[06:32] <dgadomski> mwhudson: yes, it's in xenial branch on https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity
[08:30] <realitix> Hello, I tried this patch and it works great, if Nish Aravamudan is here, can you merge it ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat8/+bug/1644144
[08:41] <rbasak> sil2100: o/ thank you for opining on the openscap bug. I think your points are quite convincing, and I'm inclined to accept the SRU now. Do you have any objection? I wondered if it was within the SRU's remit to make this decision, but as you point out all fixes are regressions for people relying on broken behaviour, so I think that making that decision is an SRU team judgement call now.
[09:14] <sil2100> rbasak: I don't think I have any objections to accepting it - as I said I also have mixed feelings, but saw this potential 'invalid usage' case here. If you have the same feeling here, I guess it should be good to go to -proposed
[09:17] <rbasak> OK, thanks
[09:51] <cpaelzer> rbasak: waveform: I depleted my py-foo - is one of you around that could help me debug a hang in a cpython  .so  (bug 1797324)?
[10:11] <TJ-> cyphermox: shim-signed (1.37~18.04.2+15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1) in bionic-proposed declares Depends: "shim (= 13-0ubuntu2)" - shouldn't that be "shim ( = 15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1)" ? Users reporting the package is listed by "apt list --upgradable" but never upgraded .
[10:14] <waveform> cpaelzer, I can take a quick look if you want?
[10:20] <cpaelzer> waveform: I'm about to leave for lunch
[10:20] <cpaelzer> waveform: would you be available for a HO later on
[10:20] <waveform> sure - ping me when you want
[10:20] <cpaelzer> we could look together with me sharing the console
[10:21] <cpaelzer> ok, also need to sort a virsh thing - will ping you
[10:21] <cpaelzer> thanks for the offer
[10:21] <waveform> no prob :)
[10:38] <cpaelzer> waveform: I'd be back
[10:42] <waveform> cpaelzer, right - I'm here (got tea :)
[10:42] <cpaelzer> I sent you a HO link in a query
[10:42] <cpaelzer> whenever you are ready
[10:42] <TJ-> cpaelzer: did you see the last comment on your bug about a possible fix?
[10:47] <cpaelzer> not yet TJ, refreshing
[11:03] <cpaelzer> TJ-: rbalint_: it doesn't exactly look like the same problem, but I'll ive it a try still after the debugging session we have atm
[11:04] <cpaelzer> rbalint_: do you have a ppa of that somewhere or do I have to put the one in -unapproved into one?
[11:31] <rbalint> cpaelzer, but if sil2100 could process it in his sru shift today ... :-) (update-manager)
[11:31] <rbalint> cpaelzer, i don't have it in ppa, sorry
[11:34] <cpaelzer> it is in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3472 now
[11:39] <sil2100> rbasak: will try, but I'm a bit busy busy this week - will hand it over to someone else if I don't make it today
[12:04] <rbasak> rbalint: I think that was for you ^
[12:23] <rbalint> rbasak, it could be you, too ;-)
[12:24] <rbasak> :)
[12:43] <rbasak> pitti: hi! Would you mind taking a glance at bug 1796407 please? I think I understand the report and I'm treating it as effectively a feature request, but wondered if you had any comment.
[12:53] <pitti> rbasak: hello! ugh, that's been a while, I'll need to spend some time to get into that code again; I kept a tab for it as a reminder
[12:58] <rbasak> Thanks!
[13:05] <cyphermox> TJ-: shim-signed it is supposed to be =15~ etc.; it had failed to build due to the messing around we did with a revert, looks like the right stuff is in -updates right now...
[13:05] <cyphermox> no, I'm thinking of xenial with the ftbfs
[13:05] <cyphermox> anyway, shim looks like it's in place and has the right Depends...
[13:07] <TJ-> cyphermox: I wasn't sure but the user was getting such weird symptoms I wondered if that may be responsible
[13:08] <cyphermox> well, if it says =13 it's clearly wrong
[13:12] <TJ-> cyphermox: I think I misread the user's "apt-cache show" - it listed for multiple versions and only captured the last one, which was for shim-signed 1.34.9+13-0ubuntu2
[13:13] <TJ-> cyphermox: so that wasn't the cause of the user problem then
[13:14] <cyphermox> no, the problem is something else
[13:14] <cyphermox> shim-signed was promoted, but not shim
[13:15] <cyphermox> that's what the problem is
[13:16] <TJ-> cyphermox: ahhh, that was my other thought but local apt-cache policy seemed to show both packages matched versions in bionic-proposed
[13:25] <cyphermox> in proposed, yes, but not in updates
[13:27] <TJ-> cyphermox: ahhh! good point, the user may not have -proposed enabled. doh! should have thought of that.
[13:34] <cyphermox> it became really noticeable, I can't deploy bionic in maas.
[18:10] <bdmurray> Laney: Did you see my comment on bug 1797384?
[19:02] <Laney> bdmurray: no, but yes that'd probably be fine :-)
[21:32] <tjaalton> hum, a qemu vm clone still gets the same ip from dhcp even though the hostname changed
[21:32] <tjaalton> and mac
[21:34] <tjaalton> ah, because of /etc/machine-id