[14:41] <Guest68723> mostly because it's actually well optimized. and no. it's faster for anything. it's just better written and designed. the dynamic linker is so much faster, it uses packed relocations, i could go on.
[15:58] <glacambr1> BlueProtoman: and I can't imagine that performance would be adequate. would this involve accessing said squashfs on each compute node? or only on the submission ones?
[15:58] <glacambr1> then so does A
[17:03] <tonymec|awayzW> i tried "git checkout mybranch" but it said pathspec did not match any files known to git
[17:03] <tonymec|awayzW> vanek: and oh vait.... that /etc/hosts has #on router  comment, what does that mean? where is that /etc/hosts defined? surely on the machine you want that to resolve FROM, right?
[21:14] <brakkvatn> weechat.bar.status.color_bg
[21:14] <brakkvatn> PLLunlock, not sure if it is the same thing you need.